Book contents
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionSecond Edition
- Ship Resistance and Propulsion
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Nomenclature
- Abbreviations
- Figure Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Propulsive Power
- 3 Components of Hull Resistance
- 4 Model–Ship Extrapolation
- 5 Model–Ship Correlation
- 6 Restricted Water Depth and Breadth
- 7 Measurement of Resistance Components
- 8 Wake and Thrust Deduction
- 9 Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance
- 10 Resistance Design Data
- 11 Propulsor Types
- 12 Propeller Characteristics
- 13 Powering Process
- 14 Hull Form Design
- 15 Numerical Methods for Propeller Analysis
- 16 Propulsor Design Data
- 17 Reductions in Propulsive Power and Emissions
- 18 Applications
- Book part
- Index
- References
4 - Model–Ship Extrapolation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 August 2017
Book contents
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionSecond Edition
- Ship Resistance and Propulsion
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Nomenclature
- Abbreviations
- Figure Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Propulsive Power
- 3 Components of Hull Resistance
- 4 Model–Ship Extrapolation
- 5 Model–Ship Correlation
- 6 Restricted Water Depth and Breadth
- 7 Measurement of Resistance Components
- 8 Wake and Thrust Deduction
- 9 Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance
- 10 Resistance Design Data
- 11 Propulsor Types
- 12 Propeller Characteristics
- 13 Powering Process
- 14 Hull Form Design
- 15 Numerical Methods for Propeller Analysis
- 16 Propulsor Design Data
- 17 Reductions in Propulsive Power and Emissions
- 18 Applications
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionPractical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power, pp. 70 - 85Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References (Chapter 4)
Froude, W. Experiments on the surface-friction experienced by a plane moving through water, 42nd Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Brighton, 1872.Google Scholar
Froude, W. Report to the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty on experiments for the determination of the frictional resistance of water on a surface, under various conditions, performed at Chelston Cross, under the Authority of their Lordships, 44th Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Belfast, 1874.Google Scholar
Froude, W. The Papers of William Froude. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 1955.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. Friction and form resistance in turbulent flow and a proposed formulation for use in model and ship correlation. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 96, 1954, pp. 314–376.Google Scholar
Telfer, E.V. Ship resistance similarity. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 69, 1927, pp. 174–190.Google Scholar
Telfer, E.V. Frictional resistance and ship resistance similarity. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, 1928/29.Google Scholar
Telfer, E.V. Further ship resistance similarity. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 93, 1951, pp. 205–234.Google Scholar
Lap, A.J.W. Frictional drag of smooth and rough ship forms. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 98, 1956, pp. 137–172.Google Scholar
Conn, J.F.C. and Ferguson, A.M. Results obtained with a series of geometrically similar models. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 110, 1968, pp. 255–300.Google Scholar
Conn, J.F.C., Lackenby, H. and Walker, W.P. BSRA Resistance experiments on the Lucy Ashton. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 95, 1953, pp. 350–436.Google Scholar
Clements, R.E. An analysis of ship-model correlation using the 1957 ITTC line. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 101, 1959, pp. 373–402.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and the law of resistance in parallel channels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Vol. 174, 1883, pp. 935–982.Google Scholar
Froude, R.E. On the ‘constant’ system of notation of results of experiments on models used at the Admiralty Experiment Works, Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 29, 1888, pp. 304–318.Google Scholar
Schoenherr, K.E. Resistance of flat surfaces moving through a fluid. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 40, 1932.Google Scholar
Lap, A.J.W. Fundamentals of ship resistance and propulsion. Part A Resistance. Publication No. 129a of the Netherlands Ship Model Basin, Wageningen. Reprinted in International Shipbuilding Progress.Google Scholar
Zborowski, A. Approximate method for estimating resistance and power of twin-screw merchant ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 20, No. 221, January 1973, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
Grigson, C.W.B. An accurate smooth friction line for use in performance prediction. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 135, 1993, pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
ITTC. Report of Resistance Committee, p. 64, 23rd International Towing Tank Conference, Venice, 2002.Google Scholar
ITTC. Report of Resistance Committee, p. 38, 25th International Towing Tank Conference, Fukuoka, 2008.Google Scholar
Grigson, C.W.B. A planar friction algorithm and its use in analysing hull resistance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 142, 2000, pp. 76–115.Google Scholar
Date, J.C. and Turnock, S.R. Computational fluid dynamics estimation of skin friction experienced by a plane moving through water. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 142, 2000, pp. 116–135.Google Scholar
Molland, A.F. and Utama, I.K.A.P. Experimental and numerical investigations into the drag characteristics of a pair of ellipsoids in close proximity. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 216, Part M. Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2002.Google Scholar
Holtrop, J. A statistical re-analysis of resistance and propulsion data. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 31, November 1984, pp. 272–276.Google Scholar
Wright, B.D.W. Apparent viscous levels of resistance of a series of model geosims. BSRA Report WG/H99, 1984.Google Scholar
Couser, P.R., Molland, A.F., Armstrong, N.A. and Utama, I.K.A.P. Calm water powering prediction for high speed catamarans. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’97, Sydney, 1997.Google Scholar
Van, S.-H., Ahn, H., Lee, Y.Y. et al. Resistance characteristics and form factor evaluation for geosim models. Proceedings of PRADS’2013, Changwon City, Korea, 2013, pp. 118–125.Google Scholar
Millward, A. The effects of water depth on hull form factor. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 36, No. 407, October 1989.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by