Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:24:40.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Interpretation of the dynamics of plant water potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

M. A. Dixon
Affiliation:
Dept. of Horticultural Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, NIG 2W1.
R. W. Johnson
Affiliation:
Dept. of Horticultural Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, NIG 2W1.
Get access

Summary

SUMMARY

Plant stem water potential was monitored continuously and non-destructively on both woody and herbaceous species under partially controlled greenhouse environment and/or field conditions. The in situ stem psychrometer was automated under computer control which resulted in 30 minute time resolution on measurements of stem water potential. These data provided greater time resolution of plant water potential than has been previously attained. Concurrent measurements of ambient vapour pressure deficit and solar radiation were also made. Interactions among physiological and environmental variables were interpreted with respect to specific and varietal differences and the extent to which mechanisms of response to water stress could be demonstrated.

Field measurements of stem water potential on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.Var.) implied distinctive varietal differences in the pattern of stomatal response to routine diurnal water stress. Greenhouse experiments on potted tree saplings (e.g. Fraxinus pennsylvanicum, Gleditsia enermis, Betula verucosa) exhibited direct correlations between stem water potential and incoming radiation. Clear differences were exhibited between species with respect to their water status under the same environmental conditions. The relationship between stem water potential and stomatal conductance in red ash indicated that partial stomatal closure was induced when the water stress dropped to about -1.0 MPa. This was followed by some rehydration, an increase in stomatal conductance and a second dehydration phase. The kinetics of water potential changes during progressive dehydration and recovery upon rewatering were observed. The automated in situ stem psychrometer emerged as a reliable and insightful tool for evaluating plant-environment interaction.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×