Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T22:36:49.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2017

Anthony F. Molland ,
Stephen R. Turnock  and
Dominic A. Hudson
Anthony F. Molland
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Stephen R. Turnock
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Dominic A. Hudson
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ship Resistance and Propulsion
Practical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power
 , pp. 174 - 197
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References (Chapter 9)

Ferziger, J.H. and Peric, M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Axel-Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best Practice Guidelines for Marine Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics, W.S. Atkins Ltd., Epsom, UK, 2003.Google Scholar
Molland, A.F. and Turnock, S.R. Marine Rudders and Control Surfaces. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007, Chapter 6. pp. 233–31.Google Scholar
Larsson, L. SSPA-ITTC Workshop on Ship Boundary Layers. SSPA Publication No. 90, Ship Boundary Layer Workshop Göteburg, 1980.Google Scholar
Larsson, L., Patel, V., Dyne, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1990 SSPA-CTH-IIHR Workshop on Ship Viscous Flow. Flowtech International Report No. 2, 1991.Google Scholar
Kodama, Y., Takeshi, H., Hinatsu, M., Hino, T., Uto, S., Hirata, N. and Murashige, S. (eds.) Proceedings, CFD Workshop. Ship Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan. 1994.Google Scholar
Tahara, Y. and Stern, , , F. A large-domain approach for calculating ship boundary layers and wakes and wave fields for nonzero Froude number. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 127, 1996, pp. 398–411.Google Scholar
Larsson, L., Stern, F. and Bertram, V. (eds.) Gothenburg 2000 a Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Chalmers University of Technology, CHA/NAV/R-02/0073, 2000.Google Scholar
Larsson, L., Stern, F. and Bertram, V. Benchmarking of computational fluid dynamics for ship flows: the Gothenburg 2000 workshop. Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, March 2003, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
Hino, T. Proceedings of the CFD Workshop Tokyo. National Maritime Institute of Japan, 2005.Google Scholar
Larson, L., Stern, F. and Visonneau, M. (eds.) Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics: An Assessment of the Gothenburg 2010 Workshop. Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J., Turnock, S.R., Cox, S.J., Phillips, A.B. and Vaz, G. Performance analysis of massively parallel computational fluid dynamics. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Hydrodynamics, Singapore, 2014.Google Scholar
Nishikawa, T., Yamade, Y., Sakuma, M. and Kato, C. Fully resolved large eddy simulation as an alternative to towing tank tests – 32 billion cells computation on K computer. Numerical Towing Tank Symposium, (NUTTS), Mülheim, Germany, 2013.Google Scholar
Landweber, L. and Patel, V.C. Ship boundary layers. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 11, 1979, pp. 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.V., Carrica, P.M. and Stern, F. Simulation of ship breaking bow waves and induced vortices and scars. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 54, pp. 419–451.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G.K. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1967.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D.C. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. 2nd Edition DCW Industries, La Canada, CA, 1998.Google Scholar
Pattenden, R.J., Bressloff, N.W., Turnock, S.R. and Zhang, X. Unsteady simulations of the flow around a short surface-mounted cylinder. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 53, No. 6, 2007, pp. 895–914.Google Scholar
Hess, J.L. Panel methods in computational fluid dynamics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 22, 1990, pp. 255–274.Google Scholar
Katz, J. and Plotkin, A. Low Speed Aerodynamics: From Wing Theory to Panel Methods. Mcgraw-Hill, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Hirt, C.W. and Nicolls, B.D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 39, No. 1, January 1981, pp. 201–225.Google Scholar
Sethian, J.A. and Smereka, P. Level set method for fluid interfaces. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 35, 2003, pp. 341–372.Google Scholar
Farmer, J., Martinelli, L. and Jameson, A. A fast multigrid method for solving incompressible hydrodynamic problems with free surfaces, AIAA-93-0767, pp. 15.Google Scholar
Newman, J. Marine Hydrodynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1977.Google Scholar
Godderidge, B., Turnock, S.R., Earl, C. and Tan, M. The effect of fluid compressibility on the simulation of sloshing impacts. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 8, 2009, pp. 578–587.Google Scholar
Godderidge, B., Turnock, S.R., Tan, M. and Earl, C. An investigation of multiphase CFD modelling of a lateral sloshing tank. Computers and Fluids, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2009, pp. 183–193.Google Scholar
Gleick, J. Chaos, the Amazing Science of the Unpredictable. William Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH, 1988.Google Scholar
Wright, A.M. Automated adaptation of spatial grids for flow solutions around marine bodies of complex geometry. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 2000.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.F., Soni, B.K. and Weatherill, N.P. (eds.) Handbook of Grid Generation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowacki, H., Bloor, M.I.G. and Oleksiewicz, B. (eds.) Computational geometry for ships, World Scientific Publishing, London, 1995.Google Scholar
CFD Online. www.cfd-online.com Last accessed May 2010.Google Scholar
Insel, M. An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 1990.Google Scholar
Couser, P.R. An investigation into the performance of high-speed catamarans in calm water and waves. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 1996.Google Scholar
Couser, P.R., Wellicome, J.F. and Molland, A.F. An improved method for the theoretical prediction of the wave resistance of transom stern hulls using a slender body approach. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 45, No. 444, 1998, pp. 331–349.Google Scholar
ShipShape User Manual, Wolfson Unit MTIA, University of Southampton, 1990.Google Scholar
Insel, M., Molland, A.F. and Wellicome, J.F. Wave resistance prediction of a catamaran by linearised theory. Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Computer Aided Design, Manufacture and Operation, CADMO’94. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, UK, 1994.Google Scholar
Doctors, L.J. Resistance prediction for transom-stern vessels. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’97, Sydney, 1997.Google Scholar
Molland, A.F., Wilson, P.A. and Taunton, D.J. Theoretical prediction of the characteristics of ship generated near-field wash waves. Ship Science Report No. 125, University of Southampton, November 2002.Google Scholar
Phillips, A.B. Simulations of a self propelled autonomous underwater vehicle, Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 2010.Google Scholar
Phillips, A.B., Turnock, S.R. and Furlong, M.E. Evaluation of manoeuvring coefficients of a self-propelled ship using a blade element momentum propeller model coupled to a Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes flow solver. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 36, 2009, pp. 1217–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansys CFX User Guide v11, Ansys, Canonsburg, PA, 2007.Google Scholar
Phillips, A.B., Turnock, S.R. and Furlong, M.E. Accurate capture of rudder-propeller interaction using a coupled blade element momentum-RANS approach. Ship Technology Research (Schiffstechnik), Vol. 57, No. 2, 2010, pp. 128–139.Google Scholar
Windén, B., Turnock, S.R. and Hudson, D.A. A RANS modelling approach for predicting powering performance of ships in waves. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 6, Issue 2, June 2014. pp. 418–430.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×