Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:27:14.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Spatial Ability as a Mediator of Gender Differences on Mathematics Tests: A Biological–Environmental Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ronald L. Nuttall
Affiliation:
Boston collage
M. Beth Casey
Affiliation:
Boston collage
Elizabeth Pezaris
Affiliation:
Norhtheastern university
Ann M. Gallagher
Affiliation:
Law School Admissions Council, Newton, PA
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Get access

Summary

It is well known that there is a gender difference on a number of standardized mathematics tests, with males outperforming females (Hyde, Fennema, & Lamon, 1990; Willingham & Cole, 1997). In addition, a relationship has been found between spatial abilities and mathematics test scores (Burnett, Lane, & Dratt, 1979; Casey, Nuttall, Pezaris, & Benbow, 1995; Casey, Nuttall, & Pezaris, 1997; Geary, Saults, Liu, & Hoard, 2000; Robinson, Abbott, Berninger, & Busse, 1996). This relationship may be key for understanding gender differences in mathematics because one of the best-known and largest gender differences is the male advantage on some types of spatial skills (Linn & Petersen, 1985). In fact, evidence has begun to accumulate that shows a connection between gender differences in mathematics achievement and gender differences in spatial skills (Casey et al., 1995; Casey et al., 1997; Casey, Nuttall, & Pezaris, 2001).

In this chapter, we review our research findings, which were designed to address a series of questions to better understand gender differences in math achievement. We propose that gender differences in spatial skills are the key to understanding gender differences in math achievement. After presenting findings on this connection, the conclusion of the chapter provides a biological/environmental framework to help understand how variations in spatial abilities might arise.

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MATH ACHIEVEMENT

The observed gender differences in mathematics performance are not universal (Hedges & Nowell, 1995; Hyde et al., 1990).

Type
Chapter
Information
Gender Differences in Mathematics
An Integrative Psychological Approach
, pp. 121 - 142
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls in education. Washington, DC: Author
Anderson, K., Casey, B., & Kerrigan, M. (2002). Froglets do the measuring. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill
Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand, and brain: The right shift theory. London: Erlbaum
Annett, M. (1995a). The right shift theory of a genetic balanced polymorphism for cerebral dominance and cognitive processing. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 14, 427–480Google Scholar
Annett, M. (1995b). The fertility of the right shift theory. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 14, 623–650Google Scholar
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassi, J. (2000). Block play: Exposing gender differences and predicting for math achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston
Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College
Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1990). Differential aptitude tests (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation
Bishop, D. V. M. (1990). Handedness and developmental disorder. Philadelphia: MacKeith Press
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). Spatial ability in children's play with lego blocks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 19–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnett, S. A. (1986). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: Are they trivial? American Psychologist, 41, 1012–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, S. A., & Lane, D. M. (1971). Effects of academic instruction on spatial visualization. Intelligence, 4, 233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, S. A., Lane, D. L., & Dratt, L. M. (1979). Spatial visualization and sex differences in quantitative ability. Intelligence, 3, 345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, L. (Ed.). (1986). Girls into maths can go. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Caldera, Y. M., Culp, A. M., O'Brien, M., Truglio, R. T., Alvarez, M., & Huston, A. C. (1999). Children's play preferences, construction play with blocks, and visual-spatial skills: Are they related? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 855–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M., & Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. American Psychologist, 40, 786–799CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, B. (2003). Mathematics problem-solving adventures: A language-arts based supplementary series for early childhood that focuses on spatial sense. In D. Clements, J. Sarama, & M. A. DiBaise (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Results of the conference on standards for pre-school and kindergarten mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates
Casey, B., Anderson, K., & Schiro, M. (2002). Layla finds secret patterns. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill
Casey, B., Goodrow, A., Schiro, M., & Anderson, K. (2002). Teeny goes to Shapeland. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill
Casey, B., Napoleon, I., Schiro, M., & Anderson, K. (2002). Seeking Mathapotamus. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill
Casey, B., Paugh, P., & Ballard, N. (2002). Sneeze the Dragon builds a castle. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill
Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, M. B. (2002). Developmental perspectives on gender. In S. G. Kornstein & A. H. Clayton (Eds.), Women's mental health. New York: Guilford Press
Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: Family handedness and college major as a factor identifying women who excel. Neuropsychologia, 27, 689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1990). Women who excel on a spatial task: Proposed genetic and environmental factors. Brain and Cognition, 12, 73–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1997). Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology, 33, 669–680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1999). Evidence in support of a model that predicts how biological and environmental factors interact to influence spatial skills. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1237–1247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (2001). Spatial-mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self-confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics subtests using cross-national gender-based items. Journal for Reseach in Mathematics Education, 32, 28–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan
Connor, J. M., & Serbin, L. A. (1977). Behaviorally based masculine- and feminine-activity-preference scales for preschoolers: Correlations with other classroom behaviors and cognitive tests. Child Development, 48, 1411–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1951). Sex differences in the play configurations of preadolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 21, 667–692CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuys, D. J., & Liebow, A. K. (1993). Geometry and spatial sense. In R. J. Jensen & S. Wagner (Eds.), Research ideas for the classroom: Early childhood mathematics (pp. 45–62). New York: Macmillan
Gallagher, A. M., DeLisi, R., Holst, P. C., McGillicuddy-DeLisi, , Morely, M., & Cahalan, C. (2000). Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 337–353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press
Govier, E., & Feldman, J. (1999). Occupational choice and patterns of cognitive abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 99–108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Hamilton, L. S., Nussbaum, E. M., Kupermintz, H., Kerkoven, J. I. M., & Snow, R. E. (1995). Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments: II. NELS:88 science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 555–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hershkowitz, R., Parzysz, B., & Van Dormolen, J. (1996). In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Labore (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250–261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalichman, S. C. (1988). Individual differences in water-level task performance: A component-skills analysis. Developmental Review, 88, 273–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Nuttall, R. L., & Zhao, S. (1999). The effect of writing Chinese characters on success on the water-level task. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liben, L. S., & Golbeck, S. L. (1984). Performance on Piagetian horizontality and verticality tasks: Sex-related difference in knowledge of relevant physical phenomena. Developmental Psychology, 20, 595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67–101). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Lynn, R. (1992). Sex differences on the Differential Aptitude Test in British and American adolescents. Educational Psychology, 12, 101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. P., & Smith, J. D. (1987). Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23, 337–341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. R., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1980). Self-perceptions, task perceptions, and academic choice: origins and change. Washington, DC: Final Report to the National Institute of Education
Pezaris, E., Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., Bassi, J. C., Trzynski, M., Averna, S., & Galluccio, L. (1998). Style of block building in boys and girls and its relationship to their spatial and mathematical skills. Paper presented at the twenty-first annual mid-year meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Budapest, Hungary
Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls' spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245–260CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Busse, J. (1996). The structure of abilities in math-precocious young children: Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., Busse, J., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (1997). Developmental changes in mathematically precocious young children: Longitudinal and gender effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiro, M., Casey, B., & Anderson, K. (2002). Tan and the Shape Changer. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill
Secada, W. G., Fennema, E., & Adajian, L. B. (Eds.). (1995). New directions for equity in mathematics education. New York: Cambridge University Press
Sherman, J. A. (1978). Sex-related cognitive differences. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas
Sholl, M. J. (1989). The relation between horizontality and rod-and-frame and vestibular navigational performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 110–125Google ScholarPubMed
Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1989). Left brain, right brain. New York: W. H. Freeman
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press
Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wachs, T. D. (1992). The nature of nurture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Wheatley, G. H. (1990). Spatial sense and mathematics learning. Arithmetic Teacher, 37, 10–11Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Wittig, M. A., & Allen, M. J. (1984). Measurement of adult performance on Piaget's water horizontality task. Intelligence, 8, 305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfgang, C. H., Stannard, L. L., & Jones, I. (2001). Block performance among preschoolers as a predictor of later school achievement in mathematics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15, 173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×