Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T13:36:32.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - Pregnancy-induced hypertension – the effects on the newborn

from Part II - Clinical Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Fiona Lyall
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Michael Belfort
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) is regarded as an obstetric complication of pregnancy. There are significant adverse maternal effects, some resulting in serious maternal morbidity or death. However, it must be remembered that placental abruption, acute renal failure, intracerebral hemorrhage and pulmonary edema will also have an adverse effect on the fetus. In addition, concern for the mother's safety may result in a plan to deliver the fetus early to avoid maternal ill health. Early delivery will result in the resolution of the maternal risk but will increase risk to the baby. The difficulty for the attending obstetrician is deciding whether continuing the pregnancy will result in harm to the mother and continued fetal compromise, or whether delivery will result in fetal morbidity or death.

Maternal reasons for delivery, such as the development of renal or hepatic dysfunction, may tax the skill of the fetal medicine specialist. When are proteinuria or elevated liver enzymes in a mother no longer tolerable; is the mother on the point of becoming significantly unwell with eclampsia or HELLP syndrome? Sometimes the risk to the mother is less immediate and the concern may be that continuing the pregnancy will result in fetal death. Worsening uteroplacental function will reduce the ability of the fetus to tolerate the in-utero environment. A biophysical profile may help in making the decision whether early delivery is indicated in the fetal interest.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pre-eclampsia
Etiology and Clinical Practice
, pp. 506 - 521
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, D. (2003). The midwife, the coincidence, and the hypothesis. Br. Med. J., 327, 1428–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, H. M., Pollock, B. H., Calhoun, A. D. and Christensen, R. D. (2001). Administration of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to neonates with septicemia: a meta-analysis. J. Pediatr., 138, 917–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, Y. F., Wong, K. Y., Lam, B. C. C. and Tsoi, N. S. (2004). Relation of arterial stiffness with gestational age and birth weight. Arch. Dis. Child., 89, 217–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cioni, G., Fazzi, B., Coluccini, M., Bartalena, L., Boldrini, A. and Hof-van Duin, J. (1997). Cerebral visual impairment in preterm infants with periventricular leukomalacia. Pediatr. Neurol., 17(4), 331–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courtney, S. E., Durand, D. J., Asselin, J. M., Hudak, M. L., Aschner, J. L. and Shoemaker, C. T. for the Neonatal Ventilation Study Group. (2002). High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. N. Engl. J. Med., 347, 643–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czernichow, P. (1997). Growth hormone treatment of short children born small for gestational age. Acta Paediatr. Suppl., 423, 213–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, H. L. (1996). Natural vs synthetic surfactants in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Drugs, 51(2), 226–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, L. K. and Dutton, G. N. (2000). Periventricular leukomalacia: an important cause of visual and ocular motility dysfunction in children. Surv. Ophthalmol., 45(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jobe, A. H. and Bancalari, E. (2001). Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 163(7), 1723–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koh, T. H. H. G., Eyre, J. A. and Aynsley-Green, A. (1988). Neural dysfunction during hypoglycemia. Arch. Dis. Child., 63, 1353–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larroque, B., Marret, S., Ancel, P. Y., et al. (2003). White matter damage and intraventricular hemorrhage in very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE study. J. Pediatr., 143(4), 477–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larroque, B., Breart, G., Kaminski, M., et al. (2004). Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., 89(2), F139–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, A. J. and Stenson, B. (2004). Cold comfort for babies. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., 89(1), F93–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. J. (2003). Nitric oxide for preemies – not so fast. N. Engl. J. Med., 349, 2157–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northway, W. H. Jr., Rosan, R. C. and Porter, D. Y. (1967). Pulmonary disease following respirator therapy of hyaline-membrane disease. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. N. Engl. J. Med., 276(7), 357–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, F., Roth, S., Stewart, A., Rifkin, L., Rushe, T. and Wyatt, J. (2004). The neurodevelopmental progress of infants less than 33 weeks into adolescence. Arch. Dis. Child., 89, 207–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saugstad, O. D. (2001). Is oxygen more toxic than currently believed?Pediatrics, 108(5), 1203–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreiber, M., Gin-Mestan, K., Marks, J. D., Huo, D., Lee, G. and Srisuparp, P. (2003). Inhaled nitric oxide in premature infants with the respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med., 349, 2099–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoll, B. J., Hansen, N., Fanaroff, A. A., et al. (2002). Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD neonatal research network. Pediatrics, 110, 285–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verder, H., Albertsen, P., Ebbesen, F., et al. (1999). Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in newborns of less than 30 weeks gestation. Pediatrics, 103(2), E24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×