Botto, LD, Moore, CA, Khoury, MJ, et al. Neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 1509–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Michie, CA. Neural tube defects in 18th century. Lancet. 1991; 337: 504.Google Scholar

Padmanabhan, R. Etiology, pathogenesis and prevention of neural tube defects. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2006; 46: 55–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deak, KL, Siegel, DG, George, TM, et al. Further evidence for a maternal genetic effect and a sex-influenced effect contributing to risk for human neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2008; 82: 662–9.Google Scholar

Wilde, JJ, Petersen, JR, Niswander, L. Genetic, epigenetic, and environmental contributions to neural tube closure. Annu Rev Genet. 2014; 48: 583–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Au, KS, Ashley-Koch, A, Northrup, H. Epidemiologic and genetic aspects of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010; 16: 6–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Copp, AJ, Adzick, NS, Chitty, LS, et al. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015; 1: 15007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Viswanathan, M, Treiman, KA, Doto, JK, et al. Folic Acid Supplementation: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2017.Google Scholar

van der Put, NM, Steegers-Theunissen, RP, Frosst, P, et al. Mutated methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase as a risk factor for spina bifida. Lancet. 1995; 346: 1070–1.Google Scholar

Besser, LM, Williams, LJ, Cragan, JD. Interpreting changes in the epidemiology of anencephaly and spina bifida following folic acid fortification of the U.S. grain supply in the setting of long-term trends, Atlanta, Georgia, 1968–2003. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007; 79: 730–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becerra, JE, Khoury, MJ, Cordero, JF, et al. Diabetes mellitus during pregnancy and the risks for specific birth defects: a population-based case-control study. Pediatrics. 1990; 85: 1–9.Google Scholar

Mitchell, LE, Adzick, NS, Melchionne, J, et al. Spina bifida. Lancet. 2004; 364: 1885–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Groenen, PM, Peer, PG, Wevers, RA, et al. Maternal myo-inositol, glucose, and zinc status is associated with the risk of offspring with spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 1713–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carmichael, SL, Rasmussen, SA, Shaw, GM. Prepregnancy obesity: a complex risk factor for selected birth defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010; 88: 804–10.Google Scholar

Parker, SE, Yazdy, MM, Tinker, SC, et al. The impact of folic acid intake on the association among diabetes mellitus, obesity, and spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209: 239. e1–8.Google Scholar

Desrosiers, TA, Siega-Riz, AM, Mosley, BS, et al. Low carbohydrate diets may increase risk of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res. 2018; 110: 901–9.Google Scholar

Vujkovic, M, Steegers, EA, Looman, CW, et al. The maternal Mediterranean dietary pattern is associated with a reduced risk of spina bifida in the offspring. BJOG. 2009; 116: 408–15.Google Scholar

Suarez, L, Cardarelli, K, Hendricks, K. Maternal stress, social support, and risk of neural tube defects among Mexican Americans. Epidemiology. 2003; 14: 612–16.Google Scholar

Moretti, ME, Bar-Oz, B, Fried, S, et al. Maternal hyperthermia and the risk for neural tube defects in offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2005; 16: 216–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Molloy, AM, Pangilinan, F, Brody, LC. Genetic risk factors for folate-responsive neural tube defects. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017; 37: 269–91.Google Scholar

Smithells, RW, Sheppard, S, Schorah, CJ, et al. Apparent prevention of neural tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. Arch Dis Child. 1981; 56: 911–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet. 1991; 338: 131–7.Google Scholar

Czeizel, AE, Dudas, I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 1832–5.Google Scholar

Giardini, V, Russo, FM, Ornaghi, S, et al. Seasonal impact in the frequency of isolated spina bifida. Prenat Diagn. 2013; 33: 1007–9.Google Scholar

Ray, JG, Wyatt, PR, Thompson, MD, et al. Vitamin B12 and the risk of neural tube defects in a folic-acid-fortified population. Epidemiology. 2007; 18: 362–6.Google Scholar

Steegers-Theunissen, RP, Boers, GH, Trijbels, FJ, et al. Maternal hyperhomocysteinemia: a risk factor for neural-tube defects? Metabolism. 1994; 43: 1475–80.Google Scholar

Steegers-Theunissen, RP, Boers, GH, Trijbels, FJ, et al. Neural-tube defects and derangement of homocysteine metabolism. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 199–200.Google Scholar

Yang, M, Li, W, Wan, Z, et al. Elevated homocysteine levels in mothers with neural tube defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 2051–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shaw, GM, Finnell, RH, Blom, HJ, et al. Choline and risk of neural tube defects in a folate-fortified population. Epidemiology. 2009; 20: 714–19.Google Scholar

Greene, ND, Leung, KY, Copp, AJ. Inositol, neural tube closure and the prevention of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res. 2017; 109: 68–80.Google Scholar

Grewal, J, Carmichael, SL, Ma, C, et al. Maternal periconceptional smoking and alcohol consumption and risk for select congenital anomalies. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008; 82: 519–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmidt, RJ, Romitti, PA, Burns, TL, et al. Maternal caffeine consumption and risk of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009; 85: 879–89.Google Scholar

Vajda, FJ, Eadie, MJ. Maternal valproate dosage and foetal malformations. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005; 112: 137–43.Google Scholar

Padula, AM, Tager, IB, Carmichael, SL, et al. The association of ambient air pollution and traffic exposures with selected congenital anomalies in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 177: 1074–85.Google Scholar

Lupo, PJ, Symanski, E, Waller, DK, et al. Maternal exposure to ambient levels of benzene and neural tube defects among offspring: Texas, 1999-2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119: 397–402.Google Scholar

Li, Z, Zhang, L, Ye, R, et al. Indoor air pollution from coal combustion and the risk of neural tube defects in a rural population in Shanxi Province, China. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 174: 451–8.Google Scholar

Righi, E, Bechtold, P, Tortorici, D, et al. Trihalomethanes, chlorite, chlorate in drinking water and risk of congenital anomalies: a population-based case-control study in Northern Italy. Environ Res. 2012; 116: 66–73.Google Scholar

Brender, JD, Felkner, M, Suarez, L, et al. Maternal pesticide exposure and neural tube defects in Mexican Americans. Ann Epidemiol. 2010; 20: 16–22.Google Scholar

Honein, MA, Paulozzi, LJ, Mathews, TJ, et al. Impact of folic acid fortification of the US food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA. 2001; 285: 2981–6.Google Scholar

Williams, J, Mai, CT, Mulinare, J, et al. Updated estimates of neural tube defects prevented by mandatory folic acid fortification – United States, 1995–2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015; 64: 1–5.Google Scholar

De Wals, P, Tairou, F, Van Allen, MI, et al. Reduction in neural-tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 135–42.Google Scholar

Bentley, TG, Weinstein, MC, Willett, WC, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of folic acid fortification policy in the United States. Public Health Nutr. 2009; 12: 455–67.Google Scholar

Atta, CA, Fiest, KM, Frolkis, AD, et al. Global birth prevalence of spina bifida by folic acid fortification status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2016; 106: e24–34.Google Scholar

Mills, JL, Von Kohorn, I, Conley, MR, et al. Low vitamin B-12 concentrations in patients without anemia: the effect of folic acid fortification of grain. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 77: 1474–7.Google Scholar

Vollset, SE, Clarke, R, Lewington, S, et al. Effects of folic acid supplementation on overall and site-specific cancer incidence during the randomised trials: meta-analyses of data on 50,000 individuals. Lancet. 2013; 381: 1029–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinker, SC, Hamner, HC, Qi, YP, et al. U.S. women of childbearing age who are at possible increased risk of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy due to suboptimal red blood cell folate concentrations, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007 to 2012. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015; 103: 517–26.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Racial/ethnic differences in the birth prevalence of spina bifida – United States, 1995–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 57: 1409–13.Google Scholar

Greene, ND, Leung, KY, Gay, V, et al. Inositol for prevention of neural tube defects: a pilot randomised controlled trial – CORRIGENDUM. Br J Nutr. 2016; 115: 1697.Google Scholar

Khoshnood, B, Loane, M, de Walle, H, et al. Long term trends in prevalence of neural tube defects in Europe: population based study. BMJ. 2015; 351: h5949.Google Scholar

Busby, A, Abramsky, L, Dolk, H, et al. Preventing neural tube defects in Europe: population based study. BMJ. 2005; 330: 574–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowman, RM, McLone, DG, Grant, JA, et al. Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001; 34: 114–20.Google Scholar

Shin, M, Kucik, JE, Siffel, C, et al. Improved survival among children with spina bifida in the United States. J Pediatrics. 2012; 161: 1132–7. e3.Google Scholar

Rintoul, NE, Sutton, LN, Hubbard, AM, et al. A new look at myelomeningoceles: Functional level, vertebral level, shunting and the implications for fetal intervention. Pediatrics. 2002; 109: 409–13.Google Scholar

Caldarelli, M, Di Rocco, C, La Marca, F. Shunt complications in the first postoperative year in children with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst. 1996; 12: 748–54.Google Scholar

McLone, DG, Dias, MS. The Chiari II malformation: cause and impact. Childs Nerv Sys. 2003; 19: 540–50.Google Scholar

Just, M, Schwarz, M, Ludwig, B, et al. Cerebral and spinal MR-findings in patients with postrepair myelomeningocele. Pediatr Radiol. 1990; 20: 262–6.Google Scholar

Mitchell, LE, Adzick, NS, Melchionne, J, et al. Spina bifida. Lancet. 2004; 364: 1885–95.Google Scholar

Cochrane, DD, Wilson, RD, Steinbok, P, et al. Prenatal spinal evaluation and functional outcome of patients born with myelomeningocele: information for improved prenatal counselling and outcome prediction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1996; 11: 159–68.Google Scholar

Cass, AS, Luxenberg, M, Johnson, CF, et al. Incidence of urinary tract complications with myelomeningocele. Urology. 1985; 25: 374–8.Google Scholar

Drennan, JC. Foot deformities in myelomeningocele. In Thilos, HS, ed., Instruction Course Lectures. Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 1991.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, P, Hunt, GM, Poulton, A, et al. Expectation of life and unexpected death in open spina bifida: a 40-year complete, nonselective, longitudinal cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010; 52: 749–53.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, P, Hunt, GM. Long-term outcome in spina bifida. Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 53: 632–6.Google Scholar

Parker, SE, Mai, CT, Canfield, MA, et al. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010; 88: 1008–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christianson, A, Modell, B, Howson, C. March of Dimes Global Report on Birth Defects: The Hidden Toll of Dying and Disabled Children. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes, 2006.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hospital stays, hospital charges, and in-hospital deaths among infants with selected birth defects – United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007; 56: 25–9.Google Scholar

Radcliff, E, Cassell, CH–Tanner, JP, et al. Hospital use, associated costs, and payer status for infants born with spina bifida. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012; 94: 1044–53.Google Scholar

Ouyang, L, Grosse, SD, Armour, BS, et al. Health care expenditures of children and adults with spina bifida in a privately insured U.S. population. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007; 79: 552–8.Google Scholar

Werner, EF, Han, CS, Burd, I, et al. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele: a decision analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 40: 158–64.Google Scholar

Michejda, M. Intrauterine treatment of spina bifida: primate model. Z Kinderchir. 1984; 39: 259–61.Google ScholarPubMed

Heffez, DS, Aryanpur, J, Rotellini, NA, et al. Intrauterine repair of experimental surgically created dysraphism. Neurosurgery. 1993; 32: 1005–10.Google Scholar

Heffez, DS, Aryanpur, J, Hutchins, GM, et al. The paralysis associated with myelomeningocele: clinical and experimental data implicating a preventable spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 1990; 26: 987–92.Google Scholar

Meuli, M, Meuli-Simmen, C, Yingling, CD, et al. Creation of myelomeningocele in utero: a model of functional damage from spinal cord exposure in fetal sheep. J Pediatr Surg. 1995; 30: 1028–32.Google Scholar

Meuli, M, Meuli-Simmen, C, Hutchins, GM, et al. In utero surgery rescues neurological function at birth in sheep with spina bifida. Nat Med. 1995; 1: 342–7.Google Scholar

Paek, BW, Farmer, DL, Wilkinson, CC, et al. Hindbrain herniation develops in surgically created myelomeningocele but is absent after repair in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1119–23.Google Scholar

Bouchard, S, Davey, MG, Rintoul, NE, et al. Correction of hindbrain herniation and anatomy of the vermis after in utero repair of myelomeningocele in sheep. J Pediatr Surg. 2003; 38: 451–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruner, JP, Tulipan, NB, Richards, WO. Endoscopic coverage of fetal open myelomeningocele in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176: 256–7.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS, Sutton, LN, Crombleholme, TM, et al. Successful fetal surgery for spina bifida. Lancet. 1998; 352: 1675–6.Google Scholar

Tulipan, N, Hernanz-Schulman, M, Bruner, JP. Reduced hindbrain herniation after intrauterine myelomeningocele repair: a report of four cases. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998; 29: 274–8.Google Scholar

Sutton, LN, Adzick, NS, Bilaniuk, LT, et al. Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA. 1999; 282: 1826–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 993–1004. (Full study protocol available in the Supplementary Appendix at NEJM.org)Google Scholar

Tulipan, N, Wellons, JC III, Thom, EA, et al. Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015; 16: 613–20.Google Scholar

Farmer, DL, Thom, EA, Brock, JW, et al. The Management of the Myelomeningocele Study: Full cohort 30 month pediatric outcomes. Am J Obstet Gyn. 2018; 218: 256. e1–13.Google Scholar

Brock, JW III, Carr, MC, Adzick, NS, et al. Bladder function after fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Pediatrics. 2015; 136: e906–13.Google Scholar

Johnson, MP, Bennett, KA, Rand, L, et al. The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: obstetrical outcomes and risk factors for obstetrical complications following prenatal surgery. Am J Obstet Gyn. 2016; 215: 778–9.Google Scholar

Antiel, RM, Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, et al. Impact on family and parental stress of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. Am J Obstet Gyn. 2016; 215: 522. e1–6.Google Scholar

Moldenhauer, JS, Soni, S, Rintoul, NE, et al. Fetal myelomeningocele repair: the post-MOMS experience at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 37: 235–40.Google Scholar

Soni, S, Moldenhauer, JS, Spinner, SS, et al. Chorioamniotic membrane separation and preterm premature rupture of membranes complicating in utero myelomeningocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 647. e1–7.Google Scholar

Wilson, RD, Johnson, MP, Crombleholme, TM, et al. Chorioamniotic membrane separation following open fetal surgery: pregnancy outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2003; 18: 314–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heuer, GG, Adzick, NS, Sutton, LN. Fetal myelomeningocele closure: technical considerations. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 37: 166–71.Google Scholar

Flanders, TM, Heuer, GG, Madsen, PJ, et al. Modified myofascial technique for open fetal myelomeningocele results in improved outcomes. Presented at the 88th meeting of the American Association of Neurological Surgery, New Orleans, LA, May 1, 2018.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 550: Maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 218–19.Google Scholar

Simpson, JL, Greene, MF. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele? N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1076–7.Google Scholar

Cohen, AR, Couto, J, Cummings, JJ, et al. Position statement on fetal myelomeningocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210: 107–11.Google Scholar

Bennett, KA, Carroll, MA, Shannon, CN, et al. Reducing perinatal complications and preterm delivery for patients undergoing in utero closure of fetal myelomeningocele: further modifications to the multidisciplinary surgical technique. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014; 14: 108–14.Google Scholar

Moise, KJ Jr, Moldenhauer, JS, Bennett, KA, et al. Current selection criteria and perioperative therapy used for fetal myelomeningocele surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: 593–7.Google Scholar

Thom, EA. Maternal reproductive outcomes after in-utero repair of myelomeningocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: S36.Google Scholar

Wilson, RD, Lemerand, K, Johnson, MP, et al. Reproductive outcomes in subsequent pregnancies after a pregnancy complicated by open maternal-fetal surgery (1996–2007). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 209. e1–6.Google Scholar

Kohl, T. Percutaneous minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part I: surgical technique and perioperative outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 515–24.Google Scholar

Degenhardt, J, Schürg, R, Winarno, A, et al. Percutaneous minimal-access fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part II: maternal management and outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 525–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Graf, K, Kohl, T, Neubauer, BA, et al. Percutaneous minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta – Part III: postnatal neurosurgical interventions in the first year of life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 158–61.Google Scholar

Flake, AW. Percutaneous minimal-access fetoscopic surgery for myelomeningocele – not so minimal! Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 499–500.Google Scholar

Pedreira, DA, Zanon, N, Nishikuni, K, et al. Endoscopic surgery for the antenatal treatment of myelomeningocele: the CECAM trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 111.e1–111.e11.Google Scholar

Belfort, MA, Whitehead, WE, Shamshirsaz, AA, et al. Fetoscopic open neural tube defect repair: Development and refinement of a two-port, carbon dioxide insufflation technique. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 734–43.Google Scholar

Luks, FI, Deprest, J, Marcus, M, et al. Carbon dioxide pneumoamnios causes acidosis in fetal lamb. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1994; 9: 105–9.Google Scholar

Skinner, S, DeKoninck, P, Crossley, K, et al. Partial amniotic carbon dioxide insufflation for fetal surgery. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 983–93.Google ScholarPubMed

Lawrence, KM, Rossidis, AC, Baumgarten, HD et al. Safety of prolonged intra-amniotic carbon dioxide insufflation in a fetal sheep model. Presented at the 49th meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association, Palm Desert, CA, May 4, 2018.Google Scholar

Joyeux, L, Engels, AC, Russo, FM, et al. Fetoscopic versus open repair for spina bifida aperta: a systematic review of outcomes. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016; 39: 161–71.Google Scholar

Araujo Junior, E, Eggink, AJ, van den Dobbelsteen, J, et al. Procedure-related complications of open vs. endoscopic fetal surgery for treatment of spina bifida in an era of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 151–60.Google Scholar

Kabagambe, SK, Jensen, GW, Chen, YJ, et al. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in fetoscopic versus open repair. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018; 43: 161–74.Google Scholar

Watanabe, M, Kim, AG, Flake, AW. Tissue engineering strategies for fetal myelomeningocele repair in animal models. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 37: 197–205.Google Scholar

Brown, EG, Saadai, P, Pivetti, CD, et al. In utero repair of myelomeningocele with autologous amniotic membrane in the fetal lamb model. J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 49: 133–8.Google Scholar

Williams, J, Mai, CT, Mulinare, J, et al. Updated estimates of neural tube defects prevented by mandatory folic acid fortification – United States, 1995–2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015; 64: 1–5.Google ScholarPubMed

Bowman, RM, Boshnjaku, V, McLone, DG. The changing incidence of myelomeningocele and its impact on pediatric neurosurgery: a review from the Children’s Memorial Hospital. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009; 25: 801–6.Google Scholar

Meuli, M, Meuli-Simmen, C, Yingling, CD, et al. In utero repair of experimental myelomeningocele saves neurological function at birth. J Pediatr Surg. 1996; 31: 397–402.Google Scholar

Paek, BW, Farmer, DL, Wilkinson, CC, et al. Hindbrain herniation develops in surgically created myelomeningocele but is absent after repair in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1119–23.Google Scholar

Tulipan, N, Bruner, JP. Myelomeningocele repair in utero: a report of three cases. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998;28: 177–80.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 993–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Farmer, DL, Thom, EA, Brock, JW 3rd, Burrows, PK, Johnson, MP, Howell, LJ, et al. The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: full cohort 30-month pediatric outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: 256. e1–256. e13.Google Scholar

Brock, JW 3rd, Carr, MC, Adzick, NS, Burrows, PK, Thomas, JC, Thom, EA, et al. Bladder function after fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Pediatrics. 2015; 136: e906–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruner, JP, Tulipan, NE, Richards, WO. Endoscopic coverage of fetal open myelomeningocele in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176: 256–7.Google Scholar

Bruner, JP, Richards, WO, Tulipan, NB, Arney, TL. Endoscopic coverage of fetal myelomeningocele in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180: 153–8.Google Scholar

Farmer, DL, von Koch, CS, Peacock, WJ, et al. In utero repair of myelomeningocele: experimental pathophysiology, initial clinical experience, and outcomes. Arch Surg. 2003; 138: 872–8.Google Scholar

Bruner, JP, Tulipan, NB, Richards, WO, Walsh, WF, Boehm, FH, Vrabcak, EK. In utero repair of myelomeningocele: a comparison of endoscopy and hysterotomy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2000; 15: 83–8.Google Scholar

Kohl, T, Hering, R, Heep, A, et al. Percutaneous fetoscopic patch coverage of spina bifida aperta in the human – early clinical experience and potential. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006; 21: 185–93.Google Scholar

Kohl, T. Percutaneous minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part I: Surgical technique and perioperative outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 515–24.Google Scholar

Degenhardt, J, Schurg, R, Winarno, A, et al. Percutaneous minimal-access fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part II: maternal management and outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 525–31.Google Scholar

Graf, K, Kohl, T, Neubauer, BA, et al. Percutaneous minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part III: neurosurgical intervention in the first postnatal year. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 158–61.Google Scholar

Ziemann, M, Fimmers, R, Khaleeva, A, Schürg, R, Weigand, MA, Kohl, T. Partial amniotic carbon dioxide insufflation (PACI) during minimally invasive fetoscopic interventions on fetuses with spina bifida aperta. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 3138–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pedreira, DA, Zanon, N, de Sa, RA, et al. Fetoscopic single-layer repair of open spina bifida using a cellulose patch: preliminary clinical experience. J Mat Fetal Neonat Med. 2014; 27: 1613–19.Google Scholar

Pedreira, DA, Zanon, N,Nishikuni, K, et al. Endoscopic surgery for the antenatal treatment of myelomeningocele: the CECAM trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 111. e1–111. e11.Google Scholar

Lapa Pedreira, DA, Acacio, GL, Gonçalves, RT, Sá, RAM, Brandt, RA, Chmait, R, et al. Percutaneous fetoscopic closure of large open spina bifida using a bilaminar skin substitute. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52: 458–66.Google Scholar

Belfort, M, Deprest, J, Hecher, K. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: in utero therapy for spina bifida is ready for endoscopic repair. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36: 1161–6.Google Scholar

Peiro, JL, Fontecha, CG, Ruano, R, Esteves, M, Fonseca, C, Marotta, M, et al. Single-access fetal endoscopy (SAFE) for myelomeningocele in sheep model I: amniotic carbon dioxide gas approach. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 3835–40.Google Scholar

Belfort, MA, Whitehead, WE, Bednov, A, Shamshirsaz, AA. Low-fidelity simulator for the standardized training of fetoscopic meningomyelocele repair. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: 125–9.Google Scholar

Belfort, MA, Whitehead, WE, Shamshirsaz, AA, et al. Fetoscopic repair of meningomyelocele. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 881–4.Google Scholar

Pham, P. (2018). Sophisticated tools lead to breakthroughs in prenatal surgery. Wired. www.wired.com/story/nicu-tools-fetal-surgeryGoogle Scholar

Belfort, MA, Whitehead, WE, Shamshirsaz, AA, et al. Fetoscopic open neural tube defect repair: development and refinement of a two-port, carbon dioxide insufflation technique. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 734–43.Google Scholar

Kohn, JR, Rao, V, Sellner, AA, Sharhan, D, Espinoza, J, Shamshirsaz, AA, et al. Management of labor and delivery after fetoscopic repair of an open neural tube defect. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: 1062–8.Google Scholar

Sanz Cortes, M, Torres, O, Sharhan, D, Yepez, M, Espinoza, J, Shamshirsaz, AA, et al. Neurodevelopmental assessment in patients who underwent prenatal fetoscopic and open fetal neural tube defect repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 1 (Suppl.): S294–5.Google Scholar

Kohl, T, Reckers, J, Strümper, D, Große Hartlage, M, Gogarten, W, Gembruch, U, et al. Amniotic air insufflation during minimally invasive fetoscopic fetal cardiac interventions is safe for the fetal brain in sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 128: 467–71.Google Scholar

Moise, KJ Jr., Tsao, K, Papanna, RM, Bebbington, MW. Fetoscopic repair of meningomyelocele. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 674.Google Scholar

Moise, KJ Jr., Flake, A. Fetoscopic open neural tube defect repair: development and refinement of a two-port, carbon dioxide insufflation technique. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 648.Google Scholar

Luks, FI, Deprest, J, Marcus, M, Vandenberghe, K, Vertommen, JD, Lerut, T, et al. Carbon dioxide pneumoamnios causes acidosis in fetal lamb. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1994; 9: 105–9.Google Scholar

Gratacós, E, Wu, J, Devlieger, R, Van de Velde, M, Deprest, JA. Effects of amniodistension with carbon dioxide on fetal acid–base status during fetoscopic surgery in the sheep model. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15: 368–72.Google Scholar

Gardner, DS, Fletcher, AJ, Bloomfield, MR, Fowden, AL, Giussani, DA. Effects of prevailing hypoxaemia, acidaemia or hypoglycaemia upon the cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic responses to acute hypoxaemia in the ovine fetus. J Physiol. 2002; 540: 351–66.Google Scholar

Sabik, JF, Assad, RS, Hanley, FL. Halothane as an anesthetic for fetal surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 1993; 28: 542–6.Google Scholar

Saiki, Y, Litwin, DE, Bigras, JL, Waddell, J, Konig, A, Baik, S, et al. Reducing the deleterious effects of intrauterine CO2 during fetoscopic surgery. J Surg Res. 1997; 69: 51–4.Google Scholar

Akbar, SA, Brown, PR. Human erythrocyte CAI and CAII isoenzymes in hypoxemic and anemic fetuses. Clin Biochem. 1996; 29: 57–62.Google Scholar

Lönnerholm, G, Wistrand, PJ. Carbonic anhydrase in the human fetal kidney. Pediatr Res. 1983; 17: 390–7.Google Scholar

Supuran, CT. Structure and function of carbonic anhydrases. Biochem J. 2016; 473: 2023–32.Google Scholar

Sly, WS, Hu, PY. Human carbonic anhydrases and carbonic anhydrase deficiencies. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995; 64: 375–401.Google Scholar

Schipain, E, Mangiavini, L, Merceron, C. HIF-1a and growth plate development: what we really know. Bonekey Rep. 2015; 4: 730.Google Scholar

Thakor, AS, Giussani, DA. Effects of acute acidemia on the fetal cardiovascular defense to acute hypoxemia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009; 296: R90–9.Google Scholar

Kohl, T. Impact of partial amniotic carbon dioxide insufflation (PACI) on middle cerebral artery blood flow in mid-gestation human fetuses undergoing fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 521–2.Google Scholar

Kassir, E, Belfort, MA, Shamshirsaz, AA, et al. Doppler changes in umbilical artery and ductus venosus during fetoscopic prenatal surgical repair of myelomeningocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 335–9.Google Scholar

Mann, DG, Nassr, AA, Whitehead, WE, Espinoza, J, Belfort, MA, Shamshirsaz, AA. Fetal bradycardia associated with maternal hypothermia after fetoscopic repair of neural tube defect. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51: 411–12.Google Scholar

Dean, M, Ramsay, R, Heriot, A, Mackay, J, Hiscock, R, Lynch, AC. Warmed, humidified CO2 insufflation benefits intraoperative core temperature during laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017; 10: 128–36.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Ahn, ES, Murphy, J, Miller, JL. Fetal blood gas values during fetoscopic myelomeningocele repair performed under carbon dioxide insufflation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52: 400–2.Google Scholar

Partridge, EA, Davey, MG, Hornick, MA, McGovern, PE, Mejaddam, AY, Vrecenak, JD, et al. An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 15112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davey, AK, Hayward, J, Marshall, JK, Woods, AE. The effects of insufflation conditions on rat mesothelium. Int J Inflam. 2013; 2013: 816283.Google Scholar

Peng, Y, Zheng, M, Ye, Q, Chen, X, Yu, B, Liu, B. Heated and humidified CO2 prevents hypothermia, peritoneal injury, and intra-abdominal adhesions during prolonged laparoscopic insufflations. J Surg Res. 2009; 151: 40–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sanz Cortes, M, Castro, E, Sharhan, D, Torres, P, Yepez, M, Espinoza, J, Shamshirsaz, AA, Nassr, AA, Popek, E, Whitehead, W, Belfort, MA. Amniotic membrane and placental histopathological findings after open and fetoscopic prenatal neural tube defect repair. Prenat Diagn. 2019 Mar; 39(4): 269–279.Google Scholar

Erikoglu, M, Yol, S, Avunduk, MC, Erdemli, E, Can, A. Electron-microscopic alterations of the peritoneum after both cold and heated carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. J Surg Res. 2005; 125: 73–7.Google Scholar

Papanna, R, Mann, LK, Moise, KJ Jr., Kyriakides, T, Johnson, A, Garcia, E, et al. Histologic changes of the fetal membranes after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2015; 78: 247–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed