Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T02:34:21.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Perioperative Complications of Robotic Surgery

Anesthetic Concerns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kaye, AD, Vadivelu, N, Ahuja, N, et al. Anesthetic considerations in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. Ochsner J. 2013;13(4):517–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Hsu, RL, Kaye, AD, Urman, RD. Anesthetic challenges in robotic-assisted urologic surgery. Rev Urol. 2013;15(4):178–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Gainsburg, DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(5):596604.Google Scholar
Phong, SVN, Koh, LKD. Anaesthesia for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: considerations for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:281–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danic, MJ, Chow, M, Gayload, A, et al. Anesthesia consideration for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a review of 1500 cases. J Robotic Surg. 2007;1:119–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klauschie, J, Wechter, ME, Jacob, K, et al. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:504–7.Google Scholar
Whitely, JR, Taylor, J, Henry, M, et al. Detection of elevated intracranial pressure in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter. J Neuro Anesth. 2015;27(2):155–9.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, J, Eckersberger, E, Sadri, H, et al. Open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: The European and US experience. Reviews in Urology. 2010;12(1):3543.Google Scholar
Estey, EP. Robotic prostatectomy: The new standard of care or a marketing success?. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2009;3(6):488–90.Google Scholar
Ishizaki, Y, Bandai, Y, Shimomura, K, et al. Safe intraabdominal pressure of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 1993;114(3):549–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Perrin, M, Fletcher, A. Laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2004;4(4):107–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, CM, Fredén, F, Maripuu, E, et al. Ventilation-perfusion distributions and gas exchange during carbon dioxide-pneumoperitoneum in a porcine model. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(5):691–7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq211.Google Scholar
Lestar, M, Gunnarsson, L, Lagerstrand, L, et al. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45° Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1069–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Malley, C, Cunningham, AJ. Physiologic changes during laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin N Am. 2001;1:118.Google Scholar
Baltayian, S. A brief review: anesthesia for robotic surgery. J Robotic Surg. 2008;2:5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainsburg, DM, Wax, D, Reich, DL, et al. Intraoperative management of robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy. JSLS. 2010;14:15.Google Scholar
Oğurlu, M, Küçük, M, Bilgin, F, et al. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(3):295300.Google Scholar
Stolzenburg, JU, Aedtner, B, Olthoff, D, et al. Anaesthetic considerations for endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006;98(3): 508–13.Google Scholar
Groeben, HT, Killic, O, Boergers, A, et al. Lung function and upper airway resistance following robotic radical prostatectomy. ASA Annual Meeting Abstract A1154, October 17, 2011, Chicago.Google Scholar
Groeben, HT, Killic, O, Boergers, A, et al. Lung function and upper airway resistance following robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with and without COPDASA. ASA Annual Meeting Abstract A1152, October 17, 2011, Chicago.Google Scholar
Halverson, A, Buchanan, R, Jacobs, L, et al. Evaluation of mechanism of increased intracranial pressure with insufflation. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:266–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doi, M, Kawai, Y. Mechanisms of increased intracranial pressure in rabbits exposed to head-down tilt. Jpn J Physiol. 1998;48(1):63–9.Google Scholar
Mavrocordatos, P, Bissonnette, B, Ravussin, P. Effects of neck position and head elevation on intracranial pressure in anesthetized neurological patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2000;12:1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthy, G, Marchbanks, RJ, Wateenpaugh, DE, et al. Increased intracranial pressure in humans during stimulated microgravity. Physiologist. 1992;35(suppl.):S184–5.Google Scholar
Lee, JR, Lee, PB, Do, SH, et al. The effect of gynaecological laparoscopic surgery on cerebral oxygenation. J Int Med Res. 2006;34:16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, DW, Kim, MJ, Lee, YK, Lee, HN. Does intrabdominal pressure affect development of subcutaneous emphysema at gynecologic laparoscopy? J Min Inv Gyn. 2011;18:761–5.Google Scholar
Harris, JA, Gallo, CD, Brummett, DM, et al. Extra-abdominal pneumodissection after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Am Surg. 2001;67:885–9.Google Scholar
Hieber, C, Ihra, G, Nachbar, S, Aloy, A, Kashanipour, A, Coraim, F. Near-fatal paradoxical gas embolism during gynecological laparoscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:898–9.Google Scholar
Cobb, WS, F leishman, HA, Kercher, KW, et al. Gas embolism during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparo Endosc Adv Surg Tech. 2005;15:387–90.Google Scholar
Hong, JY, Kim, JY, Choi, YD, et al. Incidence of venous gas embolism during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is lower than that during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:777–81.Google Scholar
Hong, JY, Kim, WO, Kil, HK. Detection of subclinical CO2 embolism by transesophageal echocardiography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;75:581–4.Google Scholar
Deem, S, Davis, CR, Tierney, JP. Transient paralysis after robotic prostatectomy. J Robotic Surg. 2008;2:45–6.Google Scholar
Hong, JY, Oh, YJ, Rha, KH, et al. Pulmonary edema after da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a case report. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22:370–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss. Practice advisory for perioperative visual loss associated with spine surgery: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):274–85.Google Scholar
Postoperative Visual Study Group. Risk factors associated with ischemic optic neuropathy after spinal fusion surgery. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(1):1524.Google Scholar
Weber, ED. Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy after minimally invasive prostatectomy J Neuroophthalmol. 2007;27(4):285–7.Google Scholar
Piegeler, T, Dreessen, P, Schlapfer, M, et al. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on outcome in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy – a retrospective analysis. Eur J Anaesth. 2011;28:6AP1–6.Google Scholar
Sampat, A, Parakati, L, Kunnavakkam, R, et al. Corneal abrasion in hysterectomy and prostatectomy: role of laparoscopic and robotic assistance. Anesthesiol. 2015:122(5):9941001.Google Scholar
Pandey, R, Elakkumanan, LB, Garg, R, et al. Brachial plexus injury after robotic-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:584–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, BJ, Flores, RM, Rusch, VW. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:54–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gharagozloo, F, Margolis, M, Tempesta, B, et al. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:380–4.Google Scholar
Van Hilleggersberg, R, Boone, J, Draaisma, WA, et al. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1435–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstine, KH, DeArmond, DT, Shamoun, DM, Campos, JH. The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2285–92.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×