Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Chou, D, Oestergaard, M, Say, L, Moller, AB, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013; 10: (Suppl. 1): S2.Google Scholar

Gravett, MG, Rubens, CE, Nunes, TM, GAPPS Review Group. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (2 of 7): discovery science. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010; 10: (Suppl. 1): S2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Romero, R, Kuivaniemi, H, Tromp, G. Functional genomics and proteomics in term and preterm parturition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87: 2431–4.Google Scholar

Bezold, KY, Karjalainen, MK, Hallman, M, Teramo, K, Muglia, LJ. The genomics of preterm birth: from animal models to human studies. Genome Med. 2013; 5: 34.Google Scholar

Liggins, GC. Initiation of parturition. Br Med Bull. 1979; 35: 145–50.Google Scholar

Smith, R. Parturition. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 271–83.Google Scholar

Phillips, JB, Abbot, P, Rokas, A. Is preterm birth a human-specific syndrome? Evol Med Public Health. 2015; 2015: 136–48.Google Scholar

Fischer, B, Mitteroecker, P. Covariation between human pelvis shape, stature, and head size alleviates the obstetric dilemma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112: 5655–60.Google Scholar

de Bernis, L, Kinney, MV, Stones, W, Ten Hoope-Bender, P, Vivio, D, Leisher, SH, et al. Stillbirths: ending preventable deaths by 2030. Lancet. 2016; 387: 703–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Phillippe, M. Cell-Free Fetal DNA, Telomeres, and the Spontaneous Onset of Parturition. Reprod Sci. 2015; 22: 1186–201.Google Scholar

Menon, R, Mesiano, S, Taylor, RN. Programmed fetal membrane senescence and exosome-mediated signaling: a mechanism associated with timing of human parturition. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017; 8: 196.Google Scholar

Menon, R, Bonney, EA, Condon, J, Mesiano, S, Taylor, RN. Novel concepts on pregnancy clocks and alarms: redundancy and synergy in human parturition. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 22: 535–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McLean, M, Bisits, A, Davies, J, Woods, R, Lowry, P, Smith, R. A placental clock controlling the length of human pregnancy. Nat Med. 1995; 1: 460–3.Google Scholar

Gaccioli, F, Sovio, U, Cook, E, Hund, M, Charnock-Jones, DS, Smith, GCS. Screening for fetal growth restriction using ultrasound and the sFLT1/PlGF ratio in nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018; 2: 569–81.Google Scholar

Kim, YM, Bujold, E, Chaiworapongsa, T, Gomez, R, Yoon, BH, Thaler, HT, et al. Failure of physiologic transformation of the spiral arteries in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 1063–9.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Espinoza, J, Kusanovic, JP, Gotsch, F, Hassan, S, Erez, O, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113 (Suppl. 3): 17–42.Google Scholar

Elovitz, MA, Saunders, T, Ascher-Landsberg, J, Phillippe, M. Effects of thrombin on myometrial contractions in vitro and in vivo. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 799–804.Google Scholar

Shynlova, O, Lee, YH, Srikhajon, K, Lye, SJ. Physiologic uterine inflammation and labor onset: integration of endocrine and mechanical signals. Reprod Sci. 2013; 20: 154–67.Google Scholar

Lindstrom, TM, Bennett, PR. The role of nuclear factor kappa B in human labour. Reproduction. 2005; 130: 569–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindstrom, T, Bennett, P. Transcriptional regulation of genes for enzymes of the prostaglandin biosynthetic pathway. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2004; 70: 115–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mendelson, CR, Montalbano, AP, Gao, L. Fetal-to-maternal signaling in the timing of birth. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017; 170: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mesiano, S, Wang, Y, Norwitz, ER. Progesterone receptors in the human pregnancy uterus: do they hold the key to birth timing? Reprod Sci. 2011; 18: 6–19.Google Scholar

Mendelson, CR. Minireview: fetal-maternal hormonal signaling in pregnancy and labor. Mol Endocrinol. 2009; 23: 947–54.Google Scholar

Nadeem, L, Shynlova, O, Matysiak-Zablocki, E, Mesiano, S, Dong, X, Lye, S. Molecular evidence of functional progesterone withdrawal in human myometrium. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 11565.Google Scholar

Ridout, AE, Ibeto, L, Ross, G, Cook, JR, Sykes, L, David, AL, et al. Cervical Length and quantitative fetal fibronectin in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women with congenital uterine anomaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; pii: S0002-9378(19)30704-5 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Zhang, X, Zhivaki, D, Lo-Man, R. Unique aspects of the perinatal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017; 17: 495–507.Google Scholar

Rinaldi, SF, Hutchinson, JL, Rossi, AG, Norman, JE. Anti-inflammatory mediators as physiological and pharmacological regulators of parturition. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011; 7: 675–96.Google Scholar

Sykes, L, MacIntyre, DA, Yap, XJ, Teoh, TG, Bennett, PR. The Th1:th2 dichotomy of pregnancy and preterm labour. Mediators Inflamm. 2012; 2012: 967629.Google Scholar

Chen, SJ, Liu, YL, Sytwu, HK. Immunologic regulation in pregnancy: from mechanism to therapeutic strategy for immunomodulation. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012; 2012: 258391.Google Scholar

Aghaeepour, N, Ganio, EA, McIlwain, D, Tsai, AS, Tingle, M, Van Gassen, S, et al. An immune clock of human pregnancy. Sci Immunol. 2017; 2: eaan2946.Google Scholar

Rinaldi, SF, Hutchinson, JL, Rossi, AG, Norman, JE. Anti-inflammatory mediators as physiological and pharmacological regulators of parturition. Expert Rev Clin Immu. 2011; 7: 675–96.Google Scholar

Migale, R, MacIntyre, DA, Cacciatore, S, Lee, YS, Hagberg, H, Herbert, BR, et al. Modeling hormonal and inflammatory contributions to preterm and term labor using uterine temporal transcriptomics. BMC Med. 2016; 14: 86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelly, RW. Pregnancy maintenance and parturition: the role of prostaglandin in manipulating the immune and inflammatory response. Endocr Rev. 1994; 15: 684–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aguilar, HN, Mitchell, BF. Physiological pathways and molecular mechanisms regulating uterine contractility. Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16: 725–44.Google Scholar

Arulkumaran, S, Kandola, MK, Hoffman, B, Hanyaloglu, AC, Johnson, MR, Bennett, PR. The roles of prostaglandin EP 1 and 3 receptors in the control of human myometrial contractility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 97: 489–98.Google Scholar

Kandola, MK, Sykes, L, Lee, YS, Johnson, MR, Hanyaloglu, AC, Bennett, PR. EP2 receptor activates dual G protein signaling pathways that mediate contrasting proinflammatory and relaxatory responses in term pregnant human myometrium. Endocrinology. 2014; 155: 605–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reinebrant, HE, Pileggi-Castro, C, Romero, CL, Dos Santos, RA, Kumar, S, Souza, JP, et al. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors for treating preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 6: CD001992.Google Scholar

Kim, SH, Bennett, PR, Terzidou, V. Advances in the role of oxytocin receptors in human parturition. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017; 449: 56–63.Google Scholar

Kim, SH, Pohl, O, Chollet, A, Gotteland, JP, Fairhurst, AD, Bennett, PR, et al. Differential effects of oxytocin receptor antagonists, atosiban and nolasiban, on oxytocin receptor-mediated signaling in human amnion and myometrium. Mol Pharmacol. 2017; 91: 403–15.Google Scholar

Lager, S, de Goffau, MC, Sovio, U, Peacock, SJ, Parkhill, J, Charnock-Jones, DS, et al. Detecting eukaryotic microbiota with single-cell sensitivity in human tissue. Microbiome. 2018; 6: 151.Google Scholar

Perez-Munoz, ME, Arrieta, MC, Ramer-Tait, AE, Walter, J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome. 2017; 5: 48.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Dey, SK, Fisher, SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014; 345: 760–5.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, DA, Sykes, L, Bennett, PR. The human female urogenital microbiome: complexity in normality. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2017; 1: 363–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Kindinger, LM, Bennett, PR, Lee, YS, Marchesi, JR, Smith, A, Cacciatore, S, et al. The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk. Microbiome. 2017; 5: 6.Google Scholar

Callahan, BJ, DiGiulio, DB, Goltsman, DSA, Sun, CL, Costello, EK, Jeganathan, P, et al. Replication and refinement of a vaginal microbial signature of preterm birth in two racially distinct cohorts of US women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114: 9966–71.Google Scholar

Brown, RG, Marchesi, JR, Lee, YS, Smith, A, Lehne, B, Kindinger, LM, et al. Vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of preterm fetal membrane rupture, neonatal sepsis and is exacerbated by erythromycin. BMC Med. 2018; 16: 9.Google Scholar

Chandiramani, M, Seed, PT, Orsi, NM, Ekbote, UV, Bennett, PR, Shennan, AH, et al. Limited relationship between cervico-vaginal fluid cytokine profiles and cervical shortening in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e52412.Google Scholar

Brown, RG, Chan, D, Terzidou, V, Lee, YS, Smith, A, Marchesi, JR, et al. Prospective observational study of vaginal microbiota pre- and post-rescue cervical cerclage. BJOG. 2019; 126: 916–925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kyrgiou, M, Athanasiou, A, Kalliala, IEJ, Paraskevaidi, M, Mitra, A, Martin-Hirsch, PP, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 11: CD012847.Google Scholar

Cook, JR, Chatfield, S, Chandiramani, M, Kindinger, L, Cacciatore, S, Sykes, L, et al. Cerclage position, cervical length and preterm delivery in women undergoing ultrasound indicated cervical cerclage: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12: e0178072.Google Scholar

Kindinger, LM, MacIntyre, DA, Lee, YS, Marchesi, JR, Smith, A, McDonald, JA, et al. Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage. Sci Transl Med. 2016; 8: 350ra102.Google Scholar

Dunsworth, HM, Warrener, AG, Deacon, T, Ellison, PT, Pontzer, H. Metabolic hypothesis for human altriciality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109: 15212–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Muglia, LJ, Katz, M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 529–35.Google Scholar

Monangi, NK, Brockway, HM, House, M, Zhang, G, Muglia, LJ. The genetics of preterm birth: Progress and promise. Semin Perinatol. 2015; 39: 574–83.Google Scholar

Zhang, G, Feenstra, B, Bacelis, J, Liu, X, Muglia, LM, Juodakis, J, et al. Genetic Associations with Gestational Duration and Spontaneous Preterm Birth. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 1156–67.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (2017). Preterm Birth. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birthGoogle Scholar

Liu, L, Oza, S, Hogan, D, Chu, Y, Perin, J, Zhu, J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. 2016; 388: 3027–35.Google Scholar

Rubens, CE, Sadovsky, Y, Muglia, L, Gravett, MG, Lackritz, E, Gravett, C. Prevention of preterm birth: Harnessing science to address the global epidemic. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6: 262sr5.Google Scholar

Shapiro-Mendoza, CK, Lackritz, EM. Epidemiology of late and moderate preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 17: 120–5.Google Scholar

Moster, D, Lie, RT, Markestad, T. Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 262–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murray, SR, Stock, SJ, Norman, JE. Long-term childhood outcomes after interventions for prevention and management of preterm birth. Semin Perinatol. 2017; 41: 519–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyle, AK, Rinaldi, SF, Norman, JE, Stock, SJ. Preterm birth: inflammation, fetal injury and treatment strategies. J Reprod Immunol. 2017; 119: 62–6.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008; 371: 75–84.Google Scholar

Kemp, MW. Preterm birth, intrauterine infection, and fetal inflammation. Front Immunol. 2014; 5: 574.Google Scholar

Fuchs, F, Senat, M-V. Multiple gestations and preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 21: 113–20.Google Scholar

Esplin, MS, O’Brien, E, Fraser, A, Kerber, RA, Clark, E, Simonsen, SE, et al. Estimating recurrence of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 516–23.Google Scholar

Dekker, GA, Lee, SY, North, RA, McCowan, LM, Simpson, NAB, Roberts, CT, et al. Risk factors for preterm birth in an international prospective cohort of nulliparous women. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e39154.Google Scholar

Mercer, BM, Goldenberg, RL, Moawad, AH, Meis, PJ, Iams, JD, Das, AF, et al. The preterm prediction study: effect of gestational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 1216–21.Google Scholar

Malouf, R, Redshaw, M. Specialist antenatal clinics for women at high risk of preterm birth: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17: 51.Google Scholar

Georgiou, HM, Di Quinzio, MKW, Permezel, M, Brennecke, SP. Predicting preterm labour: current status and future prospects. Dis Markers. 2015; 2015: 435014.Google Scholar

Honest, H, Bachmann, LM, Gupta, JK, Kleijnen, J, Khan, KS. Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review. BMJ. 2002; 325: 301.Google Scholar

Abbott, DS, Hezelgrave, NL, Seed, PT, Norman, JE, David, AL, Bennett, PR, et al. Quantitative fetal fibronectin to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at high risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 1168–76.Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Baxter, JK, Hendrix, NW. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 3: CD007235.Google Scholar

Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, Mercer, BM, Moawad, A, Das, A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 567–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berghella, V, Roman, A, Daskalakis, C, Ness, A, Baxter, JK. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 311–17.Google Scholar

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, McIntosh, J, Feltovich, H, Berghella, V, Manuck, T. The role of routine cervical length screening in selected high- and low-risk women for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: B2–7.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Allen-Coward, H, Molina, F, Vinuesa, CP, Nicolaides, K. Targeted therapy for threatened preterm labor based on sonographic measurement of the cervical length: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 29: 47–50.Google Scholar

Boots, AB, Sanchez-Ramos, L, Bowers, DM, Kaunitz, AM, Zamora, J, Schlattmann, P. The short- term prediction of preterm birth: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210: 54. e1–54. e10.Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Hayes, E, Visintine, J, Baxter, JK. Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 4: CD006843.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2015). Preterm Labour and Birth. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25.Google Scholar

Sarri, G, Davies, M, Gholitabar, M, Norman, JE, Guideline Development Group. Preterm labour: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2015; 351: h6283.Google Scholar

Watson, HA, Carter, J, Seed, PT, Tribe, RM, Shennan, AH. The QUiPP App: a safe alternative to a treat-all strategy for threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50: 342–6.Google Scholar

Palacio, M, Kühnert, M, Berger, R, Larios, CL, Marcellin, L. Meta-analysis of studies on biochemical marker tests for the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes: comparison of performance indexes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 183.Google Scholar

Norwitz, ER, Robinson, JN, Challis, JRG. The Control of Labor. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 660–6.Google Scholar

Anderson, L, Martin, W, Higgins, C, Nelson, SM, Norman, JE. The Effect of Progesterone on Myometrial Contractility, Potassium Channels, and Tocolytic Efficacy. Reprod Sci. 2009; 16: 1052–61.Google Scholar

Kumar, D, Springel, E, Moore, RM, Mercer, BM, Philipson, E, Mansour, JM, et al. Progesterone inhibits in vitro fetal membrane weakening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 520. e1–520. e9.Google Scholar

Keirse, MJ. Progestogen administration in pregnancy may prevent preterm delivery. BJOG. 1990; 97: 149–54.Google Scholar

Dodd, JM, Jones, L, Flenady, V, Cincotta, R, Crowther, CA. Prenatal administration of progesterone for preventing preterm birth in women considered to be at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7: CD004947.Google Scholar

Norman, JE, Marlow, N, Messow, C-M, Shennan, A, Bennett, PR, Thornton, S, et al. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2016; 387: 2106–16.Google Scholar

Crowther, CA, Ashwood, P, McPhee, AJ, Flenady, V, Tran, T, Dodd, JM, et al. Vaginal progesterone pessaries for pregnant women with a previous preterm birth to prevent neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (the PROGRESS Study): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. PLOS Med. 2017; 14: e1002390.Google Scholar

FIGO Working Group On Best Practice In Maternal-Fetal Medicine, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Best practice in maternal-fetal medicine. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 128: 80–2.Google Scholar

Northen, AT, Norman, GS, Anderson, K, Moseley, L, Divito, M, Cotroneo, M, et al. Follow-up of children exposed in utero to 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate compared with placebo. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 865–72.Google Scholar

Willing, J, Wagner, CK. Exposure to the synthetic progestin, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate during development impairs cognitive flexibility in adulthood. Endocrinology. 2016; 157: 77–82.Google Scholar

Shirodkar, V. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955; 52: 299–300.Google Scholar

McDonald, IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957; 64: 346–50.Google Scholar

Suhag, A, Saccone, G, Bisulli, M, Seligman, N, Berghella, V. Trends in cerclage use. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; 94: 1188–94.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Cervical insufficiency. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004; 85: 81–9.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Medley, N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6: CD008991.Google ScholarPubMed

Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. (2011). Cervical Cerclage.Green-top Guideline No. 60. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg60Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Rafael, TJ, Szychowski, JM, Rust, OA, Owen, J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obs Gynecol. 2011; 117: 663–71.Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Ciardulli, A, Rust, OA, To, M, Otsuki, K, Althuisius, S, et al. Cerclage for sonographic short cervix in singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50: 569–77.Google Scholar

Simcox, R, Seed, PT, Bennett, P, Teoh, TG, Poston, L, Shennan, AH. A randomized controlled trial of cervical scanning vs history to determine cerclage in women at high risk of preterm birth (CIRCLE trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 623. e1–623. e6.Google Scholar

Sinkey, RG, Garcia, MR, Odibo, AO. Does adjunctive use of progesterone in women with cerclage improve prevention of preterm birth? J Matern Neonatal Med. 2018; 31: 202–8.Google Scholar

Ehsanipoor, RM, Seligman, NS, Saccone, G, Szymanski, LM, Wissinger, C, Werner, EF, et al. Physical Examination–indicated cerclage. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 125–35.Google Scholar

Benson, RC, Durfee, RB. Transabdominal cervico uterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency. Obstet Gynecol. 1965; 25: 145–55.Google Scholar

Shiber, L-D, Lang, T, Pasic, R. First trimester laparoscopic cerclage. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 715–16.Google Scholar

Menderes, G, Clark, M, Clark-Donat, L, Azodi, M. Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage placement during pregnancy and its challenges. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 713–14.Google Scholar

Moawad, GN, Tyan, P, Bracke, T, Abi Khalil, ED, Vargas, V, Gimovsky, A, et al. Systematic review of transabdominal cerclage placed via laparoscopy for the prevention of preterm birth. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25: 277–86.Google Scholar

Arabin, B, Alfirevic, Z. Cervical pessaries for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: past, present and future. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42: 390–9.Google Scholar

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Publications Committee. The role of cervical pessary placement to prevent preterm birth in clinical practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216: B8–10.Google Scholar

Goya, M, Pratcorona, L, Merced, C, Rodó, C, Valle, L, Romero, A, et al. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 379: 1800–6.Google Scholar

Hui, A, Lao, TT, Ting, Y, Leung, T. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix. Lancet. 2012; 380: 887.Google Scholar

Liem, SMS, van Pampus, MG, Mol, BWJ, Bekedam, DJ. Cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013; 2013: 576723.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Syngelaki, A, Poon, LC, Picciarelli, G, Tul, N, Zamprakou, A, et al. A Randomized trial of a cervical pessary to prevent preterm singleton birth. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 1044–52.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Owen, J, Carreras Moratonas, E, Sharp, AN, Szychowski, JM, Goya, M. Vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 146–51.Google Scholar

Van 't Hooft, J, Cuijpers, C, van der Lee, JH, Liem, S, Schuit, E, Opmeer, BC, et al. Long-term effects of cervical pessary for preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancy with short cervix: a 3 years follow-up of the ProTwin trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214 (Suppl. 1): S287.Google Scholar

Hor, K, Norman, JE. Strategies for prevention of preterm birth. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2013; 24: 3–169.Google Scholar

Gyetvai, K, Hannah, ME, Hodnett, ED, Ohlsson, A. Tocolytics for preterm labor: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94: 869–77.Google Scholar

Haas, DM, Caldwell, DM, Kirkpatrick, P, McIntosh, JJ, Welton, NJ. Tocolytic therapy for preterm delivery: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012; 345: e6226.Google Scholar

van Vliet, E, Seinen, L, Roos, C, Schuit, E, Scheepers, H, Bloemenkamp, K, et al. Maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine in threatened preterm labour: 2-year follow up of the offspring in the APOSTEL II trial. BJOG. 2016; 123: 1107–14.Google Scholar

Kenyon, S, Boulvain, M, Neilson, JP. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 12: CD001058.Google Scholar

Kenyon, SL, Taylor, DJ, Tarnow-Mordi, W, ORACLE Collaborative Group. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE I randomised trial. ORACLE Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2001; 357: 979–88.Google Scholar

Kenyon, S, Pike, K, Jones, D, Brocklehurst, P, Marlow, N, Salt, A, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE II trial. Lancet. 2008; 372: 1319–27.Google Scholar

Flenady, V, Hawley, G, Stock, OM, Kenyon, S, Badawi, N. Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013: 4: CD000246.Google Scholar

Kenyon, SL, Taylor, DJ, Tarnow-Mordi, W, ORACLE Collaborative Group. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for spontaneous preterm labour: the ORACLE II randomised trial. ORACLE Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2001; 357: 989–94.Google Scholar

Othman, M, Alfirevic, Z, Neilson, JP. Probiotics for preventing preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 1: CD005941.Google Scholar

Reid, G, Bruce, AW, Fraser, N, Heinemann, C, Owen, J, Henning, B. Oral probiotics can resolve urogenital infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2001; 30: 49–52.Google Scholar

Englund-Ögge, L, Brantsæter, AL, Sengpiel, V, Haugen, M, Birgisdottir, BE, Myhre, R, et al. Maternal dietary patterns and preterm delivery: results from large prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014; 348: g1446.Google Scholar

Sosa, CG, Althabe, F, Belizán, JM, Bergel, E. Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1: CD003581.Google Scholar

Hagberg, H, Mallard, C, Ferriero, DM, Vannucci, SJ, Levison, SW, Vexler, ZS, et al. The role of inflammation in perinatal brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015; 11: 192–208.Google Scholar

FineSmith, R, Roche, K, Yellin, P, Walsh, K, Shen, C, Zeglis, M, et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate on the development of cystic periventricular leukomalacia in preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 1997; 14: 303–7.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. (2011). Magnesium Sulphate to Prevent Cerebral Palsy Following Preterm Birth. Scientific Impact Paper No. 29. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/scientific-impact-papers/sip_29.pdfGoogle Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No 652: Magnesium sulfate use in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: e52–3.Google Scholar

Macdonald, RL, Curry, DJ, Aihara, Y, Zhang, ZD, Jahromi, BS, Yassari, R. Magnesium and experimental vasospasm. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100: 106–10.Google Scholar

Oddie, S, Tuffnell, DJ, McGuire, W. Antenatal magnesium sulfate: Neuro-protection for preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015; 100: F553–7.Google Scholar

Hallak, M, Hotra, JW, Kupsky, WJ. Magnesium sulfate protection of fetal rat brain from severe maternal hypoxia. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 124–8.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (2015). WHO Recommendations on Interventions to Improve Preterm Birth Outcomes. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/183037/9789241508988_eng.pdf;jsessionid=EA58641EA182B8839EAFB90BF86428F2?sequence=1.Google Scholar

Asztalos, EV, Murphy, KE, Willan, AR, Matthews, SG, Ohlsson, A, Saigal, S, et al. Multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids for preterm birth study. JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167: 1102–10.Google Scholar

Crowther, CA, Haslam, RR, Hiller, JE, Doyle, LW, Robinson, JS, Australasian Collaborative Trial of Repeat Doses of Steroids (ACTORDS) Study Group. Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome after repeat exposure to antenatal corticosteroids: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006; 367: 1913–19.Google Scholar

Crowther, CA, Anderson, PJ, McKinlay, CJD, Harding, JE, Ashwood, PJ, Haslam, RR, et al. Mid-childhood outcomes of repeat antenatal corticosteroids: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2016; 138: e20160947.Google Scholar

Stutchfield, P, Whitaker, R, Russell, I, Antenatal Steroids for Term Elective Caesarean Section (ASTECS) Research Team. Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ. 2005; 331: 662.Google Scholar

Stutchfield, PR, Whitaker, R, Gliddon, AE, Hobson, L, Kotecha, S, Doull, IJM. Behavioural, educational and respiratory outcomes of antenatal betamethasone for term caesarean section (ASTECS trial). Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013; 98: F195–200.Google Scholar

Hall, JG. Twinning. Lancet. 2003; 362: 735–43.Google Scholar

Lee, YM, Cleary-Goldman, J, Thaker, HM, Simpson, LL. Antenatal sonographic prediction of twin chorionicity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 863–7.Google Scholar

Kulkarni, AD, Jamieson, DJ, Jones, HW Jr., Kissin, DM, Gallo, MF, Macaluso, M, et al. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. New Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 2218–25.Google Scholar

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Driscoll, AK, Drake, P. Births: Final Data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018; 67: 1–55.Google Scholar

Ventura, SJ, Martin, JA, Curtin, SC, Mathews, TJ, Park, MM. Births: Final Data for 1998. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2000; 48: 1–100.Google Scholar

Heino, A, Gissler, M, Hindori-Mohangoo, AD, Blondel, B, Klungsoyr, K, Verdenik, I, et al. Variations in multiple birth rates and impact on perinatal outcomes in Europe. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11: e0149252.Google Scholar

Bodeau-Livinec, F, Zeitlin, J, Blondel, B, Arnaud, C, Fresson, J, Burguet, A, et al. Do very preterm twins and singletons differ in their neurodevelopment at 5 years of age? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013; 98: F480–7.Google Scholar

Donovan, EF, Ehrenkranz, RA, Shankaran, S, Stevenson, DK, Wright, LL, Younes, N, et al. Outcomes of very low birth weight twins cared for in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network’s intensive care units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179: 742–9.Google Scholar

Smith, GC, Pell, JP, Dobbie, R. Birth order, gestational age, and risk of delivery related perinatal death in twins: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2002; 325: 1004.Google Scholar

Luo, ZC, Ouyang, F, Zhang, J, Klebanoff, M. Perinatal mortality in second- vs firstborn twins: a matter of birth size or birth order? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211: 153. e1–8.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008; 371: 75–84.Google Scholar

James, S, Gil, KM, Myers, NA, Stewart, J. Effect of parity on gestational age at delivery in multiple gestation pregnancies. J Perinatol. 2009; 29: 13–19.Google Scholar

Schaaf, JM, Mol, BW, Abu-Hanna, A, Ravelli, AC. Trends in preterm birth: singleton and multiple pregnancies in the Netherlands, 2000–2007. BJOG. 2011; 118: 1196–204.Google Scholar

Blondel, B, Kogan, MD, Alexander, GR, Dattani, N, Kramer, MS, Macfarlane, A, et al. The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight: an international study. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92: 1323–30.Google Scholar

To, MS, Fonseca, EB, Molina, FS, Cacho, AM, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal characteristics and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 1360–5.Google Scholar

Kahn, B, Lumey, LH, Zybert, PA, Lorenz, JM, Cleary-Goldman, J, D’Alton, ME, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 685–92.Google Scholar

Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, Daly, S, Higgins, JR, Dornan, J, et al. Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 50–9.Google Scholar

Sullivan, AE, Hopkins, PN, Weng, HY, Henry, E, Lo, JO, Varner, MW, et al. Delivery of monochorionic twins in the absence of complications: analysis of neonatal outcomes and costs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 257. e1–7.Google Scholar

Burgess, JL, Unal, ER, Nietert, PJ, Newman, RB. Risk of late-preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210: 578. e1–9.Google Scholar

Cheong-See, F, Schuit, E, Arroyo-Manzano, D, Khalil, A, Barrett, J, Joseph, KS, et al. Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016; 354: i4353.Google Scholar

Ortibus, E, Lopriore, E, Deprest, J, Vandenbussche, FP, Walther, FJ, Diemert, A, et al. The pregnancy and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations: a multicenter prospective cohort study from the first trimester onward. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 494. e1–8.Google Scholar

Barigye, O, Pasquini, L, Galea, P, Chambers, H, Chappell, L, Fisk, NM. High risk of unexpected late fetal death in monochorionic twins despite intensive ultrasound surveillance: a cohort study. PLoS Med. 2005; 2: e172.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Espinoza, J, Kusanovic, JP, Gotsch, F, Hassan, S, Erez, O, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006; 113 (Suppl. 3): 17–42.Google Scholar

Ou, CW, Orsino, A, Lye, SJ. Expression of connexin-43 and connexin-26 in the rat myometrium during pregnancy and labor is differentially regulated by mechanical and hormonal signals. Endocrinology. 1997; 138: 5398–407.Google Scholar

Lyall, F, Lye, S, Teoh, T, Cousins, F, Milligan, G, Robson, S. Expression of Gsalpha, connexin-43, connexin-26, and EP1, 3, and 4 receptors in myometrium of prelabor singleton versus multiple gestations and the effects of mechanical stretch and steroids on Gsalpha. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2002; 9: 299–307.Google Scholar

Emery, SP, Bahtiyar, MO, Dashe, JS, Wilkins-Haug, LE, Johnson, A, Paek, BW, et al. The North American Fetal Therapy Network Consensus Statement: prenatal management of uncomplicated monochorionic gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 1236–43.Google Scholar

Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 169: Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128: e131–46.Google Scholar

Cleary-Goldman, J, D’Alton, ME. Uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins and the timing of delivery. PLoS Med. 2005; 2: e180.Google Scholar

Simoes, T, Amaral, N, Lerman, R, Ribeiro, F, Dias, E, Blickstein, I. Prospective risk of intrauterine death of monochorionic-diamniotic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 134–9.Google Scholar

Beasley, E, Megerian, G, Gerson, A, Roberts, NS. Monoamniotic twins: case series and proposal for antenatal management. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93: 130–4.Google Scholar

Rodis, JF, McIlveen, PF, Egan, JF, Borgida, AF, Turner, GW, Campbell, WA. Monoamniotic twins: improved perinatal survival with accurate prenatal diagnosis and antenatal fetal surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1046–9.Google Scholar

Rolett, A, Kiely, JL. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics as risk factors for preterm birth in twins versus singletons. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000; 14: 211–18.Google Scholar

Kazemier, BM, Buijs, PE, Mignini, L, Limpens, J, de Groot, CJ, Mol, BW. Impact of obstetric history on the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton and multiple pregnancies: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014; 121: 1197–208; discussion 209.Google Scholar

McCarthy, FP, Khashan, AS, North, RA, Rahma, MB, Walker, JJ, Baker, PN, et al. Pregnancy loss managed by cervical dilatation and curettage increases the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28: 3197–206.Google Scholar

Lemmers, M, Verschoor, MA, Hooker, AB, Opmeer, BC, Limpens, J, Huirne, JA, et al. Dilatation and curettage increases the risk of subsequent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31: 34–45.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Iams, JD, Miodovnik, M, Van Dorsten, JP, Thurnau, G, Bottoms, S, et al. The preterm prediction study: Risk factors in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 1047–53.Google Scholar

Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R, Hassan, SS, Yeo, L. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 128. e1–12.Google Scholar

Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R. Cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in multiple pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23: 1365–76.Google Scholar

da Silva Lopes, K, Takemoto, Y, Ota, E, Tanigaki, S, Mori, R. Bed rest with and without hospitalisation in multiple pregnancy for improving perinatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 3: CD012031.Google Scholar

Urquhart, C, Currell, R, Harlow, F, Callow, L. Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 2: CD006172.Google Scholar

Ellings, JM, Newman, RB, Hulsey, TC, Bivins, HA Jr., Keenan, A. Reduction in very low birth weight deliveries and perinatal mortality in a specialized, multidisciplinary twin clinic. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81: 387–91.Google Scholar

Henry, A, Lees, N, Bein, KJ, Hall, B, Lim, V, Chen, KQ, et al. Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15: 217.Google Scholar

Rafael, TJ, Berghella, V, Alfirevic, Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 9: CD009166.Google Scholar

Jarde, A, Lutsiv, O, Park, CK, Barrett, J, Beyene, J, Saito, S, et al. Preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies with progesterone, pessary, or cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017; 124: 1163–73.Google Scholar

Saccone, G, Rust, O, Althuisius, S, Roman, A, Berghella, V. Cerclage for short cervix in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials using individual patient-level data. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; 94: 352–8.Google Scholar

Liem, S, Schuit, E, Hegeman, M, Bais, J, de Boer, K, Bloemenkamp, K, et al. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1341–9.Google Scholar

Goya, M, de la Calle, M, Pratcorona, L, Merced, C, Rodo, C, Munoz, B, et al. Cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth in women with twin gestation and sonographic short cervix: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (PECEP-Twins). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 145–52.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Syngelaki, A, Poon, LC, de Paco Matallana, C, Plasencia, W, Molina, FS, et al. Cervical pessary placement for prevention of preterm birth in unselected twin pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 3. e1–9.Google Scholar

Murthy, YS, Arronet, GH, Parekh, MC. Luteal phase inadequacy: its significance in infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 36: 758–61.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Conde-Agudelo, A, El-Refaie, W, Rode, L, Brizot, ML, Cetingoz, E, et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 303–14.Google Scholar

Yamasmit, W, Chaithongwongwatthana, S, Tolosa, JE, Limpongsanurak, S, Pereira, L, Lumbiganon, P. Prophylactic oral betamimetics for reducing preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 12: CD004733.Google Scholar

Palas, D, Ehlinger, V, Alberge, C, Truffert, P, Kayem, G, Goffinet, F, et al. Efficacy of antenatal corticosteroids in preterm twins: the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BJOG. 2018; 125: 1164–70.Google Scholar

Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Oestergaard, MZ, Chou, D, Moller, AB, Narwal, R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012; 379: 2162–72.Google Scholar

Liu, L, Johnson, HL, Cousens, S, Perin, J, Scott, S, Lawn, JE, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012; 379: 2151–61.Google Scholar

Mwaniki, MK, Atieno, M, Lawn, JE, Newton, CR. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet. 2012; 379: 445–52.Google Scholar

Moore, T, Hennessy, EM, Myles, J, Johnson, SJ, Draper, ES, Costeloe, KL, et al. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. BMJ. 2012; 345: e7961.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E, Salam, RA, Middleton, P, Makrides, M, McIntyre, S, Badawi, N, et al. Antenatal and intrapartum interventions for preventing cerebral palsy: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 8: CD012077.Google Scholar

Villar, J, Abalos, E, Carroli, G, Giordano, D, Wojdyla, D, Piaggio, G, et al. Heterogeneity of perinatal outcomes in the preterm delivery syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104: 78–87.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Espinoza, J, Kusanovic, JP, Gotsch, F, Hassan, S, Erez, O, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006; 113 (Suppl. 3): 17–42.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Gravett, MG, Iams, J, Papageorghiou, AT, Waller, SA, Kramer, M, et al. The preterm birth syndrome: issues to consider in creating a classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 113–18.Google Scholar

Barros, FC, Papageorghiou, AT, Victora, CG, Noble, JA, Pang, R, Iams, J, et al. The distribution of clinical phenotypes of preterm birth syndrome: implications for prevention. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169: 220–9.Google Scholar

Menon, R. Spontaneous preterm birth, a clinical dilemma: etiologic, pathophysiologic and genetic heterogeneities and racial disparity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 590–600.Google Scholar

Blondel, B, Macfarlane, A, Gissler, M, Breart, G, Zeitlin, J, Group, PS. Preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG. 2006; 113: 528–35.Google Scholar

Lee, SE, Romero, R, Park, CW, Jun, JK, Yoon, BH. The frequency and significance of intraamniotic inflammation in patients with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198: 633. e1–8.Google Scholar

Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Chou, D, Oestergaard, M, Say, L, Moller, AB, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013; 10 (Suppl. 1): S2.Google Scholar

Gyamfi Bannerman, C. Late preterm birth: can be reduced. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 459–60.Google Scholar

Newnham, JP, White, SW, Meharry, S, Lee, HS, Pedretti, MK, Arrese, CA, et al. Reducing preterm birth by a statewide multifaceted program: an implementation study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216: 434–42.Google Scholar

Bierstone, D, Wagenaar, N, Gano, DL, Guo, T, Georgio, G, Groenendaal, F, et al. Association of Histologic Chorioamnionitis With Perinatal Brain Injury and Early Childhood Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Among Preterm Neonates. JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172: 534–41.Google Scholar

Woodward, LJ, Anderson, PJ, Austin, NC, Howard, K, Inder, TE. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. New Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 685–94.Google Scholar

Behrman, R, Stith Butler, A (eds.). Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P, Paneth, N, Leviton, A, Goldstein, M, Bax, M, Damiano, D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007; 109: 8–14.Google Scholar

Graham, HK, Rosenbaum, P, Paneth, N, Dan, B, Lin, JP, Damiano, DL, et al. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 2: 15082.Google Scholar

MacLennan, AH, Thompson, SC, Gecz, J. Cerebral palsy: causes, pathways, and the role of genetic variants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 779–88.Google Scholar

Himpens, E, Van den Broeck, C, Oostra, A, Calders, P, Vanhaesebrouck, P. Prevalence, type, distribution, and severity of cerebral palsy in relation to gestational age: a meta-analytic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008; 50: 334–40.Google Scholar

Colver, A, Fairhurst, C, Pharoah, PO. Cerebral palsy. Lancet. 2014; 383: 1240–9.Google Scholar

Bos, AF, Van Braeckel, KN, Hitzert, MM, Tanis, JC, Roze, E. Development of fine motor skills in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013; 55 (Suppl. 4): 1–4.Google Scholar

Sommer, C, Urlesberger, B, Maurer-Fellbaum, U, Kutschera, J, Muller, W. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years in 23 to 26 weeks old gestation infants. Klin Padiatr. 2007; 219: 23–9.Google Scholar

Linsell, L, Malouf, R, Morris, J, Kurinczuk, JJ, Marlow, N. Prognostic Factors for Poor Cognitive Development in Children Born Very Preterm or With Very Low Birth Weight: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169: 1162–72.Google Scholar

Salmaso, N, Jablonska, B, Scafidi, J, Vaccarino, FM, Gallo, V. Neurobiology of premature brain injury. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17: 341–6.Google Scholar

Nijman, TA, van Vliet, EO, Koullali, B, Mol, BW, Oudijk, MA. Antepartum and intrapartum interventions to prevent preterm birth and its sequelae. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 21: 121–8.Google Scholar

Rolnik, DL, Wright, D, Poon, LC, O’Gorman, N, Syngelaki, A, de Paco Matallana, C, et al. Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia. New Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 613–22.Google Scholar

Stock, SJ, Ismail, KM. Which intervention reduces the risk of preterm birth in women with risk factors? BMJ. 2016; 355: i5206.Google Scholar

McNamara, HC, Wood, R, Chalmers, J, Marlow, N, Norrie, J, MacLennan, G, et al. STOPPIT Baby Follow-up Study: the effect of prophylactic progesterone in twin pregnancy on childhood outcome. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0122341.Google Scholar

Dodd, JM, Jones, L, Flenady, V, Cincotta, R, Crowther, CA. Prenatal administration of progesterone for preventing preterm birth in women considered to be at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7: CD004947.Google Scholar

Cespedes Rubio, AE, Perez-Alvarez, MJ, Lapuente Chala, C, Wandosell, F. Sex steroid hormones as neuroprotective elements in ischemia models. J Endocrinol. 2018; 237: R65–81.Google Scholar

Flenady, V, Hawley, G, Stock, OM, Kenyon, S, Badawi, N. Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 12: CD000246.Google Scholar

Neilson, JP, West, HM, Dowswell, T. Betamimetics for inhibiting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2: CD004352.Google Scholar

Haas, DM, Caldwell, DM, Kirkpatrick, P, McIntosh, JJ, Welton, NJ. Tocolytic therapy for preterm delivery: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012; 345: e6226.Google Scholar

Stock, SJ, Bricker, L, Norman, JE, West, HM. Immediate versus deferred delivery of the preterm baby with suspected fetal compromise for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 7: CD008968.Google Scholar

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, Arabin, B, Bilardo, CM, Brezinka, C, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2015; 385: 2162–72.Google Scholar

Ting, JY, Kingdom, JC, Shah, PS. Antenatal glucocorticoids, magnesium sulfate, and mode of birth in preterm fetal small for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S818–28.Google Scholar

Grabovac, M, Karim, JN, Isayama, T, Liyanage, SK, McDonald, SD. What is the safest mode of birth for extremely preterm breech singleton infants who are actively resuscitated? A systematic review and meta-analyses. BJOG. 2018; 125: 652–63.Google Scholar

Liggins, GC, Howie, RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics. 1972; 50: 515–25.Google Scholar

Roberts, D, Brown, J, Medley, N, Dalziel, SR. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 3: CD004454.Google Scholar

Brownfoot, FC, Gagliardi, DI, Bain, E, Middleton, P, Crowther, CA. Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 8: CD006764.Google Scholar

Grether, J, Hirtz, D, McNellis, D, Nelson, K, Rouse, DJ. Tocolytic magnesium sulphate and paediatric mortality. Lancet. 1998; 351: 292; author reply 3.Google Scholar

Mittendorf, R, Covert, R, Boman, J, Khoshnood, B, Lee, KS, Siegler, M. Is tocolytic magnesium sulphate associated with increased total paediatric mortality? Lancet. 1997; 350: 1517–18.Google Scholar

Magpie Trial Follow-Up Study Collaborative Group. The Magpie Trial: a randomised trial comparing magnesium sulphate with placebo for pre-eclampsia. Outcome for children at 18 months. BJOG. 2007; 114: 289–99.Google Scholar

Crowther, CA, Hiller, JE, Doyle, LW, Haslam, RR, Australasian Collaborative Trial of Magnesium Sulphate Collaborative Group. Effect of magnesium sulfate given for neuroprotection before preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003; 290: 2669–76.Google Scholar

Rouse, DJ, Hirtz, DG, Thom, E, Varner, MW, Spong, CY, Mercer, BM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. New Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 895–905.Google Scholar

Marret, S, Marpeau, L, Zupan-Simunek, V, Eurin, D, Leveque, C, Hellot, MF, et al. Magnesium sulphate given before very-preterm birth to protect infant brain: the randomised controlled PREMAG trial. BJOG. 2007; 114: 310–18.Google Scholar

Doyle, LW, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P, Marret, S, Rouse, D. Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 1: CD004661.Google Scholar

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. (2010). Antenatal magnesium sulphate prior to preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus, infant and child. National Clinical Practice Guidelines. https://www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au/register/antenatal-magnesium-sulphate-prior-preterm-birth-neuroprotection-fetus-infant-and-child.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2015). Preterm labour and Birth. NICE Guideline NG25. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25.Google Scholar

Magee, L, Sawchuck, D, Synnes, A, von Dadelszen, P, Magnesium Sulphate For Fetal Neuroprotection Consensus Committee, Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline: Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011; 33: 516–29.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Committee Opinion No. 455: Magnesium Sulfate before anticipated preterm birth for neuroprotection. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 115: 669–71.Google Scholar

Crowther, CA, Middleton, PF, Voysey, M, Askie, L, Duley, L, Pryde, PG, et al. Assessing the neuroprotective benefits for babies of antenatal magnesium sulphate: an individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017; 14: e1002398.Google Scholar

Chang, E. Preterm birth and the role of neuroprotection. BMJ. 2015; 350: g6661.Google Scholar

Colella, M, Biran, V, Baud, O. Melatonin and the newborn brain. Early Hum Dev. 2016; 102: 1–3.Google Scholar

Dickinson, H, Bain, E, Wilkinson, D, Middleton, P, Crowther, CA, Walker, DW. Creatine for women in pregnancy for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 12: CD010846.Google Scholar

Jenkins, DD, Wiest, DB, Mulvihill, DM, Hlavacek, AM, Majstoravich, SJ, Brown, TR, et al. Fetal and neonatal effects of N-acetylcysteine when used for neuroprotection in maternal chorioamnionitis. J Pediatr. 2016; 168: 67–76. e6.Google Scholar

Ranchhod, SM, Gunn, KC, Fowke, TM, Davidson, JO, Lear, CA, Bai, J, et al. Potential neuroprotective strategies for perinatal infection and inflammation. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2015; 45: 44–54.Google Scholar

Paton, MCB, McDonald, CA, Allison, BJ, Fahey, MC, Jenkin, G, Miller, SL. Perinatal brain injury as a consequence of preterm birth and intrauterine inflammation: designing targeted stem cell therapies. Front Neurosci. 2017; 11: 200.Google Scholar

Costantine, MM, Weiner, SJ, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Effects of antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate on neuroprotection and mortality in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 354–64.Google Scholar

Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R. Antenatal magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy in preterm infants less than 34 weeks’ gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 595–609.Google Scholar