Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T22:14:42.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Robotics in Thoracic Surgery 1

Pulmonary and Mediastinal Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

By
Farid Gharagozloo
Edited by
Alan David Kaye  and
Richard D. Urman
Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery , pp. 108 - 125
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2001. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.Google Scholar
Jacobeus, HC. Possibility of the use of the cystoscope for investigation of serous cavities. Munch Med Wochenschr 1910; 57: 2090.Google Scholar
Kaiser, LR. Diagnostic and therapeutic uses of pleuroscopy (thoracoscopy) in lung cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1987; 67: 1081.Google Scholar
Kirby, TJ. Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 1421–2.Google Scholar
Braimbridge, MV. Thoracoscopy—a historical perspective. In Yim, APC, Hazelrrig, SR, Izzat, MB et al. (eds). Minimal Access Cardiothoracic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000Google Scholar
McKenna, RJ, Wolf, RK, Brenner, M, et al. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:1903–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, MJ, Scruggs, GR, Kelly, KM et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery: has technology found its place? Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 111.Google Scholar
Yim, APC, Landreneau, RJ, lzzat, MB, Fung, ALK. ls video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy a unified approach? Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 16: 1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, RJ, Caccavale, N, Boncage, JP, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgical non-rib spreading simultaneously stapled lobectomy: a more patient-friendly oncologic resection. Chest 1999; 116: 1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, RJ. Simultaneously stapled lobectomy: a safe technique for video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac cardiovascular Surg 1995; 109: 619–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yim, APC, Ko, KM, Chau, WS et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resections: the initial Hong Kong experience. Chest 1996; 109: 13.Google Scholar
Swanson, SJ, Herndon, J, D’Amico, A, et al. Results of CALGB 39802: feasibility of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for early stage lung cancer. Am Assoc Clio Oncol 2002; 21: 290.Google Scholar
Luketich, JD, Meehan, MA, Landreneau, RJ, et al. Videothoracoscopic lobectomy versus open thoracotomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer 2000; 2: 56–60.Google Scholar
Landreneau, RJ, Hazelrigg, SR, Mack, MJ, et al. Postoperative pain-related morbidity: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 1285–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, RJ Jr, Fischel, RJ, Wolf, R, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 10: 321–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solaini, L, Prusciano, F, Bagioni, P, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery major pulmonary resections. Present experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 1: 437–42.Google Scholar
Daniels, LJ, Balderson, SS, Onaitis, JT, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: a safe and effective strategy for patients with stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 860–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, RJ Jr, Houck, W, Fuller, CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 421–6.Google Scholar
Kirby, TJ, Mack, MJ, Landreneau, RJ, et al. Lobectomy video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 997.Google Scholar
Giudicelli, R, Thomas, P, Lonjon, T, et al. Video-assisted minithoracotomy versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for performing lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 712.Google Scholar
Walker, WS. VATS lobectomy: the Edinburgh experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 10: 291.Google Scholar
Craig, SR, Walker, WS. Potential complications of vascular stapling in thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 736.Google Scholar
Walker, WS. Complications and pitfalls in video-assisted thoracic surgery. In Yim, APC, Hazelrigg, SR, Izzal, MB, et al. (eds). Minimal Access Cardiothoracic Surgery. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2000.Google Scholar
Yim, APC, Ho, JKS. Malfunctioning of vascular staple cutter during thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downey, RJ, McCormick, P, LoCicero, J, et al. Dissemination of malignant tumors after video-assisted thoracic surgery. A report of twenty one cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yim, APC, Wan, S, Lee, TW, Arifi, AA. VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine response compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugi, K, Kaneda, Y, Esato, K. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy reduces cytokine production more than conventional open lobectomy. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 48: 161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leaver, HA, Craig, SR, Yap, Pl, et al. Lymphocyte responses following open and minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Eur J Clin Invest 2000; 30: 230.Google Scholar
Walker, WS, Leaver, HA, Craig, SR, Yap, PL. The immune response to surgery: conventional and VATS lobectomy. In Yim, APC, Hazelrigg, SR, Izzat, MB, et al. (eds). Minimal Access Cardiothoracic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000.Google Scholar
Yim, APC, Ko, KM, Chau, WS, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resections: the initial Hong Kong experience. Chest 1996; 109: 13.Google Scholar
Demmy, TL, Curris, JJ. Minimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high-risk patients: a case control study. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landreneau, RJ, Mack, MJ, Hazelrigg, SR, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain after pulmonary resection by thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 1079.Google Scholar
Nakata, M, Saeki, H, Yokoyama, N, et al. Pulmonary function after lobectomy: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus a thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 938.Google Scholar
Kaseda, S, Aoki, T, Hangai, N, et al. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugiura, H, Morikawa, T, Kaji, M, et al. Long-term benefits for the quality of life after video-assisted thoracic lobectomy in patients with lung cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1999; 9: 403.Google Scholar
Yim, APC, liu, HP. Complications and failures from video-assisted thoracic surgery: experience from two centers in Asia. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 538.Google Scholar
Yim, APC, Liu, H, Izzat, MB, et al. Thoracoscopic major lung resection: an Asian perspective. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 10: 326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaseda, S, Aoki, T, Hangai, N. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the Japanese experience. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 10: 300.Google Scholar
Roviaro, G, Varoli, I, Vergani, C, et al. VATS major pulmonary resections: the Italian experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 10: 313.Google Scholar
McKenna, RJ Jr, Wolf, RK, Brenner, M, et al. Is VATS lobectomy an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1903.Google Scholar
Yim, APC. Thoracoscopic surgery in the elderly population. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demmy, TL. VATS lobectomy for frail or complex patients. Chest 2003; 124: 234.Google Scholar
Mack, MJ, Hazelrigg, SR, Landreneau, RJ, et al. (eds.). The first international symposium on thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 605.Google Scholar
Yim, APC, Landreneau, RJ, Izzat, MB, et al. Is video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy a unified approach? Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1155.Google Scholar
Heitmiller, RF, Mathison, DJ. French incision. In Grillo, HC, Austen, WG, Wilkins, EW, et al. (eds). Current Therapy in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Toronto, BC: Decker, 1989.Google Scholar
Brunelli, A, Monteverde, M, Borri, A, et al. Predictors of prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy. Ann. Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 1205–10.Google Scholar
Okereke, I, Murthy, SC, Alster, JM, et al. Characterization and importance of air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 1167–73.Google Scholar
Larry, R, Kaiser, LR, David, W, et al. Trial of a novel synthetic sealant in preventing air leaks after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 1623–9.Google Scholar
Belboul, A, Dernevik, L, Aljassim, O, et al. The effect of autologous fibrin sealant (Vivostat®) on morbidity after pulmonary lobectomy: a prospective randomised, blinded study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26: 1187–91.Google Scholar
Gharagozloo, F, Tempesta, B, Margolis, M, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 1009–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodner, J, Wykypiel, H, Greiner, A. Early experience with robot-assisted surgery for mediastinal masses. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 259–65.Google Scholar
Yim, AP, Lee, TW, Izzat, MM, et al. Place of video-thoracoscopy in thoracic surgical practice. World J Surg 2001; 25: 157–61.Google Scholar
Royle, JP. History of sympathectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 1999; 69: 107–12.Google Scholar
Gaskell, WH. The Involuntary Nervous System. London: Longman, Green and Co, 1916.Google Scholar
Bernard, C. Sur les effets de la section de la portion cephalous du grand sympathique. Comptes rend Soc Biol 1852; 4: 168–70.Google Scholar
Brown-Sequard, CE. Experimental researches applied to physiology and pathology. M Exam 1852; 8: 481,548,617,698.Google Scholar
Alexander, W. The Treatment of Epilepsy. Edinburgh: Y J Pentland, p. 228, 1889.Google Scholar
Adler, OB, Engel, A, Sageno, D. Palmar hyperhydrosis treated by percutaneous transthoracic chemical sympaticolysis. Eur J Radiol 4: 57–62.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, HA. Radiofrequency percutaneous upper thoracic sympathectomy. Technique and review of indications. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 34–38.Google Scholar
Telford, ED. The technique of sympathectomy. Br J Surg 1935; 23: 448–450.Google Scholar
Adson, AW, Brown, GE. Treatment of Raynaud’s disease by lumbar ram section and ganglionectomy’s and per vascular sympathetique neurectomy of the common iliacs. JAMA 1925; 84: 1908–10.Google Scholar
Telford, ED. The technique of sympathectomy. Br J Surg 1935; 23: 448–50.Google Scholar
Atkins, H. Sympathectomy by axillary approach. Lancet 1954; 1: 538.Google Scholar
Wittmoser, R. Toracoscopic sympathectomy and agronomy. In Cuschieri, A, et al. (eds). Operative Manual of Endoscopic Surgery. Berlin: Sringer Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
Teleranta, T. Secondary sympathetic chain reconstruction after endoscopes thoracic sympathectomy. Eur J Surg 1998; suppl. 1: 1–8.Google Scholar
Hashmonai, M, Assalia, A, Kopelman, D. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhydrosis. Ablate or resect? Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 435–41.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×