Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T01:59:43.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moral artificial intelligence and machine puritanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2023

Jean-François Bonnefon*
Affiliation:
Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France jean-francois.bonnefon@tse-fr.eu; https://jfbonnefon.github.io/

Abstract

Puritanism may evolve into a technological variant based on norms of delegation of actions and perceptions to artificial intelligence. Instead of training self-control, people may be expected to cede their agency to self-controlled machines. The cost–benefit balance of this machine puritanism may be less aversive to wealthy individualistic democracies than the old puritanism they have abandoned.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gonçalves, J., Weber, I., Masullo, G. M., Torres da Silva, M., & Hofhuis, J. (2021). Common sense or censorship: How algorithmic moderators and message type influence perceptions of online content deletion. New Media & Society, 14614448211032310.Google ScholarPubMed
Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köbis, N., Bonnefon, J. F., & Rahwan, I. (2021). Bad machines corrupt good morals. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(6), 679685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J. F., & Rahwan, I. (2017). Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 694696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J. F., & Rahwan, I. (2021). How safe is safe enough? Psychological mechanisms underlying extreme safety demands for self-driving cars. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 126, 103069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar