Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-competence
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-competence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Book part
- 1 Premises of multi-competence
- 2 Research questions and methodology of multi-competence
- 3 Multi-competence in second language acquisition: inroads into the mainstream?
- 4 Not through a glass darkly: refocusing the psycholinguistic study of bilingualism through a “bivocal” lens
- 5 Multilingualism research
- 6 Multi-competence and dynamic/complex systems
- 7 Multi-competence and Dominant Language Constellation
- 8 Consequences of multi-competence for sociolinguistic research
- 9 A usage-based account of multi-competence
- 10 Multi-competence and syntax
- 11 Syntactic processing
- 12 Language and cognition in bilinguals
- 13 Gestures in multi-competence
- 14 Pragmatic transferin foreign language learners: a multi-competence perspective
- 15 Multi-competence and endangered language revitalization
- 16 Multi-competence and first language attrition
- 17 Cognitive consequences of multi-competence
- 18 Space, motion and thinking for language
- 19 Multi-competence and personality
- 20 Multi-competence as a creative act: ramifications of the multi-competence paradigm for creativity research and creativity-fostering education
- 21 Multi-competence and language teaching
- 22 Multi-competence and emotion
- 23 Multi-competence and English as a lingua franca
- 24 A critical reaction from second language acquisition research
- 25 Questions of multi-competence: a written interview
- 26 Epilogue: multi-competence and the TranslanguagingInstinct
- Bibliography of ‘multi-competence’ (and related topics)
- Index
- References
9 - A usage-based account of multi-competence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-competence
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-competence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Book part
- 1 Premises of multi-competence
- 2 Research questions and methodology of multi-competence
- 3 Multi-competence in second language acquisition: inroads into the mainstream?
- 4 Not through a glass darkly: refocusing the psycholinguistic study of bilingualism through a “bivocal” lens
- 5 Multilingualism research
- 6 Multi-competence and dynamic/complex systems
- 7 Multi-competence and Dominant Language Constellation
- 8 Consequences of multi-competence for sociolinguistic research
- 9 A usage-based account of multi-competence
- 10 Multi-competence and syntax
- 11 Syntactic processing
- 12 Language and cognition in bilinguals
- 13 Gestures in multi-competence
- 14 Pragmatic transferin foreign language learners: a multi-competence perspective
- 15 Multi-competence and endangered language revitalization
- 16 Multi-competence and first language attrition
- 17 Cognitive consequences of multi-competence
- 18 Space, motion and thinking for language
- 19 Multi-competence and personality
- 20 Multi-competence as a creative act: ramifications of the multi-competence paradigm for creativity research and creativity-fostering education
- 21 Multi-competence and language teaching
- 22 Multi-competence and emotion
- 23 Multi-competence and English as a lingua franca
- 24 A critical reaction from second language acquisition research
- 25 Questions of multi-competence: a written interview
- 26 Epilogue: multi-competence and the TranslanguagingInstinct
- Bibliography of ‘multi-competence’ (and related topics)
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-Competence , pp. 183 - 205Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. 1987. ‘Competition, variation, and language learning’, in MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, pp. 157–194. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Elman, J., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. and Plunkett, K. 1998. ‘Innateness and emergentism’, in Bechtel, W. and Graham, G. (eds), A Companion to Cognitive Science, pp. 590–601. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds) 1974. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. 2005. Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Block, D. 2007. Multilingual Identities in a Global City: London Stories. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. M. 2009. ‘Ethnography and democracy: Hymes’s political theory of language’, Text and Talk 29, 257–276.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. M. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. M. 2012. ‘Supervernaculars and their dialects’, Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, 1–13.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. M. and Backus, A. 2011. ‘Repertoires revisited: “Knowing language” in superdiversity’, Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 67, downloaded July 23, 2012. www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/ldc/publications/workingpapers/67.pdfGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. M. and Rampton, B. 2011. ‘Language and superdiversity’, Diversities 13, 3–21.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. and Choi, S. 2001. ‘Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories’, in Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, pp. 475–511. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. and Goldberg, A. 2009. ‘Input effects within a constructionist framework’, Modern Language Journal 93, 418–429.Google Scholar
Boyland, J. 2001. ‘Hypercorrect pronoun case in English? Cognitive processes that account for pronoun usage’, in Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. (eds), pp. 383–404.Google Scholar
Busch, B. 2012. ‘The linguistic repertoire revisited’, Applied Linguistics 33, 503–523.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2006. ‘From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition’, Language 82, 711–733.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. (eds) 2001a. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. 2001b. ‘Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure’, in Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. (eds), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. and Scheibman, J. 1999. ‘The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don’t in English’, Linguistics 37 (4), 575–596.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. 2011. ‘Codemeshing in academic writing: identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging’, Modern Language Journal 95, 401–417.Google Scholar
Canale, M. and Swain, M. 1980. ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing’, Applied Linguistics 1, 1–47.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. 1988. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Collins, J. 2014. ‘Literacy practices, linguistic anthropology and social inequality’, Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 143, downloaded November 15, 2014. https://www.academia.edu/9277086/WP143_Collins_2014._Literacy_practices_linguistic_anthropology_and_social_inequality.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1991. ‘The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence’, Second Language Research 7, 103–117.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2012. ‘Multi-competence’, in Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, pp. 3768–3774. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (ed.) 2010. Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Creese, A., Bhatt, A., Bhojani, N. and Martin, P. 2006. ‘Multicultural, heritage and learner identities in complementary schools’, Language and Education 20, 23–43.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. 2008. ‘The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult native speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: an empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology’, Journal of Memory and Language 58, 931–951.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. 2012. ‘Different speakers, different grammars: individual differences in native language attainment’, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2, 219–225.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. 2011. ‘Language input environments and language development in bilingual acquisition’, Applied Linguistics Review 2, 221–240.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. 2007. ‘Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change’, New Ideas in Psychology 25, 108–127.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. 2006. ‘Cognitive perspectives on SLA: the Associative–Cognitive CREED’, AILA Review 19, 100–121.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. 2008. ‘Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: the associative learning of constructions, learner-attention and the limited L2 endstate’, in Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. (eds), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, pp. 372–405. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. 2012. ‘What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use?’, in Gries, S. T. and Divjak, D. S. (eds), Frequency Effects in Language Learning and Processing, pp. 7–34. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (eds) 2006. Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics, special issue of Applied Linguistics 27.Google Scholar
Ellis, N., O’Donnell, M. and Romer, U. 2013. ‘Usage-based language: investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition’, Language Learning 63, 25–51.Google Scholar
Elman, J. 1999. ‘Origins of language: a conspiracy theory’, in MacWhinney, B. (ed.), The Emergence of Language, pp. 1–28. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. and Mitchell-Kernan, C. (eds) 1977. Child Discourse. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ford, C., Fox, B. and Thompson, S. 2003. ‘Social interaction and grammar’, in Tomasello, M. (ed.), The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, pp. 119–143. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Franceschini, R. 2011. ‘Multilingualism and multi-competence: a conceptual view’, Modern Language Journal 95, 344–355.Google Scholar
Garcia, O. 2009. Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., Cheng, A. and Carlson, M. T. 2006. ‘Reconceptualizing multi-competence as a theory of language knowledge’, Applied Linguistics 27, 220–240.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and in Classrooms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M. and Parra, M. 2012. ‘Dual language exposure and early bilingual development’, Journal of Child Language 39, 1–27.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. 2009. ‘Hymes’s linguistics and ethnography in education’, Text and Talk 29, 347–358.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1964. ‘Formal discussion’, The Acquisition of Language: Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 29, 107–111.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1972. ‘On communicative competence’, in Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds), Sociolinguistics, pp. 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1986. ‘Discourse: scope without depth’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 57, 49–89.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1992. ‘The concept of communicative competence revisited’, in Putz, M. (ed.), Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution, pp. 31–58. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ibbotson, P. 2013. ‘The scope of usage-based theory’, Frontiers in Psychology 4, 1–15.Google Scholar
Lam, W. S. E. 2009. ‘Multiliteracies on instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational affiliations: a case of an adolescent immigrant’, Reading Research Quarterly 44, 77–397.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, N., Mikesell, L., Joaquin, A., Mates, A. and Schumann, J. 2009. The Interactional Instinct: The Evolution and Acquisition of Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2006. ‘On the human “interaction engine”’, in Enfield, N. J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds), Roots of Human Sociality, pp. 39–69. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Wei, Li 2011. ‘Moment analysis and translanguaging space: discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain’, Journal of Pragmatics 43, 1222–1235.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J. and Crichton, J. 2008. ‘The monolingual framing of international education in Australia’, Sociolinguistic Studies 2, 367–384.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2008. ‘A unified model’, in Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. (eds), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, pp. 341–371. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Makoni, S., Brutt-Griffler, J. and Mashiri, P. 2007. ‘The use of “indigenous” and urban vernaculars in Zimbabwe’, Language in Society 36, 25–49.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A. (eds) 2007. Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. 2007. ‘Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers’, Discourse Studies 9, 194–225.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1979. ‘Transcription as theory’, in Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B. (eds), Developmental Pragmatics, pp. 43–72. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1988. Culture and Language Development: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. 1984. ‘Language acquisition and socialization: three developmental stories’, in Shweder, R. A. and LeVine, R. A. (eds), Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, pp. 276–320. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. 1995. ‘The impact of language socialization on grammatical development’, in Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds), The Handbook of Child Language, pp. 73–94. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. 2008, ‘Language socialization: an historical overview’, in Duff, P. A. and Hornberger, N. (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, second edition, pp. 3–15. Springer.Google Scholar
Orman, J. 2012. ‘Not so super: the ontology of ‘supervernaculars’, Language and Communication 32 (4), 349–357.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2013. ‘Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA’, in May, S. (ed.), The Multilingual Turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and Bilingual Education, pp. 32–52. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Otsuji, E. and Pennycook, A. 2010. ‘Metrolingualism: fixity, fluidity and language in flux’, International Journal of Multilingualism 7, 240–254.Google Scholar
Philips, S. 1983. The Invisible Culture: Communication in Classroom and Community in the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Philipsen, G. and Carbaugh, D. 1986. ‘A bibliography of fieldwork in the ethnography of communication’, Language in Society 15, 387–398.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 2005. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents, second edition. Manchester, UK: St Jerome Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 2007. ‘Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 11, 584–607.Google Scholar
Rowland, C., Pine, J., Lieven, E. and Theakston, A. 2003. ‘Determinants of the order of acquisition of wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech’, Journal of Child Language 30, 609–635.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. 1987. ‘Dilingual discourse: the negotiation of meaning without a common code’, Linguistics 25, 81–109.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. 1996. ‘From “thought” and “language” to “thinking for speaking”’, in Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, pp. 70–96. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. 2003. ‘Language and thought online: cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity’, in Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, pp. 157–192. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, S. 2008. ‘The cultural productions of ESL student at Tradewinds High: Contingency, multidirectionality, and identity in L2 socialization’, Applied Linguistics 29, 619–644.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2006. ‘Acquiring linguistic constructions’, in Kuhn, D. and Siegler, R. (eds), Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 255–298. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. 2007. ‘Super-diversity and its implications’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 30, 1024–1054.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. 2010. ‘Towards post-multiculturalism? Changing communities, contexts and conditions of diversity’, International Social Science Journal 199, 83–95.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by