Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:16:47.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Measurement of water and solute uptake into excised roots at positive and negative root pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

H. Heydt
Affiliation:
Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstraβe 30, D-8580 Bayreuth, Germany.
E. Steudle
Affiliation:
Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstraβe 30, D-8580 Bayreuth, Germany.
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Transport properties of roots have been characterized by certain transport coefficients such as the hydraulic conductivity (LPr), the permeability (Psr), and reflection coefficient (σsr). So far, these coefficients have been measured only at positive root pressures. However, according to the cohesion theory of the ascent of sap, negative pressures exist in the xylem of transpiring plants. Therefore, it is of some interest whether or not the absolute values of the transport coefficients would change when pressures in the xylem drop to negative values, i.e. below vacuum (= 0 MPa).

In the present work, LPr, Psr σsr and asr of excised roots of Zea mays L. have been measured at positive and negative root pressures with the aid of the root pressure probe. Furthermore, responses of xylem pressures of intact maize plants to changes in the rate of transpiration have been followed directly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The hydrostatic hydraulic conductivity (LPrh) of root endsegments was determined with the aid of a root pressure probe. In ‘hydrostatic experiments’ a metal rod was moved into (out of) the probe and hence, root pressure was changed. LPrh was calculated from the following relaxation of root pressure (Steudle, Oren & Schulze, 1987). Alternatively, in ‘osmotic experiments’ the concentration of a solute in the medium was changed and LPr, Psr, and σsr were determined from the pressure responses (Steudle et al., 1987). The addition of a nonpermeating solute (mannitol) caused the root pressure to drop to a stationary negative pressure. Now, a permeating solute (Ethanol, NaNO3) was added or removed from the medium and again, LPr, Psr and σsr were calculated from root pressure responses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×