Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:58:04.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Samantha L. Hernandez
Affiliation:
San Antonio City Council
Sharon A. Navarro
Affiliation:
University of Texas, San Antonio
Get access

Summary

In order to understand the lack of diversity in our American judicial system, this edited volume examines the intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual identity and the judiciary. It is our contention that, when compared to the composition of the general population across the country, the composition of courts is simply not representative of the people whom they serve.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alozie, Nicholas O. 1988. “Black Representation on State Judiciaries.” Social Science Quarterly 69: 979–86.Google Scholar
Alozie, Nicholas O. 1990. “Distribution of Women and Minority Judges: The Effects of Judicial Selection Methods.” Social Science Quarterly 71: 315–25.Google Scholar
Alozie, Nicholas O. 1996. “Selection Methods and the Recruitment of Women to State Courts of Last Resort.” Social Science Quarterly 77: 110–26.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, Hall, Melinda Gann, and Langer, Laura. 2001. “Placing Courts in State Politics.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1: 81108.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Spill, Rorie L.. 2002. “Existing Diversity and Judicial Selection: The Role of the Appointment Method in Establishing Gender Diversity in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 83: 504–18.Google Scholar
Dubois, Philip. 1983. “The Influence of Selection System on the Characteristics of a Trial Court Bench.” Justice System Journal 8: 5987.Google Scholar
Flango, Victor Eugene, and Ducat, Craig R.. 1979. “What Difference Does Method of Judicial Selection Make? Selection Procedures in State Courts of Last Resort.” Justice System Journal 5: 2544.Google Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Emmert, Craig F.. 1987. “Selection Systems and Judicial Characteristics: The Recruitment of State Supreme Court Judges.” Judicature 70: 228–35.Google Scholar
Graham, Barbara Luck. 1990. “Do Judicial Selection Systems Matter? A Study of Black Representation on State Courts.” American Politics Quarterly 18: 316–36.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Mythos of Judicial Reform.” American Politics Science Review 95: 315–30.Google Scholar
Henry, M. L., Koslow, Estajo, Soffer, Joseph, and Furey, John. 1985. The Success of Women and Minorities in Achieving Judicial Office: The Selection Process. New York: The Fund for Modern Courts.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Mark S., and Lanier, Drew Noble. 2001. “Women and Minorities on State and Federal Appellate Benches, 1985 and 1999.” Judicature 85: 8492.Google Scholar
Lyon, Mark A. 1981. The Proportions of Black Judges to Black Population in Supreme and Appellate Jurisdictions: Elective vs. Appointive Systems of Judicial Selection. Chicago: Committee on Courts and Justice.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” Journal of Politics 61: 628–57.Google Scholar
Martin, Elaine. 1987. “Gender and Judicial Selection: A Comparison of the Reagan Carter Administrations.” Judicature 71: 136–42.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 270–83.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1995. “The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 48: 559611.Google Scholar
Schroedel, Jean Reith, and Mazumdar, Nicola. 1998. “Into the Twenty-First Century: Will Women Break the Political Glass Ceiling?” In Women and Elective Office, eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Welch, Susan. 1984. “Race, Gender, and Opinion toward Black and Female Presidential Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48: 467–75.Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. 2013. “The Supreme Court Nominee-in-Waiting.”The New Yorker. April 8. www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-supreme-court-nominee-in-waiting.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M., and Weber, Robert E.. 1983. “Policy Congruence and American State Elites: Descriptive Representation versus Electoral Accountability.” Journal of Politics 45: 183–96.Google Scholar
Walker, Thomas G., and Barrow, Deborah J.. 1985. “The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications.” Journal of Politics 47: 596617.Google Scholar
Warden, R. T., Schlesinger, , and Kearney, J.. 1979. Women, Blacks and Merit Selection of Judges. Chicago: Committee on Courts and Justice.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Samantha L. Hernandez, Sharon A. Navarro, University of Texas, San Antonio
  • Book: Race, Gender, Sexuality, and the Politics of the American Judiciary
  • Online publication: 09 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555500.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Samantha L. Hernandez, Sharon A. Navarro, University of Texas, San Antonio
  • Book: Race, Gender, Sexuality, and the Politics of the American Judiciary
  • Online publication: 09 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555500.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Edited by Samantha L. Hernandez, Sharon A. Navarro, University of Texas, San Antonio
  • Book: Race, Gender, Sexuality, and the Politics of the American Judiciary
  • Online publication: 09 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555500.001
Available formats
×