Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T21:26:41.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Causal inferences and world knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Edward J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
University of New Hampshire
Anne E. Cook
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Robert F. Lorch, Jr
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–70.Google Scholar
Andrews, M., Frank, S. L., & Vigliocco, G. (in press). Reconciling embodied and distributional accounts of meaning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Charniak, E. (1977). A framed PAINTING: the representation of a commonsense knowledge fragment. Cognitive Science, 1, 355–94.Google Scholar
Cook, A. E., Limber, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (2001). Situation-based context and the availability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 220–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozijn, R., Commandeur, E., Vonk, W., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2011). The time course of the use of implicit causality information in the processing of pronouns: a visual world paradigm study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 381403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozijn, R., Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (2011). Propositional integration and world-knowledge inference: processes in understanding because sentences. Discourse Processes, 48(7), 474500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S. L., Koppen, M., Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (2003). Modeling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehension. Cognitive Science, 27, 875910.Google Scholar
Frank, S. L., Koppen, M., Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (2007). Coherence-driven resolution of referential ambiguity: a computational model. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1307–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, S. L., Koppen, M., Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (2008). World knowledge in computational models of discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 45, 429–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & McKoon, G. (1998). The readiness is all: the functionality of memory-based text processing. Discourse Processes, 26, 6786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & O'Brien, E. J. (2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: a comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, R. M., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1993). A parallel distributed processing model of story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 16, 203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Structures and Procedures of Implicit Knowledge. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grefenstette, E., & Sadrzadeh, M. (2011). Experimental support for a categorical compositional distributional model of meaning. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 13941404). Edinburgh, UK: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kant, E. (2004). Kritiek van de zuivere rede (Veenbaas, J. & Visser, W., Trans.). (Original work, Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of Pure Reason], published in 1781). Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
Keefe, D. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The time course and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 446–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Mangalath, P. (2011). The construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 346–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, J., & Lapata, M. (2010). Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 34, 13881429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, E. T. (2004). Understanding script-based stories using commonsense reasoning. Cognitive Systems Research, 5, 307340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, E. T. (2007). Modelling space and time in narratives about restaurants. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22, 6784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, G., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2012). Causal coherence relations and levels of discourse representation. Discourse Processes, 49, 501–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L., O'Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., & Mason, R. A. (1994). Maintaining global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 876–86.Google Scholar
Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M. (2005). Taal en Kennis. [Language and Cognition]. Valedictory lecture. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (1992). Readers’ knowledge and the control of inferences in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (in press). Inferences in discourse, psychology of. In Wright, J. D. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. J. (1992). Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., & Simons, W. H. G. (2000). Knowledge representation in the domain of economics. In Lundquist, L. & Jarvella, R. J. (eds.), Language, Text, and Knowledge: Mental Models of Expert Communication (pp. 235–60). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O'Brien, E. J. (1995). Automatic components of discourse comprehension. In Lorch, R. F. & O'Brien, E. J. (eds.), Sources of Coherence in Reading (pp. 159–76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Padó, U., Crocker, M. W., & Keller, F. (2009). A probabilistic model of semantic plausibility in sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33, 794838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simons, W. H. G. (1993). De regulering van inferenties door de kennis van de lezer [The control of inferences by the knowledge of the reader]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 479516). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Singer, M. (2007). Inference processes in discourse comprehension. In Gaskell, M. G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 343–59). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, M., & O'Connell, G. (2003). Robust inference processes in expository text comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 607–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: inferences and coherence. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 539–88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A “landscape” view of reading: fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In Britton, B. K. & Graesser, A. C. (eds.), Models of Understanding Text (pp. 165–87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vonk, W., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1990). On the control of inferences in text understanding. In Balota, D. A., d'Arcais, G. B. Flores, & Rayner, K. (eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 447–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vonk, W., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2001). Inferences in discourse, psychology of. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 7427–32). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×