Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:42:42.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Themes and variation in sciurid evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

V. Louise Roth
Affiliation:
Duke University
John M. Mercer
Affiliation:
Duke University
Philip G. Cox
Affiliation:
University of York
Lionel Hautier
Affiliation:
Université de Montpellier II
Get access

Summary

Introduction: Themes emerge from variation in the Sciuridae as a group, a taxon and a clade

With a species diversity approaching 300 (Thorington and Hoffmann, 2005) and nearly worldwide in their distribution, squirrels are common and important elements of many ecological communities. The diurnal habits of most taxa together with their relative conformity in body plan make them familiar and easily recognized by both scientists and non-specialists.

The squirrel family, Sciuridae, also has a long history of recognition by taxonomists as a coherent grouping, despite its comprising distinctive forms associated with use of different locomotor substrates (Table 8.1). At times, burrowing or gliding forms have been separated from the archetypal arboreal squirrels: Fischer de Waldheim (1817), the authority credited for naming the Sciuridae (Thorington and Hoffmann, 2005), advocated use of limb structure in recognizing groups of mammals, and accordingly, he removed flying squirrels (‘Petauristus’, Fischer de Waldheim, 1817: p. 422) to another ‘Division’ apart from ‘Familia Sciuriorum’ (p. 408), even though Linnaeus had placed flying squirrels together with tree and some ground squirrels under SCIURUS (Linnaeus, 1758: pp. 63–64; see Table 8.1). Woodchucks and marmots have also posed something of a problem, to Linnaeus (1758:p. 60), who listed them under ‘MUS’, and to many subsequent authors who also set them apart from other sciurids. However, by late 1839 (according to Brandt, 1855: p. 106, and Alston, 1876: p. 62) all of these animals had been combined by Waterhouse to form a version of Sciuridae that would be congruent with the modern concept of the family. Along the way, dormice (referred to as ‘Myoxus’) have often crept into lists of squirrels (e.g. Fischer de Waldheim, 1817, but not those of Linnaeus before him or Brandt subsequently), both their exclusion and their inclusion foreshadowing current views based on molecular evidence that dormice are distinct from sciurids but have closer affinities with them (plus aplodontids) than with other rodent families (e.g. Blanga-Kanfi et al., 2009; Churakov et al., 2010; Fabre et al., 2012).

Type
Chapter
Information
Evolution of the Rodents
Advances in Phylogeny, Functional Morphology and Development
, pp. 221 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, E. R. (1876). On the classification of the Order Glires. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1876, 61–98.Google Scholar
Arbogast, B. S. (2007). A brief history of the New World flying squirrels: phylogeny, biogeography, and conservation genetics. Journal of Mammalogy, 88, 840–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badgley, C. and Finarelli, J. A. (2013). Diversity dynamics of mammals in relation to tectonic and climatic history: comparison of three Neogene records from North America. Paleobiology, 39, 373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S. S. and Roth, V. L. (1995). Jaw muscles of New World squirrels. Journal of Morphology, 224, 265–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berggrer, W. A. and Prothero, D. R. (1992). Eocene – Oligocene climatic and biotic evaluation: a overview. In Eocene – Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution, eds. Prothero, D. R. and Berggrer, W. A.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Black, C. C. (1963). A review of the North American Tertiary Sciuridae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 130, 109–248.Google Scholar
Blanga-Kanfi, S., Miranda, H., Penn, O., et al. (2009). Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boddy, A. M., McGowen, M. R., Sherwood, C. C., et al. (2012). Comparative analysis of encephalization in mammals reveals relaxed constraints on anthropoid primate and cetacean brain scaling. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 981–994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, J. F. (1855). Beiträge zur nähern Kenntniss der Säugethiere Russland's. Mémoires de l'Académie impériale des sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, 7, 1–365.Google Scholar
Cardini, A. (2003). The geometry of the marmot (Rodentia: Sciuridae) mandible: phylogeny and patterns of morphological evolution. Systematic Biology, 52, 186–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardini, A. and O'Higgins, P. (2005). Post-natal ontogeny of the mandible and ventral anium in Marmota species (Rodentia, Sciuridae): allometry and phylogeny. Zoomorphology, 124, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanovas-Vilar, I. and van Dam, J. (2013). Conservatism and adaptability during squirrel radiation: What is mandible shape telling us? PLoS ONE, e61298.
Caumul, R. and Polly, P. D. (2005). Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution, 59, 2460–2472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churakov, G., Sadasivuni, M., Rosenbloom, K., et al. (2010). Rodent evolution: back to the root. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27, 1315–1326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, P. G., Rayfield, E. J., Fagan, M. J., et al. (2012). Functional evolution of the feeding system in rodents. PLoS ONE, 7, e36299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Tex, R.-J., Thorington, R., Maldonado, J. E., and Leonard, J. A. (2010). Speciation dynamics in the SE Asian tropics: Putting a time perspective on the phylogeny and biogeography of Sundaland tree squirrels, Sundasciurus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 55, 711–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donoghue, M. J. (2008). A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, Supplement 1, 11 549–11 555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druzinsky, R. E. (1995). Incisal biting in the mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa) and woodchuck (Marmota monax). Journal of Morphology, 226, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druzinsky, R. E. (2010). Functional anatomy of incisal biting in Aplodontia rufa and sciuromorph rodents–Part 2: Sciuromorphy is efficacious for production of force at the incisiors. Cells Tissues Organs, 192, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, E. J. and Donoghue, M. J. (2013). Is it easy to move and easy to evolve? Evolutionary accessibility and adaptation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 4047–4052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, L. H. and Feer, F. (1997). Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: a Field Guide, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Emry, R. J. and Korth, W. W. (2007). A new genus of squirrel (Rodentia, Sciuridae) from the mid-Cenozoic of North America. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 27, 693–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emry, R. J. and Thorington, R. W. (1982). Descriptive and comparative osteology of the oldest fossil squirrel, Protosciurus (Rodentia: Sciuridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 47, 1–34.Google Scholar
Emry, R. J. and Thorington, R. W. (1984). The tree squirrel Sciurus as a living fossil. In Living Fossils, eds. Eldredge, N. and Stanley, S.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
Emry, R. J., Korth, W. W. and Bell, M. A. (2005). A tree squirrels (Rodentia, Sciuridae, Sciurini) from the Late Miocene (Clarendonian) of Nevada. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 25, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, P.-H., Hautier, L., Dimitrov, D. and Douzery, E. J. P. (2012) A glimpse on the pattern of rodent diversification: a phylogenetic approach. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 12, 88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer de Waldheim, G. (1817). Adversaria zoologica. Mémoires de la Société impériale des naturalistes de Moscou, 5, 368–428.Google Scholar
Fokidis, H. B. and Risch, T. S. (2008). The burden of motherhood: gliding locomotion in mammals influences maternal reproductive investment. Journal of Mammalogy, 89, 617–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth Major, C. J. (1893). On some Miocene squirrels, with remarks on the dentition and classification of the Sciurinae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1893, 179–215.Google Scholar
Goswami, A. (2006). Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. American Naturalist, 168, 270–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, R. G., Bogdanowicz, S. M., Hoffmann, R. S., et al. (2003). Phylogeny and evolutionary history of the ground squirrels (Rodentia: Marmotinae). Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 10, 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hautier, L., Fabre, P.-H. and Michaux, J. (2009). Mandible shape and dwarfism in squirrels (Mammalia, Rodentia): interaction of allometry and adaptation. Naturwissenschaften, 96, 725–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hautier, L., Lebrun, R. and Cox, P.G. (2012). Patterns of covariation in the masticatory apparatus of hystricognathous rodents: implications for evolution and diversification. Journal of Morphology, 273, 1319–1337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayssen, V. (2008). Reproductive effort in squirrels: ecological, phylogenetic, allometric, and latitudinal patterns. Journal of Mammalogy, 89, 582–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgen, K. M., Cole, F. R., Helgen, L. E. and Wilson, D. E. (2009). Generic revision in the Holarctic ground squirrel genus Spermophilus. Journal of Mammalogy, 90, 270–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, M. D., Waterman, J. M. and Parkinson, C. L. (2005). Phylogeny and historical biogeography of African ground squirrels: the role of climate change in the evolution of Xerus. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2773–2788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klingenberg, C. P. (2013). Cranial integration and modularity: insights into evolution and development from morphometric data. Hystrix, 24, 43–58.Google Scholar
Klingenberg, C. P. and Marugán-Lobón, J. (2013). Evolutionary covariation in geometric morphometric data: analyzing integration, modularity, and allometry in a phylogenetic context. Systematic Biology, 62, 591–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koprowski, J. L. and Nandini, R. (2008). Global hotspots and knowledge gaps for tree and flying squirrels. Current Science, 95, 851–856.Google Scholar
Koyabu, D., Oshida, T., Nguyen, S. T., et al. (2012). Comparison of jaw muscle morphology in two sympatic callosciurine squirrels (Callosciurus erythraeus and Dremomys rufigenis) in Vietnam. Mammal Study, 37, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae, vol. 1, Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Liu, X., Ge, D. Y.Lv, X. F., et al. (2014). Historical biogeography and body form evolution of ground squirrels (Sciuridae:Xerinae)Evolutionary Biology, 41, 99–114.Google Scholar
Lu, X., Ge, D., Xia, L., et al. (2012). The evolution and paleobiogeography of flying squirrels (Sciuridae, Pteromyini) in response to global environmental change. Evolutionary Biology, 40, 117–132.Google Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Gaskins, J. T., Lowrey, T. K., et al. (2012). Evolutionary optimization of material properties of a tropical seed. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martone, P. T., Boller, M., Burgert, I., et al. (2010). Mechanics without muscle: biomechanical inspiration from the plant world. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 50, 888–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, J. M. and Roth, V. L. (2003). The effects of Cenozoic global change on squirrel phylogeny. Science, 299, 1568–1572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaux, J., Hautier, L., Simonin, T. and Vianey-Liaud, M. (2008). Phylogeny, adaptation and mandible shape in Sciuridae (Rodentia, Mammalia). Mammalia, 72, 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. S. and Gidley, J. W. (1918). Synopsis of the supergeneric groups of Rodets. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 8, 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. C. (1959). Relationships among living squirrels of the Sciurinae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 118, 153–206.Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. and Miller, R. L. (1958). Morphological Integration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oshida, T., Arslan, A. and Noda, M. (2009). Phylogetentic relationships among Old World Sciurus squirrels. Folia Zoologica, 58, 14–25.Google Scholar
Payne, J. B., Francis, C. M. and Phillips, K. (1985). A Field Guide to the Mammals of Borneo. Kuala Lumpur: Sabah Society and World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
Pečnerová, P. and Martínková, N. (2012). Evolutionary history of tree squirrels (Rodentia, Sciuridae) based on multilocus phylogeny reconstruction. Zoologica Scripta, 41, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, A. T. and Martínez-Meyer, E. (2007). Geographic evaluation of conservation status of African forest squirrels (Sciuridae) considering land use change and climate change: the importance of point data. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 3939–3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, R. I. (1923). The classification of the Sciuridae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1923, 209–246.
Price, S. A., Hopkins, S. S. B., Smith, K. K. and Roth, V. L. (2012). Tempos of trophic evolution and its impact on mammalian diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 7008–7012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radinsky, L. B. (1985). Approaches in evolutionary morphology: a search for patterns. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Říčanová, Š., Koshev, Y., Říčan, O., et al. (2013). Multilocus phylogeography of the European ground squirrel: cryptic interglacial refugia of continental climate in Europe. Molecular Ecology, 22, 4256–4269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, V. L. (1996). Cranial integration in the Sciuridae. American Zoologist, 36, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, V. L. (2005). Variation and versatility in macroevolution. In Variation: a Central Concept in Biology, eds. Hallgrimisson, B. and Hall, B. K.. Burlington, Massachusetts: Academic Press, pp.455–473.Google Scholar
Roth, V. L. and Mercer, J. M. (2008). Differing rates of macroevolutionary diversification in arboreal squirrels. Current Science, 95, 857–861.Google Scholar
Samuels, J. X. (2009). Cranial morphology and dietary habits of rodents. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156, 864–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seilacher, A. (1970). Arbeitskonzept zur Konstruktions-Morphologie. Lethaia, 3, 393–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1945). The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 85, 1–350.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1959). The nature and origin of supraspecific taxa. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 24, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snell, O. (1891). Abhängigkeit des Hirngewichtes von dem Körpergewicht und den geistigen Fähigkeiten. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 23, 436–446.Google Scholar
Steppan, S. J., Storz, B. L., and Hoffmann, R.S. (2004). Nuclear DNA phylogeny of the squirrels (Mammalia: Rodentia) and the evolution of arboreality from c-myc and RAG1. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30, 703–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, D. E., Oh, S.-H., Tripp, E. A., et al. (2009). Natural history, distribution, phylogenetic relationships, and conservation of Central American black walnuts (Juglans sect. Rhysocaryon). Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 136, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiderski, D. L. (1993). Morphological evolution of the scapula in tree squirrels, chipmunks, and ground squirrels (Sciuridae): an analysis using thin-plate splines. Evolution, 47, 1854–1873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swiderski, D. L. and Zelditch, M. L. (2010). Morphological diversity despite isometric scaling of lever arms. Evolutionary Biology, 37, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swisher, C. C. and Prothero, D. R. (1990). Single-crystal 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Eocene–Oligocene transition in North America. Science, 249, 760–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorington, R. W. (1984). Flying squirrels are monophyletic. Science, 225, 1048–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorington, R. W. and Darrow, K. (1996). Jaw muscles of Old World squirrels. Journal of Morphology, 230, 145–165.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorington, R. W. and Heaney, L. R. (1981). Body proportions and gliding adaptations of flying squirrels (Petauristinae). Journal of Mammalogy, 62, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorington, R. W. and Hoffmann, R. S. (2005). Family Sciuridae. In Mammal Species of the World, vol. 2, eds. Wilson, D. E. and Reeder, D. M.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 754–818.Google Scholar
Thorington, R. W., Schennum, C. E., Pappas, L. A., and Pitassy, D. (2005). The difficulties of identifying flying squirrels (Sciuridae: Pteromyini) in the fossil record. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 25, 950–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velhagen, W. A. and Roth, V. L. (1997). Scaling of the mandible in squirrels. Journal of Morphology, 232, 107–132.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalobos, F. (2013). Tree squirrels: a key to understand the historic biogeography of Mesoamerica?Mammalian Biology, 78, 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. M. and Reeder, D. E. (eds.) (2005). Mammal Species of the World, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. A. B. (2013). Allometric disparity in rodent evolution. Ecology and Evolution, 3, 971–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, L. A. B. (2014). Cranial suture closure patterns in Sciuridae: heterochrony and modularity. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 21, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahler, P. and Khan, M. (2003). Evidence for dietary specialization on pine needles by the woolly flying squirrel (Eupetaurus cinereus). Journal of Mammalogy, 84, 480–486.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×