Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:01:11.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Bioinspired Underwater Propulsors

from Part II - Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2020

By
Tyler Van Buren ,
Daniel Floryan  and
Alexander J. Smits
Edited by
Wole Soboyejo  and
Leo Daniel
Wole Soboyejo
Affiliation:
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts
Leo Daniel
Affiliation:
Kwara State University, Nigeria
Get access

Summary

In recent years, there has been considerable interest in developing novel underwater vehicles that use propulsion systems inspired by biology [1,2]. Such vehicles have the potential to uncover new mission capabilities and improve maneuverability, efficiency, and speed [3,4]. Here we will explore the physical mechanisms that govern the performance – especially swimming speed and efficiency – of propulsive techniques inspired by biology. We will also show that we can translate the understanding we have gained from biology to the design of a new generation of underwater vehicles.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bioinspired Structures and Design , pp. 113 - 139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colgate, J. E., & Lynch, K. M. (2004). Mechanics and control of swimming: A review. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 29(3), 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, P. R. (2005). Trends in biorobotic autonomous undersea vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 30(1), 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, F. E., Lauder, G. V., Mittal, R., et al. (2003). Conceptual design for the construction of a biorobotic AUV based on biological hydrodynamics. In 13th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, Durham, NH. 24–27.Google Scholar
Fish, F. E., Smits, A. J., & Bart-Smith, H. (2010). Biomimetic swimmer inspired by the manta ray. In Bar-Cohen, Y. (Ed.), Biomimetics: Nature-based innovation, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Triantafyllou, M. S., & Triantafyllou, G. S. (1995). An efficient swimming machine. Scientific American, 272(3), 64–71.Google Scholar
Rufo, M., & Smithers, M. (2011). Ghostswimmer? AUV: Applying biomimetics to underwater robotics for achievement of tactical relevance. Marine Technology Society Journal, 45(4).Google Scholar
Lutz, P. L., Musick, J. A., & Wyneken, J. (2002). The biology of sea turtles (Vol. 2). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Fish, F. E. (2000). Biomechanics and energetics in aquatic and semiaquatic mammals: platypus to whale. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 73(6), 683–698.Google Scholar
Eloy, C. (2012). Optimal Strouhal number for swimming animals. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 30, 205–218.Google Scholar
Buchholz, J. H. J., & Smits, A. J. (2006). On the evolution of the wake structure produced by a low-aspect-ratio pitching panel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 546, 433–443.Google Scholar
Van Buren, T., Floryan, D., Brunner, D., Senturk, U., & Smits, A. J. (2017). Impact of trailing edge shape on the wake and propulsive performance of pitching panels. Physical Review Fluids, 2(1), 014702.Google Scholar
Floryan, D., Van Buren, T., & Smits, A. J. (2019). Swimmers’ wakes are not reliable indicators of swimming performance. arXiv:1906.10826.Google Scholar
Floryan, D., Van Buren, T.,Rowley, C. W., & Smits, A. J. (2017). Scaling the propulsive performance of heaving and pitching foils. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 822, 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buren, T., Floryan, D., Wei, N., & Smits, A. J. (2018). Flow speed has little impact on propulsive characteristics of oscillating foils. Physical Review Fluids, 3(1), 013103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, D. B., Lauder, G. V., & Smits, A. J. (2015). Maximizing the efficiency of a flexible propulsor using experimental optimization. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 767, 430–448.Google Scholar
Xu, M., & Wei, M. (2016). Using adjoint-based optimization to study kinematics, deformation of flapping wings. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 799, 56–99.Google Scholar
Van Buren, T., Floryan, D., & Smits, A. J. (2018). Scaling and performance of simultaneously heaving and pitching foils. AIAA Journal, 1–12.Google Scholar
Van Buren, T., Floryan, D, Quinn, D., & Smits, A. J. (2017). Nonsinusoidal gaits for unsteady propulsion. Physical Review Fluids, 2, 053101.Google Scholar
Floryan, D., Van Buren, T., & Smits, A. J. (2017). Forces and energetics of intermittent swimming. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 33(4), 725–732.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. B., Moored, K. W., Dewey, P. A., & Smits, A. J. (2014). Unsteady propulsion near a solid boundary. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 742, 152–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, D. B., Lauder, G. V., & Smits, A. J. (2014). Flexible propulsors in ground effect. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 9(3), 036008.Google Scholar
Dewey, P. A., Quinn, D. B., Boschitsch, B. M., & Smits, A. J. (2014). Propulsive performance of unsteady tandem hydrofoils in a side-by-side configuration. Physics of Fluids, 26(4), 041903.Google Scholar
Boschitsch, B. M., Dewey, P. A., & Smits, A. J. (2014). Propulsive performance of unsteady tandem hydrofoils in an in-line configuration. Physics of Fluids, 26(5), 051901.Google Scholar
Maertens, A. P., Gao, A., & Triantafyllou, M. S. (2017). Optimal undulatory swimming for a single fish-like body and for a pair of interacting swimmers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 813, 301–345.Google Scholar
Dewey, P. A., Boschitsch, B. M., Moored, K. W., Stone, H. A., & Smits, A. J. (2013). Scaling laws for the thrust production of flexible pitching panels. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 732, 29–46.Google Scholar
Dewey, P. A. (2013). Underwater flight: Hydrodynamics of the manta ray [PhD thesis]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. B. (2015). Optimizing the efficiency of Batoid-inspired swimming [PhD thesis]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Floryan, D., & Rowley, C. W. (2018). Clarifying the relationship between efficiency and resonance for flexible inertial swimmers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 853, 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. J., & Smits, A. J. (2001). Energy harvesting eel. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 15(3–4), 629–640.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. B., Lauder, G. V., & Smits, A. J. (2014). Scaling the propulsive performance of heaving flexible panels. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 738, 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, J. O., Colin, S. P., Katija, K., & Costello, J. H. (2010). A wake-based correlate of swimming performance and foraging behavior in seven co-occurring jellyfish species. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213(8), 1217–1225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glezer, A., & Amitay, M. (2002). Synthetic jets. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 34, 503–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buren, T., Whalen, E., & Amitay, M. (2014). Vortex formation of a finite-span synthetic jet: high Reynolds numbers. Physics of Fluids, 26, 014101–21.Google Scholar
Dhanak, M. R., & Bernardinis, B. (1981). The evolution of an elliptic vortex ring. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 109, 189–216.Google Scholar
Van Buren, T., Whalen, E., & Amitay, M. (2014). Vortex formation of a finite-span synthetic jet: effect of rectangular orifice geometry. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 745, 180–207.Google Scholar
Gharib, M., Rambod, E., & Shariff, K. (1998). A universal time scale for vortex ring formation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 360, 121–140.Google Scholar
Holman, R., Utturkar, Y., Mittal, R., Smith, B., & Cattafesta, L. (2005). Formation criterion for synthetic jets. AIAA Journal, 43(10), 2110–2115.Google Scholar
Huggins, E. R. (1966). Impulse and vortices. Physical Review Letters, 17(26), 1284.Google Scholar
Shusser, M., Gharib, M., Rosenfeld, M., & Mohseni, K. (2002). On the effect of pipe boundary layer growth on the formation of a laminar vortex ring generated by a piston/cylinder arrangement. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 15(5), 303–316.Google Scholar
Dabiri, J. O., & Gharib, M. (2004). A revised slug model boundary layer correction for starting jet vorticity flux. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 17(4), 293–295.Google Scholar
Krueger, P. S., & Gharib, M. (2003). The significance of vortex ring formation to the impulse and thrust of a starting jet. Physics of Fluids, 15(5), 1271–1281.Google Scholar
Choi, H., Jeon, W. P., & Kim, J. (2008). Control of flow over a bluff body. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 40, 113–139.Google Scholar
Cattafesta, L., & Sheplak, M. (2011). Actuators for active flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 43, 247–272.Google Scholar
Fish, F. E., Hurley, J., & Costa, D. P. (2003). Maneuverability by the sea lion zalophus californianus: turning performance of an unstable body design. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(4), 667–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoerner, S. F. (1965). Fluid-dynamic drag: Practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance. Brick Town, NJ: Hoerner Fluid Dynamics.Google Scholar
Taira, K., & Colonius, T. (2007). The immersed boundary method: a projection approach. Journal of Computational Physics, 225(2), 2118–2137.Google Scholar
Colonius, T., & Taira, K. (2008). A fast immersed boundary method using a nullspace approach and multi-domain far-field boundary conditions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197(25), 2131–2146.Google Scholar
Cabrera, D., & Ruina, A. (2006). Propulsive efficiency of rowing oars [Technical report]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×