Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:29:53.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, JS, Alshaer, T, Lukula, D, Dangerfield, R. Anesthetic Considerations for Robot-Assisted Gynecologic and Urology Surgery. J Anesth Clinic Res. 2013;4(8): 17.Google Scholar
Irvine, M, Patil, V. Anaesthesia for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. Cont Edu Anaesth Crit Care and Pain. 2009;9(4): 125129.Google Scholar
Lee, JR. Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic Surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014;66(1): 311.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine, Quality and Patient Safety Division. Preoperative Assessment and Coordination of Care, 2013. Available at www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/borim/physicians/pca-notifications/coordination-care.pdf.Google Scholar
Buchs, NC, Addeo, P, Bianco, FM, Gorodner, V, Ayloo, SM, Elli, EF, Oberholzer, J, Benedetti, E, Giulianotti, PC. Perioperative Risk Assessment in Robotic General Surgery: Lessons Learned from 884 Cases at a Single Institution. Arch Surg. 2012;147(8): 701708.Google Scholar
SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A Consensus Document on Robotic Surgery, Position Papers/Statements, 2007. Available at www.sages.org/publication/id/ROBOT/.Google Scholar
Haas, S, Haese, A, Goetz, AE, Kubitz, JC. Haemodynamics and Cardiac Function during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in Steep Trendelenburg Position. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7(4): 408413.Google Scholar
Badawy, M, Beique, F, Al-Halal, H, Azar, T, Akkour, K, Lau, SK, Gotlieb, WH. Anesthesia Considerations for Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology. J Robotic Surg. 2011;5(4): 265269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, MJ, Frost, EAM, Lew, MW. Anesthetic Care of the Patient for Robotic Surgery. ME J Anesth. 2008;19(5): 967982.Google Scholar
Kaye, AD, Vadivelu, N, Ahuja, N, Mitra, S, Silasi, D, Urman, RD. Anesthetic Considerations in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery. Ochsner J. 2013;13(4): 517524.Google ScholarPubMed
Ghomi, A. Robotics in Practice: New Angles on Safer Positioning. Contemporary OB/GYN. 2012;57(10): 26.Google Scholar
Chang, CH, Lee, HK, Nam, SH. The Displacement of the Tracheal Tube during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(5): 478480.Google Scholar
McLarney, JT, Rose, GL. Anesthetic Implications of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery. J Gynec Endosc Surg. 2011;2: 7578.Google ScholarPubMed
Weber, ED, Colyer, MH, Lesser, RL, Subramanian, PS. Posterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy after Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy. J Neuroophthalmol. 2007;27: 285287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalmar, AF, DeWolf, AM. Hendrickx, JFA. Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic Surgery in the Steep Trendelenburg Position. Advances in Anesthesia. 2012;30: 7596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksar, M, Akbulut, Z, Ocal, H, Balbay, MD, Kanbak, O. Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic Cystectomy: A Prospective Study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2014;64(2): 109115.Google Scholar
Lestar, M, Gunnarsson, L, Lagerstrand, L, Wiklund, P, Odeberg-Wernerman, S. Hemodynamic Perturbations during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in 45 Degrees Trendelenburg Position. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(5): 10691075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, R, Garg, R, Darlong, V, Punj, J, Chandralekha, KA. Unpredicted Neurological Complications after Robotic Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Formation in Steep Trendelenburg Position: Two Case Reports. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2010;61(3): 163166.Google Scholar
Kim, K, Kim, HJ, No, JH, Kim, TW, Kim, YB, Suh, CS. Increased Risk for Post-Operative Corneal Injuries in Patients Who Undergo Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56: 504506.Google Scholar
Piegeler, T, Dreessen, P, Graber, SM, Haile, SR, Schmid, DM, Beck-Schimmer, B. Impact of Intraoperative Fluid Administration on Outcome in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy—A Retrospective Analysis. BMC Anesthesiology. 2014;14: 61.Google Scholar
Diaz, M, Becker, D. Theromoregulation: Physiological and Clinical Considerations during Sedation and General Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2010;57: 2533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvir-Lazo, OL, White, PF. The Role of Multimodal Analgesia in Pain Management after Ambulatory Surgery. Curr Opin Anaestheiol. 2010;23(6): 697703.Google Scholar
Zorn, KC, Gautam, G, Shalhav, AL, et al. Training, Credentialing, Proctoring and Medicolegal Risks of Robotic Urologic Surgery: Recommendations of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182(3): 11261132.Google Scholar
Advisory on Robot-Assisted Surgery. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine. Quality and Patient Safety Division. March 2013. Available at www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/borim/physicians/pca-notifications/robot-assisted-surgery.pdfGoogle Scholar
AAGL Position Statement: Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Benign Gynecology. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2012. Available at www.jmig.org.Google Scholar
Sharmim, KM, Ahmed, K, Gavazzi, A, Gohil, R, Thomas, L, Poulsen, J, Ahmed, M, Jaye, P, Dasgupta, P. Development and Implementation of Centralized Simulation Training: Evaluation of Feasibility, Acceptability and Construct Validity. BJU International. 2013;111(3): 518523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhakar, A, Donnenfeld, BL, Kaye, AD, Felmate, CM, Urman, RD. Concepts in Creating Evidence-Based Anesthetic Protocol for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery. J Med Pract Manage. 2015;30(6): 1823.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×