Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-competence
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-competence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Book part
- 1 Premises of multi-competence
- 2 Research questions and methodology of multi-competence
- 3 Multi-competence in second language acquisition: inroads into the mainstream?
- 4 Not through a glass darkly: refocusing the psycholinguistic study of bilingualism through a “bivocal” lens
- 5 Multilingualism research
- 6 Multi-competence and dynamic/complex systems
- 7 Multi-competence and Dominant Language Constellation
- 8 Consequences of multi-competence for sociolinguistic research
- 9 A usage-based account of multi-competence
- 10 Multi-competence and syntax
- 11 Syntactic processing
- 12 Language and cognition in bilinguals
- 13 Gestures in multi-competence
- 14 Pragmatic transferin foreign language learners: a multi-competence perspective
- 15 Multi-competence and endangered language revitalization
- 16 Multi-competence and first language attrition
- 17 Cognitive consequences of multi-competence
- 18 Space, motion and thinking for language
- 19 Multi-competence and personality
- 20 Multi-competence as a creative act: ramifications of the multi-competence paradigm for creativity research and creativity-fostering education
- 21 Multi-competence and language teaching
- 22 Multi-competence and emotion
- 23 Multi-competence and English as a lingua franca
- 24 A critical reaction from second language acquisition research
- 25 Questions of multi-competence: a written interview
- 26 Epilogue: multi-competence and the TranslanguagingInstinct
- Bibliography of ‘multi-competence’ (and related topics)
- Index
- References
8 - Consequences of multi-competence for sociolinguistic research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-competence
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-competence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Book part
- 1 Premises of multi-competence
- 2 Research questions and methodology of multi-competence
- 3 Multi-competence in second language acquisition: inroads into the mainstream?
- 4 Not through a glass darkly: refocusing the psycholinguistic study of bilingualism through a “bivocal” lens
- 5 Multilingualism research
- 6 Multi-competence and dynamic/complex systems
- 7 Multi-competence and Dominant Language Constellation
- 8 Consequences of multi-competence for sociolinguistic research
- 9 A usage-based account of multi-competence
- 10 Multi-competence and syntax
- 11 Syntactic processing
- 12 Language and cognition in bilinguals
- 13 Gestures in multi-competence
- 14 Pragmatic transferin foreign language learners: a multi-competence perspective
- 15 Multi-competence and endangered language revitalization
- 16 Multi-competence and first language attrition
- 17 Cognitive consequences of multi-competence
- 18 Space, motion and thinking for language
- 19 Multi-competence and personality
- 20 Multi-competence as a creative act: ramifications of the multi-competence paradigm for creativity research and creativity-fostering education
- 21 Multi-competence and language teaching
- 22 Multi-competence and emotion
- 23 Multi-competence and English as a lingua franca
- 24 A critical reaction from second language acquisition research
- 25 Questions of multi-competence: a written interview
- 26 Epilogue: multi-competence and the TranslanguagingInstinct
- Bibliography of ‘multi-competence’ (and related topics)
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-Competence , pp. 164 - 182Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Baetens Beardsmore, H. 2003. ‘Who’s afraid of bilingualism?’, in Dewaele, J.-M., Housen, A. and Wei, Li (eds), Bilingualism: Beyond Basic Principles, pp. 10–27. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, Codes and Control, vol. 1: Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. 2001. Bilingualism in Development: Language, Literacy and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. and Barac, R. 2012. ‘Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: role of language, cultural background, and education’, Child Development 83, 413–422.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. and Luk, G. 2007. ‘Common and distinct cognitive bases for reading in English–Cantonese bilinguals’, Applied Psycholinguistics 29, 269–289.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Luk, G. and Craik, F. 2009. ‘Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34 (4), 859–873.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1927. ‘Literate and illiterate speech’, American Speech 2 (10), 432–439.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1997/2000. Pascalian Meditations, translated by Nice, R.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Byram, M. 1997. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. 2011. ‘Dell Hymes’s construct of “Communicative Competence” ’, Anthropology and Education Quarterly 42 (4), 364–369.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2007. Second Language and Language Teaching, fourth edition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 2013. ‘The language of the street’, Applied Linguistics Review 4 (1), 43–81.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. 2013. Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers’ Choices, second edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. and Wei, Li 2012. ‘Multilingualism, empathy and multi-competence’, International Journal of Multilingualism 9 (4), 352–366.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. and Wei, Li 2013. ‘Is multilingualism linked to a higher tolerance of ambiguity?’ Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16 (1), 231–240.Google Scholar
Garcia, O. and Wei, Li 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garmadi, S. 1972. ‘Les problèmes du bilinguisme en Tunisie’, in Abdel-Malek, A. (ed.), Renaissance du Monde Arabe, pp. 309–322. Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Grin, F. 1995. ‘The economics of language competence: a research project of the Swiss National Science Foundation’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 16, 227–231.Google Scholar
Grin, F. 1996. ‘The economics of language: survey, assessment and prospects’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121, 17–44.Google Scholar
Grin, F. 2007. ‘Economics and language policy’, in Hellinger, M. and Pauwels, A. (eds), Handbook of Language and Communication: Diversity and Change, pp. 271–297, vol. 9 of Handbook of Applied Linguistics. New York and Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. 2015. ‘Bicultural bilinguals’, International Journal of Bilingualism 19 (5), 572–586.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1977. ‘Norm and deviation in bilingual communities’, in Hornby, P. A. (ed.), Bilingualism: Psychological, Social, and Educational Implications, pp. 91–102. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, R. 2012. ‘Internally and externally motivated language change’, in Hernández-Compoy, J. M. and Conde-Silvestre, J. C. (eds), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, pp. 401–421. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. 1966. ‘Two types of linguistic relativity’, in Bright, W. (ed.), Sociolinguistics, pp. 114–158. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. 1972. ‘On communicative competence’, in Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J., Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269–293.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. 1996. The Linguistic Individual: Self-expression in Language and Linguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kharkhurin, A. V. 2012. Multilingualism and Creativity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kharkhurin, A. V. and Wei, Li 2015. ‘The role of code-switching in bilingual creativity’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18 (2), 153–169.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. 2006. ‘From communicative competence to symbolic competence’, Modern Language Journal 90, 249–252.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. 2009. The Multilingual Subject: What Language Learners Say about their Experience and Why it Matters. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. and Whiteside, A. 2008. ‘Language ecology in multilingual settings: towards a theory of symbolic competence’, Applied Linguistics 29, 645–671.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. II: Social Factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. III: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wei, Li. 2011. ‘Moment analysis and translanguaging space: discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain’, Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5), 1222–1235.Google Scholar
Luk, G., Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M. and Grady, C. L. 2011. ‘Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults’, The Journal of Neuroscience 31, 16808–16813.Google Scholar
Martin-Jones, M. and Romaine, S. 1986. ‘Semilingualism: a half-baked theory of communicative competence’, Applied Linguistics 7 (1), 26–38.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change: On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Namy, L. L. and Waxman, S. R. 1998. ‘Words and gestures: infants’ interpretations of different forms of symbolic reference’, Child Development 69 (2), 295–308.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (ed.) 2006. Bilingual Minds: Emotional Experience, Expression and Representation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (ed.) 2011. Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Peal, E. and Lambert, W. E. 1962. ‘The relation of bilingualism to intelligence’, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 76 (27), 1–23.Google Scholar
Plester, B., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Linjama, L. J., Rasku-Puttonen, H. and Littleton, K. 2011. ‘Finnish and UK English pre-teen children’s text message language and its relationship with their literacy skills’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (1), 37–48.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 1998. ‘Language crossing and the redefinition of reality’, in Auer, P. (ed.), Code-switching in Conversation, pp. 290–320. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 1999. ‘Styling the other: introduction’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 3 (4), 421–427.Google Scholar
Saer, D. J. 1923. ‘An inquiry into the effect of bilingualism upon the intelligence of young children’, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Part 1: 6, 232–240. Part 2: 6, 266–274.Google Scholar
Schweizer, T. A., Ware, J., Fischer, C. E., Craik, F. I. M. and Bialystok, E. 2010. ‘Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease’, SciVerse ScienceDirect 48, 991–996.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 1981. Bilingualism or not: the Education of Minorities. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
T’sou, B. 1985. ‘Chinese and the cultural eunuch syndrome’, in Lord, R. and T’sou, B. (eds), The Language Bomb, pp. 15–19. Hong Kong: Longman.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by