Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T16:39:49.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Structural and Partisan Effects on the Ascension of Women of Color to State Appellate Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Samantha L. Hernandez
Affiliation:
San Antonio City Council
Sharon A. Navarro
Affiliation:
University of Texas, San Antonio
Get access

Summary

Barbara L. Graham and Adriano Udani’s research objective is to investigate whether judicial selection methods and political party effects present barriers to women of color’s ascension to state appellate courts. Their data is based on a cross-sectional analysis of all intermediate and state supreme court judges on the bench as of January 2017 (approximately 1,280). Their models predict the likelihood that the observed judge is a woman of color for intermediate appellate courts and state supreme courts. Because Graham and Udani are interested in the conditional effects of judicial selection system characteristics, including partisan effects, they present predicted probabilities that conceptualize and communicate the nature of the relationships uncovered in our research.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alozie, Nicolas O. 1988. “Black Representation on State Judiciaries.” Social Science Quarterly 69 (4): 979–86.Google Scholar
Alozie, Nicolas O. 1990. “Distribution of Women and Minority Judges: The Effects of Judicial Selection Methods.” Social Science Quarterly 71 (2): 315–25.Google Scholar
Alozie, Nicolas O. 1996. “Selection Methods and the Recruitment of Women to State Courts of Last Resort.” Social Science Quarterly 77 (1): 115–26.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1983. “The Electoral Fates of Incumbent Judges in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas.” Judicature 66 (April): 4250.Google Scholar
Berry, William D. et al. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10 (2): 117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris W., and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Spill, Rorie L.. 2002. “Existing Diversity and Judicial Selection: The Role of Appointment Method in Establishing Gender Diversity in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 83 (2): 504–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nadia. 2014. “Political Participation of Women of Color: An Intersectional Analysis.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 35 (4): 315–48.Google Scholar
Champagne, Anthony. 1988. “Judicial Reform in Texas.” Judicature 70 (3): 146–59.Google Scholar
Champagne, Anthony. 2009. “Parties, Interest Groups, and Systemic Change.” Missouri Law Review 74 (3): 555–62.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1): 139–67.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.Google Scholar
Dubois, Philip L. 1980. From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2002. “Selecting Selection Systems.” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, eds. Burbank, Stephen B. and Friedman, Barry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Trip. 2017. “In North Carolina, Republicans Stung by Court Rulings Aim to Change the Judges.” The New York Times, October 18.Google Scholar
George, Tracey, and Yoon, Albert H.. 2016. The Gavel Gap: Who Sits in Judgment on State Courts? Washington, DC: American Constitution Society for Law and Policy.Google Scholar
Goelzhauser, Greg. 2011. “Diversifying State Supreme Courts.” Law and Society Review 45 (3): 761–81.Google Scholar
Graham, Barbara L. 1990. “Do Judicial Selection Systems Matter? A Study of Black Representation on State Courts.” American Politics Quarterly 18 (3): 316–36.Google Scholar
Graham, Barbara L. 1991. “Federal Court Policy-Making and Political Equality: An Analysis of Judicial Redistricting.” Political Research Quarterly 44 (1): 101–17.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 6379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Lisa M., and Emrey, Jolly A.. 2006. “Court Diversification: Staffing the State Courts of Last through Interim Appointments.” Justice System Journal 27 (1): 113.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Mark S., and Lanier, Drew Noble. 2003. “Explaining Judicial Diversity: The Differential Ability of Women and Minorities to Attain Seats on State Supreme and Appellate Courts.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3 (4): 329–52.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Mark S., and Lanier, Drew Noble. 2008. “Diversity in State and Federal Appellate Courts: Change and Continuity across 20 Years.” Justice System Journal 29 (1): 4770.Google Scholar
Hardy-Fanta, Carol, Lien, Pei-te, Pinderhughes, Dianne M., and Sierra, Christine Marie. 2006. “Gender, Race, and Descriptive Representation in the United States: Findings from the Gender and Multicultural Leadership Project.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (3/4): 741.Google Scholar
Ifill, Sherrilyn A. 1997. “Judging the Judges: Racial Diversity, Impartiality and Representation on State Trial Courts.” Boston College Law Review 39 (1): 95149.Google Scholar
Ifill, Sherrilyn A. 2000. “Racial Diversity on the Bench: Beyond Role Models and Public Confidence.” Washington and Lee Law Review 57 (2): 405–95.Google Scholar
Lien, Pei-te. 2015. “Reassessing Descriptive Representation by Women and Men of Color: New Evidence at the Subnational Level.” Urban Affairs Review 51 (2): 239–62.Google Scholar
Lovrich, Nicholas P., Sheldon, Charles H., and Wasmann, Erik. 1988. “The Racial Factor in Nonpartisan Judicial Elections: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 41 (4): 807–16.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
Martin, Elaine, and Pyle, Barry. 2002. “Gender and Racial Diversification of State Supreme Courts.” Women and Politics 24 (2): 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, Aman. 2012. “The Party on the Bench: Partisanship, Judicial Selection Commissions, and State High-Court Appointments.” Justice System Journal 33 (3): 262–74.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., Caufield, Rachel Paine, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2013. “OH, MI: A Note on Empirical Examinations of Judicial Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 13 (4): 495–11.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara. 2001. “‘To Do Justly’: The Integration of Women into the American Judiciary.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (2): 235239.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, Stephen W., and Bryk, Anthony S.. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Volume 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L. 2015. The Trouble with Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salokar, Rebecca Mae, Berggren, D. Jason, and DePalo, Kathryn A.. 2006. “The New Politics of Judicial Selection in Florida: Merit Selection Redefined.” Justice System Journal 27 (2): 123–42.Google Scholar
Scherer, Nancy, and Curry, Brett. 2010. “Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of U.S. Courts.” Journal of Politics 72 (1): 90104.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Charles H., and Maule, Linda S.. 1997. Choosing Justice: The Recruitment of State and Federal Judges. Pullman: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot E. 1984. “Judicial Selection Systems and Nomination Outcomes: Does the Process Make a Difference? American Politics Quarterly 12 (2): 225–40.Google Scholar
Smooth, Wendy. 2006. “Intersectionality in Electoral Politics: A Mess Worth Making.” Politics & Gender 2 (3): 400–14.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R,. and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streb, Matthew J. 2007. “Partisan Involvement in Partisan and Nonpartisan Trial Court Elections.” In Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial and Legal Stakes in Judicial Elections, ed. Streb, Matthew J.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Streb, Matthew J., and Frederick, Brian. 2009. “Conditions for Competition in Low–Information Judicial Elections: The Case of Intermediate Appellate Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 523–37.Google Scholar
Swain, Katie E. O., and Lien, Pei-te. 2017. “Structural and Contextual Factors Regarding the Accessibility of Elective Office for Women of Color at the Local Level.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38 (2): 128–50.Google Scholar
Tarr, G. Alan. 2012. Without Fear or Favor: Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability in the States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Margaret. 2007. “Women’s Representation on State Trial and Appellate Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (5): 1192–204.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×