Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:52:04.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - General and Colorectal Robotic Surgery of the Abdomen and Pelvis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

By
Guy R. Orangio ,
Jeffrey S. Barton  and
Kurt G. Davis
Edited by
Alan David Kaye  and
Richard D. Urman
Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery , pp. 44 - 69
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kwoh, YS, Hou, J, Honckheere, EA, Hayati, S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Engineering 1988; 35(2): 152–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackier, JM, Wang, Y. Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery: from concept to development. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 63–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marescaux, J, Rubino, F. The ZEUS robotic system: experimental and clinical applications. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83(6): 1305–1315.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, GH, Moll, F. The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83(6): 1293–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarasekera, D, Kaouk, JH. Robotic single port surgery: current status and future considerations. Indian J Urol 2014; 30(3): 326–332.Google Scholar
Joseph, RA, Goh, AC, Cuevas, SP, et al. Chopstick surgery: a novel technique improves surgeon performance and eliminates arm collision in robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2010; 24.Google ScholarPubMed
Lasser, MS, Patel, CK, Elsamra, SE, et al. Dedicated robotics team reduces pre-surgical preparation time. Indian J Urol 2012; 28(3): 263–266.Google Scholar
Mühlmann, G, Klaus, A, Kirchmayr, W, et al. DaVinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric surgery: is it justified in a routine setting? Obes Surg 2003; 13(6): 848–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, CP, Lynch, AC, Senagore, AJ, et al. Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46(12): 1633–1639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danic, MJ, Chow, M, Alexander, G, et al. Anesthesia considerations for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a review of 1,500 cases. J Robotic Surg 2007; 1(2): 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainsburg, DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol 2012; 78(5): 596–604.Google Scholar
Yoo, YC, Kim, NY, Shin, S, et al. The intraocular pressure under deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade during low-pressure robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a randomized trial. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(8): e0135412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madsen, MV, Istre, O, Staehr-Rye, AK, et al. Postoperative shoulder pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy with deep neuromuscular blockage and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32: 1–7.Google Scholar
Madsen, MV, Gatke, MR, Springborg, HH, et al. Optimizing abdominal space with deep neuromuscular blockade in gynaecologic laparoscopy – a randomized, blinded crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2015; 59(4): 441–447.Google Scholar
Van Wijk, RM, Watts, RW, Ledowski, T, et al. Deep neuromuscular block reduces intra-abdominal pressure requirements during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2015; 59(4): 434–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, RL, Kaye, AD, Urman, RD Anesthetic challenges in robotic-assisted urologic surgery. Rev Urol 2013; 15(4): 178–184.Google Scholar
Lee, JR. Anesthetic considerations for robotic surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014; 33(1): 3–11.Google Scholar
Rencuzogullari, A, Gorgun, E. Robotic rectal surgery. J Surg Onc 2015; 112(3): 326–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, J, Kang, WH, Oh, SJ, et al. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(6): 1204–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koc, G, Tazeh, NN, Joudi, FN, et al. Lower extremity neuropathies after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on a split-leg table. J Endourol 2012; 26(8): 1026–1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wexner, SD, Bergamaschi, R, Lacy, A, et al. The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(2): 438–443.Google Scholar
Awad, H, Walker, CM, Shaikh, M, et al. Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the literature. J Clin Anes 2012; 24(6): 494–504.Google Scholar
Zimmern, A, Prasad, L, deSouza, A, et al. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 2010; 34(8): 1954–1958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Pierro, GB, Wirth, JG, Ferrai, M, et al. Impact of a single-surgeon learning curve on complications, positioning injuries, and renal function in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Urology 2014; 84(5): 1106–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balick-Weber, CC, Nicolas, P, Hedreville-Montout, M, et al. Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlled vs. pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99(3): 429–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, EM, Na, S, Choi, SH, et al. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in steep Trendelenburg position for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth 2011; 23(3): 183–188.Google Scholar
Jobe, BA, Hunter, JG. Minimally invasive surgery: In Schwartz’s principles of surgery, eighth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005, pp. 379–401.Google Scholar
Sood, J. Advancing frontiers in anaesthesiology with laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(39): 14308–14314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neudecker, J, Sauerland, S, Neugebauer, EAM, et al. The EAES clinical practice guidelines on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(7): 1121–1143.Google Scholar
Meininger, D, Byhahn, C, Wolfram, M, et al. Prolonged intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide in patients undergoing totally endoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 2004; 18(5): 829–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumpf, E, Crozier, TA, Ahrens, D, et al. Carbon dioxide absorption during extraperitoneal and transperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty. Anesth Analg 2000; 91(3): 589–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lestar, M, Gunnarsson, L, Lagerstrand, L, et al. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45° Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg 2011; 113(5): 1069–1075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearon, C, Kahn, SR, Agnelli, G, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133(6 suppl): 454S–545S.Google Scholar
Moghadamyeghaneh, Z, Hanna, MH, Carmichael, JC, et al. A nationwide analysis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in colon and rectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18(12): 2169–2177.Google Scholar
Falabella, A, Moore-Jeffries, E, Sullivan, MJ, et al. Cardiac function during steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum for robotic-assisted prostatectomy: a transoesophageal Doppler probe study. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2007; 3(4): 312–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas, S, Haese, A, Goetz, AE, et al. Haemodynamics and cardiac function during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in steep Trendelenburg position. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2011; 7(4): 408–413.Google Scholar
Joris, JL, Noirot, DP, Legrand, MJ, et al. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1993; 76(5): 1067–1071.Google Scholar
Speicher, PJ, Fanapathi, AM, Englum, BR, et al. Laparoscopy is safe among patients with congestive heart failure undergoing general surgery procedures. Surgery 2014; 156(2): 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalmar, AF, Dewaele, F, Foubert, L, et al. Cerebral haemodynamic physiology during steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108(3): 478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Closhen, D, Treiber, AH, Berres, M, et al. Robotic assisted prostatic surgery in the Trendelenburg position does not impair cerebral oxygenation measured using two different monitors: a clinical observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31(2): 104–109.Google Scholar
Kukahvecioglu, O, Sare, M, Karamercan, A, et al. Intermittent pneumatic sequential compression of the lower extremities restores cerebral oxygen saturation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22(4): 907–911.Google Scholar
Jo, YY, Kim, JY, Lee, MG, et al. Changes in cerebral oxygen saturation and early postoperative cognitive function after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a comparison with conventional open surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2016; 69(1): 44–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishara, B, Karram, T, Khatib, S, et al. Impact of pneumoperitoneum on renal perfusion and excretory function: beneficial effects of nitroglycerine. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(3): 568–576.Google Scholar
Dolkart, O, Khoury, W, Amar, E, et al. Pneumoperitoneum in the presence of acute and chronic kidney injury: an experimental model in rats. Urology 2014; 192 (4): 1266–1271.Google Scholar
Wiesenthal, JD, Fazio, LM, Perks, AE, et al. Effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal tissue oxygenation and blood flow in a rat model. Urology 2011; 77(6): 1508.e9–e15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattei, A, Di Pierro, GB, Rafeld, V et al. Positioning injury, rhbadomyolysis, and serum creatine kinase-concentration course in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. J Endo Urology 2013; 27(1): 45–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Park, EY, Kwon, JY, Kim, KJ. Carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopic surgery. Yonsei Med J 2012; 53(3): 459–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmad, G, Gent, D, Henderson, D, et al. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 2015; 8.Google Scholar
Molloy, BL. Implications for postoperative visual loss: steep Trendelenburg position and effects on intraocular pressure. AANA J 2011; 79(2): 115.Google ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, W. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2001; 5: 89–94.Google Scholar
Litynski, GS. Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 1998; 2: 341–346.Google Scholar
Himpens, J, Leman, G, Cadiere, GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1998; 12(8): 1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornprat, P, Werkartner, G, Cerwenka, H, et al. Prospective study comparing standard and robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lagenbecks Arch Surg 2006; 391: 216–221.Google Scholar
Nio, D, Bemelman, WA, Busch, OR, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 379–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, JH, Baek, NH, Guangyl, LI, et al. Robotic cholecystectomy with new port sites. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(20): 3077–3082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayaraman, S, Davies, W, Schlachta, C. Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. J Can Chir 2009; 52(5): 374–378.Google ScholarPubMed
Cadiere, GB, Himpens, J, Germay, O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001: 16: 1187–1191.Google Scholar
Ruurda, JP, Broeders, IA, Simmermacher, RP, et al. Feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an evaluation of 35 robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Laprarosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12: 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giulianotte, PC, Coratti, A, Angelini, M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidovszky, TJ, Smith, W, Ghosh, J, et al. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages and limitations. J Surg Res 2006; 136: 172–178.Google Scholar
Navarra, G, Pozza, I, Occhionorelli, S, Carcoforo, P, Donini, I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 695.Google ScholarPubMed
Chamberlin, RS, Sakpal, SV. A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 1733–1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoglio, G, Priora, F, Bianchi, PP, et al. Real-time near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent cholangiography in single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): a single-institutional prospective study. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 2156–2162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, P, Hagan, ME, Bucher, P, Buchs, NC, Pugin, F. Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gasrtoint Surg 2011; 15: 2182–2186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinoglio, G, Lenti, LM, Maglione, V, et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1648–1655.Google Scholar
Lee, SH, Jung, MJ, Hwang, HK et al. The first experiences of robotic single-site cholecystectomy in Asia: a potential way to expand minimally-invasive single-site surgery? Yousei Med J 2015; 56(1): 189–195.Google Scholar
Buschs, NC, Hage, ME, Pugin, F, et al. Intra-operative fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanine green during robotic single site cholecystectomy. Int J Med Robot 2012; 8: 436–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marano, A, Priora, F, Lenti, LM et al. Application of fluorescence in robotic general surgery: review of the literature and state of the art. World J Surg. 2013; 37: 2800–2811.Google Scholar
Parra-Membrives, P, Diaz-Gomez, D, Vilegas-Portero, R, et al. Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: a RAND Corporation/UCLA appropriateness method statistical analysis. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1187–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkhamesi, NA, Davies, WT, Pinto, RF, Schlachta, CM. Robot-assisted common bile duct exploration as an option for complex choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 263–266.Google Scholar
Milone, L, Daskalaki, D, Fernandes, E, et al. State of art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2747–2755.Google Scholar
Rosemurgy, A, Ryan, C, Klein, R, et al. Does the cost of robotic cholecystectomy translate to a financial burden? Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 2115–2120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheriqui, D, Husson, E, Hammond, R, et al. Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 753–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng-Maw, H, Wakabayashi, G, Nitta, H, et al. Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 732–739.Google Scholar
Milone, L, Daskalaki, D, Fernandes, E et al. State of the art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2747–2755.Google Scholar
Leung, U, Fong, Y. Robotic liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2014; 3(5): 288–294.Google Scholar
Giulianotte, PC, Sbrana, F, Bianco, FM, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1646–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adachi, Y, Shiraishi, N, Shiromizu, A, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135: 806–810.Google Scholar
Song, J, Kang, WH, Oh, SJ, et al. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1204–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, WS, Xi, HQ, Chen, L, A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 2795–2802.Google Scholar
Shen, W, Xi, H, Wei, B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 574–580.Google Scholar
Gamme, G, Birch, DW, Karmali, S, et al. Minimally invasive splenectomy: an update and review. Can J of Surg 2013: 56: 280–285.Google Scholar
Vasilescu, C, Stanciulea, O, Tudor, S. Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of and expensive approach. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2802–2809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balaphas, A, Buchs, NC, Meyer, J, et al. Partial splenectomy in the era of minimally invasive surgery: the current laparoscopic and robotic experiences. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3618–3627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, M, Verdeja, JC, Goldstein, HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy 1991; 1(3): 144–150.Google ScholarPubMed
Weber, PA, Meorola, S, Wasielewski, A, et al. Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1689–1694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayne, DG, Guillou, PJ, Thorpe, H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(21): 3061–3068.Google Scholar
Jayne, DG, Thorpe, HC, Copeland, J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASSICC Trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surgery 2010; 97(11): 1638–1645.Google Scholar
Fleishman, JW, Nelson, H, Peters, AR, et al. Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) study group. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39(10): 545–551.Google Scholar
Peterson, C, Weiser, MR, Robotic colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18: 398–403.Google Scholar
Kim, CW, Kim, CH, Baik, SH, Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18: 816–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiong, B, Ma, L, Huang, W, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19: 516–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleishman, J, Branda, M, Sargent, D, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs. open resection of stage II or stage III rectal cancer on pathological outcomes. The ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314(13): 1346–1355.Google Scholar
Stevenson, ARL, Solomon, MJ, Lumley, JW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs. open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer. The ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314(13): 1356–1563.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. Enhanced recovery clinical education program improves quality of post-operative care. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015; 4(1).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagnall, NM, Malietzis, G, Kennedy, RH, et al. A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16(12): 947–956.Google Scholar
Kehlet, H, Mogensen, T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation program. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 227–230.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, A, Kang, P, Evans, J, Khanna, A. A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R. Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93(8): 583–588.Google Scholar
Wang, G, Jiang, Z, Zhao, K, Li, G, Liu, F, Pan, H, Li, J. Immunologic response after laparoscopic colon cancer operation within an enhanced recovery program. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1379–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maessen, J, Dejong, CH, Hausel, J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programs for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 224–231.Google Scholar
Bona, S, Molteni, M, Rosati, R, et al. Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(46): 17578–17587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keane, C, Savage, S, McFarlane, K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional care in colonic and rectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 2012; 82(10): 697–703.Google Scholar
Zhuang, CL, Ye, XZ, Zhang, XD, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56(5): 667–678.Google Scholar
Miller, TE, Thacker, JK, White, WD, et al. Enhanced Recovery Study Group. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 2014; 118(5): 966–975.Google Scholar
Varadhan, KK, Neal, KR, Dejong, CH, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2010; 29(4): 434–440.Google Scholar
Geltzeiler, CB, Rotramel, A, Wilson, C, et al. Prospective study of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery in a community hospital. JAMA Surg 2014; 149(9): 955–961.Google Scholar
Eskicioglu, C, Forbes, SS, Aarts, MA, Okrainec, A, McLeod, RS. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13(12): 2321–2329.Google Scholar
Lv, L, Shao, YF, Zhou, YB. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27(12): 1549–1554.Google Scholar
Greco, M, Capretti, G, Beretta, L, et al. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 2014; 38(6): 1531–1541.Google Scholar
Spanjersberg, WR, Reurings, J, Keus, F, vanLaarhoven, CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (2).Google Scholar
Barreca, M, Renzi, C, Tankel, J, et al. Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; pii: S1550-7289(15)00063-5.Google Scholar
Miralpeix, E, Nick, AM, Cata, J, et al. A call for new standard of care in perioperative gynecologic oncology practice: impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Gynecol Oncol 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G, Kalpgera, E, Dowdy, SC. Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 135(3): 586–594.Google Scholar
Hahl, T, Peromaa-Haavisto, P, Tarkiainen, P, Knutar, O, Victorzon, M. Outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) with a program for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Obes Surg 2016; 26(3): 505–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldini, G, Fawcett, WJ. Anesthesia for colorectal surgery. Anesthesiol Clin 2015; 33(1): 93–123.Google Scholar
Fearon, KC, Ljungqvist, O, VonMeyenfeldt, M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005; 24(3): 466–477.Google Scholar
Lassen, K, Soop, M, Nygren, J, et al; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009; 144(10): 961–969.Google Scholar
Chand, M, DeAth, HD, Rasheed, S, et al. The influence of peri-operative factors for accelerated discharge following laparoscopic colorectal surgery when combined with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Int J Surg 2015; 25: 59–63.Google Scholar
Ahmed, J, Khan, S, Lim, M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols – compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14(9): 1045–1051.Google Scholar
Vlug, MS, Wind, J, Hollmann, MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 2011; 254: 868–875.Google Scholar
Lithner, M, Klefsgard, R, Johansson, J, Andersson, E. The significance of information after discharge for colorectal cancer surgery-a qualitative study. BMC Nurs 2015; 14: 36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, S, Zalunardo, MP, Hubner, M, et al. A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 842–847.Google Scholar
Smart, NJ, White, P, Allison, AS, et al. Deviation and failure of enhanced recovery after surgery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: early prediction model. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14(10): e727–734.Google Scholar
Aarts, MA, Okrainec, A, Glicksman, A, et al. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(2): 442–450.Google Scholar
Erhan, Y, Erhan, E, Aydede, H, Yumus, O, Yentur, A. Ondansetron, granisetron and dexamethasone compared for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Surg Endosc 2008; 22(6): 1487–1492.Google Scholar
Fujii, Y, Itakura, M. Reduction of postoperative nausea, vomiting and analgesic requirement with dexamethasone for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24(3): 692.Google Scholar
Cox, F. Systematic review of ondansetron for the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults. Br J Theatre Nurs 1999; 9(12): 556–563.Google ScholarPubMed
Bragg, D, El-Sharkaway, AM, Psaltis, E, Maxwell-Armstrong, CA, Lobo, DN. Poatoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr 2015; 34(3): 367–376.Google Scholar
Vaughan-Shaw, PG, Fecher, IC, Harris, S, Knight, JS. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the opioid receptor antagonist alvimopan in reducing hospital length of stay and time to GI recovery in patients enrolled in a standardized accelerated recovery program after abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55(5): 611–620.Google Scholar
Earnshaw, SR, Kauf, TL, McDade, C, et al. Economic impact of Alvimopan considering varying definitions of postoperative ileus. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221(5): 941–950.Google Scholar
Nguyen, DL, Maithel, S, Nguyen, ET, Bechtold, ML. Does alvimopan enhance return of bowel function in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery? A meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 2015; 28(4): 475–480Google Scholar
Matot, I, Paskaleva, R, Eid, L, et al. Effect of the volume of fluids administered on intraoperative oliguria in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2012; 147(3): 228–234.Google Scholar
Gupta, R, Gan, TJ. Peri-operative fluid management to enhance recovery. Anaesthesia 2016; 71 suppl 1: 40–45.Google Scholar
Wool, DB, Lemmens, HJ, Brodsky, JB, et al. Intraoperative fluid replacement and postoperative creatine phosphokinase levels in laparoscopic bariatric patients. Obes Surg. 2010; 20(6): 698–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, MD, McCall, J, Plank, L, et al. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 14; 8.Google Scholar
Nygren, J, Soop, M, Thorrell, A, et al. Preoperative oral carbohydrate and insulin resistance. Clin Nutr 1999; 18(2): 117–120.Google Scholar
Lidder, P, Thomas, S, Fleming, S, et al. A randomized placebo controlled trial of preoperative carbohydrate drinks and early postoperative nutritional supplement drinks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15(6): 737–745.Google Scholar
Bilku, DK, Dennison, AR, Hall, TC, et al. Role of preoperative carbohydrate loading: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014; 96(1): 15–22.Google Scholar
Waldron, NH, Miller, TE, Thacker, JK, et al. A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2014; 118(5): 966–975.Google Scholar
Beck, DE, Margolin, DA, Babin, SF, Russo, CT. Benefits of a multimodal regimen for postsurgical pain management in colorectal surgery. Ochsner J 2015; 15(4): 408–412.Google Scholar
Charlton, S, Cyna, AM, Middleton, P, Griffiths, JD. (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (12).Google Scholar
Johns, N, O’Neill, S, Ventham, NT, et al. Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14(10): e635–642.Google Scholar
Yu, N, Long, X, Lujan-Hernandez, JR, et al. Transversus abdominis-plane block versus local anesthetic wound infiltration in lower abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 2014; 14: 121.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×