Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:54:05.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 46 - Spine and Joint Disorders in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)

from Section 5 - Late Pregnancy – Maternal Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

David James
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Get access

Summary

During pregnancy, maternal anatomic changes present mechanical challenges to the musculoskeletal system. The enlarging gravid uterus alters the maternal body’s center of gravity, mechanically stressing the axial and pelvic systems, compounding the stresses brought about by the hormonal changes and fluid retention associated with pregnancy.

Type
Chapter
Information
High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
, pp. 1366 - 1396
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Betz, RR, Bunnell, WP, Lombrecht-Mulier, E, et al. Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69: 90–6.Google Scholar
Borg-Stein, J, Dugan, SA, Gruber, J. Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 180–92.Google Scholar
Danielsson, AJ, Nachemson, AL. Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case–control study. Spine 2001; 26: 1449–56.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, LT, Weiss, G, Steinetz, BG. Relaxin and its role in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1995; 24: 171–86.Google Scholar
Grahame, R, Bird, HA, Child, A. The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS). J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 1777–9.Google Scholar
Mens, JM, Pool-Goudzwaard, A, Stam, HJ. Mobility of the pelvic joints in pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009; 64: 200–8.Google Scholar
Sierra, RJ, Trousdale, RT, Cabanela, ME. Pregnancy and childbirth after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 21–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, MW, Marcus, PS, Wurtz, LD. Orthopedic issues in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008; 63: 103–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, WH, Meijer, OG, Uegaki, K, et al. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J 2004; 13: 575–89.Google Scholar
Wurdinger, S, Humbsch, K, Reichenbach, JR, et al. MRI of the pelvic ring joints postpartum: normal and pathologic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 324–9.Google Scholar

References

Stapleton, DB, MacLennan, AH, Kristiansson, P. The prevalence of recalled low back pain during and after pregnancy: a South Australian population survey. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42: 482–5.Google Scholar
Pennick, VE, Young, G. Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2): CD001139.Google Scholar
Wu, WH, Meijer, OG, Uegaki, K, et al. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J 2004; 13: 575–89.Google Scholar
Walde, J. Obstetrical and gynecological back and pelvic pains, especially those contracted during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1962; 41 (Suppl 2): 1153.Google Scholar
Brynnildsen, J, Hansson, A, Persson, A, Hammar, M. Follow-up of patients with low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 182–6.Google Scholar
Berg, G, Hammar, M, Möller-Nielsen, J, Lindén, U, Thorblad, J. Low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 71–5.Google Scholar
Fast, A, Weiss, L, Parikh, S, Hertz, G. Night backache in pregnancy: hypothetical pathophysiological mechanisms. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 68: 227–9.Google Scholar
Albert, HB, Godskesen, M, Westergaard, JG. Incidence of four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Spine 2002; 27: 2831–4.Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, A, Nagandla, K. Musculoskeletal symptoms and orthopaedic complications in pregnancy: pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches and modern management. Postgrad Med J 2014; 90: 450–60.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, LT, Weiss, G, Steinetz, BG. Relaxin and its role in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1995; 24: 171–86.Google Scholar
Kristiansson, P, Svardsudd, K, von Schoultz, B. Serum relaxin, symphyseal pain, and back pain during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 1342–7.Google Scholar
Mens, JM, Pool-Goudzwaard, A, Stam, HJ. Mobility of the pelvic joints in pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009; 64: 200–8.Google Scholar
Björklund, K, Bergström, S, Nordström, ML, Ulmsten, U. Symphyseal distention in relation to serum relaxin levels and pelvic pain in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 269–75.Google Scholar
Wong, CA, Scavone, BM, Dugan, S, et al. Incidence of postpartum lumbosacral spine and lower extremity nerve injuries. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 279–88.Google Scholar
Bushnell, LF. Postural backache of the gynecic patient. Clin Orthop 1955; 5: 164–8.Google Scholar
Ostgaard, HC, Anderson, GBJ, Schultz, AB, et al. Influence of some biomechanical factors on low-back pain in pregnancy. Spine 1993; 18: 61–5.Google Scholar
Bullock, JE, Jull, GA, Bullock, M. The relationship of low back pain to postural changes during pregnancy. Aust J Physiother 1987; 33: 1017.Google Scholar
Rodacki, CL, Fowler, NE, Rodacki, AL, et al. Stature loss and recovery in pregnant women with and without low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 507–12.Google Scholar
Grahame, R, Bird, HA, Child, A. The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS). J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 1777–9.Google Scholar
Sanderson, PL, Fraser, RD. The influence of pregnancy on the development of degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 951–4.Google Scholar
Brown, MD, Levi, AD. Surgery for lumbar disc herniation during pregnancy. Spine 2001; 26: 440–3.Google Scholar
De Wilde, JP, Rivers, AW, Price, DL. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005; 87: 335–53.Google Scholar
Smith, MW, Marcus, PS, Wurtz, LD. Orthopedic issues in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008; 63: 103–11.Google Scholar
Kathirgamanathan, A, Jardine, AD, Levy, DM, Grevitt, MP. Lumbar disc surgery in the third trimester: with the fetus in utero. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 181–2.Google Scholar
Desai, P, Suk, M. Orthopedic trauma in pregnancy. Am J Orthop 2007; 36: E160–6.Google Scholar
Wells, J. Osteitis condensans ilii. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1956; 76: 1141–3.Google Scholar
Shipp, FL, Haggart, GE. Further experience in the management of osteitis condensans ilii. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1950; 32: 841–7.Google Scholar
Borg-Stein, J, Dugan, SA, Gruber, J. Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy: Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 180–92.Google Scholar
Stuge, B, Laerum, E, Kirkesola, G, et al. The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy. Spine 2004; 29: 351–9.Google Scholar
Institute of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy and Post-Partum. Version 1.0, Guideline 16. Dublin: RCPI, 2014.Google Scholar
Naumburg, E, Bellocco, R, Cnattingius, S, et al. Intrauterine exposure to diagnostic x-rays and risk of childhood leukemia subtypes. Radiat Res 2001; 156: 718–23.Google Scholar
Stuge, B, Garratt, A, Krogstad Jenssen, H, Grotle, M. The Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire: a condition-specific instrument for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in people with pelvic girdle pain. Phys Ther 2011; 91: 1096–108.Google Scholar
Casagrande, D, Gugala, Z, Clark, SM, Lindsey, RW. Low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23: 539–49. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00248.Google Scholar
Jain, S, Eedarapalli, P, Jamjute, P, Sawdy, P. Symphysis pubus dysfunction: a practical approach to management. Obstetrician Gynaecologist 2006; 8: 153–8.Google Scholar
Nilsson-Wikmar, L, Holm, K, Oijerstedt, R, et al. Effect of three different physical therapy treatments on pain and activity in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: a randomized clinical trial with 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up postpartum. Spine 2005; 30: 850–6.Google Scholar
Noren, L, Ostgaard, S, Nielsen, TF, et al. Reduction of sick leave for lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy. Spine 1997; 22: 2157–60.Google Scholar
Richardson, CA, Snijders, CJ, Hides, JA, et al. The relationship between the transversus abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low back pain. Spine 2002; 27: 399405.Google Scholar
Damen, L, Buyruk, HM, Guler-Uysal, F, et al. Pelvic pain during pregnancy is associated with asymmetrical laxity of the sacroiliac joints. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 1019–24.Google Scholar
Garshasbi, A, Zadeh, SF. The effect of exercise on the intensity of low back pain in pregnant women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 88: 271–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waller, B, Lambeck, J, Daly, D. Therapeutic aquatic exercise in the treatment of low back pain: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 314.Google Scholar
Almousa, S, Lamprianidou, E, Kitsoulis, G. The effectiveness of stabilising exercises in pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy and after delivery: a systematic review. Physiother Res Int 2018; 23 (1). doi: 10.1002/pri.1699.Google Scholar
Stuber, KJ, Smith, DL. Chiropractic treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain: a systematic review of the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008; 31: 447–54.Google Scholar
Kushtagi, P, Bhanu, BT. Effectiveness of subcutaneous injection of sterile water to the lower back for pain relief in labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 231–3.Google Scholar
Fogarty, V. Intradermal sterile water injections for the relief of low back pain in labour: a systematic review of the literature. Women Birth 2008; 21: 157–63.Google Scholar
Mårtensson, L, Wallin, G. Sterile water injections as treatment for low-back pain during labour: a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48: 369–74.Google Scholar
Pennick, V, Liddle, SD. Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 (8): CD001139.Google Scholar
Röst, CC, Jacqueline, J, Kaiser, A, Verhagen, AP, Koes, BW. Prognosis of women with pelvic pain during pregnancy: a long-term follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 771–7.Google Scholar
Robinson, HS, Mengshoel, AM, Bjelland, EK, Vøllestad, NK. Pelvic girdle pain, clinical tests and disability in late pregnancy. Man Ther 2010; 15: 280–5.Google Scholar
Albert, H, Godskesen, M, Westergaard, J. Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 505–10.Google Scholar
Weinstein, SL. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Prevalence and natural history. In Weinstein, SL (ed), The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice. New York, NY: Raven, 1994, pp. 463–78.Google Scholar
Betz, RR, Bunnell, WP, Lombrecht-Mulier, E, et al. Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69: 90–6.Google Scholar
Danielsson, AJ, Nachemson, AL. Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Spine 2001; 26: 1449–56.Google Scholar
To, WW, Wong, MW. Kyphoscoliosis complicating pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996; 55: 123–8.Google Scholar
Reddy, R, Evans, E, Khoo, O, Allen, MB. Pregnancy in kyphoscoliosis: benefit of non-invasive ventilatory support. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 267–8.Google Scholar
Costello, JF, Balki, M. Cesarean delivery under ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in a parturient with poliomyelitis and Harrington instrumentation. Can J Anaesth 2008; 55: 606–11.Google Scholar
Lebel, DE Levy, A, Holcberg, G, Sheiner, E. Symphysiolysis as an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 417–20.Google Scholar
Damen, L, Buyruk, HM, Guler-Uysal, F, et al. The prognostic value of asymmetrical laxity of the sacroiliac joints in pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Spine 2002; 27: 2820–4.Google Scholar
Van Dongen, PW, De Boer, M, Lemmens, WA, et al. Hypermobility and peripartum pelvic pain syndrome in pregnant South African women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 84: 7782.Google Scholar
Scriven, MW, Jones, DA, McKnight, L. The importance of pubic pain following childbirth: a clinical and ultrasonographic study of diastasis of the pubic symphysis. J R Soc Med 1995; 88: 2830.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, K, Nordstrom, ML, Bergstrom, S. Sonographic assessment of symphyseal joint distention during pregnancy and post partum with special reference to pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 125–30.Google Scholar
Wurdinger, S, Humbsch, K, Reichenbach, JR, et al. MRI of the pelvic ring joints postpartum: normal and pathologic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 324–9.Google Scholar
Kurzel, RB, Au, AH, Rooholamini, SA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of peripartum rupture of the symphysis pubis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 826–9.Google Scholar
Depledge, J, McNair, PJ, Keal-Smith, C, Williams, M. Management of symphysis pubis dysfunction during pregnancy using exercise and pelvic support belts. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 1290–300.Google Scholar
Rommens, PM. Internal fixation in postpartum symphysis rupture: report of three cases. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 273–6.Google Scholar
Dunbar, RP, Ries, AM. Puerperal diastasis of the pubic symphysis: a case report. J Reprod Med 2002; 47: 581–3.Google Scholar
Heath, T, Gherman, RB. Symphyseal separation, sacroiliac joint dislocation and transient lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy associated with McRobert’s manoeuvre: a case report. J Reprod Med 1999; 44: 902–4.Google Scholar
Kharrazi, FD, Rodgers, WB, Kennedy, JG, Lhowe, DW. Parturition-induced pelvic dislocation: a report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 277–81.Google Scholar
Jain, N, Sternberg, LB. Symphyseal separation. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 1229–32.Google Scholar
Lindsey, RW, Leggon, RE, Wright, DG, et al. Separation of the symphysis pubis in association with childbearing: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 289–92.Google Scholar
Dhar, S, Anderton, J. Rupture of the symphysis pubis during labor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 283: 252–7.Google Scholar
Luger, EJ, Arbel, R, Dekel, S. Traumatic separation of the symphysis pubis during pregnancy: a case report. J Trauma 1995; 38: 255–6.Google Scholar
Giannoudis, PV, Chalidis, BE, Roberts, CS. Internal fixation of traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis: is plate removal essential? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128: 325–31.Google Scholar
Kowalk, DL, Perdue, PS, Bourgeois, FJ, et al. Disruption of the symphysis pubis during vaginal delivery: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 1746–8.Google Scholar
Culligan, P, Hill, S, Heit, M. Rupture of the symphysis pubis during vaginal delivery followed by two subsequent uneventful pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 1114–17.Google Scholar
Gonik, B, Stringer, A. Postpartum osteitis pubis. South Med J 1985; 78: 213–14.Google Scholar
Borg-Stein, J, Dugan, S., Musculoskeletal disorders of pregnancy, delivery and postpartum. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2007; 18: 459–76.Google Scholar
Maksymowych, WP, Aaron, SL, Rusel, AS. Treatment of refractory symphysitis pubis with intravenous pamidronate. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 2754–7.Google Scholar
Magnusdottir, R, Franklin, J, Gestsson, J. Septic symphysial disruption presenting as severe symphysiolysis in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 681–2.Google Scholar
Lovisetti, G, Sala, F, Battaini, A, Lovisetti, L, Guicciardi, E. Osteomyelitis of the pubic symphysis, abscess and late disjunction after delivery: a case report. Chir Organi Mov 2000; 85: 85–8.Google Scholar
Moran, JJ. Stress fractures in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 1274–7.Google Scholar
Mikawa, Y, Watanabe, R, Yamano, Y, et al. Stress fracture of the body of pubis in a pregnant woman. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1988; 107: 193–4.Google Scholar
Almog, G, Liebergall, M, Tsafrir, A, Barzilay, Y, Mosheiff, R. Management of pelvic fractures during pregnancy. Am J Orthop 2007; 36: E153–9.Google Scholar
Leggon, RE, Wood, GC, Indeck, MC. Pelvic fractures in pregnancy: factors influencing maternal and fetal outcomes. J Trauma 2002; 53: 796804.Google Scholar
Porter, SE, Russell, GV, Qin, Z, Graves, ML. Operative fixation of acetabular fractures in the pregnant patient. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22: 508–16.Google Scholar
Madsen, LV, Jensen, J, Christensen, ST. Parturition and pelvic fracture. follow-up of 34 obstetric patients with a history of pelvic fracture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 62: 617–20.Google Scholar
Funk, JL, Shoback, DM, Genant, HK. Transient osteoporosis of the hip in pregnancy: natural history of changes in bone mineral density. Clin Endocrinol 1995; 43: 373–82.Google Scholar
Lequesne, M. Transient osteoporosis of the hip: a nontraumatic variety of Sudecks atrophy. Ann Rheum Dis 1968; 27: 463–71.Google Scholar
Bruinsma, BJ, LaBan, MM. The ghost joint: transient osteoporosis of the hip. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 295–8.Google Scholar
Guerra, JJ, Steinberg, ME. Distinguishing transient osteoporosis from avascular necrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 616–24.Google Scholar
Shifrin, LZ, Reis, ND, Zinman, H, Besser, MI. Idiopathic transient osteoporosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69: 769–73.Google Scholar
Curtiss, PH, Kincaid, WE. Transitory demineralization of the hip in pregnancy: A report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959; 41: 1327–33.Google Scholar
Montella, BJ, Nunley, JA, Urbaniak, JR. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head associated with pregnancy: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 790–8.Google Scholar
Sierra, RJ, Trousdale, RT, Cabanela, ME. Pregnancy and childbirth after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 21–4.Google Scholar
McDowell, CM, Lachiewicz, PF. Pregnancy after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 1490–4.Google Scholar
Meldrum, R, Feinberg, JR, Capello, WN, et al. Clinical outcome and incidence of pregnancy after bipolar and total hip arthroplasty in young women. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 879–85.Google Scholar
Loder, RT. The long-term effect of pelvic osteotomy on birth canal size. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 2934.Google Scholar
Masui, T. Hasegawa, T, Yamaguchi, J, et al. Childbirth and sexual activity after eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 459: 195–9.Google Scholar
Zyluk, A. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy: a review. Pol Orthop Traumatol 2013; 78: 223–7.Google Scholar
Balik, G, Sabri Balik, M, Ustüner, I, et al. Hand and wrist complaints in pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290: 479–83.Google Scholar
Moghtaderi, AR, Moghtaderi, N, Loghmani, A. Evaluating the effectiveness of local desamethasone injection in pregnant women with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Res Med Sci 2011; 16: 687–90.Google Scholar
Mondelli, M, Rossi, S, Monti, E, et al. Long term follow-up of carpal tunnel syndrome during pregnancy: a cohort study and review of the literature. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 47: 259–71.Google Scholar
van Slobbe, AM, Bohnyen, AM, Byernsen, RM, et al. Incidence rates and determinants in meralgia paresthetica in general practice. J. Neurol 2004; 251: 294–7.Google Scholar
Klein, A. Peripheral nerve disease in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56: 382–8.Google Scholar
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. De Quervain’s tenosynovitis. http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=a00007 (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×