Book contents
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionSecond Edition
- Ship Resistance and Propulsion
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Nomenclature
- Abbreviations
- Figure Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Propulsive Power
- 3 Components of Hull Resistance
- 4 Model–Ship Extrapolation
- 5 Model–Ship Correlation
- 6 Restricted Water Depth and Breadth
- 7 Measurement of Resistance Components
- 8 Wake and Thrust Deduction
- 9 Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance
- 10 Resistance Design Data
- 11 Propulsor Types
- 12 Propeller Characteristics
- 13 Powering Process
- 14 Hull Form Design
- 15 Numerical Methods for Propeller Analysis
- 16 Propulsor Design Data
- 17 Reductions in Propulsive Power and Emissions
- 18 Applications
- Book part
- Index
- References
7 - Measurement of Resistance Components
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 August 2017
Book contents
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionSecond Edition
- Ship Resistance and Propulsion
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Nomenclature
- Abbreviations
- Figure Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Propulsive Power
- 3 Components of Hull Resistance
- 4 Model–Ship Extrapolation
- 5 Model–Ship Correlation
- 6 Restricted Water Depth and Breadth
- 7 Measurement of Resistance Components
- 8 Wake and Thrust Deduction
- 9 Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance
- 10 Resistance Design Data
- 11 Propulsor Types
- 12 Propeller Characteristics
- 13 Powering Process
- 14 Hull Form Design
- 15 Numerical Methods for Propeller Analysis
- 16 Propulsor Design Data
- 17 Reductions in Propulsive Power and Emissions
- 18 Applications
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionPractical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power, pp. 113 - 148Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References (Chapter 7)
ITTC International Towing Tank Conference. Register of Recommended Procedures. Accessed via www.ittc.info. Last accessed January 2017.Google Scholar
Coleman, H.W. and Steele, W.G. Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers. 2nd Edition. Wiley, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
ISO (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organisation for Standardisation, Genève, Switzerland. ISO ISBN 92-67-10188-9, 1995.Google Scholar
Lofdahl, L. and Gad-el-Hak, M., MEMS-based pressure and shear stress sensors for turbulent flows. Measurement Science Technology, Vol. 10, 1999, pp. 665–686.Google Scholar
Fernholz, H.H., Janke, G., Schober, M., Wagner, P.M. and Warnack, D., New developments and applications of skin-friction measuring techniques. Measurement Science Technology, Vol. 7, 1996, pp. 1396–1409.Google Scholar
Patel, V.C. Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 23, 1965, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar
Steele, B.N. and Pearce, G.B. Experimental determination of the distribution of skin friction on a model of a high speed liner. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 110, 1968, pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
Shearer, J.R. and Steele, B.N. Some aspects of the resistance of full form ships. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 112, 1970, pp. 465–486.Google Scholar
Ireland, P.T. and Jones, T.V. Liquid crystal measurements of heat transfer and surface shear stress. Measurement Science Technology, Vol. 11, 2000, pp. 969–986.Google Scholar
Shearer, J.R. and Cross, J.J. The experimental determination of the components of ship resistance for a mathematical model. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 107, 1965, pp. 459–473.Google Scholar
Townsin, R.L. The frictional and pressure resistance of two ‘Lucy Ashton’ geosims. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 109, 1967, pp. 249–281.Google Scholar
Molland, A.F. and Turnock, S.R. Wind tunnel investigation of the influence of propeller loading on ship rudder performance. University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 46, 1991.Google Scholar
Molland, A.F., Turnock, S.R. and Smithwick, J.E.T. Wind tunnel tests on the influence of propeller loading and the effect of a ship hull on skeg-rudder performance, University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 90, 1995.Google Scholar
Lewis, S.G., Hudson, D.A., Turnock, S.R. and Taunton, D.J. Impact of a free-falling wedge with water: synchronised visualisation, pressure and acceleration measurements, Fluid Dynamics Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dam, C.P. Recent experience with different methods of drag prediction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 35, 1999, pp. 751–798.Google Scholar
Giles, M.B. and Cummings, R.M. Wake integration for three-dimensional flowfield computations: theoretical development, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1999, pp. 357–365.Google Scholar
Townsin, R.L. Viscous drag from a wake survey. Measurements in the wake of a ‘Lucy Ashton’ model. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 110, 1968, pp. 301–326.Google Scholar
Townsin, R.L. The viscous drag of a ‘Victory’ model. Results from wake and wave pattern measurements. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 113, 1971, pp. 307–321.Google Scholar
Insel, M. and Molland, A.F. An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 134, 1992, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Gadd, G.E. and Hogben, N. The determination of wave resistance from measurements of the wave profile. NPL Ship Division Report No. 70, November 1965.Google Scholar
Hogben, N. and Standing, B.A. Wave pattern resistance from routine model tests. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 117, 1975, pp. 279–299.Google Scholar
Hogben, N. Automated recording and analysis of wave patterns behind towed models. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 114, 1972, pp. 127–153.Google Scholar
Insel, M. An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 1990.Google Scholar
Couser, P. An investigation into the performance of high-speed catamarans in calm water and waves. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 1996.Google Scholar
Taunton, D.J. Methods for assessing the seakeeping performance of high speed displacement monohulls and catamarans. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 2001.Google Scholar
Kim, W.J., Van, S.H., Kim, D.H., Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models, Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 31, 2001, pp. 567–578.Google Scholar
Bruun, H.H. Hot-Wire Anemometry: Principles and Signal Processing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1995.Google Scholar
Turnock, S.R., Hughes, A.W., Moss, R. and Molland, A.F. Investigation of hull-waterjet flow interaction. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’97, Sydney, Australia. Vol. 1, Baird Publications, South Yarra, Australia, July 1997, pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
Halliwell, N.A. A laser anemometer for use in ship research. University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 1, 1975.Google Scholar
International Towing Tank Conference. Uncertainty analysis: laser Doppler velocimetry calibration. Document 7.5-01-03-02, 2008, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Raffel, M., Willert, C., Werely, S. and Kompenhans, J. Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practicle Guide. 2nd Edition. Springer, New York, 2007.Google Scholar
Gui, L., Longo, J. and Stern, F. Towing tank PIV measurement system, data and uncertainty assessment for DTMB Model 5512. Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 31, 2001, pp. 336–346.Google Scholar
Pattenden, R.J., Turnock, S.R., Bissuel, M. and Pashias, C. Experiments and numerical modelling of the flow around the KVLCC2 hullform at an angle of yaw. Proceedings of 5th Osaka Colloquium on Advanced Research on Ship Viscous Flow and Hull Form Design, 2005, pp. 163–170.Google Scholar
Bissuel, M. Experimental investigation of the flow around a KVLCC2 hull for CFD validation. M.Sc. thesis, University of Southampton, 2004.Google Scholar