Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T01:43:17.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Propulsor Design Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2017

Anthony F. Molland
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Stephen R. Turnock
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Dominic A. Hudson
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ship Resistance and Propulsion
Practical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power
, pp. 395 - 450
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References (Chapter 16)

Van Manen, J.D. The choice of propeller. Marine Technology, SNAME, Vol. 3, No. 2, April 1966, pp. 158171.Google Scholar
Lewis, E.V. (ed.) Principles of Naval Architecture. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Rawson, K.J. and Tupper, E.C. Basic Ship Theory. 5th Edition, Combined Volume. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
Molland, A.F. (ed.) The Maritime Engineering Reference Book. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2008.Google Scholar
O'Brien, T.P. The Design of Marine Screw Propellers. Hutchinson and Co., London, 1969.Google Scholar
Van Lammeren, W.P.A., Van Manen, J.D. and Oosterveld, M.W.C. The Wageningen B-Screw Series. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 77, 1969, pp. 269317.Google Scholar
Dang, J., Brouwer, J., Bosman, R. and Pouw, C. Quasi-steady two-quadrant open water tests for the Wageningen propeller C- and D-series. 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden, August, 2012.Google Scholar
Dang, J., van den Boom, H.J.J. and Ligtelijn, J. The Wageningen C- and D- series propellers. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’2013, Amsterdam, 2013.Google Scholar
Gawn, R.W.L. Effects of pitch and blade width on propeller performance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 95, 1953, pp. 157193.Google Scholar
Yazaki, A. Design diagrams of modern four, five, six and seven-bladed propellers developed in Japan. 4th Naval Hydrodynamics Symposium, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1962.Google Scholar
Lingren, H. Model tests with a family of three and five bladed propellers. SSPA Paper No. 47, Gothenburg, 1961.Google Scholar
Gawn, R.W.L. and Burrill, L.C. Effect of cavitation on the performance of a series of 16 in. model propellers. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 99, 1957, pp. 690728.Google Scholar
Burrill, L.C. and Emerson, A. Propeller cavitation: some observations from 16 in. propeller tests in the new King's College Cavitation Tunnel. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 70, 1953, pp. 121150.Google Scholar
Burrill, L.C. and Emerson, A. Propeller cavitation: further tests on 16 in. propeller models in the King's College Cavitation Tunnel. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 79, 1962–1963, pp. 295320.Google Scholar
Emerson, A. and Sinclair, L. Propeller design and model experiments. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 94, No. 6, 1978, pp. 199234.Google Scholar
Carlton, J.S. Marine Propellers and Propulsion. 2nd Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
Oosterveld, M.W.C., van Oossanen, P. Further computer-analysed data of the Wageningen B-screw series. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 22, No. 251, July 1975, pp. 251262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blount, D.L. and Hubble, E.N. Sizing segmental section commercially available propellers for small craft. Propellers 1981. SNAME Symposium, 1981.Google Scholar
Baker, G.S. The effect of propeller boss diameter upon thrust and efficiency at given revolutions. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 94, 1952, pp. 92109.Google Scholar
Oosterveld, M.W.C. Wake adapted ducted propellers. NSMB Wageningen Publication No. 345, 1970.Google Scholar
Oosterveld, M.W.C. Ducted propeller characteristics. RINA Symposium on Ducted Propellers, RINA, London, 1973.Google Scholar
ITTC. Report of specialist committee on azimuthing podded propulsors. Proceedings of 25th ITTC, Vol. II. Fukuoka, 2008.Google Scholar
Molland, A.F. and Turnock, S.R. Marine Rudders and Control Surfaces. Butterworh-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
Hoerner, S.F. Fluid-Dynamic Drag. Published by the author, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Flikkema, M.B., Holtrop, J. and Van Terwisga, T.J.C. A parametric power prediction model for tractor pods. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advances in Podded Propulsion, T-POD. University of Brest, France, October 2006.Google Scholar
Stierman, E.J. The influence of the rudder on the propulsive performance of ships. Parts I and II. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 36, No. 407, 1989, pp. 303334; No. 408, 1989, pp. 405–435.Google Scholar
Funeno, I. Hydrodynamic development and propeller design method of azimuthing podded propulsion systems. Ninth Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, PRADS’2004, Lübeck-Travemünde, Germany, 2004, pp. 888893.Google Scholar
Islam, M.F., He, M. and Veitch, B. Cavitation characteristics of some pushing and pulling podded propellers. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 149, 2007, pp. 4150.Google Scholar
Islam, M.F., Molloys, S., He, M., Veitch, B., Bose, N. and Liu, P. Hydrodynamic study of podded propulsors with systematically varied geometry. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advances in Podded Propulsion, T-POD. University of Brest, France, October 2006.Google Scholar
Bose, N. Marine Powering Predictions and Propulsors. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. New York, 2008.Google Scholar
Heinke, C. and Heinke, H-J. Investigations about the use of podded drives for fast ships. Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’2003, Ischia, Italy, October 2003.Google Scholar
Frolova, I., Kaprantsev, S., Pustoshny, A. and Veikonheimo, T. Development of the propeller series for azipod compact. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advances in Podded Propulsion, T-POD. University of Brest, France, October 2006.Google Scholar
T-POD First International Conference on Advances in Podded Propulsion, Conference Proceedings, University of Newcastle, UK, 2004.Google Scholar
T-POD Second International Conference on Advances in Podded Propulsion, Conference Proceedings, University of Brest, France, October 2006.Google Scholar
ITTC. Report of Propulsion Committee. Proceedings of the 23rd ITTC, Venice, 2002.Google Scholar
ITTC. Report of specialist committee on azimuthing podded propulsors. Proceedings of 24th ITTC, Vol. II. Edinburgh, 2005.Google Scholar
Radojcic, D. An engineering approach to predicting the hydrodynamic performance of planing craft using computer techniques. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 133, 1991, pp. 251267.Google Scholar
Newton, R.N. and Rader, H.P. Performance data of propellers for high-speed craft. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 103, 1961, pp. 93129.Google Scholar
Tulin, M.P. Supercavitating flow past foils and struts. Proceedings of NPL Symposium on Cavitation in Hydrodynamics. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1956.Google Scholar
Rose, J.C. and Kruppa, F.L. Surface piercing propellers: Methodical series model test results. Proceedings of First International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’91, Trondheim, 1991.Google Scholar
Ferrando, M., Scamardella, A., Bose, N., Liu, P. and Veitch, B. Performance of a family of surface piercing propellers. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 144, 2002, pp. 6375.Google Scholar
Chudley, J., Grieve, D. and Dyson, P.K. Determination of transient loads on surface piercing propellers. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 144, 2002, pp. 125141.Google Scholar
Gutsche, F. The study of ships’ propellers in oblique flow. Schiffbauforschung 3, 3/4. Translation from German, Defence Research Information Centre DRIC Translation No. 4306, 1964, pp. 97122.Google Scholar
Hadler, J.B. The prediction of power performance of planing craft. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 74, 1966, pp. 563610.Google Scholar
Peck, J.G. and Moore, D.H. Inclined-shaft propeller performance characteristics. Paper G, SNAME Spring Meeting, April 1973, pp. G1G21.Google Scholar
Barnaby, K.C. Basic Naval Architecture. Hutchinson, London, 1963.Google Scholar
Tabaczek, T and Bulgalski, T. Drag and torque on locked screw propeller. TransNav, International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2014, pp. 441447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, P.M. and Forrester, M.A. Sailboat propeller drag. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 1, January 2008, pp. 2840.Google Scholar
Miles, A., Wellicome, J.F. and Molland, A.F. The technical and commercial development of self-pitching propellers. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 135, 1993, pp. 133147.Google Scholar
Greco, L., Leone, S., Testa, C., Salvatore, F. and Mauro, S. Theoretical and numerical analysis of self-pitching propellers. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’11, Hamburg, Germany. 2011, pp. 284293.Google Scholar
Allison, J.L. Marine waterjet propulsion. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 101, 1993, pp. 275335.Google Scholar
Van, Terwisga, T. A parametric propulsion prediction method for waterjet driven craft. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’97, Sydney, Australia. Baird Publications, South Yarra, Australia, July 1997.Google Scholar
ITTC. Report of Specialist Committee on Validation of Waterjet Test Procedures. Proceedings of 23rd ITTC, Vol. II, Venice, 2002.Google Scholar
ITTC. Report of Specialist Committee on Validation of Waterjet Test Procedures. Proceedings of 24th ITTC, Vol. II, Edinburgh, 2005.Google Scholar
Proceedings of International Conference on Waterjet Propulsion III, RINA, Gothenburg, 2001.Google Scholar
Proceedings of International Conference on Waterjet Propulsion IV, RINA, London, 2004.Google Scholar
Michael, T.J. and Chesnakas, C.J. Advanced design, analysis and testing of waterjet pumps. 25th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, August 2004, pp. 104114.Google Scholar
Brennen, C.E. Hydrodynamics of Pumps. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Svensson, R. Water jet for naval applications. RINA International Conference on New Developments in Warship Propulsion. RINA, London, 1989.Google Scholar
Van Manen, J.D. Results of systematic tests with vertical axis propellers. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 13, 1966.Google Scholar
Van Manen, J.D. Non-conventional propulsion devices. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 20, No. 226, June 1973, pp. 173193.Google Scholar
Volpich, H. and Bridge, I.C. Paddle wheels: Part I, Preliminary model experiments. Transactions Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland IESS, Vol. 98, 1954–1955, pp. 327380.Google Scholar
Volpich, H. and Bridge, I.C. Paddle wheels: Part II, Systematic model experiments. Transactions Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland IESS, Vol. 99, 1955–1956, pp. 467510.Google Scholar
Volpich, H. and Bridge, I.C. Paddle wheels: Part IIa, III, Further model experiments and ship/model correlation. Transactions Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland IESS, Vol. 100, 1956–1957, pp. 505550.Google Scholar
Ridley, D.E. Observations on the effect of vessel speed on bow thruster performance. Marine Technology, 1971, pp. 9396.Google Scholar
Norrby, R.A. and Ridley, D.E. Notes on ship thrusters. Transactions of the Institute of Marine Engineers, Vol. 93, Paper 6, 1981, pp. 28.Google Scholar
Brix, J. (ed.) Manoeuvring Technical Manual, Seehafen Verlag, Hamburg, 1993.Google Scholar
Beveridge, J.L. Design and performance of bow thrusters. Marine Technology, October 1972, pp. 439453.Google Scholar
Palmer, A., Hearn, G.E. and Stevenson, P. Experimental testing of an autonomous underwater vehicle with tunnel thrusters. First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’09, Trondheim, Norway, June 2009, pp. 569575.Google Scholar
English, J.W. The design and performance of lateral thrust units. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 105, 1963, pp. 251278.Google Scholar
Alexander, F.H. The propulsive efficiency of rowing. In Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 69, 1927, pp. 228244.Google Scholar
Wellicome, J.F. Some hydrodynamic aspects of rowing. In Rowing – A Scientific Approach, ed. Williams, J.P.G and Scott, A.C.. A.S. Barnes, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Shaw, J.T. Rowing in ships and boats. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 135, 1993, pp. 211224.Google Scholar
Kleshnev, V. Propulsive efficiency of rowing. Proceedings of XVII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports, Perth, Australia, 1999, pp. 224228.Google Scholar
Marchaj, C.A. Aero-Hydrodynamics of Sailing, Adlard Coles Nautical, London, 1979.Google Scholar
Campbell, I.M.C. Optimisation of a sailing rig using wind tunnel data, The 13th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium, Annapolis. SNAME, 1997.Google Scholar
Offshore Racing Congress. VPP Documentation 2009 Offshore Racing Congress. http://www.orc.org/ (last accessed January 2017), 69 pp.Google Scholar
Hazen, G.S. A model of sail aerodynamics for diverse rig types, New England Sailing Yacht Symposium. SNAME, 1980.Google Scholar
Claughton, A.R. Developments in the IMS VPP formulations, The 14th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium, Annapolis. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1999, pp. 2740.Google Scholar
Larsson, L. and Eliasson, R.E. Principles of Yacht Design. 3rd Edition, Adlard Coles Nautical, London, 2009.Google Scholar
Pattullo, R.N.M. and Wright, B.D.W. Methodical series experiments on single-screw ocean-going merchant ship forms. Extended and revised overall analysis. BSRA Report NS333, 1971.Google Scholar
Sabit, A.S. An analysis of the Series 60 results: Part II, Regression analysis of the propulsion factors. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 19, No. 217, September 1972, pp. 294301.Google Scholar
Holtrop, J. and Mennen, G. G. J. An approximate power prediction method. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 29, No. 335, July 1982, pp. 166170.Google Scholar
Parker, M.N. and Dawson, J. Tug propulsion investigation. The effect of a buttock flow stern on bollard pull, towing and free-running performance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 104, 1962, pp. 237279.Google Scholar
Moor, D.I. An investigation of tug propulsion. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 105, 1963, pp. 107152.Google Scholar
Pattulo, R.N.M. and Thomson, G.R. The BSRA Trawler Series (Part I). Beam-draught and length-displacement ratio series, resistance and propulsion tests. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 107, 1965, pp. 215241.Google Scholar
Pattulo, R.N.M. The BSRA Trawler Series (Part II). Block coefficient and longitudinal centre of buoyancy series, resistance and propulsion tests. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 110, 1968, pp. 151183.Google Scholar
Thomson, G.R. and Pattulo, R.N.M. The BSRA Trawler Series (Part III). Resistance and propulsion tests with bow and stern variations. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 111, 1969, pp. 317342.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. A statistical analysis of propulsion data obtained from models of high speed round bilge hulls. Symposium on Small Fast Warships and Security Vessels. RINA, London, 1982.Google Scholar
Gamulin, A. A displacement series of ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 43, No. 434, 1996, pp. 93107.Google Scholar
Andersen, P., Kappel, J.J. and Spangenberg, E. Aspects of propeller developments for a submarine. First International Symposium on Marine Propulsion, SMP’09, Trondheim, Norway, 2009, pp. 554561.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×