Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:01:48.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - New England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Listening to the Past
Audio Records of Accents of English
, pp. 257 - 297
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Folklife Center 2009. American Dialect Society Collection. AFC1984/011. Washington, DC: American Folklife Center.Google Scholar
Ash, Sharon 2002. The distribution of a phonemic split in the Mid-Atlantic region: Yet more on short a. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(3): 111.Google Scholar
Avis, Walter S. 1961. The New England short o: A recessive phoneme. Language 37: 544559.Google Scholar
Babbitt, E. H. 1896. The English of the lower classes in New York City and vicinity. Dialect Notes 1: 457464.Google Scholar
Baker, Billy 2013. In Walsh, students of Bostonese have found their avatah. Boston Globe, www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/11/17/bostonaccent-strong-mayor-electwalsh/AFouySIXDXFVE58IMsJGwI/story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben and Walker, Steven 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–6. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4Google Scholar
Becker, Kara 2010. Social conflict and social practice on the Lower East Side: A study of regional dialect features in New York City English. PhD dissertation: New York University.Google Scholar
Benson, Erica J., Fox, Michael J. and Balkman, Jared 2011. The bag that Scott bought: The low vowels in Northwest Wisconsin. American Speech 86(3): 271311.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard 1935. The treatment of Middle English final and preconsonantal R in the present-day speech of New England. PhD dissertation: Brown University.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles 2001. The phonological status of Western New England. American Speech 76(1): 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boberg, Charles and Strassel, Stephanie 2000. Short a in Cincinnati: A change in progress. Journal of English Linguistics 28: 108126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David 2014. Praat: Doing linguistics by computer. Version 5.3.71 www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praatGoogle Scholar
Chase, Margaret Taft 1935. The derivatives of Middle English short o in the speech of New England. Masters thesis: Brown University.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia, Pisoni, David B. and de Jong, Kenneth 2005. Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(3): 16611676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinkin, Aaron 2009. Dialect boundaries and phonological change in Upstate New York. PhD dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Dinkin, Aaron 2011. Weakening resistance: Progress toward the low back merger in New York State. Language Variation and Change 23(3): 315345.Google Scholar
Dobson, Eric J. 1957. English Pronunciation, 1500–1700. Vol. 2: Phonology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Durian, David 2012. A new perspective on vowel variation across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in Columbus, OH. PhD dissertation: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert 1946. American and British Pronunciation. Uppsala: American Institute of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Emerson, Oliver F. 1891. The Ithaca dialect: A study of present English. Dialect Notes 1: 85173.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles 1972. ‘Short a’ in Philadelphia English. In Smith, M. Estellie (ed.) Studies in Honor of George L. Trager. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 259274.Google Scholar
Fisher, Sabriya, Prichard, Hilary and Sneller, Betsy 2014. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree: Incremental change in Philadelphia families. Paper presented at NWAV 43, Chicago.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler and Farrington, Charlie 2014. Durational and spectral differences in American English vowels: Dialect variation within and across regions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136(1): 341349.Google Scholar
Garde, Paul 1961. Reflexions sur les différences phonétiques entre les langues slaves. Word 17: 3462.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jennifer, MacLagan, Margaret, Sudbury, Andrea and Trudgill, Peter 2004. New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. 2006. Tracking the low back merger in Missouri. In Murray, Thomas and Simon, Beth (eds.) Language Variation and Change in the American Midland: A New Look at ‘Heartland’ English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandgent, Charles H. 1890. Vowel measurements. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America. Supplement to 5(2).Google Scholar
Grandgent, Charles H. 1892. ‘Haf’ and ‘haef’. Dialect Notes 1: 269275.Google Scholar
Grandgent, Charles H. 1920. Fashion and the broad a. In Old and New: Sundry Papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 2530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren 2009. Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. PhD dissertation: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren 2013. ‘Flip-flop’ and mergers-in-progress. English Language and Linguistics 17(2): 359390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Miles 1936. Phonographic recording. In Jones, Daniel and Fry, Dennis B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Cambridge University Press, pp. 7582.Google Scholar
Hansen, Gert Foget and Pharao, Nicolai 2006. Microphones and measurements. Lund University Department of Linguistics Working Papers 52: 4952.Google Scholar
Herold, Ruth 1990. Mechanisms of merger: The implementation and distribution of the low back merger in Eastern Pennsylvania. PhD dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Herold, Ruth 1997. Solving the actuation problem: Merger and immigration in Eastern Pennsylvania. Language Variation and Change 9(2): 165189.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond 2004. A Sound Atlas of Irish English. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Irons, Terry Lynn 2007. On the status of low back vowels in Kentucky English: More evidence of merger. Language Variation and Change 19(2): 137180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert Allen and Salmons, Joseph 2011. Cross-generational vowel change in American English. Language Variation and Change 23: 4586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Daniel Ezra 1998. The tensing and laxing of short ‘a’ in New Haven, Connecticut. BA thesis: Yale University.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra 2010. Stability and Change along a Dialect Boundary: The Low Vowels of Southeastern New England. Publication of the American Dialect Society 95. Raleigh: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans 1928a. American pronunciation. S[ociety for] P[ure] E[nglish] Tract 30: 279297.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans 1928b. The origin of the dialectal differences in spoken American English. Modern Philology 25(4): 385395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans 1949. A Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans, Hansen, Marcus L., Bloch, Julia and Bloch, Bernard (eds.) 1939. Handbook of the Linguistic Geography of New England. Providence, RI: Brown University.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans, Hanley, Miles L., Bloch, Bernard, Lowman, Guy S., Jr and Hansen, Marcus L. (eds.) 1939–1943. Linguistic Atlas of New England. 6 vols. Providence, RI: Brown University.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans and McDavid, Raven I., Jr 1961. Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per Bruun and Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen 2014. lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package version 2.0–6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTestGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273309.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2): 344387.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon and Boberg, Charles 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah and Steiner, Richard 1972. A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Laferriere, Martha 1977. Boston short a: Social variation as historical residue. In Fasold, Ralph W. and Shuy, Roger W. (eds.) Studies in Language Variation: Semantics, Syntax, Phonology, Pragmatics, Social Situations, Ethnographic Approaches. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 100107.Google Scholar
Laferriere, Martha 1979. Ethnicity in phonological variation and change. Language 55: 603617.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger 1976. English Phonology and Phonological Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lobanov, B. M. 1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49(2): 606608.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I., Jr 1981. Low-back vowels in Providence: A note in structural dialectology. Journal of English Linguistics 15(1): 2129.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1968. Structural dialectology. Language 44(3): 451466.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi and Irwin, Patricia 2010. Boston (r): Neighbo(r)s nea(r) and fa(r). Language Variation and Change 22(2): 241278.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi and Roberts, Julie 2004. New England: Phonology. In Schneider, Edgar, Burridge, Kate, Kortmann, Bernd, Mesthrie, Rajend and Upton, Clive (eds.) A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. I: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 270281.Google Scholar
Newlin-Łukowicz, Luiza 2013. Is the low back merger facilitated by L1? Poster presented at NWAV 42. Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Olsaker, Anders 2013. An acoustic study of the low back merger and Northern Cities Shift in Des Moines, Iowa. Master's thesis: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Parslow, Robert L. 1967. The pronunciation of English in Boston, Massachusetts: Vowels and consonants. PhD dissertation: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartek 2002. Best practices in the acquisition, processing, and analysis of acoustic speech signals. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8: Selected Papers from NWAV 30.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas 2012. Dialect recordings from the Hanley Collection, 1931–1937. American Speech 87(4): 511513.Google Scholar
Rathcke, Tamara and Stuart-Smith, Jane 2014. On the impact of noise on vowel formant measurements. Paper presented at Methods in Dialectology XV, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie 2007. Vermont lowering? Raising some questions about (ay) and (aw) south of the Canadian border. Language Variation and Change 19(2): 181197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Josef, Evanini, Keelan and Yuan, Jiahong 2011. FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction) Program Suite. http://fave.ling.upenn.eduGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James N., Leddy-Cecere, Thomas and Baclawski, Kenneth 2012. Farewell to the founders: Major dialect changes along the east-west New England border. American Speech 87(2): 126–69.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2001. An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English. Publication of the American Dialect Society 85. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. 1930. The pronunciation of ‘short a’ in American Standard English. American Speech 5: 396400.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. 1940. One phonemic entity becomes two: The case of ‘short a. American Speech 15: 255258.Google Scholar
Tsukada, Kimiko 2009. An acoustic comparison of vowel length contrasts in Arabic, Japanese and Thai: Durational and spectral data. International Journal of Asian Language Processing 19(4): 127138.Google Scholar
Tuttle, George 1902. Phonetic notation. In Scripture, Edward (ed.) Studies from the Yale Psychology Laboratory, Vol. X. New Haven, CT; n.p. pp. 96117.Google Scholar
Waterman, Margaret 1974. The Hanley tapes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. 3 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wetmore, Thomas 1959. The Low Central and Low Back Vowels in the English of the Eastern United States. Publication of the American Dialect Society 32. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wong, Amy Wing-mei 2012. The lowering of raised-thought and the low-back distinction in New York City: Evidence from Chinese Americans. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2): Article 18.Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry Cecil 1936. A History of Modern Colloquial English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, Wilbur 1973. The Cultural Geography of the United States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×