Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. www.ahrq.gov/.Google Scholar

American Board of Surgery. www.absurgery.org/Google Scholar

Murphy, M, Redding, S, Twyman, J, eds (2013). Handbook on innovations in learning. www.centeril.org/handbook/resources/fullchapter/Handbook_on_Innovations_in_Learning.pdf. Retrieved May 15, 2016Google Scholar

Anderson, JR (2000). Learning and memory: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Armour Forse, R, Bramble, JD, McQuillan, R (2011). Team training can improve operating room performance. Surgery. 150(4):771–8.Google Scholar

Barsuk, JH, McGaghie, WC, Cohen, ER, O’Leary, KJ, Wayne, DB (2009). Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine. 37:2697–01.Google Scholar

Barsuk, JH (2012). Use of simulation-based mastery learning to improve patient outcomes for central venous catheter insertion.Google Scholar

Bleakley, A (2006). You are who I say you are: the rhetorical construction of identity in the operating theatre. J Workplace Learning. 18(7–8):414–25.Google Scholar

Bloom, BS (1968). Learning for master. UCLS-CSEIP Evaluation Comment. 1(2):1–12.Google Scholar

Bloom, BS (1971). Mastery learning. In Block, JH (Ed.). Mastery learning: Theory and practice, pp. 47–63. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Bloom, BS (1979). Mastery learning – does it work? Educational Leadership. 37(2):110–13.Google Scholar

Bric, J, Connolly, M, Kastenmeier, A, Goldblatt, M, Gould, JC (2014). Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc. 28:3343–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bric, JD, Lumbard, DC, Frelich, MJ, Gould, JC (2016). Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review. Surgical Endoscopy. 30:2169–78.Google Scholar

Chauvin, SW (2012). Educational principles in simulation in radiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, ER, Feinglass, J, Barsuk, JH (2010). Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simulation in Healthcare: 98–102.Google Scholar

Kumara, A, Smithb, R, Patela, VR (2015). Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills. Curr Opin Urol. 25:168–74.Google Scholar

Damavandi, ME, Shekari, KZ (2010). Effect of mastery learning method on performance, attitude of the weak students in chemistry. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 5:1574–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulan, G, Rege, RV, Hogg, DC, Gilberg-Fisher, KK, Tesfay, ST, Scott, DJ (2012). Content and face validity of a comprehensive robotic skills training program for general surgery, urology, and gynecology. American Journal of Surgery. 203:535–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dulan, G, Rege, RV, Hogg, DC, et al. (2012). Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. Surgery.152:477–88.Google Scholar

Ericsson, KA (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 79;suppl 10:S70–81.Google Scholar

Fitts, PM, Posner, MI (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Foote, JR, Valea, FA (2015). Robotic surgical training: where are we? Gynecologic Oncology.Google Scholar

Fox, EJ (2004). The personalized system of instruction: a flexible and effective approach to mastery learning. In Moran, D. & Malott, R. (Eds.), Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 201–21). San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Gillespie, BM, Chaboyer, W, Wallis, M, Fenwick, C (2010). Why isn’t “time out” being implemented? An exploratory study. Qual Saf Health Care. 19:103–6.Google Scholar

Goh, AC, Aghazadeh, MA, Mercado, MA, et al. (2015). Multi-institutional validation of fundamental inanimate robotic skills tasks. Journal of Urology. 194:1751–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goh, AC, Goldfarb, DW, Sander, JC, Miles, BJ, Dunkin, BJ (2012). Global evaluative assessment of Robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. Journal of Urology. 187:247–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guskey, TR (2010). Lessons of mastery learning. Educational Leadership: Interventions That Work. 68(2):52–7.Google Scholar

Guskey, TR (2005). Formative classroom assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: theory, research, and implications. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Huser, A-S, Muller, D, Brunkhorst, V, Kannisto, P, Musch, M, Kropfl, D, Groeben, H(2014). Simulated life-threatening emergency during robot-assisted surgery. Journal of Endourology. 28.Google Scholar

Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative.Google Scholar

Kohn, LT, Corrigan, JM, Donaldson, MS, eds (2000). To error is human. Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Kumar, A, Smith, R, Patel, VR (2015). Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills. Current Opinion in Urology. 25:168–74.Google Scholar

Lallas, CD, Davis, JW (2012). Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons. Journal of Endourology. 26(3):283–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liu, M, Curet, M (2015). A review of training research and virtual reality simulators for the da Vinci surgical system. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 27(1):12–26.Google Scholar

Mazzocco, K, Petitti, DB, Fong, KT, et al. (2009). Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 197:678–85.Google Scholar

McGaghie, WC, Issenberg, SB, Cohen, ER, Barsuk, JH, Wayne, DB (2011). Medical education featuring mastery learning with deliberate practice can lead to better health for individuals and populations. Academic Medicine. 86(11):e8–e9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moglia, A, et al. (2015). A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol, doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021Google Scholar

Paige, JT,(2012). Principles of simulation in radiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Paige, JT, Arora, S, Fernandez, G, Seymour, N (2015). Debriefing 101: training faculty to promote learning in simulation-based training. Am J Surg. 209(1):126–31.Google Scholar

Paige, JT, Kozmenko, V, Yang, T, et al. (2009). High-fidelity, simulation-based, interdisciplinary operating room team training at the point of care. Surgery. 145(2):138–46Google Scholar

Rosen, MA, Salas, E, Wu, TS, et al. (2008). Promoting teamwork: an event-based approach to simulation-based teamwork training for emergency medicine residents. Acad Emerg Med. 15:1190–8.Google Scholar

Raza, SJ, Froghi, S, Chowriappa, A, et al. (2014). Construct validation of the key components of fundamental skills of robotic surgery (FSRS) curriculum –a multi-institution prospective study. JSurg. 71:316–24.Google Scholar

Salas, E, Sims, DE, Burke, CS (2005). Is there a big five in teamwork? Small Group Res. 36:555–99.Google Scholar

Sánchez, R, Rodríguez, O, Rosciano, J, et al. (2016). Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). J Robot Surg.Google Scholar

Schedllhase, KC (2008). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research. 57(2):175–213.Google Scholar

Smith, R, Patel, V, Satava, R (2014). Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 10:379–84.Google Scholar

Stegemann, AP, Ahmed, K, Syed, JR, et al. (2013). Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology. 81:767–74.Google Scholar

Suh, IH, LaGrange, CA, Oleynikov, D, Siu, K-C (2016). Evaluating robotic surgical skills performance under distractive environment using objective and subjective measures. Surgical Innovation. 23(1):78–89.Google Scholar

Thiel, DD, Lannen, A, Richie, E, et al. (2013). Simulation-based training for bedside assistants can benefit experienced robotic prostatectomy teams. Journal of Endourology 27(2).Google Scholar

Volpe, A, Ahmed, K, Dasgupta, P, et al. (2015). Pilot validation study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum. European Urology. 6(8):292–9.Google Scholar

Xu, S, Perez, M, Perreno, C, et al. Face, content, construct, and concurrent validity of a novel robotic surgery patient-side simulator: the Xperience team trainer. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4607-xGoogle Scholar

Willis, RE, Van Sickle, KR (2015). Current status of simulation-based training in graduate medical education. Surg Clin North Am. 95(4):767–79.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf. Accessed February 3, 2015.Google Scholar

Zendeias, B, Cook, DA, Bingener, J, et al. (2011). Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 254(3):502–9, discussion 509–11.Google Scholar