We consider the long-time (many revolutions) behaviour of an axisymmetric isolated anticyclonic vortex of constant density which floats inside a large ambient linear-stratified fluid rotating with constant
. We have developed a closed simple model for the prediction of the vertical thickness to diameter aspect ratio
(and actually the shape) and internal angular velocity
, relative to the ambient, as functions of time
. (In our model
is scaled with
; the literature sometimes uses the Rossby number
.) This model is an extension of the model of Aubert et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 706, 2012, pp. 34–45) and Hassanzadeh et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 706, 2012, pp. 46–57), which derived the connection between
, for prescribed
and buoyancy frequency of the ambient
. This work adds the balance of angular momentum and resolves the spin-up process of the vortex, which were not accounted for in the previous model. The Ekman number
now enters into the formulation; here
is the coefficient of kinematic viscosity and
is the half-height of the vortex, roughly (a sharper definition is given in the paper). The model can be applied to cases of both fixed-volume and injection-sustained vortices.
The often-cited aspect ratio
, which is a plausible initial condition for typical systems. We show that the continuous ‘decay’ of
from that value over many revolutions of the system is indeed governed by the spin-up effect which reduces
, but with significant differences to the classical spin-up of a fluid in a closed solid container. The spin-up shear torque decays with time because the thickness of the boundary shear layer increases. The layer starts as a double Ekman layer (between two fluids) but it quite quickly expands due to stratification effects, and later due to viscous diffusion. This prolongs the spin-up somewhat beyond the classical
time interval. Moreover, when
becomes small, the momentum of angular inertia of the vortex increases like
; this further hinders the spin-up, and prolongs the process.
Comparisons of the prediction of the model with previously published experimental and Navier–Stokes simulation data were performed for four cases. In three cases the agreement is good. In one case, the model predicts a much faster decay than the observed one; we have suggested a plausible explanation for this discrepancy.