A Psychobiosocial Model: Why Females Are Sometimes Greater Than and Sometimes Less Than Males in Math Achievement

Diane F. Halpern; Jonathan Wai; Amanda Saw

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614446.004

3 - A Psychobiosocial Model: Why Females Are Sometimes Greater Than and Sometimes Less Than Males in Math Achievement

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Diane F. Halpern ,

Jonathan Wai and

Amanda Saw

Edited by

Ann M. Gallagher and

James C. Kaufman

Show author details

Diane F. Halpern: Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College
Jonathan Wai: Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College
Amanda Saw: Affiliation:
Claremont Graduate University
Ann M. Gallagher: Affiliation:
Law School Admissions Council, Newton, PA
James C. Kaufman: Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino

Book contents

Get access

Summary

We have some numbers that may surprise you, but first you need to supply some of your own. Make your best estimate in answering the following questions: What percentage of all accountants and auditors in the United States in 1983 were female? Now answer the same question for the year 2000. What about other math-intensive professions, say economists? What percentage of economists in the United States in 1983 and in 2000 were female? What about the percentage of all engineers who were female in 1983 and in 2000? Finally, is the difference in achievement scores between girls and boys much larger on tests of reading literacy or tests of mathematical literacy?

Are you fairly confident about your answers? Give yourself a “point” for each answer you supplied that is within five percentage points of the correct answer. According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census (2001), the majority of accountants and auditors in 2000 were female (56.7%), up considerably from 1983 when females made up slightly more than one-third of this profession (36.7%). The comparable values for economists in 1983 and 2000 were 37.9% and 53.3%. Surprised that these values are so high? Most people are. What about engineers? Females were 5.9% of all engineers in 1983 and still only 9.9% in 2000 – values that are probably closer to what most people estimated for all these math-intensive professions.

Type: Chapter
Information: Gender Differences in Mathematics
An Integrative Psychological Approach
, pp. 48 - 72

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614446.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L. (2002). Gender differences in intelligence and knowledge: How should we look at achievement score differences? Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology

Ackerman, P. L., Bowen, K. R., Beier, M., & Kanfer, R. (2001). Determinants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 797–825CrossRef Google Scholar

American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: The AAUW report. New York: Marlowe

Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (1988). Should we stop studying sex differences altogether? American Psychologist, 42, 756–757Google Scholar

Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232CrossRef Google Scholar

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Birenbaum, M., Kelly, A. E., & Levi-Keren, M. (1994). Stimulus features and sex differences in mental rotation test performance. Intelligence, 19, 51–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Bryden, M. P. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia, 15, 617–624CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender difference in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697–705CrossRef Google Scholar

College Entrance Examination Board. (1997). National report on college-bound seniors, various years. New York: Author

De Lisi, R., & McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. (2002). Sex differences in mathematical abilities and achievement. In McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A., & De Lisi, R. (Eds.), Biology, Society, and Behavior: The development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 155–181). CT: Ablex Publishing

Diamond, M. C. (1999). Enrichment response of the brain. In G. Adelman & J. DePasquale (Eds.), Elsevier's encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 655–657). New York: Elsevier Science

Dwyer, C. A., & Johnson, L. M. (1997). Grades, accomplishments, and correlates. In Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (Eds.), Gender and fair assessment (pp. 127–156). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Eagly, A. H. (1990). On the advantages of reporting sex comparisons. American Psychologist, 45, 560–562CrossRef Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. (1994). On comparing women and men. Feminism & Psychology, 4, 513–522CrossRef Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172CrossRef Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609CrossRef Google Scholar

Evelyn, J. (2002, June 28). Community colleges start to ask, where are the men? 151 women receive associate degrees for every 100 men who do. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A32

Gallagher, A. M., & Lisi, R. (1994). Gender differences in scholastic aptitude test mathematics problem solving among high ability students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 204–211CrossRef Google Scholar

Geschwind, N. (1983). Biological associations of left-handedness. Annals of Dyslexia, 33, 29–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Geschwind, N. (1984). Cerebral dominance in biological perspective. Neuropsychologia, 22, 675–683CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Grandy, J. (1994). GRE – Trends & profiles: Statistics about general test examinees by sex and ethnicity (ETS RR-94–1) and Supplementary tables (ETS RR-94–1A). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

Greenough, W. T., Black, J. E., & Wallace, C. S. (1987). Experience and brain development. Child Development, 58, 539–559CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Halpern, D. F. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for educations. American Psychologist, 52, 1091–1102CrossRef Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Halpern, D. F., & Collaer, M. L. (in press). Sex differences in visuospatial abilities: More than meets the eye. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Higher-level visuospatial thinking and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press

Halpern, D. F., Haviland, M. G., & Killian, C. D. (1998). Handedness and sex differences in intelligence: Evidence from the Medical College Admission Test. Brain and Cognition, 38, 87–101CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hampson, E. (1990a). Estrogen-related variations in human spatial and articulatory-motor skills. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 15, 97–111CrossRef Google Scholar

Hampson, E. (1990b). Variations in sex-related cognitive abilities across the menstrual cycle. Brain and Cognition, 14, 26–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Hampson, E., & Kimura, D. (1988). Reciprocal effects of hormonal fluctuations on human motor and perceptual-spatial skills. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 456–495CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Heister, G., Landis, T., Regard, M., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1989). Shift of functional cerebral asymmetry during the menstrual cycle. Neuropsychologia, 27, 871–880CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hines, M. (1982). Prenatal gonadal hormones and sex differences in human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 56–80CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–153CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 299–324CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacobson, L. (2002, April 24). Poll: Public sees schools as a priority. Education Week. Retrieved June 29, 2002, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/newstory

Kimura, D., & Hampson, E. (1994). Cognitive pattern in men and women is influenced by fluctuations in sex hormones. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 57–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Loring-Meier, S., & Halpern, D. F. (1999). Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(3), 464–471CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maccoby, E. E. (1966). Sex differences in intellectual functioning. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 25–55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

MacGillis, A. (2001, December 31). Gender gap dogs nation's vet schools: Nearly 75٪ of students are women, leading some to predict far-reaching changes in the profession. The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved June 29, 2002, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe

Matlin, M. W. (2002). Cogntion (5th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers

Moffat, S. D., & Hampson, E. (1996). A curvilinear relationship between testosterone and spatial cognition in humans: Possible influence of hand preference. Psychoneuroendocrinolgy, 21, 323–337CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Naglieri, J. A., & Rojahn, J. (2001). Gender differences in planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive (PASS) cognitive processes and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 430–437CrossRef Google Scholar

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1999). NAEP trends in academic progress. U.S. Department of Education

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1997). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. fourth-grade mathematics and science achievement in international context (NCES 97–255). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1998). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. twelfth-grade mathematics and science achievement in international context (NCES 98–049). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2000). Pursuing excellence: Comparisons of international eighth-grade mathematics and science achievement from a U.S. perspective, 1995 and 1999 (NCES 2001–028). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2002). Outcomes of learning: Results from the 2000 Program for International Student Assessment of 15-year-olds in reading, mathematics, and science literacy (NCES 2002–115). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved July 5, 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math ≠ Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nyborg, H. (1983). Spatial ability in men and women: Review and new theory. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 89–140CrossRef Google Scholar

Nyborg, H. (1990). Sex hormones, brain development and spatio-perceptual strategies in Turner syndrome. In D. B. Berch & B. G. Bender (Eds.), Sex chromosome abnormalities and human behavior (pp. 100–128). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science

Petersen, A. C. (1976). Physical androgyny and cognitive functioning in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 12, 524–533CrossRef Google Scholar

Resnick, S. M., Berenbaum, S. A., Gottesman, I. I., & Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (1986). Early hormonal influences of cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasis. Developmental Psychology, 22, 191–198CrossRef Google Scholar

Resnick, S. M., Maki, P. M., Golski, S., Kraut, M. A., & Zonderman, A. B. (1998). Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on PET cerebral blood flow and neuropsychological performance. Hormones and Behavior, 34, 171–182CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rovet, J., Szekely, C., & Hockenberry, M. (1994). Specific arithmetic calculation deficits in children with Turner syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 820–839CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sells, L. W. (1980). The mathematics filter and the education of women and minorities. In L. H. Fox & D. Tobin (Eds.), Women and the mathematical mystique (pp. 66–75). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Sommers, C. (2000). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. New York: Simon & Schuster

Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Steele, C. M. (1998). Stereotyping and its threat are real. American Psychologist, 53, 680–681CrossRef Google Scholar

Stricker, L. J. (1998). Inquiring about examinees' ethnicity and sex: Effects on AP Calculus AB Examination performance (Report No. 98–1). New York: The College BoardCrossRef

Stricker, L. J., & Ward, W. C. (1998). Inquiring about examinees' ethnicity and sex: Effects on computerized placement tests performance (Report No. 98–2). New York: The College BoardCrossRef

Swainson, G. (2002, January 10). Girls not wired for science, author claims. Toronto Star. Retrieved June 29, 2002, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe

Tanner, J. M. (1962). Growth and adolescence. Oxford, England: Blackwell

Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Functional brain imaging studies of cortical mechanisms for memory. Science, 270, 769–775CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2001 (121st ed.). Washington, DC: Author

Vermeer, H. J., Boekaerts, M., & Seegers, G. (2000). Motivational and gender differences: sixth-grade students' mathematical problem-solving behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 308–315CrossRef Google Scholar

Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Book contents

3 - A Psychobiosocial Model: Why Females Are Sometimes Greater Than and Sometimes Less Than Males in Math Achievement

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive