Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T12:59:23.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Algorithmic Approach to the Interpretation of Renal Biopsy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2017

Xin Jin (Joseph) Zhou
Affiliation:
Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas
Zoltan G. Laszik
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Tibor Nadasdy
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Vivette D. D'Agati
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Weening, JJ, Jennette, JC. Historical milestones in renal pathology. Virchows Arch 461: 311, 2012.Google Scholar
D’Agati, VD, Mengel, M. The rise of renal pathology in nephrology: structure illuminates function. Am J Kidney Dis 61: 10161025, 2013.Google Scholar
Lajoie, G, Silva, FG. Approach to the interpretation of renal biopsy. In: Silva, FG, D’Agati, VD, Nadasdy, T (eds). Renal Biopsy Interpretation. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1996; pp. 3170.Google Scholar
Weening, JJ, D’Agati, VD, Schwartz, MM, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revised. Kidney Int 65: 521530, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, PD, Cavallo, T, Bonsib, SM. The Ad Hoc committee on renal biopsy guidelines of the renal pathology society: Practice guidelines for renal biopsy. Modern Pathology 17: 15551563, 2004.Google Scholar
Bonsib, SM, Pei, Y. The non-neoplastic kidney in tumor nephrectomy specimens: What can it show and what is important? Adv Anat Pathol 17: 235250, 2010.Google Scholar
Volhard, F, Fahr, T.Die Brightische Nierenkrankheit. Springer, Berlin, 1914.Google Scholar
Addis, T. A clinical classification of Bright’s disease. JAMA 35: 163, 1925.Google Scholar
Heptinstall, RB. Pathology of the kidney. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA, 1966.Google Scholar
Churg, J, Berstein, J, Glassock, RJ. Renal Disease: Classification and Atlas of Glomerular Diseases. 2nd ed., Igaku-Shoin, Tokyo, 1995.Google Scholar
Seshan, SV, D’Agati, VD, Appel, GA, Churg, J. Renal Disease: Classification and Atlas of Tubulo-interstital and Vascular Diseases. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 1999.Google Scholar
Haas, M, Rastaldi, MP, Fervenza, FC. Histologic classification of glomerular diseases: Clinicopathologic correlations, limitations exposed by validation studies, and suggestions for modification. Kidney Int 85: 779793, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debiec, H, Ronco, P. Immunopathogenesis of membranous nephropathy: An update. Semin Immunopathol. 36: 381397, 2014.Google Scholar
Sethi, S, Vrann, JA, Theis, JD, et al. Laser microdissection and mass spectrometry-based proteomics aids the diagnosis and typing of renal amyloidosis. Kidney Int 82: 226234, 2012.Google Scholar
Barisoni, L, Schnaper, HW, Kopp, JB. Advances in the biology and genetics of the podocytopathies: Implications for diagnosis and therapy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133: 201216, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, MC, D’Agati, VD, Nester, CM, et al. C3 glomerulopathy: Consensus report. Kidney Int 84: 10791089, 2013.Google Scholar
Hou, J, Markowitz, GS, Bomback, AS, et al. Toward a working definition of C3 glomerulopathy by immunofluorescence. Kidney Int 85: 450456, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, S, Haas, M, Markowitz, GS, et al. Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society consensus report on pathologic classification, diagnosis, and reporting of GN. J Am Soc Nephrol 27: 12781287, 2015.Google Scholar
Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society. The Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy: Rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. Kidney Int 76: 534545, 2009.Google Scholar
Tervaert, TW, Mooyaart, AL, Amann, K, et al. Pathologic classification of diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 556563, 2010.Google Scholar
D’Agati, VD, Kaskel, FJ, Falk, RJ. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. N Engl J Med 365: 2398–411, 2011.Google Scholar
Berden, AE, Ferrario, F, Hagen, EC, et al. Histopathologic classification of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 16281636, 2010.Google Scholar
Jennette, JC, Falk, RJ, Bacon, PA, et al. 2012 revised international Chapel Hill consensus conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum 65: 111, 2013.Google Scholar
Solez, K, Colvin, RB, Racusen, LC, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: Updates and future directions. Am J Transplant 8: 753760, 2008.Google Scholar
Haas, M. An updated Banff schema for diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 19: 315–22, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sethi, S, Fervenza, FC. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis – A new look at an old entity. N Engl J Med 366: 11191131, 2012.Google Scholar
Glassock, RJ, Fervenza, FC, Hebert, L, Cameron, JS. Nephrotic syndrome redux. Nephrol Dial Transplant 30: 1217, 2015.Google Scholar
Lajoie, G, Silva, FG. Technical aspects of renal biopsy processing. In: Silva, FG, D’Agati, VD, Nadasdy, T, eds. Renal Biopsy Interpretation. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1996; pp. 423435.Google Scholar
Roos-van Groningen, MC, Eikmans, M, Baelde, HJ, De Heer, E, Bruijn, JA. Improvement of extraction and processing of RNA from renal biopsies. Kidney Int 65: 97105, 2004.Google Scholar
Nasr, SH, Galgano, SJ, Markowitz, GS, Stokes, MB, D’Agati, VD. Immunofluorescence on pronase-digested paraffin sections: A valuable salvage technique for renal biopsies. Kidney Int 70: 21482151, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messias, NC, Walker, PD, Larsen, CP. Paraffin immunofluorescence in the renal pathology laboratory: More than a salvage technique. Mod Pathol 28: 854860, 2015.Google Scholar
Kaplan, C, Pasternack, B, Shah, H, Gallo, G. Age-related incidence of sclerotic glomeruli in human kidneys. Am J Pathol 80: 227234, 1975.Google Scholar
Smith, SM, Hoy, WE, Cobb, L. Low incidence of glomerulosclerosis in normal kidneys. Archives Pathol Lab Med 113: 12531255, 1989.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J, Brodsky, SV, Satoskar, AA, Nadasdy, G, Nadasdy, T. The relevance of periglomerular fibrosis in the evaluation of routine needle core renal biopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 135: 117122, 2011.Google Scholar
Thorner, PS, Ho, M, Eremina, V, et al. Podocytes contribute to the formation of glomerular crescents. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 495502, 2008.Google Scholar
Couser, WG. Basic and translational concepts of immune-mediated glomerular diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 381399, 2012.Google Scholar
Bonsib, SM. Differential diagnosis in nephropathology: An immunofluorescence-driven approach. Adv Anat Pathol 9: 101114, 2002.Google Scholar
Haas, M. A reevaluation of routine electron microscopy in the examination of native renal biopsies. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 7076, 1997.Google Scholar
Silva, FG, Pirani, CL. Electron microscopic study of medical diseases of the kidney: Update – 1988. Mod Pathol 1: 292315, 1988.Google Scholar
Saeki, T, Kawano, M. IgG4-related kidney disease. Kidney Int 85: 251257, 2014.Google Scholar
Devuyst, O, Knoers, NV, Remuzzi, G, Schaefer, F. Rare inherited kidney diseases: Challenges, opportunities, and perspectives. Lancet 383: 18441859, 2014.Google Scholar
Hodgin, JB, Borczuk, AC, Nasr, SH, et al. A molecular profile of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Am J Pathol 177: 16741686, 2010.Google Scholar
Peterson, KS, Huang, JF, Zhu, J, D’Agati, V, et al. Characterization of heterogeneity in the molecular pathogenesis of lupus nephritis from transcriptional profiles of laser-captured glomeruli. J Clin Invest 113: 17221733, 2004.Google Scholar
Jain, S, Suarez, AA, McGuire, J, Liapis, H. Expression profiles of congenital renal dysplasia reveal new insights into renal development and disease. Pediatr Nephrol 22: 972974, 2007.Google Scholar
Halloran, PF, de Freitas, DC, Einecke, G, et al. An integrated view of molecular changes, histopathology, and outcomes in kidney transplants. Am J Transplant 10: 22232230, 2010.Google Scholar
Sis, B, Halloran, PF. Endothelial transcripts uncover a previously unknown phenotype: C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 15: 4248, 2010.Google Scholar
Gbadegesin, RA, Winn, MP, Smoyer, WE. Genetic testing in nephrotic syndrome – Challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Nephrol 9: 179–84, 2013.Google Scholar
Chang, A, Gibson, IW, Cohen, AH, et al. A position paper on standardizing the nonneoplastic kidney biopsy report. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 13651368, 2012.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×