Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:16:00.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Classification and diagnosis of pre-eclampsia

from Part II - Clinical Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Fiona Lyall
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Michael Belfort
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Pre-eclampsia is a pregnancy-specific condition characterized by placental dysfunction and a maternal response featuring systemic inflammation with activation of the endothelium and coagulation. This multifactorial disease presents as a syndrome of symptoms and signs, with associated hematological and biochemical abnormalities. Most consider hypertension and proteinuria to be the hallmarks of pre-eclampsia, but the clinical manifestations of this syndrome are very heterogeneous. Some women develop severe maternal disease requiring intensive care, whereas others remain asymptomatic with mild hypertension and proteinuria. Approximately one in six babies born to mothers with pre-eclampsia is very preterm. In contrast, two-thirds are delivered after 37 weeks, most of whom are normally grown, healthy babies. It is the very nature of the condition that creates difficulties in classifying pre-eclampsia precisely.

Over the decades a number of classifications have been promoted by different groups of experts or representative bodies (Anonymous, 1990, 2000, 2002; Brown et al., 2000; Davey and MacGillivray, 1988; Helewa et al., 1997; Hughes, 1972; Redman and Jefferies, 1988). This range of definitions has served to confuse clinicians and researchers as to the most appropriate definition to use (Chappell et al., 1999; Harlow and Brown, 2001). The most recent classification proposals are more closely aligned, with some commonality in terminology and criteria for abnormal blood pressure and proteinuria. It is now widely accepted that gestational hypertension is the presence of de novo hypertension (usually diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg) occurring in the second half of pregnancy and pre-eclampsia is the combination of gestational hypertension with new proteinuria (Anonymous, 2000, 2002; Brown et al. Brown et al., 2000; Helewa et al., 1997).

Type
Chapter
Information
Pre-eclampsia
Etiology and Clinical Practice
, pp. 243 - 257
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. (1990). National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group report on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Arch. Int. Med., 150, 2270–80.CrossRef
Anonymous. (2000). National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group report on high blood pressure in pregnancy. NIH Publication No. 00-3029.
Anonymous. (2002). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 33. Obstet. Gynecol., 99, 159–67.
Barton, J. R., O'Brien, J. M., Bergauer, N. K., Jacques, D. L. and Sibai, B. M. (2001). Mild gestational hypertension remote from term: progression and outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 184, 979–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, S., Halligan, A., Martin, A., et al. (1999). The role of observer error in antenatal dipstick proteinuria analysis. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 106, 1177–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M. and Buddle, M. (1995a). The importance of nonproteinuric hypertension in pregnancy. Hypertens. Preg., 14, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. and Buddle, M. (1995b). Inadequacy of dipstick proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 35, 366–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M., Buddle, M., Farrell, T., Davis, G. and Jones, M. (1998). Randomised trial of management of hypertensive pregnancies by Korotkoff phase IV or phase V. Lancet, 352, 777–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M. A., Robinson, A. and Jones, M. (1999). The white coat effect in hypertensive pregnancy: much ado about nothing?Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 106, 474–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M. A., Hague, W. M., Higgins, J., et al. (2000). The detection, investigation and management of hypertension in pregnancy: full consensus statement. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 40, 139–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M. A., Davis, G. K. and McHugh, L. (2001). The prevalence and clinical significance of nocturnal hypertension in pregnancy. J. Hypertens., 19, 1437–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, L., Poulton, L., Halligan, A. and Shennan, A. H. (1999). Lack of consistency in research papers over the definition of pre-eclampsia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 106, 983–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, S., Hofmeyr, G. J., Coats, A. J. and Redman, C. W. G. (1991). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy: validation of the TM-2420 monitor. Obstet. Gynecol., 77, 152–5.Google Scholar
CLASP. (1994). Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. Lancet, 343, 619–29.CrossRef
Davey, D. A. and MacGillivray, I. (1988). The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 158, 892–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, K. A. and Redman, C. W. (1994). Eclampsia in the United Kingdom. Br. Med. J., 309, 1395–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douma, C. E., Post, J. A., Acker, B. A. C., Boer, K. and Koopman, M. G. (1995). Circadian variation of urinary albumin excretion in pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 102, 107–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durnwald, C. and Mercer, B. (2003). A prospective comparison of total protein/creatinine ratio versus 24-hour urine protein in women with suspected preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 189, 848–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franx, A., Post, J., Elfering, I., et al. (1994). Validation of automated blood pressure recording in pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 101, 66–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golara, M., Benedict, A., Jones, C., Randhawa, M., Poston, L. and Shennan, A. H. (2002). Inflationary oscillometry provides accurate measurement of blood pressure in pre-eclampsia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 109, 1143–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, M., Shennan, A. H., Halligan, A., Taylor, D. J. and Swiet, M. (1997). Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 104, 350–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halligan, A., Bell, S. and Taylor, D. (1999). Dipstick proteinuria: caveat emptor. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 106, 1113–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halligan, A., Shennan, A., Thurston, H., Swiet, M. and Taylor, D. (1995). Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: the current state of the art. Hypertens. Preg., 14, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, F. H. and Brown, M. A. (2001). The diversity of diagnoses of preeclampsia. Hypertens. Preg., 20, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauth, J. C., Ewell, M. G., Levine, R. J., et al. (2000). Pregnancy outcomes in healthy nulliparas who developed hypertension. Obstet. Gynecol., 95, 24–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Helewa, M., Burrows, R., Smith, J., Williams, K., Brain, P. and Rabkin, S. (1997). Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society consensus conference: 1. Definitions, evaluation and classification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Can. Med. Assoc. J., 157, 715–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Higby, K., Suiter, C. R., Phelps, J. Y., Siler-Khoder, T. and Langer, O. (1994). Normal values of urinary albumin and total protein excretion during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 171, 984–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higby, K., Suiter, C. R. and Siler-Khoder, T. (1995). A comparison between two screening methods for detection of microproteinuria. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 173, 1111–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, E. ed. (1972). Obstetric–Gynecologic Terminology. Philadelphia: Davis, pp. 422–3.Google Scholar
Jaschevatzky, O. E., Rosenberg, R. P., Shalit, A., Zonder, H. B. and Grunstein, S. (1990). Protein/creatinine ratio in random urine specimens for quantitation of proteinuria in preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol., 75, 604–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuo, V., Koumantakis, G. and Gallery, E. (1992). Proteinuria and its assessment in normal and hypertensive pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 167, 723–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, R. J., Ewell, M. G., Hauth, J. C., et al. (2000). Should the definition of preeclampsia include a rise in diastolic blood pressure of >/=15 mmHg to a level <90 mmHg in association with proteinuria?Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 183, 787–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, C., Taylor, R. S., Gamble, G., McCowan, L. and North, R. A. (2002). Use of automated home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy: is it safe?Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 187, 1321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, M. H., Waks, A. U., Schroth, P. C., Karam, M. and Dornfield, L. P. (1982). Error in blood pressure measurement due to incorrect cuff size in obese patients. Lancet, ii, 33–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, N., Mercer, B., Friedman, S. and Sibai, B. (1994). Urinary dipstick protein: a poor predictor of absent or severe proteinuria. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 170, 137–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natarajan, P., Shennan, A. H., Penny, J., Halligan, A. W., Swiet, M. and Anthony, J. (1999). Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 181, 1203–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neithardt, A. B., Dooley, S. L. and Borensztajn, J. (2002). Prediction of 24-hour protein excretion in pregnancy with a single voided urine protein-to-creatinine ratio. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 186, 883–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
North, R. A., Taylor, R. S. and Schellenberg, J. C. (1999). Evaluation of a definition of pre-eclampsia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 106, 767–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, E., Mee, F., Atkins, N., Halligan, A. and O'Malley, K. (1993a). Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system in normotensive pregnant women determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol. J. Hypertens., 11, S282–3.Google Scholar
O'Brien, E., Petrie, J., Littler, W., et al. (1993b). The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J. Hypertens., 11, S43–62.Google Scholar
Ohkoshi, A., Iwasaki, R., Ojima, T., et al. (2003). Increase in systolic blood pressure of ≥30 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of ≥15 mmHg during pregnancy: is it pathologic?Hypertens. Preg., 22, 275–86.Google Scholar
Penny, J., Shennan, A., Rushbrook, J., Halligan, A., Taylor, D. J. and Swiet, M. (2001). Validation of the Welch Allyn QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure monitor in pregnancy. Hypertens. Preg., 15, 313–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, I. J. and Beevers, D. G. (1994). The definition of pre-eclampsia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 101, 587–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, M. (1994). Automated blood pressure measurement devices: a potential source of morbidity in preeclampsia?Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 170, 1303–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramos, J. G. L., Martins-Costa, S. H., Mathias, M. M., Guerin, Y. L. S. and Barros, E. G. (1999). Urinary protein/creatinine ratio in hypertensive pregnant women. Hypertens. Preg., 18, 209–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redman, C. W. and Jefferies, M. (1988). Revised definition of pre-eclampsia. Lancet, 1, 809–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinders, A., Cuckson, A. C., Jones, C. R., Poet, R., O'Sullivan, G. and Shennan, A. (2003). Validation of the Welch Allyn ‘Vital Signs’ blood pressure measurement device in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 110, 134–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinders, A., Cuckson, A. C., Lee, J. T. M. and Shennan, A. H. (2005). An accurate automated pressure device for use in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: the Microlife 3BTO-A. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 112, 915–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robert, M., Sepandj, F., Liston, R. M. and Dooley, K. C. (1997). Random protein–creatinine ratio for the quantitation of proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol., 90, 893–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Thompson, D. and Lieberman, E. S. (2001). Use of a random urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio for the diagnosis of significant proteinuria during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 185, 808–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saudan, P., Brown, M., Buddle, M. and Jones, M. (1998). Does gestational hypertension become pre-eclampsia?Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 105, 1177–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saudan, P., Brown, M., Farrell, T. and Shaw, L. (1997). Improved methods of assessing proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 104, 1159–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shennan, A., Gupta, M., Halligan, A., Taylor, D. and Swiet, M. (1996a). Lack of reproducibility in pregnancy of Korotkoff phase IV as measured by mercury sphygmomanometry. Lancet, 347, 139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shennan, A., Halligan, A., Gupta, M., Taylor, D. and Swiet, M. (1996b). Oscillometric blood pressure measurements in severe pre-eclampsia: validation of the SpaceLabs 90207. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 103, 171–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shennan, A. H. and Halligan, W. F. (1999). Measuring blood pressure in normal and hypertensive pregnancy. Baill. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., 13, 1–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Shennan, A. H., Kissane, J. and Swiet, M. (1993). Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 100, 904–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, P., Cook, D., Hutton, J., Purdie, G., Murray, H. and Harcourt, L. (1995). Measurements of blood pressure, oedema and proteinuria in a pregnant population of New Zealand. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 35, 32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R. S., Gamble, G., McCowan, L. and North, R. A. (2001). Sleep effects on ambulatory blood pressure measurements in pregnant women. Am. J. Hypertens., 14, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villar, M. A. and Sibai, B. M. (1989). Clinical significance of elevated mean arterial blood pressure in second trimester and threshold increase in systolic or diastolic blood pressure during third trimester. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 160, 419–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dadelszen, P., Magee, L. and Roberts, J. M. (2003). Subclassification of preeclampsia. Hypertens. Preg., 22, 143–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, J., Bell, S. C., Kilby, M., Lambert, P., Shennan, A. and Halligan, A. (2001). Effect of concentration and biochemical assay on the accuracy of urine dipsticks in hypertensive pregnancies. Hypertens. Preg., 20, 205–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, L. (1982). Syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count: a severe consequence of hypertension in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 142, 159–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J., Klebanoff, M. A. and Roberts, J. M. (2001). Prediction of adverse outcomes by common definitions of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol., 97, 261–7.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×