Book contents
- Frontiers of Strategic Alliance Research
- Frontiers of Strategic Alliance Research
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Theory and Future Directions in Alliance Research
- Part II Alliances in the Context of Rapid Technological Change and Disruptions
- Part III Microfoundational Processes and Coordination between Partners
- Part IV Alliance Management Capability
- 11 The Evolution of Alliance Capability in Large Organizations
- 12 Strategic Animation in Global Professional Services
- 13 The Organizational Design of the Alliance Management System
- Part V Alliance Scope
- Part VI Alliance Portfolios and Multilateral Alliances
- Part VII Multimarket Competition and Multinational Alliances
- Part VIII Innovation Networks and Alliances
- Part IX Fostering Trust and the Impact of Culture
- Part X The Evolution, Survival or Termination of Alliances
- Part XI Public–Private Partnerships
- Index
- References
12 - Strategic Animation in Global Professional Services
A Case for Virtual Integration Processes in Network Organizations
from Part IV - Alliance Management Capability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 2019
Book contents
- Frontiers of Strategic Alliance Research
- Frontiers of Strategic Alliance Research
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Theory and Future Directions in Alliance Research
- Part II Alliances in the Context of Rapid Technological Change and Disruptions
- Part III Microfoundational Processes and Coordination between Partners
- Part IV Alliance Management Capability
- 11 The Evolution of Alliance Capability in Large Organizations
- 12 Strategic Animation in Global Professional Services
- 13 The Organizational Design of the Alliance Management System
- Part V Alliance Scope
- Part VI Alliance Portfolios and Multilateral Alliances
- Part VII Multimarket Competition and Multinational Alliances
- Part VIII Innovation Networks and Alliances
- Part IX Fostering Trust and the Impact of Culture
- Part X The Evolution, Survival or Termination of Alliances
- Part XI Public–Private Partnerships
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Frontiers of Strategic Alliance ResearchNegotiating, Structuring and Governing Partnerships, pp. 204 - 215Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abdelzaher, D. M. (2012). The impact of professional service firms’ expansion challenges on internationalization processes and performance. The Service Industries Journal, 32(10), 1721–38.Google Scholar
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–55.Google Scholar
Andersson, U. & Forsgren, M. (2000). In search of centre of excellence: network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40, 329–50.Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Baschab, J. & Piot, J. (2005). The Professional Services Firm Bible. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bäumer, U., Kreutter, P., & Messner, W. (2012). Globalization of Professional Services. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. (2013). Blurred boundaries between firms, and new boundaries within (large multinational) firms: the impact of decentralized networks for innovation. Seoul Journal of Economics, 26, 1–28.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15, 603–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes-Casseres, B. (2003). Constellation strategy: managing alliance groups. Ivey Business Journal, May/June, 1–6.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: a theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85–112.Google Scholar
Hedlund, G. (1986). The hypermodern MNC: a heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1), 9–35.Google Scholar
Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Borgatti, S. P. (1998). Professional service constellations: how strategies and capabilities influence collaborative stability and change. Organization Science, 9(3), 396–410.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319–22.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.Google Scholar
Koza, M. P. & Lewin, A. Y. (1999). The co-evolution of network alliances: a longitudinal analysis of an international professional service network. Organization Science, 10(5), 638–53.Google Scholar
Koza, M. P., Tallman, S., & Ataay, A. (2011). The strategic assembly of global firms: a micro-structural analysis of local learning and global adaptation. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31, 638–58.Google Scholar
Madhok, A. & Tallman, S. B. (1998). Resources, transactions and rents: managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organization Science, 9(3), 326–339.Google Scholar
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
Narula, R. (2007). Multinational enterprises. Princeton Encyclopedia of the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H., & Swann, J. (2009). Managing Knowledge Work and Innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxley, J. E. (1997). Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: a transaction cost approach. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 13, 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T. E., & Hannan, M. T. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 659–89.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–45.Google Scholar
Saas, S. (2016). The U.S. professional sector: 1950–1980. New England Economic Review, Jan–Feb, 37–55.Google Scholar
Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 595–623.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R. (2001). Colonizing knowledge: commodification as a dynamic of jurisdictional expansion in professional service firms. Human Relations, 54(7), 933–53.Google Scholar
Tallman, S. & Koza, M. P. (2010). Keeping the global in mind: the evolution of headquarters in global multi-business firms. Management International Review, 50, 433–48.Google Scholar
Tallman, S. & Koza, M. P. (2016). Strategic animation and emergent processes: managing for efficiency and innovation in globally networked organizations. Research in Global Strategic Management, 17, 59–85.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Industries at a glance: Professional, scientific, and technical services: NAICS 54. Bls.gov. www.bls.gov/tgs/iag54.htm.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. (2016). US Census Bureau News. US Department of Commerce. www2.census.gov/services/qss/2015/qssq4-15pr.pdf.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269–96.Google Scholar
Young, L. (2005). Marketing the Professional Services Firm. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Zenger, T. R. & Hesterly, W. S. (1997). The disaggregation of corporations: selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units. Organization Science, 8(3), 209–22.Google Scholar