Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T15:54:23.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - An elemental model of associative learning and memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Emmanuel M. Pothos
Affiliation:
Swansea University
Andy J. Wills
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

The aim of this chapter is to demonstrate that an elemental model, using a relatively simple error correcting learning algorithm, can prove remarkably resourceful when it comes to simulating human and infra-human learning and memory. The basic premise behind all elemental models of category learning is that the representation of any stimulus comprises multiple components which can individually enter into associations with designated category labels or responses. Used to its full potential, this approach captures the strengths of both prototype- and exemplar-based approaches to categorization. The full range of resources that elemental associative theories have to offer are rarely taken into account in comparisons with models that use other forms of representation, such as the configural theories offered by Pearce (1987, 1994) in the animal domain and Nosofsky (1991) in the human domain. We are by no means the only theorists to adopt this position, and the reader will find considerable overlap between our approach and that of several others (Brandon, Vogel, & Wagner, 2000; Harris, 2006; Wagner & Brandon, 2001).

We first set out the formal details of a model that implements elemental representation within an associative network employing a modified delta rule (following McClelland & Rumelhart, 1985). The modifications transform the delta rule into the basic real-time learning algorithm used by McLaren, Kaye, and Mackintosh (1989). For simplicity, some of the complexities of the latter model (e.g., weight decay and salience modulation) will not be considered here.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blough, D.S. (1975). Steady state data and a quantitative model of operant generalization and discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 3–21.Google Scholar
Brandon, S.E., Vogel, E.H., & Wagner, A.R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioral Brain Research, 110, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghirlanda, S., & Enquist, M. (2003). A century of generalization. Animal Behaviour, 66, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. A. (2006). Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning. Psychological Review, 113, 584–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. A. & Livesey, E. J. (2008). Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 144–154.Google ScholarPubMed
Honig, W.K., & Urcuioli, P.J. (1981). The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 405–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, F., & McLaren, I.P.L. (1999). Rules and associations. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jones, F. W., & McLaren, I.P.L. (2009). Human sequence learning under incidental and intentional conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 538–553.Google ScholarPubMed
Lamberts, K. (1996). Exemplar models and prototype effects in similarity-based categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1503–1507.Google Scholar
Pelley, M.E., & McLaren, I.P.L. (2003). Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 56–67.Google Scholar
Pelley, M.E., Suret, M. B., & Beesley, T. (2009). Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35 (3), 312–327.Google Scholar
Livesey, E.J. (2006). Discrimination learning and stimulus representation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Livesey, E.J., Harris, I.M., & Harris, J.A. (2009). Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 408–422.Google ScholarPubMed
Livesey, E.J., & McLaren, I.P.L. (2007). Elemental associability changes in human discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 148–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Livesey, E.J., & McLaren, I.P.L. (2009). Discrimination and generalization along a simple dimension: peak shift and rule-governed responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 554–565.Google ScholarPubMed
Livesey, E.J., Pearson, L.S., & McLaren, I.P.L. (2005). Spatial variability and peak shift: a challenge for elemental associative learning? In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1302–1307). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lochman, T., & Wills, A.J. (2003). Predictive history in an allergy prediction task. In Proceedings of EuroCogSci 03: The European Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 217–222).
McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, I.P.L., Bennett, C.H., Guttman-Nahir, T., Kim, K., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1995). Prototype effects and peak-shift in categorisation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 662–673.Google Scholar
McLaren, I.P.L., Kaye, H., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In Morris, R. G. M. (ed.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Psychology and Neurobiology (pp. 102–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McLaren, I.P.L., & Mackintosh, N.J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 28, 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, I.P.L., & Mackintosh, N.J. (2002). Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination. Animal Learning and Behavior, 30, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosofsky, R.M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosofsky, R.M. (1991). Typicality in logically defined categories: exemplar-similarity versus rule instantiation. Memory & Cognition, 19, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakeshott, S.M. (2002). Peak shift: an elemental vs a configural analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Palmeri, T.J., & Nosofsky, R.M. (2001). Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J.M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalisation for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, D.R., & Darby, R.J. (1998). Feature- and rule-based generalization in human associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 405–415.Google Scholar
Spetch, M.L., Cheng, K., & Clifford, C.W.G. (2004). Peak shift but not range effects in recognition of faces. Learning and Motivation, 35 (3), 221– 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, R. & McLaren, I.P.L. (2003). Abstract and associatively-based representations in human sequence learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 358, 1277–1283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suret, M.B., & McLaren, I.P.L. (2005). Elemental representation and associability: an integrated model. In Wills, A.J. (ed.), New Directions in Human Associative Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.F. (1965). The neural basis of stimulus generalization. In Mostofsky, D.I. (ed.), Stimulus Generalization (pp. 154–178). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, A.R., & Brandon, S.E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In Mowrer, R.R. & Klein, S.B. (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Learning Theories (pp. 23–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Widrow, G., & Hoff, M.E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. Institute of Radio Engineers, Western Electronic Show and Convention Record, 4, 96–104.Google Scholar
Wills, A. J., Reimers, S., Stewart, N., Suret, M., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2000). Tests of the ratio rule in categorization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A (4), 983–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). Peak shift on an artificial dimension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B (1), 1–32.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×