Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T21:33:29.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The role of inferences in narrative experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

By
Richard J. Gerrig  and
William G. Wenzel
Edited by
Edward J. O'Brien ,
Anne E. Cook  and
Robert F. Lorch, Jr
Edward J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
University of New Hampshire
Anne E. Cook
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Robert F. Lorch, Jr
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Inferences during Reading , pp. 362 - 385
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bezdek, M. A., Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2013). “Run for it!”: Viewers’ participatory responses to film narratives. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, I. (2012). A Wanted Man. New York: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: the mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, C. (2011). The Trinity Six. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (2003). Creativity, personality, and the convergent-divergent continuum. In Runco, M. A. (ed.), Critical Creative Processes (pp. 95–114).Google Scholar
Fincher-Kiefer, R., Post, T. A., Greene, T. R., & Voss, J. F. (1988). On the role of prior knowledge and task demands in the processing of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 416–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, C. (2010). The Dogs of Rome. New York: Bloomsbury USA.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R.J. (1993). Experiencing Narrative Worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R.J. (2005). Moral judgments in narrative contexts. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (1994). Readers as problem-solvers in the experience of suspense. Poetics, 22, 459–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Jacovina, M. E. (2009). Reader participation in the experience of narrative. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. LI, pp. 223–54). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., Love, J., & McKoon, G. (2009) Waiting for Brandon: how readers respond to small mysteries. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 144–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerrig, R. J., & McKoon, G. (2001). Memory processes and experiential continuity. Psychological Science, 12, 81–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & O'Brien, E. J. (2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1001–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In Anderson, H. H. (ed.), Creativity and Its Cultivation (pp. 142–61). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Harbach, C. (2011). The Art of Fielding. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hitchcock, A. (Producer/Director). (1964). Marnie [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
Jacovina, M. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2010) How readers experience characters’ decisions. Memory & Cognition, 38, 753–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klin, C. M., Guzmán, A. E., Weingartner, K. W., & Ralano, A. S. (2006). When anaphor resolution fails: partial encoding of anaphoric inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassonde, K. A., & O'Brien, E. J. (2009). Contextual specificity in the activation of predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 46, 426–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, J., & McKoon, G. (2011). Rules of engagement: incomplete and complete pronoun resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 874–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Love, J., McKoon, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (2010). Searching for Judy: how small mysteries affect narrative processes and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 790–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Lovesey, P. (2011). Stagestruck. New York: Soho Crime.Google Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 668–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 82–91.Google ScholarPubMed
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (2013). Aging and predicting inferences: a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 240–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. LI, pp. 298–384). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mednick, S.A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaud, J. (2011). When Tito Loved Clara. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
O'Brien, E. J., Raney, G. E., Albrecht, J. E., & Rayner, K. (1997). Processes involved in the resolution of explicit anaphors. Discourse Processes, 23, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G., & Collins, A. (1988). The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Readers’ reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 30, 779–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2006). Predilections for narrative outcomes: the impact of story contexts and reader preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, C. J. (1975). Conceptual memory and inference. In Schank, R. C. (ed.), Conceptual Information Processing (pp. 157–288). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayles, J. (2011). A Moment in the Sun. San Francisco: McSweeney’s Books.Google Scholar
Smith, K. A., Huber, D. E., & Vul, E. (2013). Multiply-constrained semantic search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition, 128, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. (2011). Just what is it that makes Tony Soprano such an appealing, attractive murderer? In Jones, W. E. & Vice, S. (eds.), Ethics at the Cinema (pp. 66–90). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swierczynski, D. (2011). Hell & Gone. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K. (2011). The Family Fang. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×