Bibliography

Allen, G. E. (1966). Thomas Hunt Morgan and the problem of sex determination, 1903–1910. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 110, 48–57.Google Scholar

Allen, G. E. (1975 [1978]). Life Science in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, G. E. (1978). Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, G. E. (1979). Naturalists and experimentalists: The genotype and the phenotype. In Coleman, W. and Limoges, C. (eds.), Studies in the History of Biology (Vol. III, pp. 179–209). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, G. E. (1984). Thomas Hunt Morgan: Materialism and experimentalism in the development of modern genetics. Social Research, 51(3), 709–738.Google Scholar

Altenburg, E. (1933). The production of mutations by ultra-violet light. Science, 78, 587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Altenburg, E., and Muller, H. J. (1920). The genetic basis of truncate wing – an inconstant and modifiable character in Drosophila. Genetics, 5, 1–59.Google Scholar

Amundson, R. (2006). EvoDevo as cognitive psychology. Biological Theory, 1(1), 10–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anfinsen, C. B., and Redfield, R. R. (1956). Protein structure in relation to function and biosynthesis. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 11, 1–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ankeny, R. A. (2000). Marvelling at the marvel: The supposed conversion of A. D. Darbishire to Mendelism. Journal of the History of Biology, 33(2), 315–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D., and Lake, R. J. (1999). Notch signaling: Cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science, 284(5415), 770–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Auerbach, C. (1967). The chemical production of mutations. Science, 158, 1141–1147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Auerbach, C., and Robson, J. M. (1947). The production of mutations by chemical substances. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, series B, 62, 271–283.Google ScholarPubMed

Auerbach, C., Robson, J. M., and Carr, J. G. (1947). The chemical production of mutations. Science, 105, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Avery, O. T., MacLeod, C. M., and McCarty, M. (1944). Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of Pneumococcal types. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 79, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baltimore, D. (1970). RNA-dependent polymerase in virions of RNA tumor viruses. Nature and System, 226, 1209–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, , J. (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bacq, Z. M., and Alexander, P. (1955). Fundamentals of Radiobiology. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar

Bateson, W. (1894). Materials for the Study of Variation. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bateson, W. (1905 [1928]). A suggestion as to the nature of the “walnut” comb in fowls. In Punnett, R. C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson (Vol. II, pp. 135–138). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, W. (1907). Facts limiting the theory of heredity. Science N.S., 26(672), 649–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bateson, W. (1913 [1979]). Problems of Genetics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, W. (1926 [1928]). Segregation. In Punnett, R. C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson (Vol. II, pp. 405–440). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, W., and Punnett, R. C. (1911). On gametic series involving reduplication of certain terms. Journal of Genetics, 1(4), 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, W., and Saunders, E. R. (1902). Reports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society (pp. 1–160) (Report I. – Experiments undertaken by W. Bateson, F.R.S. and Miss E. R. Saunders). London: Royal Society.Google Scholar

Baur, E. (1912). Ein Fall von geschlechtsbegrenzter Vererbung bei Melandrium album. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre, 8, 335–336.Google Scholar

Beadle, G. W. (1945). Biochemical genetics. Chemical Review, 37, 15–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beadle, G. W., and Ephrussi, B. (1936). The differentiation of eye pigments in Drosophila as studied by transplantation. Genetics, 21(3), 225–247.Google ScholarPubMed

Beadle, G. W., and Tatum, E. L. (1941a). Experimental control of development and differentiation: Genetic control of developmental reactions. The American Naturalist, 75, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beadle, G. W., and Tatum, E. L. (1941b). Genetic control of biochemical reaction in Neurospora. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 27, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belling, J. (1928). A working hypothesis for segmental interchange between homologous chromosomes in flowering plants. University of California Publications in Botany, 14(8), 283–291.Google Scholar

Ben-Chetrit, E., and Levy, M. (1998). Familial Mediterranean fever. Lancet, 351, 659–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bender, W., Akam, M., Karch, F., Beachy, P., Pfeifer, M., Spierer, P., et al. (1983). Molecular genetics of the bithorax complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 221, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benzer, S. (1957). The elementary units of heredity. In Glass, B. and McElroy, W. D. (eds.), The Chemical Basis of Heredity (pp. 70–93). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Benzer, S. (1973). Genetic dissection of behavior. Scientific American, 229(6), 24–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benzer, S., and Champe, S. P. (1961). Ambivalent rII mutants of phage T4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 47, 1025–1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benzer, S., and Champe, S. P. (1962). A change from nonsense to sense in the genetic code. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 48, 1114–1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benzer, S., and Freese, E. (1958). Induction of specific mutations with 5-bromouracil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 44(2), 112–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berry, A. J., Ajioka, J. W., and Kreitman, M. (1991). Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics, 129, 1111–1117.Google ScholarPubMed

Bishop, B. E. (1996). Mendel's opposition to evolution and to Darwin. Journal of Heredity, 87(3), 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blakeslee, A. F. (1922). Variations in Datura due to changes in chromosome number. The American Naturalist, 56, 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blixt, S. (1975). Why didn't Mendel find linkage?Nature, 256, 206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bolton, E. T., and McCarthy, B. J. (1962). A general method for the isolation of RNA complementary to DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 48(8), 1390–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boveri, T. (1902). Über mehrpolige Mitosen als Mittel zur Analyse des Zellkerns. Verhandlungen der physikalische-medizinische Gesellschaft, Würzburg, N.F., 35, 67–90.Google Scholar

Boyce, R. P., and Howard-Flanders, P. (1964). Release of ultraviolet light-induced thymine dimers from DNA in E. coli K12. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 51, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brannigan, A. (1979). The reification of Mendel. Social Studies of Science, 9, 423–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, S. (1957). On the impossibility of all overlapping triplet codes in information transfer from nucleic acid to proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 43(8), 687–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brenner, S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 77, 71–94.Google ScholarPubMed

Brenner, S. (2000). The end of the beginning. Science, 287(5461), 2173–2174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brenner, S., Dove, W., Herskowitz, I., and Thomas, R. (1990). Genes and development: Molecular and logical themes. Genetics, 126(3), 479–486.Google ScholarPubMed

Bridges, C. B. (1913). Non-disjunction of the sex chromosomes of Drosophila. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 15, 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridges, C. B. (1914). Direct proof through non-disjunction that the sex-linked genes of Drosophila are borne by the X-chromosome. Science, 40, 107–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bridges, C. B. (1916). Non-disjunction as proof of the chromosome theory of heredity. Genetics, 1, 1–52 and 107–163.Google ScholarPubMed

Bridges, C. B. (1917). Deficiency. Genetics, 2, 445–465.Google ScholarPubMed

Bridges, C. B. (1925). Sex in relation to chromosomes and genes. The American Naturalist, 59, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridges, C. B. (1935). Salivary chromosome maps. The Journal of Heredity, 26, 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridges, C. B. (1938). A revised map of the salivary gland X-chromosome. The Journal of Heredity, 29, 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridges, C. B., and Anderson, E. G. (1925). Crossing over in the X chromosome of triploid females of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 10, 418–441.Google Scholar

Bridges, C. B., and Bridges, P. N. (1939). A new map of the second chromosome. The Journal of Heredity, 30, 475–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britten, R. J., and Davidson, E. H. (1969). Gene regulation for higher cells: A theory. Science, 165, 349–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Britten, R. J., and Kohne, D. E. (1968). Repeated sequences in DNA. Science, 161(3841), 529–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, S. W., and Zohary, D. (1955). The relationship of chiasmata and crossing over in Lilium formosanum. Genetics, 40, 850–873.Google ScholarPubMed

Bruce, A. B. (1910). The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science, 32, 627–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bull, A. (1966). Bicaudal, a genetic factor which affects the polarity of the embryo in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 161, 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, J. (1963). The bacterial chromosome and its manner of replication as seen in autoradiography. Journal of Molecular Biology, 6(3), 208–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cairns, J., Overbaugh, J., and Miller, S. (1988). The origin of mutants. Nature, 335, 142–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, M. (1982). Mendel's theory: Its context and plausibility. Centaurus, 26, 38–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carlson, E. A. (1959). Allelism, pseudoallelism, and complementation at the dumpy locus in D. melanogaster. Genetics, 44, 347–373.Google Scholar

Carlson, E. A. (1966 [1989]). The Gene: A Critical History. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar

Carlson, E. A. (2004). Mendel's Legacy: The Origin of Classical Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar

Carothers, E. E. (1913). The Mendelian ratio in relation to certain Orthopteran chromosomes. Journal of Morphology, 24, 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casperson, T., and Schultz, J. (1938). Nucleic acid metabolism of the chromosomes in relation to gene reproduction. Nature, 142, 294–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castle, W. E. (1906). Yellow mice and gametic purity. Science N.S., 24, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Castle, W. E. (1913a). Heredity. New York: D. Appleton and Comp.Google Scholar

Castle, W. E. (1913b). Simplification of Mendelian formulae. The American Naturalist, 47(555), 170–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castle, W. E. (1915). Mr. Muller on the constancy of Mendelian factors. The American Naturalist, 49, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castle, W. E. (1919a). Is the arrangement of the genes in the chromosome linear?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 5(2), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Castle, W. E. (1919b). Piebald rats and selection. The American Naturalist, 53, 370–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castle, W. E. (1919c). Piebald rats and the theory of genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 5, 126–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chovnick, A. (1961). The garnet locus in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Pseudoallelism. Genetics, 46, 493–507.Google ScholarPubMed

Chovnick, A. (1989). Intragenic recombination in Drosophila: The rosy locus. Genetics, 123(4), 621–624.Google ScholarPubMed

Chovnick, A., Schalet, A., Kernaghan, R. P., and Kraus, M. (1964). The rosy cistron in Drosophila melanogaster genetic fine structure analysis. Genetics, 50, 1254–1259.Google ScholarPubMed

Churchill, F. B. (1974). William Johannsen and the genotype concept. Journal of the History of Biology, 7, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Churchill, F. B. (1987). From heredity theory to Vererbung. The transmission problem, 1850–1915. Isis, 78(3), 337–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, J. (2007). DNA duplications and deletions help determine health. Science, 317(5843), 1315–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coleman, W. (1970). Bateson and chromosomes: Conservative thought in science. Centaurus, 15(3–4), 228–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, K. W. (1948). A new theory of secondary non-disjunction in female Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 34, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Correns, C. (1902 [1924]). Scheinbare Ausnahmen von der Mendel'schen Spaltungregel für Bastarde. In Carl Correns: Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Vererbungswissenschaft aus periodischen Schrifren, 1899–1924 (pp. 287–299). Berlin: Julius Springer.Google Scholar

Correns, C. (1903 [1924a]). Über die dominierenden Merkmale der Bastarde. In Carl Correns: Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Vererbungswissenschaft aus periodischen Schrifren, 1899–1924 (pp. 329–343). Berlin: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correns, C. (1903 [1924b]). Weitere beiträge zur Kenntnis der dominierenden Merkmale und der Mosaikbildung der Bastarde. In Carl Correns: Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Vererbungswissenschaft aus periodischen Schrifren, 1899–1924 (pp. 342–349). Berlin: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creager, A. N. H. (2004). Mapping genes in microorganisms. In Gaudillière, J.-P. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds.), From Molecular Genetics to Genomics: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth-Century Genetics (Vol. XXII, pp. 9–41). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Creighton, H. B., and McClintock, B. (1931). A correlation of cytological and genetical crossing-over in Zea mays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 17, 492–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crick, F. H. C. (1958). On protein synthesis. In Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology. The Biological Replication of Macromolecules (Vol. 12, pp. 138–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crick, F. H. C. (1966). On Molecules and Men. Seattle, WA:University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Crick, F. H. C. (1970). Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature, 227(5258), 561–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crick, F. H. C., Barnett, L., Brenner, S., and Watts-Tobin, R. J. (1961). General nature of the genetic code for proteins. Nature, 192(4809), 1227–1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crick, F. H. C., and Lawrence, P. A. (1975). Compartments and polyclones in insect development. Science, 189, 340–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crow, J. F., and Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Crow, J. F., and Temin, R. G. (1964). Evidence for the partial dominance of recessive lethal genes in natural populations of Drosophila. The American Naturalist, 98, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danchin, A., and He'enaut, A. (1997). The map of the cell is in the chromosome. Current Opinions in Genetics and Development, 7(6), 852–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darbishire, A. D. (1902). Note on the results of crossing Japanese Waltzing mice with European Albino races. Biometrika, 2, 101–104.Google Scholar

Darden, L. (1991). Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Darlington, C. D. (1931). Meiosis (precocity theory). Biological Review, 6, 221–264.Google Scholar

Darlington, C. D. (1937). Recent Advances in Cytology (2nd edn.). London: J and A Churchill.Google Scholar

Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1999). E.B. Wilson Lecture, 1998. Eukaryotic RNAs: Once more from the beginning. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 10(6), 1685–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, R. H., and Perkins, D. D. (2002). Neurospora: a model of model microbes. Nature Reviews: Genetics, 3(5), 397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, R. L. (2000). Neurofibromin progress on the fly. Nature, 403(6772), 846–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darwin, C. (1868). The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication (Vol. I and II). London: Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1981 [1871]). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: D. Appleton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vries, H. (1889). Intracelluläre Pangenesis. Jena: Gustav Fischer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vries, H. (1889 [1910]). Intracellular Pangenesis. Chicago, IL: Open Court.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vries, H. (1902–3). Die Mutationstheorie: Versuche und Beobachtungen Über die Entstehung von Arten im Pflanzenreich. Leipzig: Von Veit.Google Scholar

Vries, H. (1912 [c. 1904]). Species and Varieties: Their Origin by Mutation (3rd, corrected and revised edn.). Chicago, IL: The Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Vries, H. (1950 [1900]). Concerning the law of segregation of hybrids. Genetics, 35 Supplement (The birth of Genetics) (5, part 2), 30–32.Google Scholar

Deichmann, U. (2004). Early responses to Avery et al.'s paper on DNA as hereditary material. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 34(2), 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demerec, M., and Hoover, M. E. (1936). Three related X-chromosome deficiencies in Drosophila. The Journal of Heredity, 27, 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, C. (2002a). Gene regulation: The brave new world of RNA. Nature, 418(6894), 122–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennis, C. (2002b). Small RNAs: The genome's guiding hand?Nature, 420(6917), 732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Depew, D. J., and Weber, B. H. (1995). Darwinism Evolving. Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Di Trocchio, F. (1991). Mendel's experiments: a reinterpretation. Journal of the History of Biology, 24, 485–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1929). Genetical and cytological proof of translocations involving the third and the fourth chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Biologisches Zentralblat, 49, 408–419.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1931). Translocations involving the second and the fourth chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 16, 629–658.Google ScholarPubMed

Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the Origin of Species (1st edn.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35, 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duhem, P. (1914). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, L. C. (1965). A Short History of Genetics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

East, E. M. (1910). A Mendelian interpretation of variation that is apparently continuous. The American Naturalist, 44(518), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

East, E. M. (1911). The genotype hypothesis and hybridization. The American Naturalist, 45, 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

East, E. M. (1912). The Mendelian notation as a description of physiological facts. The American Naturalist, 46, 633–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

East, E. M. (1923). Mendel and his contemporaries. The Scientific Monthly, 6, 225–237.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibrium: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.), Models of Paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco, CA: Freeman, Cooper and Co.Google Scholar

Emerson, R. A. (1914). The inheritance of a recurring somatic variation in variegated ears of maize. The American Naturalist, 48, 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. (2001). The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, R. (1955). Some preliminary observations on crossing-over and non-disjunction. Hereditas, 41, 376–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, R. (1961). Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? II. Experimental results. Genetics, 46(7), 737–757.Google ScholarPubMed

Falk, R. (1967). Fitness of heterozygotes for irradiated chromosomes in Drosophila. Mutation Research, 4, 805–819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Falk, R. (1986). What is a gene?Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 17(2), 133–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Falk, R. (1988). Species as individuals. Biology and Philosophy, 3(4), 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, R. (1991). The dominance of traits in genetic analysis. Journal of the History of Biology, 24(3), 457–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Falk, R. (1995). The struggle of genetics for independence. Journal of the History of Biology, 28(2), 219–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Falk, R. (2000a). Can the norm of reaction save the gene concept? In Singh, R. S., Krimbas, C. B., Paul, D. B. and Beatty, J. (eds.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives (Vol. II, pp. 119–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Falk, R. (2000b). The gene – a concept in tension. In Beurton, P. J., Falk, R. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives (pp. 317–348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Falk, R. (2001a). Mendel's hypothesis. In Allen, G. E. and MacLeod, R. M. (eds.), Science, History and Social Activism: A Tribute to Everett Mendelsohn (pp. 77–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Falk, R. (2001b). The rise and fall of dominance. Biology and Philosophy, 16(3), 285–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, R. (2003). Linkage: From particulate to interactive genetics. Journal of the History of Biology, 36(1), 87–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Falk, R. (2004). Long Live the Genome! So should the gene. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 26, 105–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Falk, R. (2006). Mendel's impact. Science in Context, 19(2), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, R. (2007). Genetic analysis. In Matthen, M. and Stephens, C. (eds.), Philosophy of Biology (Vol. III, pp. 249–308). Dordrecht: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Falk, R. (2008). Wilhelm Johannsen: A rebel or a diehard? In Harman, O. and Dietrich, M. R. (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology (pp. 66–83). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Falk, R. (in press). Genetic regulation before the 1960s. In Laubichler, M., Rheinberger, H.-J. and Hammerstein, P. (eds.), Regulation: Historical and Current Themes in Theoretical Biology.

Falk, R., and Sarkar, S. (1991). The real objective of Mendel's paper. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 447–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, R., and Sarkar, S. (2006). Genetics. In Sarkar, S. and Pfeifer, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia (Vol. I, pp. 330–339). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Falk, R., and Schwartz, S. (1993). Morgan's hypothesis of the genetic control of development. Genetics, 134(3), 671–674.Google ScholarPubMed

Farber, P. L. (1976). The type-concept in zoology during the first half of the nineteenth century. Journal of the History of Biology, 9(1), 93–119.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. (2001). The origin of cultivated wheat. In Bonjean, A. and Angus, W. (eds.), The World of Wheat Book (pp. 3–56). Paris: Lavoisier Tech. and Doc.Google Scholar

Fincham, J. R. S. (1998). Fungal genetics – past and present. Journal of Genetics, 77(2 and 3), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fincham, J. R. S., Day, P. R., and Radford, A. (1979). Fungal Genetics (4th edn.). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society, Edinburgh, 52, 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the dominance ratio. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, series B, 42, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1928). The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutation. The American Naturalist, 62, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1936). Has Mendel's work been rediscovered?Annals of Science, 1, 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, E. B. (1964). Ecological Genetics. London/New York: Methuen/John Wiley.Google Scholar

Franklin, I., and Lewontin, R. C. (1970). Is the gene the unit of selection?Genetics, 65(4), 707–734.Google ScholarPubMed

Freese, E. (1957). The correlation effect for a histidine locus of Neurospora crassa. Genetics, 42, 671–684.Google ScholarPubMed

Freese, E. (1959). The specific mutagenic effect of base analogues. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuerst, J. A. (1982). The role of reductionism in the development of molecular biology: Peripheral or central?Social Studies of Science, 12, 241–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fuller, S. (2000). Thomas Kuhn: A philosophical history for our times. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1875). A theory of heredity (Revised version). Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 5, 329–348.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1908). Memories of My Life (2nd edn.). London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamow, G. (1954). Possible relation between deoxyribonucleic acid and protein structure. Nature, 173, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia-Bellido, A. (1998). The engrailed story. Genetics, 148(2), 539–544.Google ScholarPubMed

Garcia-Bellido, A., Lawrence, P. A., and Morata, G. (1979). Compartments in animal development. Scientific American, 241(1), 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia-Bellido, A., and Merriam, J. R. (1969). Cell lineage of the imaginal disc in Drosophila gynandromorphs. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 170, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garcia-Bellido, A., and Merriam, J. R. (1971). Parameters of the wing imaginal disc development of Drosophila melanogaster. Developmental Biology, 24, 61–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garcia-Bellido, A., Rippoll, P., and Morata, G. (1973). Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disc of Drosophila. Nature: New Biology, 245, 251–253.Google Scholar

Garcia-Bellido, A., and Santamaria, P. (1972). Developmental analysis of the wing disc in the mutant engrailed of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 72, 87–104.Google ScholarPubMed

Garen, A. (1992). Looking for the homunculus in Drosophila. Genetics, 131(1), 5–7.Google ScholarPubMed

Garrod, A. E. (1908). Inborn Errors of Metabolism (2nd edn. 1923). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gasper, P. (1992). Reduction and instrumentalism in genetics. Philosophy of Science, 59, 655–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gayon, J. (2000). From measurement to organization: A philosophical scheme for the history of the concept of heredity. In Beurton, P. J., Falk, R. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives (pp. 69–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gehring, W. J. (1967). Clonal analysis of determination dynamics in cultures of imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster. Developmental Biology, 16, 438–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehring, W. J. (1998). Master Control Genes in Development and Evolution: The Homeobox Story. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gehring, W. J., and Nöthiger, R. (1973). The imaginal discs of Drosophila. In Counce, S. J. and Waddington, C. H. (eds.), Developmental Systems (Vol. II, pp. 211–290). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gerstein, M. B., Lan, N., and Jansen, R. (2002). Integrating interactomes. Science, 295(5553), 284–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gerstein, M. B., Bruce, C., Rozowsky, J. S., Zheng, D., Du, J., Korbel, J. O., et al. (2007). What is a gene, post-ENCODE? History and updated definition. Genome Research, 17(6), 669–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ghiselin, M. T. (1971). The individual in the Darwinian revolution. New Literary History, 3, 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghiselin, M. T. (1987). Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity. Biology and Philosophy, 2(2), 127–143.Google Scholar

Gibbs, W. W. (2003). The unseen genome: Gems among the junk. Scientific American, 289(5), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, S. F. (1978). The embryological origins of the gene theory. Journal of the History of Biology, 11(2), 307–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, S. F. (1991a). Developmental Biology (3rd edn.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. F. (1991b). Induction and the origins of developmental genetics. In Gilbert, S. (ed.), Developmental Biology. A Comprehensive Synthesis. A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology (pp. 181–206). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, S. F. (1998). Bearing crosses: A historiography of genetics and embryology. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 76(2), 168–182.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. M., and Raff, R. A. (1996). Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developmental Biology, 173, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gingeras, T. R. (2007). Origin of phenotypes: Genes and transcripts. Genome Research, 17(6), 682–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glass, B. (1963). The establishment of modern genetical theory as an example of the interaction of different models, techniques, and inferences. In Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change: Historical studies in the intellectual, social and technical conditions for scientific discovery and technical invention, from antiquity to the present (pp. 521–541). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Gliboff, S. (1999). Gregor Mendel and the law of evolution. History of Science, 37, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golding, B. (1994). Non-Neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldschmidt, R. (1917). Crossing over Ohne Chiasmatypie?Genetics, 2(1), 82–95.Google ScholarPubMed

Goldschmidt, R. (1938a). The theory of the gene. Scientific Monthly, 45, 268–273.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, R. (1938b). Physiological Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, R. (1950). Fifty years of Genetics. The American Naturalist, 84, 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldschmidt, R. (1954). Different philosophies of genetics. Science, 119, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldschmidt, R. (1955). Theoretical Genetics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 205, 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowen, J. W. (1952). Heterosis. Ames, IA:Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar

Gray, J. (1969). Near Eastern Mythology, Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine. London: The Hamlyn Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Green, M. M. (1963). Interallelic complementation and recombination at the rudimentary wing locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica, 34, 242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greider, C. W., and Blackburn, E. H. (1985). Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts. Cell, 43, 405–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grell, R. F. (1976). Distributive pairing. In Ashburner, M. and Novitski, E. (eds.), The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila (Vol. Ia, pp. 435–486). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Griesemer, J. R. (2000). Reproduction and reduction of genetics. In Beurton, P. J., Falk, R. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives (pp. 240–285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. J. F., Gelbart, W. M., Miller, J. H., and Lewontin, R. C. (1999). Modern Genetic Analysis. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. E. (2006). The fearless vampire conservator: Philip Kitcher, genetic determinism, and the informational gene. In Neumann-Held, E. M. and Rehmann-Sutter, C. (eds.), Genes in Development: Re-reading the Molecular Paradigm (pp. 175–198). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. E., and Stotz, K. (2006). Genes in the postgenomic era. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27(6), 499–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gruneberg, H. (1938). An analysis of the “pleiotropic” effects of a new lethal mutation in the rat (Mus norvegicus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 125, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadorn, E. (1961). Developmental Genetics and Lethal Factors. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Hadorn, E. (1968). Transdetermination in cells. Scientific American, 219 (5), 110–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haldane, J. B. S. (1930). A note on Fisher's theory of the origin of dominance, and a correlation between dominance and linkage. The American Naturalist, 64, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S. (1954). The Biochemistry of Genetics. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S. (1957). The cost of natural selection. Journal of Genetics, 55, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. D. (1963). The evolution of altruistic behavior. The American Naturalist, 97, 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behavior. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, G. H. (1908). Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science, 28, 49–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, G. H. (1940). A Mathematician's Apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harman, O. S. (2004). The Man Who Invented the Chromosome: A Life of Cyril Darlington. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Harper, L., Golubovskaya, I., and Cande, W. Z. (2004). A bouquet of chromosomes. Journal of Cell Science, 117(18), 4025–4032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, H. (1966). Enzyme polymorphism in man. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 164, 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartman, P. E., Loper, J. C., and Serman, D. (1960). Fine structure mapping by complete transduction between histidine-requiring Salmonella mutants. Journal of General Microbiology, 22, 323–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harwood, J. (1987). National style in science: Genetics in Germany and the United Stated between the world wars. Isis, 78, 390–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harwood, J. (1993). Styles of Scientific Thought. The German Genetics Community 1900–1933. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Harwood, J. (1996). Weimar culture and biological theory: A study of Richard Woltereck (1877–1944). History of Science, 34, 347–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hastings, P. J., and Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1964). A polaron model of genetic recombination by the formation of hybrid deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature, 201, 1052–1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hayes, W. (1953). The mechanism of genetic recombination in E. coli. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 18, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, W. (1964). The Genetics of Bacteria and Their Viruses: Studies in Basic Genetics and Molecular Biology. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Heitz, E. (1929). Heterochromatin, Chromozentern, Chromomeren. Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft, 47, 274–284.Google Scholar

Heitz, E., and Bauer, H. (1933). Beweise für die Chromosomennatur der Kernschleifen in den Knäuelkernen von Bibio hortulanus. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie, 17, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helinski, D. R., and Yanofsky, C. (1962). Correspondence between genetic data and the position of amino acid alteration in a protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 48, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershey, A. D., and Chase, M. (1952). Independent functions of viral protein and nucleic acid in growth of bacteriophage. Journal of General Physiology, 36(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holliday, R. (1964). A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genetical Research, 5, 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, F. L. (2000). Seymour Benzer and the definition of the gene. In Beurton, P. J., Falk, R. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution (pp. 115–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, F. L. (2001). Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA: A History of “The Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology”. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornstein, E., and Shomron, N. (2006). Canalization of development by microRNAs. Nature Genetics, 38 (Supplement), S20–S24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horowitz, N. H. (1991). Fifty years ago: The Neurospora revolution. Genetics, 127(4), 631–635.Google ScholarPubMed

Hotta, Y., and Benzer, S. (1972). Mapping of behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 240, 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hotta, Y., Ito, M., and Stern, H. (1966). Synthesis of DNA during meiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 56, 1184–1191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Howard, A., and Pelc, S. R. (1951). Nuclear incorporation of P32 as demonstrated by autoradiographs. Experimental Cell Research, 2, 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyer, B. H., McCarthy, B. J., and Bolton, E. T. (1964). A molecular approach in the systematics of higher organisms. Science, 144, 959–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubby, J. L., and Lewontin, R. C. (1966). A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. I. The number of alleles at different loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 54, 577–594.Google Scholar

Huberman, J. A., and Riggs, D. A. (1968). On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes. Journal of Molecular Biology, 32, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hull, D. L. (1973). Darwin and His Critics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. (1974). Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. (1976). Are species really individuals?Systematic Zoology, 25, 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurst, C. C. (1906). Mendelian characters in plants and animals. In Report of Conference on Genetics (pp. 114–129). London: Royal Horticultural Society.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. E., and Rachootin, S. (1979). Historical introduction. In William Bateson: Problems of Genetics (pp. vii–xx). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Huxley, J. (1943). Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Ingram, V. M. (1957). Gene mutations in human haemoglobin: the chemical difference between normal and sickle cell haemoglobin. Nature, 180, 326–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ingram, V. M. (1963). The Hemoglobin in Genetics and Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Jacob, F., and Monod, J. (1961). Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 3, 318–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jacob, F., and Wollman, E. L. (1961). Sexuality and the Genetics of Bacteria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Jahn, I. (1957/58). Zur Geschichte der Wiederentdeckung der Mendelschen Gesetze. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Reihe, 7(2/3), 215–227.Google Scholar

Janssens, F. A. (1909). La Théorie de la chiasmatypie. Nouvelle interprétation des cinèses de maturation. La Cellule, 25, 389–411.Google Scholar

Johannsen, W. (1903). Über Erblichkeit in Populationen und reinen Linien. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

Johannsen, W. (1903 [1955]). Concerning heredity in populations (Über Erblichkeit in Populationen und in reinen Linien) (H. Gall and E. Putschar, Trans.). By The Staff of Natural Science 3 (ed.), Selected Readings in Biology for Natural Sciences (Vol. III, pp. 172–215). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Johannsen, W. (1909). Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

Johannsen, W. (1911). The genotype conception of heredity. The American Naturalist, 45(531), 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johannsen, W. (1923). Some remarks about units in heredity. Hereditas, 4, 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johannsen, W. (1926). Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre (3rd edn.). Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

Judson, H. F. (1979). The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of Revolution in Biology. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Kacser, H. (1987). Dominance not inevitable but very likely. Journal of theoretical Biology, 126, 505–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kacser, H., and Burns, J. A. (1981). The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics, 97, 639–666.Google ScholarPubMed

Kauffman, S. A. (1973). Control circuits for determination and transdetermination. Science, 181, 310–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kavenoff, R., and Zimm, B. H. (1973). Chromosome-sized DNA molecules from Drosophila. Chromosoma, 41, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kay, L. E. (2000). Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Keeble, F., and Pellew, C. (1910). The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of Genetics, 1, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keightley, P. D. (1996). A metabolic basis for dominance and recessivity. Genetics, 143(2), 621–625.Google ScholarPubMed

Keller, E. F. (1995). Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Keller, E. F. (2000). The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Keller, E. F. (2002). Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kelner, A. (1949). Effect of visible light on the recovery of Streptomyces griseus conidia from ultraviolet irradiation injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 35, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kettlewell, H. B. D. (1955). Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity, 9, 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kettlewell, H. B. D. (1956). Further selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity, 10, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature, 217, 624–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

King, J. L., and Jukes, T. H. (1969). Non-Darwinian evolution. Science, 164, 788–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitcher, P. (1984). 1953 and all that. A tale of two sciences. The Philosophical Review, 93(3), 335–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kohler, R. E. (1994). Lords of the Fly. Drosophila Genetics and Experimental Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kostoff, D. (1930). Discoid structure of the spireme. The Journal of Heredity, 21(7), 323–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kottler, M. J. (1979). Hugo de Vries and the rediscovery of Mendel's laws. Annals of Science, 36, 517–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreitman, M. (1983). Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 304, 412–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kreitman, M., and Antezana, M. (2000). The population and evolutionary genetics of codon bias. In Singh, R. S., Lewontin, R. C., and Krimbas, C. B. (eds.), Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology (Vol. I, pp. 82–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kühn, A. (1941). Über eine Gen-Wirkkette der Pigmentbildung bei Insekten. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physkalische Klasse, 1941, 231–261.Google Scholar

Laubichler, M., and Rheinberger, H.-J. (2004). Alfred Kühn (1885–1968) and developmental evolution. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 302B, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lea, D. E. (1962). Actions of Radiations on Living Cells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lederberg, J. (1947). Gene recombination and linked segregation in Escherichia coli. Genetics, 32, 505–525.Google Scholar

Lederberg, J. (ed.). (1990). The Excitement and Fascination of Science: Reflections by Eminent Scientists (Vol. III, part 1). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar

Lederberg, J. (1994). The transformation of genetics by DNA: An anniversary celebration of Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty (1944). Genetics, 136(2), 423–426.Google Scholar

Lederberg, J. (1996). Genetic recombination in Escherichia coli: Disputation at Cold Spring Harbor, 1946–1996. Genetics, 144(2), 439–443.Google ScholarPubMed

Lederberg, J., and Lederberg, E. M. (1952). Replica plating and indirect selection of bacterial mutants. Journal of Bacteriology, 63, 399–406.Google ScholarPubMed

Lederberg, J., Lederberg, E. M., Zinder, N. D., and Lively, E. R. (1951). Recombination analysis of bacterial heredity. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 16, 413–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lederberg, J., and Tatum, E. L. (1946). Gene recombination in Escherichia coli. Nature, 158, 558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lenoir, T. (1982). The Strategy of Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lerner, I. M. (1954). Genetic Homeostasis. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Levine, M. (1988). Molecular analysis of dorsal-ventral polarity in Drosophila. Cell, 52, 785–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewis, E. B. (1951). Pseudoallelism and gene evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 16, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewis, E. B. (1963). Genes and developmental pathways. American Zoologist, 3, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, E. B. (1967). Genes and gene complexes. In Brink, R. A. (ed.), Heritage from Mendel (pp. 17–47). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, E. B. (1978). A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature, 276, 565–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewis, E. B. (1998). Antonio Garcia-Bellido in Caltech. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 42, 523–524.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (1991). Twenty-five years ago in Genetics: Electrophoresis in the development of evolutionary genetics: Milestone or millstone?Genetics, 128(4), 657–662.Google ScholarPubMed

Lewontin, R. C. (1992). Genotype and phenotype. In Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A. (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology (pp. 137–144). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C., and Berlan, J.-P. (1986). Technology, research, and the penetration of capital: The case of U.S. agriculture. Monthly Review, 38, 21–34.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C., and Berlan, J.-P. (1990). The political economy of agricultural research: The case of hybrid corn. In Carroll, C. R., Vandermer, J. H. and Rosset, P. (eds.), Agroecology (pp. 613–628). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C., and Hubby, J. L. (1966). A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 54, 595–609.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C., and Kojima, K.-I. (1960). The evolutionary dynamics of complex polymorphism. Evolution, 14(4), 458–472.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C., Moore, J. A., Provine, W. B., and Wallace, B. (1981). Dobzhansky's Genetics of Natural Populations I-XLIII. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C., Paul, D., Beatty, J., and Krimbas, C. B. (2000). Interview of R. C. Lewontin. In R. S. Singh, Krimbas, C. B., Paul, D. B., and Beatty, J. (eds.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives (Vol. II, pp. 22–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liebe, B., Alsheimer, M., Höög, C., Benavente, R., and Scherthan, H. (2004). Telomere attachment, meiotic chromosome condensation, pairing, and bouquet stage duration are modified in spermatocytes lacking axial elements. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 15, 827–837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lifschytz, E., and Falk, R. (1969a). Fine structure analysis of a chromosome segment in Drosophila melanogaster. Analysis of ethyl methanesulphonate-induced lethals. Mutation Research, 8, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lifschytz, E., and Falk, R. (1969b). A genetic analysis of the Killer-prune (K-pn) locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 62, 353–358.Google ScholarPubMed

Lindegren, C. C. (1953). Gene conversion in Saccharomyces. Journal of Genetics, 51, 625–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsley, D. L., and Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic Variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication No. 627.Google Scholar

Loeb, J. (1912). The Mechanistic Conception of Life: Biological Essays. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O. (1936 [1950]). The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lüning, K. G. (1952a). Studies on the origin of apparent gene mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Acta Zoologica, 33, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lüning, K. G. (1952b). X-ray induced chromosome breaks in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas, 38, 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luria, S. E., and Delbrück, M. (1943). Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics, 28(6), 491–511.Google ScholarPubMed

MacCorquodale, K., and Meehl, P. E. (1948). On distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Malling, H. V., and Serres, F. J. (1968). Identification of genetic alterations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate in Neurospora crassa. Mutation Research, 6, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marmur, J., and Lane, D. (1960). Strand separation and specific recombination in deoxyribonucleic acids: biological studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 46(4), 453–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mattick, J. S. (2003). Challenging the dogma: the hidden layer of non-protein-coding RNAs in complex organisms. BioEssays, 25(10), 930–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mattick, J. S. (2005). The functional genomics of noncoding RNA. Science, 309, 1527–1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayr, E. (1987). The ontological status of species: scientific progress and philosophical terminology. Biology and Philosophy, 2(2), 145–166.Google Scholar

McCarthy, B. J., and Bolton, E. T. (1963). An approach to the measurement of genetic relatedness among organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 50(1), 156–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCarthy, B. J., and Hoyer, B. H. (1964). Identity of DNA and diversity of messenger RNA molecules in normal mouse tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 52(4), 915–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McClintock, B. (1938). The production of homozygous deficient tissues with mutant characteristics by means of the aberrant mitotic behavior of ring-shaped chromosomes. Genetics, 23, 315–376.Google ScholarPubMed

McClintock, B. (1951). Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 16, 13–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGinnis, W. (1994). A century of homeosis; A decade of homeoboxes. Genetics, 137(3), 607–611.Google ScholarPubMed

McGinnis, W., Garber, R., Wirz, J., Kuroiwa, A., and Gehring, W. (1984). A homologous protein-coding sequence in Drosophila homeotic genes and its conservation in other metazoans. Cell, 37, 403–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McLaughlin, P. (2002). Naming Biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 35(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meijer, O. G. (1985). Hugo de Vries no Mendelian?Annals of Science, 42, 189–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendel, G. (1866). Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden. Verhandlungen Naturforscher Verein, Brunn, 4, 3–47.Google Scholar

Meselson, M., and Stahl, F. W. (1958a). The replication of DNA. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 23, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meselson, M., and Stahl, F. W. (1958b). The replication of DNA in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 44, 671–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meselson, M. S., and Radding, C. M. (1975). A general model for genetic recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 72, 358–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Metz, C. W. (1935). Structure of the salivary gland chromosomes in Sciara. The Journal of Heredity, 26, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, M. B. (1955). Aberrant recombination of pyridoxine mutants of Neurospora. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencess of the USA, 41, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moberg, C. L. (2005). René Dubos: Friend of the Good Earth. Microbiologist, Medical Scientist, Environmentalist. Washington, DC: ASM Press.Google Scholar

Mohr, O. L. (1923). Das Defizienz-Phänomen bei Drosophila melanogaster. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre, 30, 279–283.Google Scholar

Mohr, O. L. (1924). A genetic and cytological analysis of a section deficiency involving four units of the X-chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre, 32, 108–232.Google Scholar

Monaghan, F. V., and Corcos, A. F. (1990). The real objective of Mendel's paper. Biology and Philosophy, 5, 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monod, J. (1972). Chance and Necessity. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Morange, M. (1994). Histoire de la biologie moléculaire. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Morange, M. (1998). A History of Molecular Biology (M. Cobb, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. V. (1922). Non-criss-cross inheritance in Drosophila melanogaster. Biological Bulletin, Woods Hole, 42, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1910a). Chromosomes and heredity. The American Naturalist, 44, 449–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1910b). Sex limited inheritance in Drosophila. Science, 32, 120–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morgan, T. H. (1911). Random segregation versus coupling in Mendelian inheritance. Science, 34(873), 384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morgan, T. H. (1912). A modification of the sex ratio, and of other ratios, in Drosophila through linkage. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre, 7, 323–345.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1913a). Factors and unit characters in Mendelian heredity. The American Naturalist, 47(553), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1913b). Heredity and Sex. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1913c). Simplicity versus adequacy in Mendelian formulae. The American Naturalist, 47(558), 372–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1919). The Physical Basis of Heredity. Philadelphia and London: Lippincott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1934a). Embryology and Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1934b). The relation of genetics to physiology and medicine. In Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1922–1941. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1965.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. H., Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H., and Bridges, C. B. (1915). The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. New York: Henry Holt and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moss, L. (2003). What Genes Can't Do. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1914a). The bearing of the selection experiments of Castle and Philips on the variability of Genes. The American Naturalist, 48, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1914b). A gene for the fourth chromosome of Drosophila. The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 17, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1916). The mechanism of crossing over. The American Naturalist, 50(592–595), 193–221, 284–305, 350–366, 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1918). Genetic variability, twin hybrids and constant hybrids, in a case of balanced lethal factors. Genetics, 3, 422–499.Google Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1920). Are the factors of heredity arranged in a line?The American Naturalist, 54(631), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1922). Variation due to change in the individual gene. The American Naturalist, 56, 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1927a). Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science, 66, 84–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Muller, H. J. (1927b). Quantitative methods in gene research. The American Naturalist, 61, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1928). The measurement of gene mutation rate in Drosophila, its high variability, and its dependence upon temperature. Genetics, 13, 279–357.Google ScholarPubMed

Muller, H. J. (1929). The gene as the basis of life. Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Sciences, Ithaca 1926, 1, 897–921.Google Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1932). Further studies on the nature and causes of gene mutations. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Genetics, Ithaca, 1, 213–255.Google Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1940). An analysis of the process of structural change in chromosomes of Drosophila. Journal of Genetics, 40, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1947). The gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 134, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Muller, H. J. (1950a). Evidence of the precision of genetic adaptation. The Harvey Lectures, 43, 165–229.Google Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1950b). Our load of mutations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2(2), 111–176.Google ScholarPubMed

Muller, H. J. (1954). The manner of production of mutations by radiation. In Hollaender, A. (ed.), Radiation Biology (Vol. I, pp. 475–626). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Muller, H. J. (1956). On the relation between chromosome changes and gene mutations. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology, 8 (591), 126–147.Google Scholar

Muller, H. J., and Falk, R. (1961). Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? I. Experimental design. Genetics, 46(7), 727–735.Google ScholarPubMed

Muller, H. J., and Herskowitz, I. H. (1954). Concerning the healing of chromosome ends produced by breakage in Drosophila melanogaster. The American Naturalist, 88, 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, H. J., and Painter, T. S. (1929). The cytological expression of changes in gene alignment produced by X-rays in Drosophila. The American Naturalist, 63(686), 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller-Hill, B. (1996). The lac Operon: A Short History of a Genetic Paradigm. Berlin, New York: Walter Gruyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller-Wille, S. (1998). “Reducing varieties to their species”. The Linnaean research program and its significance for modern biology. In Ruis, E. M. and Corrales, M. de P. P. (eds.), Carl Linnaeus and Enlightened Science in Spain (pp. 113–126). Madrid: Fundacion Berndt Wistedt (Spain and Sweden: Encounters throughout History).Google Scholar

Müller-Wille, S., and Orel, V. (2007). From Linnaean species to Mendelian factors: Elements of hybridism, 1751–1870. Annals of Science, 64(2), 171–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neel, J. V., and Schull, W. J. (1954). Human Heredity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nelkin, D., and Lindee, M. S. (1995). The DNA Mystique. The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Neumann-Held, E. M., and Rehmann-Sutter, C. (eds.). (2006). Genes in Development: Re-reading the Molecular Paradigm. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newcombe, H. B. (1949). The origin of bacterial variants. Nature, 164, 150–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nicklas, R. B. (1997). How cells get the right chromosomes. Science, 275(5300), 632–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nicklas, R. B., and Koch, C. A. (1969). Chromosome micromanipulation: 3. Spindle Fiber Tension and the Reorientation of Mal-Oriented Chromosomes. Journal of Cell Biology, 43(1), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nöthiger, R. (2002). Ernst Hadorn, a Pioneer of Developmental Genetics. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 46, 23–27.Google Scholar

Novitski, C. E. (2004). Revision of Fisher's analysis of Mendel's garden peas experiments. Genetics, 166(3), 1139–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novitski, E. (2004). On Fisher's criticism of Mendel's results with the garden pea. Genetics, 166(3), 1133–1136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Novitski, E., and Blixt, S. (1978). Mendel, linkage and synteny. BioScience, 28(1), 34–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1977). Genetic analysis of pattern-form organization in the embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. Characterization of the maternal effect mutant bicaudal. Roux's Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik, 183, 249–268.Google Scholar

Nüsslein-Volhard, C., and Wieschaus, E. (1980). Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature, 287, 795–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ohno, S. (1970). Evolution by Gene Duplication. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okazaki, R., Okazaki, T., Sakabe, K., Sugimoto, K., and Sugino, A. (1968). Mechanism of DNA chain growth. I. Possible discontinuity and unusual secondary structure of newly synthesized chains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 59, 598–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olby, R. C. (1974). The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Olby, R. C. (1979). Mendel no Mendelian?History of Science, 17, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olby, R. C. (1985). Origins of Mendelism (2nd edn.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Olby, R. C. (1987). William Bateson's introduction of Mendelism to England: A reassessment. British Journal for the History Science, 20, 399–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olby, R. C. (1990). The molecular revolution in biology. In Olby, R. C., Cantor, G. N., Christie, J. R. R. and Hodge, M. J. S. (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science (pp. 503–520). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Oliver, B., and Leblanc, B. (2003). How many genes in a genome?Genome Biology, 5(1), 204.1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Orel, V. (1996). Gregor Mendel: The First Geneticist (S. Finn, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Orel, V. (2005). Contested memory: debates over the nature of Mendel's paradigm. Hereditas, 142, 98–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Orel, V. (personal communication a). Science studies and nature of Mendel's paradigm.

Orel, V. (unpubl. ms. b). The useful research question of heredity in the background of the origin of heredity and evolution.

Orel, V., and Hartl, D. (1994). Controversies in the interpretation of Mendel's discovery. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 16, 423–464.Google Scholar

Orel, V., and Wood, R. J. (1998). Empirical genetic laws published in Brno before Mendel was born. Journal of Heredity, 89(1), 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orr-Weaver, T. L., Szostak, J. W., and Rothstein, R. J. (1981). Yeast transformation: A model system for the study of recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 78, 6354–6358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orr, H. A. (1991). A test of Fisher's theory of dominance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 88, 11413–11415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oyama, S. (2000). The Ontogeny of Information: Development Systems and Evolution (2nd edn.). Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., and Gray, R. D. (eds.). (2001). Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Painter, T. S. (1934a). A new method for the study of chromosome aberrations and the plotting of chromosome maps in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 19, 175–188.Google Scholar

Painter, T. S. (1934b). Salivary chromosomes and the attack on the gene. The Journal of Heredity, 25, 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panshin, I. B. (1936). A demonstration of the specific nature of position effect. Compts Rendus (Doklady) Academie Science U.R.S.S., N.S., 1(10), 83–86.Google Scholar

Panshin, I. B. (1938). The cytogenetic nature of the position effect of the genes white (mottled) and cubitus interuptus (translated from Russian). Biologicheskii zhurnal, 7(4), 837–865.Google Scholar

Pardee, A. B., Jacob, F., and Monod, J. (1959). The genetic control and cytoplasmic expression of inducibility in the synthesis of β-galactosidase by E. coli. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pardue, M. L., and Gall, J. G. (1970). Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science, 168, 1356–1358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Parnas, O. S. (2006). On the shoulders of generations: The new epistemology of heredity in the nineteenth century. In Müller-Wille, S. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds.), Heredity Produced: At the Crossroads of Biology, Politics, and Culture 1500–1870 (Vol. I, pp. 315–346). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Paul, D. (1992). Heterosis. In Keller, E. Fox and Lloyd, E. A. (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology (pp. 167–169). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pearson, H. (2006). What is a gene?Nature, 441, 399–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pearson, K. (1900). The Grammar of Science (2nd edn.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Peaslee, M. H., and Orel, V. (2007). The evolutionary ideas of F. M. (Ladimir) Klácel, teacher of Gregor Mendel. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty, University Palacky Olomouc Czech Republic, 151(1), 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pick, D. (1989). Faces of Degeneration. A European Disorder, c. 1848 – c. 1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plunkett, C. R. (1932). Temperature as a tool of research in phenogenetics: Methods and results. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Genetics, Ithaca, 2, 158–169.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1968). Life's irreducible structure. Science, 160, 1308–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pontecorvo, G. (1952). Genetic formulation of gene structure and gene action. Advances in Enzymology, 13, 121–149.Google ScholarPubMed

Pontecorvo, G. (1958). Trends in Genetic Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Portin, P. (1993). The concept of the gene: Short history and the present status. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 68(2), 173–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pritchard, R. H. (1955). The linear arrangement of a series of alleles of Aspergillus nidulans. Heredity, 9, 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Provine, W. B. (1971). The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Punnett, R. C. (1909). Mendelism (American Edition of 2nd edn., 1907). New York: Wilshire.Google Scholar

Punnett, R. C. (1911). Mendelism (3rd edn.). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Punnett, R. C. (1913). Reduplication series in sweet peas. Journal of Genetics, 3(2), 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Punnett, R. C. (1950). Early days of genetics. Heredity, 4(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raff, R. A., and Kaufman, T. C. (1983). Embryos, Genes, and Evolution: The Developmental-Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Raffel, D., and Muller, H. J. (1940). Position effect and gene divisibility considered in connection with three strikingly similar scute mutations. Genetics, 25, 541–583.Google ScholarPubMed

Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Rheinberger, H.-J. (2000). Ephestia: The experimental design of Alfred Kühn's physiological developmental genetics. Journal of the History of Biology, 33(3), 535–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rheinberger, H.-J. (2006). Epistemologie des Konkreten. Studies zur Geschichte der modernen Biologie. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Rieger, R., Michaelis, A., and Green, M. M. (1976). Glossary of Genetics and Cytogenetics (4th edn.). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roll-Hansen, N. (1978). The genotype theory of Wilhelm Johannsen and its relation to plant breeding and the study of evolution. Centaurus, 22, 201–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, A. (1979). From reductionism to instrumentalism? In Ruse, M. (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays Dedicated to David Hull (pp. 245–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, A. (1985). The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roux, W. (1894). The problems, methods, and scope of developmental mechanics. In Maienschein, J. (ed.), Defending Biology: Lectures from the 1890s (pp. 104–148). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sandler, I., and Sandler, L. (1985). A conceptual ambiguity that contributed to the neglect of Mendel's paper. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 7, 3–70.Google ScholarPubMed

Sapp, J. (1983). The struggle for authority in the field of heredity, 1900–1932: New perspectives on the rise of genetics. Journal of the History of Biology, 16, 311–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sapp, J. (1990). Where the Truth Lies: Franz Moewus and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sarkar, S. (1998). Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarkar, S. (1999). From the Reaktionsnorm to the adaptive norm: The norm of reaction, 1909–1960. Biology and Philosophy, 14(2), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffner, K. F. (1969). The Watson-Crick model and reductionism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 20, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffner, K. F. (1976). Reduction in biology: prospects and problems. In Cohen, R. S., Hooker, C. A., Pearce, G., Michalos, A. C. and Evra, J. W. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1974 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 613–632). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Schaffner, K. F. (1993). Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Scherthan, H. (2001). A bouquet makes ends meet. Nature Review: Molecular Cell Biology, 2, 621–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scherthan, H. (2007). Telomere attachment and clustering during meiosis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 64(2), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmitt, J., Benavente, R., Hodzic, D., Höög, C., Stewart, C. L., and Alsheimer, M. (2007). Transmembrane protein Sun2 is involved in tethering mammalian meiotic telomeres to the nuclear envelope. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104(18), 7426–7431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schrödinger, E. (1962 [1944]). What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar