Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:07:12.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Marked for Excellence

Race, Gender, and the Treatment of Supreme Court–Worthy Nominees to the U.S. Courts of Appeals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Samantha L. Hernandez
Affiliation:
San Antonio City Council
Sharon A. Navarro
Affiliation:
University of Texas, San Antonio
Get access

Summary

Lisa M. Holmes takes a close look at Supreme Court–worthy nominees. Holmes examines if “non-traditional” nominees (those who are not white men) are treated less favorably in the confirmation process, especially when they have the kind of education and professional backgrounds that mark a court of appeals nominee as a potential future Supreme Court pick.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Bar Association. 2017. “Statement of Nancy Scott Degan, Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, American Bar Association, Concerning the Nomination of The Honorable Neil M. Gorsuch to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.” www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/uncategorized/GAO/Gorsuch%20Statement%20submitted%203%2019%202017F.authcheckdam.pdf.Google Scholar
Banks, Christopher P. 1999. Judicial Politics in the D.C. Circuit Court. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Lauren Cohen. 2002. Warring Factions: Interest Groups, Money, and the New Politics of Senate Confirmation. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2002. “Senatorial Delay in Confirming Judges, 1947–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 190–99.Google Scholar
Carp, Robert A., Stidham, Ronald, and Manning, Kenneth L.. 2004. Judicial Process in America, 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dewar, Helen. 1990. “Thomas Confirmed by Senate; Two Fault Nominee for Appeals Court.” The Washington Post. March 7.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Lindstadt, Rene, Segal, Jeffrey A., and Westerland, Chad. 2006. “The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees.” The Journal of Politics 68: 296307.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Segal, Jeffrey A., Spaeth, Harold J., and Walker, Thomas G.. 2015. The Supreme Court Compendium, 6th ed. Los Angeles: Sage/CQ Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon. 1997. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Joel B. 1965. Lawyers and Judges: The ABA and the Politics of Judicial Selection. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Haire, Susan Brodie. 2001. “Rating the Ratings of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary.” Justice System Journal 22:117.Google Scholar
Harris, Gardiner. 2016. “For Garland, Third Time Was Charm.” The New York Times. March 16.Google Scholar
Holmes, Lisa M. 2016. “The Perils of a Politicized Judicial Appointment Process: Home State Media Coverage of Court of Appeals Nominees.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association. San Diego, CA, March 24–26.Google Scholar
Holmes, Lisa M., and Savchak, Elisha. 2003. “Judicial Appointment Politics in the 107th Congress.” Judicature 86:232–39.Google Scholar
Holmes, Lisa M., Shomade, Salmon A., and Hartley, Roger E.. 2012. “The Confirmation Obstacle Course: Signaling Obstruction through Delay.” The American Review of Politics 33:2349.Google Scholar
“Judicial Crisis Network Launches New Ad Campaign Exposing Potential Obama Supreme Court Nominee Judge Jane Kelly.” 2016. March 11. http://judicialnetwork.com/?s=jane+kelly.Google Scholar
Lanier, Drew Noble, and Hurwitz, Mark S.. 2016. “Diversity by Other Means: Professional, Educational, and Life Diversity of U.S. Appellate Judges.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego, CA, March 24–26.Google Scholar
Leahy, Patrick J. 1991. “Opening Statement of Hon. Patrick J. Leahy.” Nomination of Clarence Thomas to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Hearings before the Committee on the Judiciary. September 10.Google Scholar
Lewis, Neil A. 1990. “Metzenbaum Weights in against Court Nominee.” The New York Times. February 21.Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. 2017. “White House Ends Bar Association’s Role in Vetting Judge.” The New York Times. March 31.Google Scholar
Martinek, Wendy L., Kemper, Mark, and Van Winkle, Steven R.. 2002. “To Advise and Consent: The Senate and Lower Federal Court Nominations, 1977–2002.” The Journal of Politics 64: 337–61.Google Scholar
McAllister, Bill. 1990. “Judiciary Panel Votes 12 to 1 to Put Thomas on U.S. Bench; Don’t Assume Way is Clear to Supreme Court Seat, Democrats Warn.” The Washington Post. February 23.Google Scholar
Miller, Bill. 2001. “Appeals Court Nominees Share Conservative Roots; Records of Roberts and Estrada Are Being Studied Closely.” The Washington Post. May 23.Google Scholar
Moraski, Bryon J., and Shipan, Charles R.. 1999. “The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 1069–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemacheck, Christine L. 2007. Strategic Selection: Presidential Nomination of Supreme Court Justices from Herbert Hoover through George W. Bush. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
The New York Times. 2003. “An Unacceptable Nominee.” January 29. www.nytimes.com/2003/01/29/opinion/an-unacceptable-nominee.html.Google Scholar
The New York Times. 2010. “An Exceptional Nominee.” March 27. www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/opinion/28sun3.html?ref=topics.Google Scholar
Peppers, Todd C. 2006. Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise and Influence of the Supreme Court Law Clerk. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Mike. 1990. “Conservative Black Judicial Candidate Clears Committee Hurdle.” AP Online. February 22.Google Scholar
Ruckman, P. S. 1993. “The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process.” Journal of Politics 55: 793805.Google Scholar
Scherer, Nancy. 2005. Scoring Points: Politicians, Activists, and the Lower Federal Court Appointment Process. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, Nancy, Bartels, Brandon L., and Steigerwalt, Amy. 2008. “Sounding the Fire Alarm: The Role of Interest Groups in the Lower Federal Court Confirmation Process.” The Journal of Politics 70: 1026–39.Google Scholar
Sen, Maya. 2014. “How Judicial Qualification Ratings May Disadvantage Minority and Female Candidates.” Journal of Law and Courts 2: 3365.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R. 2008. “Partisanship, Ideology, and Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 5: 5576.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles, and Shannon, Megan L.. 2003. “Delaying Justice(s): A Duration Analysis of Supreme Court Confirmations.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 654–68.Google Scholar
Smelcer, Susan Navarro, Steigerwalt, Amy, and Vining, Richard L. Jr. 2012. “Bias and the Bar: Evaluating the ABA Ratings of Federal Judicial Nominees.” Political Research Quarterly 65: 827–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solowiej, Lisa A., Martinek, Wendy L., and Brunnell, Thomas L.. 2005. “Partisan Politics: The Impact of Party in the Confirmation of Minority and Female Federal Court Nominees.” Party Politics 11: 557–77.Google Scholar
Sturgess, Garry. 1991. “The Court Also Aches: D.C. Circuit Rocked Again by Nomination Politics.” Legal Times. October 14.Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. 2013. “The Supreme Court Nominee-in-Waiting.”The New Yorker. April 8. www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-supreme-court-nominee-in-waiting.Google Scholar
Totenberg, Nina. 2016. “President Obama Meets with Supreme Court Candidates.” NPR. March 8.Google Scholar
Ward, Artemus, and Weiden, David L.. Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Wittes, Benjamin. 2002. “Too Smart to be a Judge.” The Washington Post. June 11.Google Scholar
Yalof, David A. 2005. “Dress Rehearsal Politics and the Case of Earmarked Judicial Nominees.” Cardozo Law Review 26: 691709.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×