Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T15:31:40.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Tabun Cave in the Carmel Culture Sphere

from Part III: - Archaeology of Human Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Yehouda Enzel
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ofer Bar-Yosef
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Tabun Cave sediments in the west slope of Mt. Carmel are 25 m thick. The lower 10 m are wind-born quartz sand. A 2-m thick wind-born silt followed. Last, some 10-m thick alluvial clay penetrated the cave. The oldest occupation (800 and 630 ka), a pre-Acheulean flake industry, was sparse. An Upper Acheulean assemblage followed (600-450 ka) characterized by 30% handaxes. A Yabrudian assemblage (415-250 ka) is a flake industry of few handaxes (5%) and 50-70% racloirs, made on thick, side-struck flakes and shaped by invasive Quina retouch. The Amudian assemblage is a short intra-Yabrudian episode. The Levallois-Mousterian (250-100 ka) is dominated by the Levallois knapping method. Neanderthal remains (100/120 ka) and modern human remains (130/150 ka) testify to their co-existence. Attempts were made to view the Acheulean, Yabrudian and Amudian as functional facies of a single culture. While tool types are function-dependent, blank production technique is not. Techno-typological norms play a role in the cultural heritage. A Yabrudian racloir and an Amudian blade are tools and culture icons. The Tabun assemblages represent distinct cultures created by distinct social groups.
Type
Chapter
Information
Quaternary of the Levant
Environments, Climate Change, and Humans
, pp. 215 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Yosef, O. 2011. A geographic overview of Neanderthal–Modern Human encounters. In: Casting the Net Wide. Papers in Honor of Glynn Isaac and his Approach to Human Origins Research, ed. Sept, J. & Pilbeam, D.. American School of Prehistoric Research Monograph. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 193212.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. & Callander, J. 1999. The woman from Tabun: Garrod's doubts in historical perspective. Journal of Human Evolution 37: 879–85.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef Mayer, D.E. 2005. The exploitation of shells as beads in the Palaeolithic and Neolithic of the Levant. Paléorient 31: 176–85.Google Scholar
Barkai, R., Gopher, A., Lauritzen, S.E. & Frumkin, A. 2003. Uranium series dates from Qesem Cave, Israel, and the end of the Lower Palaeo-lithic. Nature 423: 977–79.Google Scholar
Barkai, R., Lemorini, C., Shimelmitz, R. et al. 2009. A blade for all seasons? Making and using Amudian blades at Qesem Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 24: 5775.Google Scholar
Beyin, A. 2006. The Bab el Mandab vs the Nile-Levant: An appraisal of the two dispersal routes for Early Modern Humans out of Africa. African Archaeology Review 23: 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppa, A., Grün, R., Stringer, C., Eggins, S. & Vargiu, R. 2005. Newly recognized Pleistocene human teeth from Tabun Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 49: 301–15.Google Scholar
Enzel, Y., Amit, R., Dayan, U. et al. 2008. The climatic and physiographic controls of the eastern Mediterranean over the late Pleistocene climates in the southern Levant and its neighboring deserts. Global and Planetary Change 60: 165–92.Google Scholar
Garrod, D.A.E. 1956. ‘Acheulo-Yabrudian’ et ‘Pre-Aurignacien’ de la grotte Du Tabun (Mont Carmel); etude stratigraphique et chronologique. Quaternaria 3: 3959.Google Scholar
Garrod, D.A.E. 1970. Pre-Aurignacian and Amudian: A comparative study of the earliest blade industries of the Near East. Fundamenta A2: 224–9.Google Scholar
Garrod, D.A.E. & Bate, D.M.A. 1937. The Stone Age of Mount Carmel Vol. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gilead, D. 1977. Some metrical studies of Acheulian assemblages in Israel. Eretz-Israel 13: 3848.Google Scholar
Gilead, D. & Ronen, A. 1977. Acheulian industries from Evron on the Western Galilee coastal plain. Eretz-Israel 13: 5686.Google Scholar
Gisis, I. 2006. The Lower Palaeolithic in Tabun Cave, Israel. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Gisis, I. & Ronen, A. 2006. Bifaces from the Acheulian and Yabrudian layers of Tabun Cave, Israel. In Axe Age, Acheulian Tool-Making from Quarry to Discard, ed. Goren-Inbar, N. & Sharon, G.. London: Equinox, pp. 137–54.Google Scholar
Goldberg, P. 1973. Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Paleoclimatology of Et-Tabun Cave, Mt. Carmel, Israel. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Gopher, A., Barkai, R., Shimelmitz, R. et al. 2005. Qesem Cave, an Amudian site in central Israel. Journal of Israel Prehistoric Society – Mitekufat Haeven 35: 6992.Google Scholar
Gopher, A., Ayalon, A., Bar-Matthews, M. et al. 2010. The chronology of the Late Lower Paleolithic in the Levant. Quaternary Geochronology 5: 644–56.Google Scholar
Grün, R. & Stringer, C. 2000. Tabun revisited: Revised ESR chronology and new ESR and U-series analyses of dental material from Tabun C1. Journal of Human Evolution 9: 601–12.Google Scholar
Grün, R., Stringer, C., McDermott, F. et al. 2005. U-series and ESR analyses of bones and teeth relating to the human burials from Skhul. Journal of Human Evolution 49: 316–34.Google Scholar
Hauck, T.C. 2011. The Mousterian sequence of Hummal and its tentative placement in the Levant Middle Paleolithic. In The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic in the Middle East and Neighbouring Regions. Basel Symposium (May, 8–10, 2008), ed. Le Tensorer, J.-M., Jagher, R. & Otte, M., ERAUL 126. Liège: University of Liége Press, pp. 309–23.Google Scholar
Hovers, E. 2009. The Lithic Assemblages of Qafzeh Cave. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hovers, E., Rak, Y. & Kimbel, W.H. 1991. Amud Cave – the 1991 season. Journal of Israel Prehistoric Society – Mitekufat Haeven 24: 152–7.Google Scholar
Hovers, E., Ilani, S., Bar-Yosef, O. & Vandermeersch, B. 2003. An early case of color symbolism. Ochre use by modern humans in Qafzeh Cave. Current Anthropology 44: 491522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, A.J. 1982a. The Tabun Cave and Paleolithic Man in the Levant. Science 216: 1369–75.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A.J. 1982b. The Middle Paleolithic in the southern Levant with comments on the appearance of modern Homo Sapiens. In The Transition from Lower to Middle Paleolithic and the Origin of Modern Man, ed. Ronen, A.. BAR International Series 151. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, pp. 57101.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A.J., Farrand, W.R., Hass, G., Horowitz, A. & Goldberg, P. 1973. New excavation at the Tabun Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel, 1967–1972: A preliminary report. Paleorient 1: 151–83.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity. Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lamdan, M. & Ronen, A. 1989. Middle and Upper Palaeolithic blades in the Levant. In People and Culture in Change, ed. Hershkovitz, I., BAR S508. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, pp. 2936.Google Scholar
Laukhin, S.A., Ronen, A., Ranov, V.A. et al. 2000. New data on the Paleolithic geochronology in southern Levant. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 8: 498510.Google Scholar
Le Tensorer, J.M., Muhesen, S. & Schmidt, P. 2008. Le Paleolithique de Hummal a el Kowm: Premier bilan des fouilles Syro-Swisses 1999–2008. Chronique Archeologique en Syrie, Excavation Reports of 2007. Damascus: Direction Générale des Antiqiotés et Musées de Syrie, pp. 923.Google Scholar
McCown, T.D. 1937. Mugharet es Skhul. Description and Excavations. In The Stone Age of Mount Carmel I: Excavations at the Wadi el-Mughara, ed. Garrod, D.A.E. and Bate, D.M.A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 91107.Google Scholar
McCown, T.D. & Keith, A. 1939. The Stone Age of Mount Carmel II: The Fossil Human Remains from the Levalloiso-Mousterian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McPherron, S.P. 2003. Technological and typological variability in the bifaces from Tabun Cave, Israel. In Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, ed. Soressi, M. & Dibble, H.L.. Philadelphia: Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, pp. 5576.Google Scholar
Meignen, L. 1995. Levallois lithic production systems in the Middle Palaeo-lithic of the Near East: The case of the unidirectional method. In The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, ed. Dibble, H.L. & Bar-Yosef, O.. Madison: Prehistory Press, pp. 361–79.Google Scholar
Meignen, L. 2011. The contribution of Hayonim Cave assemblages to the understanding of the so-called Early Levantine Mousterian. In The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic in the Middle East and Neighbouring Regions. Basel Symposium (May, 8–10, 2008), ed. Le Tensorer, J.-M., Jagher, R. & Otte, M., ERAUL 126. Liège: University of Liége Press, pp. 85100.Google Scholar
Meignen, L. & Bar-Yosef, O. 1992. Middle Palaeolithic variability in Kebara Cave (Mount Carmel, Israel). In The Evolution and Dispersal of Modern Humans in Asia, ed. Akazawa, T., Aoki, K. & Kimura, T.. Tokyo: Hokusen-Sha, pp. 129–48.Google Scholar
Mercier, N. & Valladas, H. 2003. Reassessment of TL age estimates of burnt flints from the Palaeolithic site of Tabun Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 45: 401–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, N., Valladas, H., Froget, L., Joron, J.L. & Ronen, A. 2000. Datation par thermoluminescence de la base du gisement paléolithique de Tabun (Mont Carmel, Israël). Comptes Rendus Académie des Sciences 330: 731–8.Google Scholar
Mercier, N., Valladas, H., Froget, L. et al. 2007. Hayonim Cave: A TL-based chronology of a Levantine Mousterian sequence. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1064–7.Google Scholar
Mercier, N., Valladas, H., Falguères, C. et al. 2013. New datings of Amudian layers at Qesem Cave (Israel): results of TL applied to burnt flints and ESR/U-series of teeth. Journal of Archaeological Science 4:, 3011–20.Google Scholar
Muhesen, S. 1985. L' Acheuléen récent évolué de Syrie, BAR International Series 248. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohel, M. 1986. The Acheulean of the Yiron Plateau, Israel. BAR S307, Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Olami, Y. 1984. Prehistoric Carmel. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Rak, Y. 1998. Does any Mousterian cave present evidence of two hominid species? In Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia, ed. Akazawa, T., Aoki, K. & Bar-Yosef, O.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 353–66.Google Scholar
Rak, Y., Kimbel, W.H. & Hovers, E. 1994. A Neandertal infant from Amud Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 26: 313–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rink, W.J., Richter, D., Schwarcz, H.P. et al. 2003. Age of the Middle Palaeolithic site of Rosh Ein Mor, central Negev, Israel: Implications for the age range of the Early Levantine Mousterian of the Levantine corridor. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 195204.Google Scholar
Rink, W.J., Schwarcz, H.P., Ronen, A. & Tsatskin, A. 2004. Confirmation of a near 400 ka age for the Yabrudian industry at Tabun Cave, Israel. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 1520.Google Scholar
Roe, D. (ed.) 1983. Adlun in the Stone Age: The excavations of D.A.E. Garrod in Lebanon, 1958–1963, BAR International Series 159. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Ronen, A. 1992. The emergence of blade technology: Cultural affinities. In The Evolution and Dispersal of Modern Humans in Asia, ed. Akazawa, T., Aoki, A. & Kimura, T.. Tokyo: HokusenSha, pp. 217–28.Google Scholar
Ronen, A. 1995. The Levallois method as cultural constraint. In The Defin-ition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, ed. Dibble, H.L. & Bar-Yosef, O.. Madison: Prehistory Press, pp. 293304.Google Scholar
Ronen, A. 2012. The oldest burials and their significance. In African Genesis: Perspectives on hominid evolution, ed. Reynolds, S.C. & Gallagher, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 554–70.Google Scholar
Ronen, A. & Tsatskin, A. 1995. New interpretations of the oldest part of the Tabun Cave sequence. Mount Carmel, Israel. In Man and Environment in the Palaeolithic, ed. Ullrich, H., ERAUL 62. Liège: University of Liége Press, pp. 265–81.Google Scholar
Ronen, A., Shifroni, A., Laukhin, S. & Tsatskin, A. 2000. Observations on the Acheulean of Tabun Cave, Israel. In A la Recherche de lʼHomme Préhistorique, ed. Mester, Z. & Ringer, A., ERAUL 95. Liége: University of Liége Press, pp. 20924.Google Scholar
Ronen, A., Gisis, I. & Safadi, A. 2003. Tabun-Mapolet, An Acheulo-Yabrudian Lithic Assemblage from Garrod's Layer Ed/Ec. Veröffentlichungen des Landesamtes für Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt-Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte 57: 477–94.Google Scholar
Ronen, A., Zviely, D. & Galili, E. 2007. Did the Last Interglacial sea penetrate Mount Carmel Caves? Comments on ‘The setting of the Mt. Carmel caves reassessed’ by C. Vita-Finzi and C. Stringer. Quaternary Science Reviews 26: 2684–91.Google Scholar
Rust, A. 1950. Die Höhlenfunde von Jabrud (Syrien). Neumünster: Karl Wachholz.Google Scholar
Shimelmitz, R., Kuhn, S.L., Ronen, A. & Weinstein-Evron, M. 2014a. Predetermined flake production at the Lower/Middle Paleolithic boundary: Yabrudian scraper-blank technology. PLoS ONE 9: e106293.Google Scholar
Shimelmitz, R., Kuhn, S.L. Jelinek, A.J. et al. 2014b. ‘Fire at will’: The emergence of habitual fire use 350,000 years ago. Journal of Human Evolution 77: 196203.Google Scholar
Shimelmitz, R., Weinstein-Evron, M., Ronen, A., Jelinek, A.J. & Kuhn, S.L. 2014c. The Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition and the diversification of Levallois technology in the southern Levant: Evidence from Tabun Cave, Israel. Oral presentation at XVII World UISPP Congress 2014 Burgos, 1–7 September.Google Scholar
Valladas, H., Mercier, N., Hershkovitz, I. et al. 2013. Dating the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Levant: A view from Misliya Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 65: 585–93.Google Scholar
Vandermeersch, B. 1970. Une sepulture mousterienne avec offtrandes decouverte dans la grotte de Qafzeh. Comptes Rendus Académie des Sciences 268: 298301.Google Scholar
Vandermeersch, B. 1981. Les hommes fossils de Qafzeh (Israel). Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Vandermeersch, B. 2006. Ce que nous apprennent les premières sépultures. Comptes Rendus Palevol 5: 161–7.Google Scholar
Vanhaeren, M., D'Errico, F., Stringer, C. et al. 2006. Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria. Science 312: 1785–8.Google Scholar
Yizraeli, T. 1967. A Lower Palaeolithic site at Holon – preliminary report. Israel Exploration Journal 17: 144–52.Google Scholar
Zaidner, Y., Druck, D. & Weinstein-Evron, M. 2006. Acheulo-Yabrudian handaxes from Misliya Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel. In Axe Age, Acheulian Tool-Making from Quarry to Discard, ed. Maos, O., Inbar, M. & Shmueli, D.F.. Haifa: University of Haifa, pp. 247–54.Google Scholar
Zviely, D. & Ronen, A. 2004. Garrod's spring in Tabun Cave, Mt. Carmel (Israel): 70 years later. In Contemporary Israeli Geography, ed. Maos, J.O., Inbar, M & Shmueli, D, Special Issue of Horizons in Geography 6061: 167–76.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×