Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:11:38.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fetal Stem Cell Transplantation

from Section 2: - Fetal Disease: Pathogenesis and Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Edited by
Mark D. Kilby ,
Anthony Johnson  and
Dick Oepkes
Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
 , pp. 512 - 539
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Kassim, AA, Sharma, D. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease: the changing landscape. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2017; 10: 259–66.Google Scholar
Raje, N, Dinakar, C. Overview of immunodeficiency disorders. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2015; 35: 599–623.Google Scholar
Sagar, R, Walther-Jallow, L, David, AL, Götherström, C, Westgren, M. Fetal mesenchymal stromal cells: an opportunity for prenatal cellular therapy. Curr Stem Cell Rep. 2018; 4: 61–8.Google Scholar
Squillaro, T, Peluso, G, Galderisi, U. Clinical trials with mesenchymal stem cells: an update. Cell Transplant. 2016; 25: 829–48.Google Scholar
Nijagal, A, Flake, AW, MacKenzie, TC. In utero hematopoietic cell transplantation for the treatment of congenital anomalies. Clin Perinatol. 2012; 39: 301–10.Google Scholar
Tiblad, E, Westgren, M. Fetal stem-cell transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 22 : 189–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Touraine, JL, Raudrant, D, Royo, C, Rebaud, A, Roncarolo, MG, Souillet, G, et al. In-utero transplantation of stem cells in bare lymphocyte syndrome. Lancet. 1989; 1: 1382.Google Scholar
Vrecenak, JD, Flake, AW. In utero hematopoietic cell transplantation –recent progress and the potential for clinical application. Cytotherapy. 2013; 15: 525–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flake, AW, Zanjani, ED. In utero hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: ontogenic opportunities and biologic barriers. Blood. 1999; 94: 2179–91.Google Scholar
Westgren, M, Ringdén, O, Eik-Nes, S, Ek, S, Anvret, M, Brubakk, AM, et al. Lack of evidence of permanent engraftment after in utero fetal stem cell transplantation in congenital hemoglobinopathies. Transplantation. 1996; 61: 1176–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewendorf, AI, Csete, M, Flake, A. Immunological considerations in in utero hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (IUHCT). Front Pharmacol. 2014; 5: 282.Google Scholar
Perez, B, Vilageliu, L, Grinberg, D, Desviat, LR. Antisense mediated splicing modulation for inherited metabolic diseases: challenges for delivery. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2014; 24: 48–56.Google Scholar
Baris, HN, Cohen, IJ, Mistry, PK. Gaucher disease: the metabolic defect, pathophysiology, phenotypes and natural history. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2014; 12 (Suppl. 1): 72–81.Google Scholar
Charrow, J, Scott, CR. Long-term treatment outcomes in Gaucher disease. Am J Hematol. 2015; 90 (Suppl. 1): S19–24.Google Scholar
Orvisky, E, Sidransky, E, McKinney, CE, Lamarca, ME, Samimi, R, Krasnewich, D, et al. Glucosylsphingosine accumulation in mice and patients with type 2 Gaucher disease begins early in gestation. Pediatr Res. 2000; 48: 233–7.Google Scholar
Müller, I, Kustermann-Kuhn, B, Holzwarth, C, Isensee, G, Vaegler, M, Harzer, K, et al.. In vitro analysis of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells as potential cellular therapeutics in neurometabolic diseases in pediatric patients.. Exp Hematol. 2006; 34: 1413–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, K, Gonzalez, A, Lopez, G, Pedoeim, L, Groden, C, Sidransky, E. The clinical management of Type 2 Gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2015; 114: 110–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meregalli, M, Farini, A, Belicchi, M, Parolini, D, Cassinelli, L, Razini, P, et al. Perspectives of stem cell therapy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. FEBS J. 2013; 280: 4251–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanigan, KM. Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Neurol Clin. 2014; 32: 671–88, viii.Google Scholar
Mendell, JR, Rodino-Klapac, LR, Sahenk, Z, Roush, K, Bird, L, Lowes, LP, et al. Eteplirsen for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol. 2013; 74: 637–47.Google Scholar
Aartsma-Rus, A, Goemans, N. A Sequel to the eteplirsen saga: eteplirsen is approved in the United States but was not approved in Europe. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2019; 29: 13–15.Google Scholar
Falzarano, MS, Scotton, C, Passarelli, C, Ferlini, A. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: from diagnosis to Therapy. Molecules. 2015; 20: 18168–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordova, G, Negroni, E, Cabello-Verrugio, C, Mouly, V, Trollet, C. Combined therapies for duchenne muscular dystrophy to optimize treatment efficacy. Front Genet. 2018; 9: 114.Google Scholar
Chan, J, Waddington, SN, O’Donoghue, K, Kurata, H, Guillot, PV, Götherström, C, et al. Widespread distribution and muscle differentiation of human fetal mesenchymal stem cells after intrauterine transplantation in dystrophic mdx mouse. Stem Cells. 2007; 25: 875–84.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, SC, Hindi, SM, Kumar, A, Marques, MJ. Effects of omega-3 on matrix metalloproteinase-9, myoblast transplantation and satellite cell activation in dystrophin-deficient muscle fibers. Cell Tissue Res. 2017; 369: 591–602.Google Scholar
Aminzadeh, MA, Rogers, RG, Fournier, M, Tobin, RE, Guan, X, Childers, MK, et al. Exosome-mediated benefits of cell therapy in mouse and human models of duchenne muscular dystrophy. Stem Cell Reports. 2018; 10: 942–55.Google Scholar
Silva, MC, Magalhaes, TA, Meira, ZM, Rassi, CH, Andrade, AC, Gutierrez, PS, et al. Myocardial fibrosis progression in duchenne and becker muscular dystrophy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2: 190–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Marini, JC, Forlino, A, Bachinger, HP, Bishop, NJ, Byers, PH, Paepe, A, et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017; 3: 17052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folkestad, L, Hald, JD, Canudas-Romo, V, Gram, J, Hermann, AP, Langdahl, B, et al. Mortality and causes of death in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta: a register-based nationwide cohort study. J Bone Miner Res. 2016; 31: 2159–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hald, JD, Evangelou, E, Langdahl, BL, Ralston, SH. Bisphosphonates for the prevention of fractures in osteogenesis imperfecta: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. J Bone Miner Res. 2015; 30: 929–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwan, K, Phillipi, CA, Steiner, RD, Basel, D. Bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 7: CD005088.Google Scholar
Chan, JK, Götherström, C. Prenatal transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells to treat osteogenesis imperfecta. Front Pharmacol. 2014; 5: 223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horwitz, EM, Prockop, DJ, Gordon, PL, Koo, WW, Fitzpatrick, LA, Neel, MD, et al. Clinical responses to bone marrow transplantation in children with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. Blood. 2001; 97: 1227–31.Google Scholar
Horwitz, EM, Gordon, PL, Koo, WK, Marx, JC, Neel, MD, McNall, RY, et al. Isolated allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells engraft and stimulate growth in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: implications for cell therapy of bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 8932–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Blanc, K, Götherström, C, Ringden, O, Hassan, M, McMahon, R, Horwitz, E, et al. Fetal mesenchymal stem-cell engraftment in bone after in utero transplantation in a patient with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. Transplantation. 2005; 79: 1607–14.Google Scholar
Götherström, C, Westgren, M, Shaw, SW, Astrom, E, Biswas, A, Byers, PH, et al. Pre- and postnatal transplantation of fetal mesenchymal stem cells in osteogenesis imperfecta: a two-center experience. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014; 3: 255–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Götherström, C, Hermerén, G, Johansson, M, Sahlin, N-E, Westgren, M. Stem cells and fetal therapy: is it a reality? Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med. 2017; 27: 166–7.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, TC, David, AL, Flake, AW, Almeida-Porada, G. Consensus statement from the first international conference for in utero stem cell transplantation and gene therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2015; 6: 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Deprest, JA, Lerut, TE, Vandenberghe, K. Operative fetoscopy: new perspective in fetal therapy? Prenat Diagn. 1997; 17: 1247–60.Google Scholar
Gratacós, E, Sanin-Blair, J, Lewi, L, et al. A histological study of fetoscopic membrane defects to document membrane healing. Placenta. 2006; 27: 452–6.Google Scholar
Crowley, AE, Grivell, RM, Dodd, JM. Sealing procedures for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 7: CD010218.Google Scholar
Theoret, C. Physiology of wound healing. In Theoret, C, Schumacher, J, eds., Equine Wound Management. Ames: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2017, 1–13.Google Scholar
Devlieger, D, Millar, LK, Bryant-Greenwood, G, Lewi, L, Deprest, JA. Fetal membrane healing after spontaneous and iatrogenic membrane rupture: a review of current evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 1512–20.Google Scholar
Sopher, D. The response of rat fetal membranes to injury. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1972; 51: 240–9.Google Scholar
Devlieger, R, Riley, SC, Verbist, L, Leask, R, Pijnenborg, R, Deprest, JA. Matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 and their endogenous tissue inhibitors in tissue remodeling after sealing of the fetal membranes in a sheep model of fetoscopic surgery. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2002; 9: 137–45.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Mann, LK, Tseng, SC, et al. Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane and a bioinspired underwater adhesive to seal and promote healing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defect sites. Placenta. 2015; 36: 888–94.Google Scholar
Mogami, H, Hari Kishore, A, Akgul, Y, Word, RA. Healing of preterm ruptured fetal membranes. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 13139.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Mann, LK, Moise, KJ, et al. Histologic changes of the fetal membranes after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2015; 78: 247–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, S, Moron, AF, Menon, R, et al. Histological evidence of reparative activity in chorioamniotic membrane following open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Exp Ther Med. 2017; 14: 3732–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engels, AC, Bauters, D, Rynkevic, R, et al. Thrombin generation by fetoscopic trauma to the fetal membranes: an in vivo and in vitro Study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016; 39: 261–8.Google Scholar
Bilic, G, Ochsenbein-Kolble, N, Hall, H, Huch, R, Zimmermann, R. In vitro lesion repair by human amnion epithelial and mesenchymal cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 87–92.Google Scholar
Ochsenbein-Kölble, N, Bilic, G, Hall, H, Huch, R, Zimmermann, R. Inducing proliferation of human amnion epithelial and mesenchymal cells for prospective engineering of membrane repair. J Perinat Med. 2003; 31: 287.Google Scholar
Lim, R, Chan, ST, Tan, JL, Mockler, JC, Murphy, SV, Wallace, EM. Preterm human amnion epithelial cells have limited reparative potential. Placenta. 2013; 34: 486–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, DW, David, AL, Thrasivoulou, C, Mata, A, Becker, DL, Engels, AC, et al. Connexin 43 is overexpressed in human fetal membrane defects after fetoscopic surgery. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 36: 942–52.Google Scholar
Barrett, DW, Keethes, A, Thrasivoulou, C, et al. Trauma induces overexpression of Cx43 in human fetal membrane defects. Prenat Diagn. 2017; 37: 899–906.Google Scholar
Genz, HG. Treatment of premature rupture of the fetal membranes by means of fibrin adhesion. Med Welt. 1979; 30: 1557–9.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, K, Moser, S. The technique of fibrin adhesion for premature rupture of the membranes during pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 1986; 14: 43–9.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, M, Bornick, PW, Arroyo, J, LeParc, G. Treatment of iatrogenic previable premature rupture of membranes with intra-amniotic injection of platelets and cryoprecipitate (amniopatch): preliminary experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 744–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, UM, Shah, SS, Nemiroff, RL, et al. In vitro sealing of punctured fetal membranes: potential treatment for midtrimester premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 1090–3.Google Scholar
Harmanli, OH, Wapner, RJ, Lontz, JF. Efficacy of fibrin glue for in vitro sealing of human chorioamniotic membranes. J Reprod Med. 1998; 43: 986–90.Google Scholar
Young, BK, Roman, AS, MacKenzie, AP, et al. The closure of iatrogenic membrane defects after amniocentesis and endoscopic intrauterine procedures. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004; 19: 296–300.Google Scholar
Sciscione, AC, Manley, JS, Pollock, M, et al. Intracervical fibrin sealants: a potential treatment for early preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 368–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, RA. New horizons in the treatment of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Clin Perinatol. 2001; 28: 861–75.Google Scholar
Chmait, RH, Kontopoulos, EV, Chon, AH, Korst, LM, Llanes, A, Quintero, RA. Amniopatch treatment of iatrogenic preterm premature rupture of membranes (iPPROM) after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 1349–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sung, JH, Kuk, JY, Cha, HH, et al. Amniopatch treatment for preterm premature rupture of membranes before 23 weeks’ gestation and factors associated with its success. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 56: 599–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luks, FI, Deprest, JA, Peers, KH, Steegers, EA, van Der Wildt, B. Gelatin sponge plug to seal fetoscopy port sites: technique in ovine and primate models. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 995–6.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Bornick, PW, Allen, M, Garabelis, N. Surgical treatment of spontaneous rupture of membranes: the amniograft – first experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186: 155–7.Google Scholar
O’Brien, JM, Barton, JR, Milligan, DA. An aggressive interventional protocol for early midtrimester premature rupture of the membranes using gelatin sponge for cervical plugging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 1143–6.Google Scholar
O’Brien, JM, Mercer, BM, Barton, JR, Milligan, DA. An in vitro model and case report that used gelatin sponge to restore amniotic fluid volume after spontaneous premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 1094–7.Google Scholar
Deprest, JA, Papadopulos, NA, Decaluw, H, Yamamoto, H, Lerut, TE, Gratacós, E. Closure techniques for fetoscopic access sites in the rabbit at mid-gestation. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 1730–4.Google Scholar
Liekens, D, Lewi, L, Jani, J, et al. Enrichment of collagen plugs with platelets and amniotic fluid cells increases cell proliferation in sealed iatrogenic membrane defects in the fetal rabbit model. Prenat Diagn. 2008; 28: 503–7.Google Scholar
Papadopulos, NA, Kyriakidis, DI, Schillinger, U, Totis, A, Henke, J, Kovacs, L, et al. Successful anatomic repair of fetoscopic access sites in the mid-gestational rabbit model using amnion cell engineering. In Vivo. 2010; 24: 745–50.Google Scholar
Engels, AC, Hoylaerts, MF, Endo, M, et al. In vitro sealing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defects by a collagen plug imbued with fibrinogen and plasma. Prenat Diagn. 2013: 33: 162–7.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Mann, LK, Moise, KY, Johnson, A, Moise, KJ. Absorbable gelatin plug does not prevent iatrogenic preterm premature rupture of membranes after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42: 456–60.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Molina, S, Moise, KY, Moise, KJ Jr., Johnson, A. Chorioamnion plugging and the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes after laser surgery in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35: 337–43.Google Scholar
Engels, AC, Van Calster, B, Richter, J, et al. Collagen plug sealing of iatrogenic fetal membrane defects after fetoscopic surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 54–9.Google Scholar
Mallik, AS, Fichter, MA, Rieder, S, et al. Fetoscopic closure of punctured fetal membranes with acellular human amnion plugs in a rabbit model. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1121–9.Google Scholar
Devlieger, R, Ardon, H, Verbist, L, Gratacós, E, Pijnenborg, R, Deprest, JA. Increased polymorphonuclear infiltration and iatrogenic amniotic band after closure of fetoscopic access sites with a bioactive membrane in the rabbit at midgestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 844–8.Google Scholar
Ochsenbein-Kolble, N, Jani, J, Lewi, L, et al. Enhancing sealing of fetal membrane defects using tissue engineered native amniotic scaffolds in the rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 263. e1–7.Google Scholar
Engels, AC, Joyeux, L, Van der Merwe, J, Jimenez, J, Prapanus, S, Barrett, DW, et al. Tissuepatch is biocompatible and seals iatrogenic membrane defects in a rabbit model. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kivelio, A, Dekoninck, P, Perrini, M, et al. Mussel mimetic tissue adhesive for fetal membrane repair: initial in vivo investigation in rabbits. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med. 2013; 171: 240–5.Google Scholar
Haller, CM, Buerzle, W, Brubaker, CE, et al. Mussel-mimetic tissue adhesive for fetal membrane repair: a standardized ex vivo evaluation using elastomeric membranes. Prenat Diagn. 2011; 31: 654–60.Google Scholar
Mann, LK, Papanna, R, Moise, KJ Jr., et al. Fetal membrane patch and biomimetic adhesive coacervates as a sealant for fetoscopic defects. Acta Biomater. 2012; 8: 2160–5.Google Scholar
Bilic, G, Brubaker, C, Messersmith, PB, et al. Injectable candidate sealants for fetal membrane repair: bonding and toxicity in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 85. e1–9.Google Scholar
Parolini, O, Alviano, F, Bagnara, GP, et al. Concise review: isolation and characterization of cells from human term placenta: outcome of the First International Workshop on Placenta Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 300–11.Google Scholar
Miki, T, Lehmann, T, Cai, H, Stolz, DB, Strom, SC. Stem cell characteristics of amniotic epithelial cells. Stem Cells. 2005; 23: 1549–59.Google Scholar
Mi, S, David, AL, Chowdhury, B, Jones, RR, Hamley, IW, Squires, AM, Connon, CJ. Tissue engineering a fetal membrane.Tissue Eng Part A. 2012; 18: 373–81.Google Scholar
Papanna, R, Fletcher, S, Moise, KJ Jr., et al. Cryopreserved human umbilical cord patch for in-utero spina bifida repair. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 168–76.Google Scholar
Roman, S, Bullock, AJ, Anumba, DO, MacNeil, S. Development of an implantable synthetic membrane for the treatment of preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes. J Biomater Appl. 2016; 30: 995–1003.Google Scholar
Perrini, M, Mauri, A, Ehret, AE, et al. Mechanical and microstructural investigation of the cyclic behavior of human amnion. J Biomech Eng. 2015; 137: 061010.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, B, David, AL, Thrasivoulou, C, Becker, DL, Bader, DL, Chowdhury, TT. Tensile strain increased COX-2 expression and PGE2 release leading to weakening of the human amniotic membrane. Placenta. 2014; 35: 1057–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sooranna, SR, Lee, Y, Kim, LU, Mohan, AR, Bennett, PR, Johnson, MR. Mechanical stretch activates type 2 cyclooxygenase via activator protein-1 transcription factor in human myometrial cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004; 10: 109–13.Google Scholar
Adams Waldorf, KM. Uterine overdistention induces preterm labor mediated by inflammation: observations in pregnant women and nonhuman primates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 830. e1–830. e19.Google Scholar
Mauri, A, Perrini, M, Mateos, JM, et al. Second harmonic generation microscopy of fetal membranes under deformation: normal and altered morphology. Placenta. 2013; 34: 1020–6.Google Scholar
Kumar, D, Moore, RM, Nash, A, et al. Decidual GM-CSF is a critical common intermediate necessary for thrombin and TNF induced in-vitro fetal membrane weakening. Placenta. 2014; 35: 1049–56.Google Scholar
Petersen, SG, Gibbons, KS. The impact of entry technique and access diameter on prelabour rupture of membranes following primary fetoscopic laser treatment for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016; 40: 100–9.Google Scholar
Beck, V, Lewi, P, Gucciardo, L, Devlieger, R. Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and fetal survival after minimally invasive fetal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012; 31: 1–9.Google Scholar

References

Amit, M, Shariki, C, Margulets, V, Itskovitz-Eldor, J. Feeder layer and serum-free culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biol Reprod. 2004; 70: 837–45.Google Scholar
Fong, H, Hohenstein, KA, Donovan, PJ. Regulation of self-renewal and pluripotency by Sox2 in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 1931–8.Google Scholar
Klimanskaya, I, Chung, Y, Becker, S, et al. Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from single blastomeres. Nature. 2006; 444: 481–5.Google Scholar
Chung, Y, Klimanskaya, I, Becker, S, Marh, J, Lu, SJ, Johnson, J, et al. Embryonic and extraembryonic stem cell lines derived from single mouse blastomeres. Nature. 2006; 439: 216–19.Google Scholar
Deb, KD, Sarda, K. Human embryonic stem cells: preclinical perspectives. J Transl Med. 2008; 6: 7.Google Scholar
Briggs, R, King, TJ. Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frogs’ eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1952; 38: 455–63.Google Scholar
Campbell, KH, McWhir, J, Ritchie, WA, Wilmut, I. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature. 1996; 380: 64–6.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K, Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006; 126: 663–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slamecka, J, Salimova, L, McClellan, S, van Kelle, M, Kehl, D, Laurini, J, et al. Non-integrating episomal plasmid-based reprogramming of human amniotic fluid stem cells into induced pluripotent stem cells in chemically defined conditions. Cell Cycle. 2016; 15: 234–49.Google Scholar
Velasquez-Mao, AJ, Tsao, CJM, Monroe, MN, Legras, X, Bissig-Choisat, B, Bissig, K-D, et al. Differentiation of spontaneously contracting cardiomyocytes from non-virally reprogrammed human amniotic fluid stem cells. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0177824.Google Scholar
Chang, C-Y, Ting, H-C, Su, H-L, Jeng, J-R. Combining induced pluripotent stem cells and genome editing technologies for clinical applications. Cell Transplant. 2018; 27: 379–92.Google Scholar
De Coppi, P, Pozzobon, M, Piccoli, M, Gazzola, M, Boldrin, L, Slanzi, E, et al. Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from human vermiform appendix. J Surg Res. 2006; 135: 85–91.Google Scholar
Loukogeorgakis, SP, De Coppi, P. Stem cells from amniotic fluid – potential for regenerative medicine. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 31: 45–57.Google Scholar
De Coppi, P. Tissue engineering and stem cell research. In Puri, P, ed., Newborn Surgery, 4th edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017, pp. 301–14.Google Scholar
Caves, JM, Kumar, VA, Martinez, AW, Kim, J, Ripberger, CM, Haller, CA, et al. The use of microfiber composites of elastin-like protein matrix reinforced with synthetic collagen in the design of vascular grafts. Biomaterials. 2010; 31: 7175–82.Google Scholar
Gasior, AC, St. Peter, SD. A review of patch options in the repair of congenital diaphragm defects. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012; 28: 327–33.Google Scholar
Mayer, S, Decaluwe, H, Ruol, M, Manodoro, S, Kramer, M, Till, H, et al. Diaphragm repair with a novel cross-linked collagen biomaterial in a growing rabbit model. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0132021.Google Scholar
Huang, AH, Niklason, LE. Engineering Biological-Based Vascular Grafts Using a Pulsatile Bioreactor. J Vis Exp. 2011; 52: 2646.Google Scholar
Lu, H, Feng, Z, Gu, Z, Liu, C. Growth of outgrowth endothelial cells on aligned PLLA nanofibrous scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009; 20: 1937–44.Google Scholar
Tillman, BW, Yazdani, SK, Lee, SJ, Geary, RL, Atala, A, Yoo, JJ. The in vivo stability of electrospun polycaprolactone-collagen scaffolds in vascular reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2009; 30: 583–8.Google Scholar
Mathews, A, Colombus, S, Krishnan, VK, Krishnan, LK. Vascular tissue construction on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds by dynamic endothelial cell seeding: effect of pore size. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2012; 6: 451–61.Google Scholar
Zhao, J, Qiu, H, Chen, D, Zhang, W, Zhang, D, Li, M. Development of nanofibrous scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013; 56: 106–13.Google Scholar
Huang, Y-C, Kuo, Y, Huang, Y, Chen, C, Ho, D, Shi, C-S. The effects of adipose-derived stem cells in a rat model of tobacco-associated erectile dysfunction. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0156725.Google Scholar
Satake, R, Komura, M, Komura, H, Kodaka, T, Terawaki, K, Ikebukuro, K, et al. Patch tracheoplasty in body tissue engineering using collagenous connective tissue membranes (biosheets). J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 51: 244–8.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K, Komura, M, Terawaki, K, Kodaka, T, Gohara, T, Komura, H, et al. Engineering and repair of diaphragm using biosheet (a collagenous connective tissue membrane) in rabbits. J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53: 330–4.Google Scholar
Mitchell, IC, Garcia, NM, Barber, R, Ahmad, N, Hicks, BA, Fischer, AC. Permacol: a potential biologic patch alternative in congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2008; 43: 2161–4.Google Scholar
Balayssac, D, Poinas, AC, Pereira, B, Pezet, D. Use of permacol in parietal and general surgery: a bibliographic review. Surg Innov. 2013; 20: 176–82.Google Scholar
Cheng, AW, Abbas, MA, Tejirian, T. Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: PermacolTM versus StratticeTM. Am Surg. 2014; 80: 999–1002.Google Scholar
Gilpin, A, Yang, Y. Decellularization strategies for regenerative medicine: from processing techniques to applications. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 9831534.Google Scholar
Wainwright, DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns. 1995; 21: 243–8.Google Scholar
Elliott, MJ, De Coppi, P, Speggiorin, S, Roebuck, D, Butler, CR, Samuel, E, et al. Stem-cell-based, tissue engineered tracheal replacement in a child: a 2-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2012; 380: 994–1000.Google Scholar
Flake, AW, Roncarolo, M-G, Puck, JM, Almeida-Porada, G, Evans, MI, Johnson, MP, et al. Treatment of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by in utero transplantation of paternal bone marrow. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1806–10.Google Scholar
Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, Brock, JW 3rd, Burrows, PK, Johnson, MP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 993–1004.Google Scholar
Götherström, C, Westgren, M, Shaw, SWS, Åström, E, Biswas, A, Byers, PH, et al. Pre- and postnatal transplantation of fetal mesenchymal stem cells in osteogenesis imperfecta: a two-center experience. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014; 3: 255–64.Google Scholar
Deprest, J, Brady, P, Nicolaides, K, Benachi, A, Berg, C, Vermeesch, J, et al. Prenatal management of the fetus with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the era of the TOTAL trial. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 19: 338–48.Google Scholar
Haynes, BF. Human thymic epithelium and T cell development: current issues and future directions. Thymus. 1990; 16: 143–57.Google Scholar
Pawlowski, TJ, Staerz, UD. Thymic education – T cells do it for themselves. Trends Immunol. 1994; 15: 205–9.Google Scholar
Liechty, KW, MacKenzie, TC, Shaaban, AF, Radu, A, Moseley, AM, Deans, R, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation after in utero transplantation in sheep. Nat Med. 2000; 6: 1282–6.Google Scholar
Maselli, KM, Badillo, A. Advances in fetal surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4: 394.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, H, Pringle, KC. Fetal surgery: a critical review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017; 33: 421–33.Google Scholar
Partridge, EA, Davey, MG, Hornick, MA, McGovern, PE, Mejaddam, AY, Vrecenak, JD, et al. An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 15112.Google Scholar
Larson, BJ, Longaker, MT, Lorenz, HP. Scarless fetal wound healing: a basic science review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1172–80.Google Scholar
Yagi, LH, Watanuki, LM, Isaac, C, Gemperli, R, Nakamura, YM, Ladeira, PRS. Human fetal wound healing: a review of molecular and cellular aspects. Eur J Plastic Surg. 2016; 39: 239–46.Google Scholar
Hosper, NA, Eggink, AJ, Roelofs, LAJ, Wijnen, RMH, van Luyn, MJA, Bank, RA, et al. Intra-uterine tissue engineering of full-thickness skin defects in a fetal sheep model. Biomaterials. 2010; 31: 3910–19.Google Scholar
Xia, W, Noimark, S, Ourselin, S, West, SJ, Finlay, MC, David, AL, et al. Ultrasonic needle tracking with a fibre-optic ultrasound transmitter for guidance of minimally invasive fetal surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2017; 10434: 637–45.Google Scholar
Peter, L, Tella-Amo, M, Shakir, DI, Attilakos, G, Wimalasundera, R, Deprest, J, et al. Retrieval and registration of long-range overlapping frames for scalable mosaicking of in vivo fetoscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018; 13: 713–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, M, Kim, AG, Flake, AW. Tissue engineering strategies for fetal myelomeningocele repair in animal models. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 37: 197–205.Google Scholar
Fauza, DO, Jennings, RW, Teng, YD, Snyder, EY. Neural stem cell delivery to the spinal cord in an ovine model of fetal surgery for spina bifida. Surgery. 2008; 144: 367–73.Google Scholar
Peiro, JL, Fontecha, CG, Ruano, R, Esteves, M, Fonseca, C, Marotta, M, et al. Single-Access Fetal Endoscopy (SAFE) for myelomeningocele in sheep model I: Amniotic carbon dioxide gas approach. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2013; 27: 3835–40.Google Scholar
Brown, EG, Saadai, P, Pivetti, CD, Beattie, MS, Bresnahan, JC, Wang, A, et al. In utero repair of myelomeningocele with autologous amniotic membrane in the fetal lamb model. J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 49: 133–7; discussion 137–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, YJ, Chung, K, Pivetti, C, Lankford, L, Kabagambe, SK, Vanover, M, et al. Fetal surgical repair with placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cell engineered patch in a rodent model of myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53: 183–88.Google Scholar
Roelofs, LAJ, Eggink, AJ, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, CA, van den Berg, PP, van Kuppevelt, TH, van Moerkerk, HTB, et al. Fetal abdominal wall repair with a collagen biomatrix in an experimental sheep model for gastroschisis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008; 14: 2033–40.Google Scholar
Roelofs, LAJ, Geutjes, PJ, Van De Kaa, CAH, Eggink, AJ, Van Kuppevelt, TH, Daamen, WF, et al. Prenatal coverage of experimental gastroschisis with a collagen scaffold to protect the bowel. J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48: 516–24.Google Scholar
Coughlin, MA, Werner, NL, Gajarski, R, Gadepalli, S, Hirschl, R, Barks, J, et al. Prenatally diagnosed severe CDH: mortality and morbidity remain high. J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 51: 1091–5.Google Scholar
Deprest, J, Gucciardo, L, Eastwood, P, Zia, S, Jimenez, J, Russo, F, et al. Medical and regenerative solutions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A perinatal perspective. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 24: 270–7.Google Scholar
Fuchs, JR, Kaviani, A, Oh, JT, LaVan, D, Udagawa, T, Jennings, RW, et al. Diaphragmatic reconstruction with autologous tendon engineered from mesenchymal amniocytes. J Pediatr Surg. 2004; 39: 834–8.Google Scholar
Turner, CG, Klein, JD, Steigman, SA, Armant, M, Nicksa, GA, Zurakowski, D, et al. Preclinical regulatory validation of an engineered diaphragmatic tendon made with amniotic mesenchymal stem cells. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46: 57–61.Google Scholar
Pederiva, F, Ghionzoli, M, Pierro, A, De Coppi, P, Tovar, JA. Amniotic fluid stem cells rescue both in vitro and in vivo growth, innervation, and motility in nitrofen-exposed hypoplastic rat lungs through paracrine effects. Cell Transplant. 2013; 22: 1683–94.Google Scholar
Lim, R, Malhotra, A, Tan, J, Chan, ST, Lau, S, Zhu, D, et al. First-in-human administration of allogeneic amnion cells in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a safety study. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018; 7: 628–35.Google Scholar
Zani, A, Pierro, A, Elvassore, N, De Coppi, P. Tissue engineering: an option for esophageal replacement? Semin Pediatr Surg. 2009; 18: 57–62.Google Scholar
Lee, E, Milan, A, Urbani, L, De Coppi, P, Lowdell, MW. Decellularized material as scaffolds for tissue engineering studies in long gap esophageal atresia. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017; 17: 573–84.Google Scholar
Scottoni, F, Urbani, L, Camilli, C. D1.4 Oesophageal tissue engineering: preliminary evaluation of a 2 stage surgical approach in a mouse model. Arch Dis Child. 2017; 102 (A6).Google Scholar
Okuyama, H, Umeda, S, Takama, Y, Terasawa, T, Nakayama, Y. Patch esophagoplasty using an in-body-tissue-engineered collagenous connective tissue membrane. J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53: 223–6.Google Scholar
Poghosyan, T, Sfeir, R, Michaud, L, Bruneval, P, Domet, T, Vanneaux, V, et al. Circumferential esophageal replacement using a tube-shaped tissue-engineered substitute: an experimental study in minipigs. Surgery. 2015; 158: 266–77.Google Scholar
Catry, J, Luong-Nguyen, M, Arakelian, L, Poghosyan, T, Bruneval, P, Domet, T, et al. Circumferential esophageal replacement by a tissue-engineered substitute using mesenchymal stem cells: an experimental study in mini pigs. Cell Transplant. 2017; 26: 1831–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petsche Connell, J, Camci-Unal, G, Khademhosseini, A, Jacot, JG. Amniotic fluid-derived stem cells for cardiovascular tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013; 19: 368–79.Google Scholar
Velasquez-Mao, AJ, Tsao, CJM, Monroe, MN, Legras, X, Bissig-Choisat, B, Bissig, KD, et al. Differentiation of spontaneously contracting cardiomyocytes from non-virally reprogrammed human amniotic fluid stem cells. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0177824.Google Scholar
Nolan, HR, Gurria, J, Peiro, JL, Tabbah, S, Diaz-Primera, R, Polzin, W, et al. Congenital high airway obstruction syndrome (CHAOS): Natural history, prenatal management strategies, and outcomes at a single comprehensive fetal center. J Pediatr Surg. 2019; 54:1153–1158.Google Scholar
Lange, P, Fishman, JM, Elliott, MJ, De Coppi, P, Birchall, MA. What can regenerative medicine offer for infants with laryngotracheal agenesis? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 145: 544–50.Google Scholar
Atala, A, Bauer, SB, Soker, S, Yoo, JJ, Retik, AB. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet. 2006; 367: 1241–6.Google Scholar
Corre, P, Merceron, C, Longis, J, Khonsari, RH, Pilet, P, Thi, TN, et al. Direct comparison of current cell-based and cell-free approaches towards the repair of craniofacial bone defects – a preclinical study. Acta Biomater. 2015; 26: 306–17.Google Scholar
Steigman, SA, Ahmed, A, Shanti, RM, Tuan, RS, Valim, C, Fauza, DO. Sternal repair with bone grafts engineered from amniotic mesenchymal stem cells. J Pediatr Surg. 2009; 44: 1120–6.Google Scholar
Klein, JD, Turner, CGB, Ahmed, A, Steigman, SA, Zurakowski, D, Fauza, DO. Chest wall repair with engineered fetal bone grafts: an efficacy analysis in an autologous leporine model. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45: 1354–60.Google Scholar
Turner, CG, Klein, JD, Gray, FL, Ahmed, A, Zurakowski, D, Fauza, DO. Craniofacial repair with fetal bone grafts engineered from amniotic mesenchymal stem cells. J Surg Res. 2012; 178: 785–90.Google Scholar
Ranzoni, AM, Corcelli, M, Hau, K-L, Kerns, JG, Vanleene, M, Shefelbine, S, et al. Counteracting bone fragility with human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 39656.Google Scholar
Flake, AW, Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Zanjani, ED. Transplantation of fetal hematopoietic stem cells in utero: the creation of hematopoietic chimeras. Science. 1986; 233: 776–8.Google Scholar
Liechty, KW, Mackenzie, TC, Shaaban, AF, Radu, A, Moseley, AMB, Deans, R, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation after in utero transplantation in sheep. Nat Med. 2000; 6: 1282–6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×