Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T23:07:46.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Social learning about food in birds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Louis Lefebvre
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 avenue Docteur Penfield, Montréal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada
Julie Bouchard
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada
Dorothy M. Fragaszy
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Susan Perry
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since the classic studies on potato and wheat washing in Japanese macaques (Kawai, 1965), traditions have often been studied in nonhuman animals because they represent an important precursor to human culture. This anthropocentric program has led many researchers to study primates and to focus on cognitive traits that are associated with human culture, for example imitation, language, tool use, and theory of mind. In this perspective, the study of nonhuman culture has recently culminated in the demonstration that wild chimpanzees in seven African populations show as many as 39 behavioral variants that may be attributed to “culture” (Whiten et al., 1999). For psychologists and anthropologists, the concern with precursors of human behavior in the closest relatives of Homo sapiens is perfectly justified. For biologists, however, the evolution of cognition must be studied on a much broader and phylogenetically distant set of taxa; in comparative biology (Harvey and Pagel, 1991), one of the goals is to remove phylogenetic influences from taxonomic data and to look for independent evolution of traits as adaptations to particular ecological and life-history conditions.

In this chapter, we compare the origin and diffusion of new feeding behaviors in birds and mammals. We begin by explaining why birds are particularly suitable to a comparison with mammals, and we discuss the use of anecdotal reports in the study of cognition. We then highlight three features by which the current literature on birds appears to differ from that on mammals and propose hypotheses to explain the differences.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Biology of Traditions
Models and Evidence
, pp. 94 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akins, C. K. and Zentall, T. R. 1996. Imitative learning in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using the two-action method. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 316–420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akins, C. K. and Zentall, T. R. 1998. Imitation in Japanese quail: the role of reinforcement of demonstrator responding. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 694–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, J. 1969a. Observational learning in three species of birds. Ibis, 111, 308–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, J. 1969b. Observational learning by fork-tailed flycatchers (Muscivora tyrannus). Animal Behaviour, 17, 652–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, J. 1970. The origin of tool-using by Egyptian vultures. Ibis, 112, 542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderks, C. E. 1986. Observational learning in the pigeon: effects of model's rate of response and percentage of reinforcement. Animal Learning and Behavior, 14, 331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altshuler, D. L. and Nunn, A. M. 2001. Observational learning in hummingbirds. Auk, 118, 795–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, S. 1989. Tool use by the fan-tailed raven (Corvus rhipidurus). Condor, 91, 999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, M. L. 1996. Food avoidance by adult house finches, Carpodacus mexicanus, affects seed preferences of offspring. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1279–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, K. L., Potter, G. D., Friend, T. H., and Beaver, B. V. 1983. Observational effects on learning in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 11, 123–129Google Scholar
Baker, A. E. M. and Crawford, B. H 1986. Observational learning in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 15, 7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, D. P., Donovan, P., and Myrick, R. 1975. Clam dropping behaviour of the glaucous-winged gull (Larus glaucescens). Wilson Bulletin, 87, 60–64Google Scholar
Barnard, C. J. and Sibly, R. M. 1981. Producers and scroungers, a general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 29, 543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, B. B. 1982. Chimpocentrism: bias in cognitive ethology. Journal of Human Evolution, 11, 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednekoff, P. A., and Balda, R. P. 1996a. Observational spatial memory in Clark's nutcrackers and Mexican jays. Animal Behaviour, 52, 833–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednekoff, P. A. and Balda, R. P. 1996b. Social caching and observational spatial memory in pinyon jays. Behaviour, 133, 807–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boire, D. 1989. Comparaison quantitative de l'encéphale, de ses grandes subdivisions et de relais visuels, trijumaux et acoustiques chez 28 espèces d'oiseaux. PhD Thesis, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
Boswall, J. 1977. Tool using by birds and related behaviour. Avicultultural Magazine,83, 88–97, 146–159, 220–228
Bowman, R. I. and Billeb, S. L. 1965. Blood-eating in a Galapagos finch. Living Bird, 4, 29–44Google Scholar
Breitwisch, R. and Breitwisch, M. 1991. House sparrows open an automatic door. Wilson Bulletin, 103, 725–726Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. 1993. Do larger brains mean greater intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 696–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. W. and Whiten, A. 1988. Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Cadieu, J. C. and Cadieu, N. 1996. Influence of some interactions between fledglings and adults on the food choice in young canaries (Serinus canarius). Journal of Ethology, 14, 99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadieu, N. and Cadieu, J. C. 1998. Is food recognition in an unfamiliar environment a long-term effect of stimulus or local enhancement? A study in the juvenile canary. Behavioural Processes, 43, 183–192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, G. S. 1981. Attraction to tropical mixed-species heron flocks: proximate mechanism and consequences. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 8, 99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambefort, J. P. 1981. Comparative study of culturally-transmitted patterns of feeding habits in the chacma baboon (Papio ursinus) and the vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). Folia Primatologica, 36, 243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F. M., Heyes, C. M., and Goldsmith, A. R. 1999. Stimulus learning and response learning by observation in the European starling, in a two-object/two-action test. Animal Behaviour, 58, 151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlier, P. and Lefebvre, L. 1997. Ecological differences in social learning between adjacent, mixing populations of zenaida doves. Ethology, 103, 772–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J., Nicol, C., Jones, R., and McGreevy, P. 1996. Effects of observational learning on food selection in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 50, 177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloutier, S. and Newberry, R. C. 2001. Cannibalistic behaviour is influenced by social learning. Advances in Ethology, 36, 138Google Scholar
Cole, H. 1996. Brothers and sisters in arms: sibling coalitions in juvenile pigeons. MSc Thesis, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Cook, L. M., Brower, L. P., and Alcock, J. 1969. An attempt to verify mimetic advantage in a neotropical environment. Evolution, 23, 339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. and Penny, D. 1997. Mass survival of birds across the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary: molecular evidence. Science, 275, 1109–1113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cracraft, J. 2001. Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous–Tertiary mass extinction event. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 459–469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cristol, D. A. and Switzer, P. V. 1999. Avian prey-dropping behavior. II. American crows and walnuts. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 220–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, B. V. and Foss, B. M. 1965. Observational learning in budgerigars. Animal Behaviour, 13, 470–474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groot, P. 1980. Information transfer in a socially roosting weaver bird (Quelea quelea; Ploceinae): an experimental study. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1249–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perera, T. B. and Guilford, T. 1999. The social transmission of spatial information in homing pigeons. Animal Behaviour, 57, 715–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolman, C. S., Templeton, J., and Lefebvre, L. 1996. Mode of foraging competition is related to tutor preference in Zenaida aurita. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 45–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubbledam, J. L. 1998. Birds. In The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates, ed. R. Nieuwenhuys, H. J. TenDonkelaar, and C. Nicholson, pp. 1525–1620. Berlin: Springer Verlag
Dunbar, R. I. M. 1998. The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 178–1903.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. 1984. Spontaneous and deferred imitation in the pigeon. Behavioural Processes, 9, 347–354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erwin, R. M., Hafner, H., and Dugan, P. 1985. Differences in the feeding behaviour of little egrets (Egretta garzetta) in two habitats in the Camargue, France. Wilson Bulletin, 97, 534–538Google Scholar
Fisher, J. and Hinde, R. A. 1949. The opening of milk bottles by birds. British Birds, 42, 347–357Google Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M. and Visalberghi, E. 1989. Social influences on the acquisition of tool-using behaviors in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, J. and Kotrschal, K. 1999. Social learning in common ravens, Corvus corax. Animal Behaviour, 57, 785–793CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, J., Bugnyar, T., and Kotrschal, K. 1997. Learning or scrounging? Implications of an experimental study with ravens (Corvus corax). Advances in Ethology, 32, 77Google Scholar
Fritz, J., Bisenberger, A., and Kotrschal, K. 1999. Social mediated learning of an operant task in greylag geese: field observation and experimental evidence. Advances in Ethology, 34, 51Google Scholar
Fritz, J., Bisenberger, A., and Kotrschal, K. 2000. Stimulus enhancement in greylag geese: socially mediated learning of an operant task. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1119–1125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fryday, S. L., and Greig-Smith, P. W. 1994. The effects of social learning on the food choice of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Behaviour, 128, 281–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galef, B. G. Jr. 1980. Diving for food: analysis of a possible case of social learning in wild rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 94, 416–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galef, B. G., Jr. 1996. Social enhancement of food preferences in Norway rats: a brief review. In Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture, ed. C. M. Heyes and B. G. Galef Jr., pp. 49–64. New York: Academic Press
Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. and Franck, D. 1991. Socialisation tactics of the spectacled parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 119, 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraldeau, L. A. and Caraco, T. 2000. Social Foraging Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Giraldeau, L. A. and Lefebvre, L. 1986. Exchangeable producer and scrounger roles in a captive flock of feral pigeons: a case for the skill pool effect. Animal Behaviour, 34, 797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraldeau, L. A. and Lefebvre, L. 1987. Scrounging prevents cultural transmission of food-finding behaviour in pigeons. Animal Behaviour, 35, 387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, J. 1964. Tool-using and aimed throwing in a community of free-living chimpanzees. Nature, 201, 1264–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götmark, F. 1990. A test of the information-centre hypothesis in a colony of sandwich terns Sterna sandvicensis. Animal Behaviour, 39, 487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig-Smith, P. W. 1978. Imitative foraging in mixed-species flocks of Seychelles birds. Ibis, 120, 233–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hailman, J. P. 1961. Why do gull chicks peck at visually contrasting spots? A suggestion concerning social learning of food-discrimination. American Naturalist, 95, 245–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hatch, K. K. and Lefebvre, L. 1997. Does father know best? Social learning from kin and non-kin in juvenile ringdoves. Behavioral Processes, 41, 1–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedges, S. B., Parker, P. H., Sibley, C. G., and Kumar, S. 1996. Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals. Nature, 381, 226–229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higuchi, H. 1987. Individual differences in bait-fishing by the green-backed heron Ardeola striata associated with territory quality. Ibis, 130, 39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. and Fisher, J. 1951. Further observations on the opening of milk bottles by birds. British Birds, 44, 393–396Google Scholar
Hino, T. 1998. Mutualistic and commensal organization of avian mixed-species foraging flocks in a forest of western Madagascar. Journal of Avian Biology, 29, 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, C. L. and Sherry, D. F. 1995. Cache pilfering and its prevention in pairs of black-capped chickadees. Journal of Avian Biology, 26, 187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus). Ecology, 49, 682–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, G. R. 1996. Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature, 379, 249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., and Rizzolatti, G. 1999. Cortical mechanisms in human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imanishi, K. and Altmann, S. A. (ed.) 1965. Japanese Monkeys: A Collection of Translations. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press
Ingram, J. 1998. The Barmaid's Brain. Toronto: Viking Press
Iwaniuk, A. N., Nelson, J. E., and Pellis, S. M. 2001. Do big-brained mammals play more? Comparative analyses of play and relative brain size in mammals. Journal of Comparative Psychology 115, 29–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, T. B. and Kamil, A. C. 1973. Tool-making and tool-using in the Northern blue jay. Science, 180, 1076–1078CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jouventin, P., Pasteur, G., and Cambefort, J. P. 1976. Observational learning of baboons and avoidance of mimics. Evolution, 31, 214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karten, H. J. 1991. Homology and evolutionary origins of the “neocortex”. Brain Behavior and Evolution, 38, 264–272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawai, M. 1965. Newly-acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima Islet. Primates, 6, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klopfer, P. H. 1957. An experiment on emphatic learning in ducks. American Naturalist, 91, 61–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klopfer, P. H. 1959. Social interactions in discrimination learning with special reference to feeding behavior in birds. Behaviour, 14, 282–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klopfer, P. H. 1961. Observational learning in birds: the establishment of behavioral modes. Behaviour, 17, 71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, S. K. and Knight, R. L. 1983. Aspects of food finding by wintering bald eagles. Auk, 100, 477–484Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. 1973. Social learning and the significance of mixed species flocks of chickadees (Parus spp.). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 51, 1275–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. 1974. Colonial nesting and social feeding as strategies for exploiting food resources in the great blue heron (Ardea herodias). Behaviour, 51, 99–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R., MacRoberts, M. H., and Cullen, J. M. 1972. Flocking and feeding in the great tit Parus major: an experimental study. Ibis, 114, 507–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushlan, J. A. 1977. The significance of plumage colour in the formation of feeding aggregations of Ciconiiforms. Ibis, 119, 361–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langen, T. A. 1996a. Skill acquisition and the timing of natal dispersal in the white-throated magpie-jay, Calocitta formosa. Animal Behaviour, 51, 575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langen, T. A. 1996b. Social learning of a novel foraging skill by white-throated magpiejays (Calocitta formosa, Corvidae): a field experiment. Ethology, 102, 157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. F. and Guindon, C. F. 1981. Flock composition, breeding success, and learning in the brown jay. Condor, 83, 27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeCroy, M. 1972. Young common and roseate terns learning to fish. Wilson Bulletin, 84, 201–202Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L. 1986. Cultural diffusion of a novel food-finding behavior in urban pigeons: an experimental field test. Ethology, 71, 295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L. 1995a. The opening of milk bottles by birds: evidence for accelerating learning rates, but against the wave-of-advance model of cultural transmission. Behavioural Processes, 34, 43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L. 1995b. Ecological correlates of social learning: problems and solutions for the comparative method. Behavioural Processes, 35, 163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L. 2000. Feeding innovations and their cultural transmission in bird populations. In The Evolution of Cognition, ed. C. Heyes and L. Huber, pp. 311–328. Cambridge: MIT Press
Lefebvre, L. and Giraldeau, L.-A. 1996. Is social learning an adaptive specialization? In Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture, ed. C. M. Heyes and B. G. Galef Jr., pp. 107–128. New York: Academic Press. in kin-structured pigeon flocks
Lefebvre, L. and Helder, R. 1997. Scrounger numbers and the inhibition of social learning in pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 40, 201–207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefebvre, L. and Henderson, D. 1986. Resource defense and priority of access to food by the mate in pigeons. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64, 1889–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Palameta, B., and Hatch, K. K. 1996. Is group-living associated with social learning? A comparative test of a gregarious and a territorial columbid. Behaviour, 133, 241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Templeton, J., Brown, K., and Koelle, M. 1997a. Carib grackles imitate conspecific and zenaida dove tutors. Behaviour, 134, 1003–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Whittle, P., Lascaris, E., and Finkelstein, A. 1997b. Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Animal Behaviour, 53, 549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Gaxiola, A., Dawson, S., Timmermans, S., Rozsa, L., and Kabai, P. 1998. Feeding innovations and forebrain size in Australasian birds. Behaviour, 135, 1077–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Nicolakakis, N., and Boire, D. 2002. Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour, 139, 939–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévesque, H. and McNeil, R. 1985. Abondance et activités du pigeon biset, Columba livia, dans le port de Montréal. Canadian Field Naturalist, 99, 343–355Google Scholar
Ligon, J. D. and Martin, D. J. 1974. Pinyon seed assessment by the pinyon jay Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus. Animal Behaviour, 22, 421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, D. W. and Henderson, D. G. 1977. Aspects of the behaviour and ecology of mixed-species bird flocks in Kashmir. Ibis, 119, 481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, S. F. 1970. Social stimulation modifies the feeding behavior of the American robin. Condor, 72, 499–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. R. 1988. Direct and observational learning by redwinged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus): the importance of complex visual stimuli. In Social Learning: Psychological and Biological Perspectives, ed. T. R. Zentall and B. G. Galef Jr., pp. 99–115. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Mason, J. R. and Reidinger, R. F. 1981. Effects of social facilitation and observational learning on feeding behavior of the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Auk, 98, 778–784Google Scholar
Mason, J. R. and Reidinger, R. F. 1982. The relative importance of reinforced versus nonreinforced stimuli in visual discrimination learning by red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Journal of General Psychology, 107, 219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. R., Arzt, A. H., and Reidinger, R. H. 1984. Comparative assessment of food preferences and aversions acquired by blackbirds via observational learning. Auk, 101, 796–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuoid, L. M. and Galef, B. G. Jr. 1993. Social stimuli influencing feeding behaviour of Burmese fowl: a video analysis. Animal Behaviour, 46, 13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinertzhagen, R. 1954. The education of young ospreys. Ibis, 96, 153–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midford, P. E., Hailman, J. P., and Woolfenden, G. E. 2000. Social learning of a novel foraging patch in families of free-living Florida scrub-jays. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1199–1207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millikan, G. C. and Bowman, R. I. 1967. Observations on Galápagos tool-using finches in captivity. Living Bird, 6, 23–41Google Scholar
Mìacu kovský, J. 1989a. Brain size in birds: 1. Tinamiformes through Ciconiiformes. Vestnik Ceskoslovnskae Spolecnosti Zoologickae, 53, 33–47Google Scholar
Mìacu kovský, J. 1989b. Brain size in birds: 2. Falconiformes through Gaviiformes. Vestnik Ceskoslovnskae Spolecnosti Zoologickae, 53, 200–213Google Scholar
Mìacu kovský, J. 1989c. Brain size in birds: 3. Columbiformes through Piciformes. Vestnik Ceskoslovnskae Spolecnosti Zoologickae, 53, 252–264Google Scholar
Mìacu kovský, J. 1990. Brain size in birds: 4. Passeriformes. Acta Societas Zoologica Bohemoslovensis, 54, 27–37Google Scholar
Mönkkönen, M. and Koivula, K. 1993. Neophobia and social learning of foraging skills in willow tits Parus montanus. Ardea, 81, 43–46Google Scholar
Moore, B. R. 1992. Avian movement imitation and a new form of mimicry: tracing the evolution of a complex form of learning. Behaviour, 122, 231–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murton, R. K. 1970. Why do some bird species feed in flocks?Ibis, 113, 534–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murton, R. K. and Isaacson, A. J. 1962. The functional basis of some behaviour in the woodpigeon Columbus palumbus. Ibis, 104, 503–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murton, R., Coombs, C., and Thearle, R. 1972. Ecological studies of the feral pigeon Columba livia var. II. Flock behaviour and social organization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 9, 875–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. 1967. Evolution and ecology of some British finches. Ibis, 109, 33–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C. J., and Pope, S. J. 1994. Social learning in small flocks of laying hens. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1289–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C. J. and Pope, S. J. 1999. The effects of demonstrator social status and prior foraging success on social learning in laying hens. Animal Behaviour, 57, 163–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolakakis, N. and Lefebvre, L. 2000. Forebrain size and innovation rate in European birds: Feeding, nesting and confounding variables. Behaviour, 137, 1415–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolakakis, N., Sol, D., and Lefebvre, L. 2002. Innovation rate predicts species richness in birds, but not extinction risk. Animal Behaviour, in press
Norton-Griffiths, M. 1969. The organization, control and development of parental feeding in the oyster catcher (Haematopus ostralegus). Behaviour, 34, 55–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palameta, B. 1989. The importance of socially transmitted information in the acquisition of novel foraging skills by pigeons and canaries. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK
Palameta, B. and Lefebvre, L. 1985. The social transmission of a food-finding technique in pigeons: what is learned?Animal Behaviour, 33, 892–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, M. 1956. Diffusion of a new habit among greenfinches. Nature, 177, 709–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, A. O. and Cushing, J. E. 1949. Acquired feeding behavior in mallards. Auk, 66, 80Google Scholar
Reader, S. M. 2000. Social learning and innovation: individual differences, diffusion dynamics and evolutionary issues. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK
Reader, S. M. and Laland, K. 2002. Social intelligence, innovation and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 4436–4441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reader, S. M. and Lefebvre, L. 2001. Social learning and sociality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 353–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehkämper, G. K. and Zilles, K. 1991. Parallel evolution in mammalian and avian brains: comparative cytoachitectonic and cytochemical analysis. Cell and Tissue Research, 263, 23–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehkämper, G. K., Frahm, H. D., and Zilles, K. 1991. Quantitative development of brain structures in birds (Galliformes and Passeriformes) compared with that in mammals (Insectivores and Primates). Brain Behavior and Evolution, 37, 125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roell, A. 1978. Social behaviour of the jackdaw, Corvus monedula, in relation to its niche. Behaviour, 64, 1–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M. and Ford, R. 1968. Warning signals from a starling Sturnus vulgaris observing a bird rejecting unpalatable prey. Ibis, 110, 104–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, I. and Chapman, G. 1986. Cross-fostering, imprinting and learning in two sympatric species of cockatoo. Behaviour, 96, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, D. I., Barnett, R. J., Ridgely, R. S., and Klopfer, P. H. 1977. Adaptive advantages of mixed-species feeding flocks among seed-eating finches in Costa Rica. Ibis, 119, 10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasvári, L. 1979. Observational learning in great, blue and marsh tits. Animal Behaviour, 27, 767–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasvári, L. 1985a. Keypeck conditioning with reinforcement in two different locations in thrush, tit and sparrow species. Behavioral Processes, 11, 245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasvári, L. 1985b. Different observational learning capacity in juvenile and adult individuals of congeneric bird species. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 69, 293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasvári, L. and Hegyi, Z. 1998. How mixed-species foraging flocks develop in response to benefits from observational learning. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1461–1469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schildkraut, D. L. 1974. Observational learning in captive blue jays. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 6143BGoogle Scholar
Sherry, D. F., and Galef, B. G. Jr. 1984. Cultural transmission without imitation: milk bottle opening by birds. Animal Behaviour, 32, 937–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, D. F., and Galef, B. G. Jr. 1990. Social learning without imitation: more about milk bottle opening by birds. Animal Behaviour, 40, 987–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, G. C. and Alquist, J. E. 1990. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Sibley, C. G. and Monroe, B. L. 1990. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Sol, D., Timmermans, S., and Lefebvre, L. 2002. Behavioral flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behaviour, 63, 495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenhouse, D. 1962. A new habit of the redpoll Carduelis flammea in New Zealand. Ibis, 104, 250–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, H., Baron, G., and Frahm, H. 1988. Comparative size of brains and brain components. In Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 4: Neurosciences, ed. H. D. Stekliss and J. Erwin, pp. 1–38. New York: Alan R. Liss
Stokes, A. W. 1971. Parental and courtship feeding in red jungle fowl. Auk, 88, 21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K. A. 1984. The advantages of social foraging in downy woodpeckers. Animal Behaviour, 32, 16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. M. 1972. Hovering behavior by house finches. Condor, 74, 219–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebbich, S., Taborsky, M., Fessl, B., and Blomqvist, D. 2001. Do woodpecker finches acquire tool use by social learning?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 2189–2193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tebbich, S.Taborsky, M., Fessl, B., and Dvorak, M. 2002. The ecology of tool use in the woodpecker finch Cactospiza pallida. Ecology Lettrs, 5, 656–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, J. J., Kamil, A. C., and Balda, R. P. 1999. Sociality and social learning in two species of corvids: the pinyon jay (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) and the Clark's nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. F., Ray, G. F., and Preston, R. L. 1996. Nectar robbing in blue tits Parus caeruleus: failure of a novel feeding trait to spread. Ibis, 138, 552–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. L. 1964. A New Dictionary of Birds. London: Nelson
Thorpe, W. H. 1956. Records of the development of original and unusual feeding methods by wild passerine birds. British Birds, 49, 389–395Google Scholar
Timmermans, S., Lefebvre, L., Boire, D., and Basu, P. 2000. Relative size of the hyperstriatum ventrale is the best predictor of innovation rate in birds. Brain Behavior and Evolution, 56, 196–203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, E. R. A. 1961. The acquisition of new behaviour patterns: an analysis of social feeding in sparrows and chaffinches. Animal Behaviour, 9, 113–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, E. R. A. 1964. Social feeding in birds. Behaviour, 24, 1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veissier, I. 1993. Observational learning in cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 35, 235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, R. K. 1981. Local enhancement for food-finding by rooks (Corvus frugilegus) foraging on grassland. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 57, 15–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, T. A., and Grubb, T. C. Jr. 1988. Copying of foraging locations in mixed-species flocks of temperate-deciduous woodland birds: an experimental study. Condor, 90, 132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, B. 1988. The spread of food producing techniques in a captive flock of jackdaws. Behaviour, 107, 267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidmann, U. 1957. Verhaltensstudien an der stockente. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 13, 208–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, T. K. and Sherry, T. W. 1987. Behavioral feeding specialization in Pinaroloxias inornata, the “Darwin's Finch” of Cocos Island, Costa Rica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 84, 5506–5510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A. and Byrne, R. W. 1997. Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W., and Boesch, C. 1999. Culture in chimpanzees. Nature, 399, 682–685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A. C. 1985. The molecular basis of evolution. Scientific American, 253, 148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyles, J. S., Kunkel, J. G., and Wilson, A. C. 1983. Birds, behavior and anatomical evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 80, 4394–4397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zach, R. 1979. Shell-dropping: decision-making and optimal foraging in northwestern crows. Behaviour, 68, 106–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentall, T. R. and Hogan, D. E. 1976. Imitation and social facilitation in the pigeon. Animal Learning and Behavior, 4, 427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Social learning about food in birds
    • By Louis Lefebvre, Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 avenue Docteur Penfield, Montréal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada, Julie Bouchard, Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Social learning about food in birds
    • By Louis Lefebvre, Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 avenue Docteur Penfield, Montréal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada, Julie Bouchard, Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Social learning about food in birds
    • By Louis Lefebvre, Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 avenue Docteur Penfield, Montréal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada, Julie Bouchard, Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Québec H3A 1B1, Canada
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.005
Available formats
×