Couser, P.R., Wellicome, J.F. and Molland, A.F. Experimental measurement of sideforce and induced drag on catamaran demihulls. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 45(443), 1998, pp. 225–235.Google Scholar

Lackenby, H. An investigation into the nature and interdependence of the components of ship resistance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 107, 1965, pp. 474–501.Google Scholar

Insel, M. and Molland, A.F. An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 134, 1992, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F. and Utama, I.K.A.P. Experimental and numerical investigations into the drag characteristics of a pair of ellipsoids in close proximity. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, Vol. 216, Part M, 2002, pp. 107–115.Google Scholar

Savitsky, D., DeLorme, M.F. and Datla, R. Inclusion of whisker spray drag in performance prediction method for high-speed planing hulls. Marine Technology, SNAME, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2007, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar

Clayton, B.R. and Bishop, R.E.D. Mechanics of Marine Vehicles. E. and F.N. Spon, London, 1982.Google Scholar

Faltinsen, O.M. Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005.Google Scholar

Claughton, A.R., Wellicome, J.R. and Shenoi, R.A. (eds). Sailing Yacht Design. Vol. 1 Theory, Vol. 2 Practice. The University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2006.Google Scholar

Larsson, L. and Eliasson, R. Principles of Yacht Design. 3rd Edition. Adlard Coles Nautical, London, 2007.Google Scholar

Crewe, P.R. and Eggington, W.J. The hovercraft – a new concept in marine transport. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 102, 1960, pp. 315–365.Google Scholar

Crewe, P.R. The hydrofoil boat: its history and future prospects. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 100, 1958, pp. 329–373.Google Scholar

Yun, L. and Bliault, A. Theory and Design of Air Cushion Craft. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2005.Google Scholar

Froude, R.E. On the ‘constant’ system of notation of results of experiments on models used at the Admiralty Experiment Works, Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 29, 1888, pp. 304–318.Google Scholar

Taylor, D.W. The Speed and Power of Ships. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1943.Google Scholar

Lackenby, H. On the presentation of ship resistance data. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 96, 1954, pp. 471–497.Google Scholar

Telfer, E.V. The design presentation of ship model resistance data. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 79, 1962–1963, pp. 357–390.Google Scholar

Doust, D.J. Optimised trawler forms. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 79, 1962–1963, pp. 95–136.Google Scholar

Sabit, A.S. Regression analysis of the resistance results of the BSRA Series. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 18, No. 197, January 1971, pp. 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Froude, W. Experiments on the surface-friction experienced by a plane moving through water. 42nd Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Brighton, 1872.Google Scholar

ITTC. Recommended procedure for the resistance test. Procedure 7.5–0.2-0.2-0.1 Revision 01, 2002.Google Scholar

ITTC. Recommended procedure for ship models. Procedure 7.5-01-01-01, Revision 01, 2002.Google Scholar

Hughes, G. and Allan, J.F. Turbulence stimulation on ship models. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 59, 1951, pp. 281–314.Google Scholar

Barnaby, K.C. Basic Naval Architecture. Hutchinson, London, 1963.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F., Wellicome, J.F. and Couser, P.R. Resistance experiments on a systematic series of high speed displacement catamaran forms: Variation of length-displacement ratio and breadth-draught ratio. University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 71, 1994.Google Scholar

Hughes, G. Tank boundary effects on model resistance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 103, 1961, pp. 421–440.Google Scholar

Scott, J.R. A blockage corrector. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 108, 1966, pp. 153–163.Google Scholar

Scott, J.R. Blockage correction at sub-critical speeds. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 118, 1976, pp. 169–179.Google Scholar

Coleman, H.W. and Steele, W.G. Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers. 2nd Edition. Wiley, New York, 1999.Google Scholar

ITTC. Final report of The Specialist Committee on Model Tests of High Speed Marine Vehicles. Proceedings of the 22nd International Towing Tank Conference, Seoul and Shanghai, 1999.Google Scholar

Renilson, M. Predicting the hydrodynamic performance of very high-speed craft: A note on some of the problems. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 149, 2007, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar

Duncan, W.J., Thom, A.S. and Young, A.D. Mechanics of Fluids. Edward Arnold, Port Melbourne, Australia, 1974.Google Scholar

Massey, B.S. and Ward-Smith, J. Mechanics of Fluids. 8th Edition. Taylor and Francis, London, 2006.Google Scholar

Froude, W. Report to the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty on experiments for the determination of the frictional resistance of water on a surface, under various conditions, performed at Chelston Cross, under the Authority of their Lordships. 44th Report by the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Belfast, 1874.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F. and Turnock, S.R. Marine Rudders and Control Surfaces. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007.Google Scholar

Allan, J.F. Some results of scale effect experiments on a twin-screw hull series. Transactions of the Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland, Vol. 93, 1949/50, pp. 353–381.Google Scholar

Lackenby, H. BSRA resistance experiments on the Lucy Ashton. Part III. The ship model correlation for the shaft appendage conditions. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 97, 1955, pp. 109–166.Google Scholar

Hoerner, S.F. Fluid-Dynamic Drag. Published by the Author. Washington, DC, 1965.Google Scholar

Mandel, P. Some hydrodynamic aspects of appendage design. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 61, 1953, pp. 464–515.Google Scholar

Peck, R.W. The determination of appendage resistance of surface ships. AEW Technical Memorandum, 76020, 1976.Google Scholar

Kirkman, K.L. and Kloetzli, J.N. Scaling problems of model appendages, Proceedings of the 19th ATTC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1981.Google Scholar

Tulin, M.P. Supercavitating flow past foil and struts. Proceedings of Symposium on Cavitation in Hydrodynamics. NPL, 1955.Google Scholar

Rutgersson, O. Propeller-hull interaction problems on high-speed ships: on the influence of cavitation. Symposium on Small Fast Warships and Security Vessels. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, 1982.Google Scholar

Holtrop, J. and Mennen, G.G.J. An approximate power prediction method. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 29, No. 335, July 1982, pp. 166–170.Google Scholar

van Berlekom, W.B., Trägårdh, P. and Dellhag, A. Large tankers – wind coefficients and speed loss due to wind and waves. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 117, 1975, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar

Shearer, K.D.A. and Lynn, W.M. Wind tunnel tests on models of merchant ships. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 76, 1960, pp. 229–266.Google Scholar

White, G.P. Wind resistance – suggested procedure for correction of ship trial results. NPL TM116, 1966.Google Scholar

Gould, R.W.F. The estimation of wind loadings on ship superstructures. RINA Marine Technology Monograph 8, 1982.Google Scholar

Isherwood, R.M. Wind resistance of merchant ships. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 115, 1973, pp. 327–338.Google Scholar

van Berlekom, W.B. Wind forces on modern ship forms–effects on performance. Transactions of the North East Coast Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 97, No. 4, 1981, pp. 123–134.Google Scholar

Blendermann, W. Estimation of wind loads on ships in wind with a strong gradient. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering (OMAE), New York, ASME, Vol. 1-A, 1995, pp. 271–277.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F. and Barbeau, T.-E. An investigation into the aerodynamic drag on the superstructures of fast catamarans. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 145, 2003, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar

Reddy, K.R., Tooletto, R. and Jones, K.R.W. Numerical simulation of ship airwake. Computers and Fluids, Vol. 29, 2000.Google Scholar

Sezer-Uzol, N., Sharma, A. and Long, L.N. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of ship airwake. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 219, Part G, 2005, pp. 369–392.Google Scholar

Wakefield, N.H., Newman, S.J. and Wilson, P.A. Helicopter flight around a ship's superstructure. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 216, Part G, 2002, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar

Moat, I, Yelland, M., Pascal, R.W. and Molland, A.F. Quantifying the airflow distortion over merchant ships. Part I. Validation of a CFD Model. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 23, 2006, pp. 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moat, I, Yelland, M., Pascal, R.W. and Molland, A.F. Quantifying the airflow distortion over merchant ships. Part II. Application of the model results. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 23, 2006, pp. 351–360.Google Scholar

ITTC. Report of Resistance Committee. 25th ITTC, Fukuoka, Japan, 2008.Google Scholar

Hucho, W.H. (ed.) Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles. 4th Edition. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, USA, 1998.Google Scholar

Anonymous, . Emissions are a drag. The Naval Architect, RINA, London, January 2009, pp. 28–31.Google Scholar

Grigson, C.W.B. The drag coefficients of a range of ship surfaces. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 123, 1981, pp. 195–208.Google Scholar

Candries, M. and Atlar, M. On the drag and roughness characteristics of antifoulings. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 145, 2003, pp. 107–132.Google Scholar

Townsin, R.L. The ITTC line–its genesis and correlation allowance. The Naval Architect, RINA, London, September 1985, pp. E359–E362.Google Scholar

ITTC. Report of the Specialist Committee on Powering Performance Prediction, Proceedings of the 25th International Towing Tank Conference, Vol. 2, Fukuoka, Japan, 2008.Google Scholar

Townsin, R.L., Byrne, D., Milne, A. and Svensen, T. Speed, power and roughness – the economics of outer bottom maintenance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 122, 1980, pp. 459–483.Google Scholar

Aertssen, G. Service-performance and seakeeping trials on MV Lukuga. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 105, 1963, pp. 293–335.Google Scholar

Aertssen, G. Service-performance and seakeeping trials on MV Jordaens. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 108, 1966, pp. 305–343.Google Scholar

Aertssen, G., Ferdinande, V. and de Lembre, R. Service-performance and seakeeping trials on a stern trawler. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 83, 1966–1967, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar

Aertssen, G. and Van Sluys, M.F. Service-performance and seakeeping trials on a large containership. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 114, 1972, pp. 429–447.Google Scholar

Aertssen, G. Service performance and trials at sea. App.V Performance Committee, 12th ITTC, 1969.Google Scholar

Townsin, R.L., Moss, B, Wynne, J.B. and Whyte, I.M. Monitoring the speed performance of ships. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 91, 1975, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar

Carlton, J.S. Marine Propellers and Propulsion. 2nd Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007.Google Scholar

Atlar, M., Glover, E.J., Candries, M., Mutton, R. and Anderson, C.D. The effect of foul release coating on propeller performance. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Marine Research for Environmental Sustainability ENSUS 2002, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2002.Google Scholar

Atlar, M., Glover, E.J., Mutton, R. and Anderson, C.D. Calculation of the effects of new generation coatings on high speed propeller performance. Proceedings of 2nd International Warship Cathodic Protection Symposium and Equipment Exhibition. Cranfield University, Shrivenham, UK, 2003.Google Scholar

Okuno, T., Lewkowicz, A.K. and Nicholson, K. Roughness effects on a slender ship hull. Second International Symposium on Ship Viscous Resistance, SSPA, Gothenburg, 1985, pp. 20.1–20.27.Google Scholar

Lewthwaite, J.C., Molland, A.F. and Thomas, K.W. An investigation into the variation of ship skin frictional resistance with fouling. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 127, 1985, pp. 269–284.Google Scholar

Cutland, R.S. Velocity measurements in close proximity to a ship's hull. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders. Vol. 74, 1958, pp. 341–356.Google Scholar

Satchwell, C.J. Windship technology and its application to motor ships. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 131, 1989, pp. 105–120.Google Scholar

Townsin, R.L. and Kwon, Y.J. Approximate formulae for the speed loss due to added resistance in wind and waves. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 125, 1983, pp. 199–207.Google Scholar

Townsin, R.L., Kwon, Y.J., Baree, M.S. and Kim, D.Y. Estimating the influence of weather on ship performance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 135, 1993, pp. 191–209.Google Scholar

ITTC. Report of the Seakeeping Committee, Proceedings of the 25th International Towing Tank Conference, Vol. 1, Fukuoka, Japan, 2008.Google Scholar

Aertssen, G. The effect of weather on two classes of container ship in the North Atlantic. The Naval Architect, RINA, London, January 1975, p. 11.Google Scholar

Kwon, Y.J. Estimating the effect of wind and waves on ship speed and performance. The Naval Architect, RINA, London, September 2000.Google Scholar

Kwon, Y.J. Speed loss due to added resistance in wind and waves. The Naval Architect, RINA, London, March 2008, pp. 14–16.Google Scholar

Hogben, N. and Lumb, F.E. Ocean Wave Statistics. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1967.Google Scholar

Hogben, N., Dacunha, N.M.C. and Oliver, G.F. Global Wave Statistics. Compiled and edited by British Maritime Technology, Unwin Brothers, Old Woking, UK, 1985.Google Scholar

ITTC. Report of The Specialist Committee on Powering Performance and Prediction. Proceedings of the 24th International Towing Tank Conference, Vol. 2, Edinburgh, UK, 2005.Google Scholar

Woodyard, D.F. Pounder's Marine Diesel Engines and Gas Turbines. 8th Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2004.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F. (ed.) The Maritime Engineering Reference Book. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2008.Google Scholar

Burcher, R.K. and Rydill, L.J. Concepts in Submarine Design. Cambridge Ocean Technology Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renilson, M. Submarine Hydrodynamics. Springer Science and Business Media, London, 2015.Google Scholar