Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:24:06.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Microfoundational Processes and Coordination between Partners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

Edited by
Farok J. Contractor  and
Jeffrey J. Reuer
Farok J. Contractor
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Jeffrey J. Reuer
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Frontiers of Strategic Alliance Research
Negotiating, Structuring and Governing Partnerships
 , pp. 133 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Andreu, R. & Sieber, S. (1999). Knowledge and problem solving: a proposal for a model of individual and collective learning. IESE Working Paper.Google Scholar
Ariño, A. & de la Torre, J. (1998). Learning from failure: towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organization Science, 9(3), 306–25.Google Scholar
Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faems, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A. & Van Looy, B. (2008). Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1053–78.Google Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H. & Madsen, T. L. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1351–74.Google Scholar
Font, D., Escarrabill, J., Gómez, M., Ruiz, R., Enfedaque, B. & Altimiras, X. (2016). Integrated Health Care Barcelona Esquerra (Ais-Be): a global view of organisational development, re-engineering of processes and improvement of the information systems. The role of the tertiary university hospital in the transformation. International Journal of Integrated Care, 16(2), Art. 8, 1–10.Google Scholar
Gerwin, D. (2004). Coordinating new product development in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 241–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R. & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F. & Zhelyazkov, P. I. (2012). The two facets of collaboration: cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 531–83.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A. C. & Tsang, E. W. K. (2007). Learning and strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 479–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. L., Sohi, R. S. & Grewal, R. (2004). The role of relational knowledge stores in interfirm partnering. Journal of Marketing, 68, 21–36.Google Scholar
Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lioukas, C. S. & Reuer, J. J. (2015). Isolating trust outcomes from exchange relationships: social exchange and learning benefits of prior ties in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1826–47.Google Scholar
Lumineau, F., Fréchet, M. & Puthod, D. (2011). An organizational learning perspective on the contracting process. Strategic Organization, 9(1), 8–32.Google Scholar
Lumineau, F. & Malhotra, D. (2011). Shadow of the contract: how contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution. Strategic Management Journal, 32(5), 532–55.Google Scholar
Lyles, M., von Krogh, G, Roos, J. & Kleine, D. (1996). The impact of individual and organizational learning on formation and management of organizational cooperation. In von Krogh, G. and Roos, J., eds., Managing Knowledge: Perspectives on Cooperation and Competition. London: Sage, pp. 82–99.Google Scholar
Madhok, A. & Tallman, S. B. (1998). Resources, transactions, and rents: managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organization Science, 9(3), 326–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Oxford: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. J. & Argyres, N. S. (2004). Learning to contract: evidence from the personal computer industry. Organization Science, 15(4), 394–410.Google Scholar
Okhuysen, G. A. & Bechky, B. A. (2009). Coordination in organizations: an integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuer, J. J. & Ariño, A. (2003). Strategic alliances as contractual forms. Academy of Management Proceedings 1(Meeting Abstract Supplement), R1–R6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuer, J. J. & Ariño, A. (2007). Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepker, D. J., Oh, W.-Y., Martynov, A. & Poppo, L. (2014). The many futures of contracts: moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. Journal of Management, 40(1), 193–225.Google Scholar
Schilke, O. (2014). Second-order dynamic capabilities: how do they matter? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 368–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilke, O. & Goerzen, A. (2010). Alliance management capability: an investigation of the construct and its measurement. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1192–219.Google Scholar
Schreiner, M., Kale, P. & Corsten, D. (2009). What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success? Strategic Management Journal, 30(13): 1395–419.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Rajagopalan, N. (2015). Alliance capabilities: review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 236–60.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. Health care. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care, accessed December 18, 2016.Google Scholar
Zollo, M, Reuer, J. & Singh, H. (2002). Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 13(6), 701–13.Google Scholar

References

Adegbesan, J. A. & Higgins, M. J. (2011). The intra-alliance division of value created through collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 32(2), 187–211.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. & Kranton, R. E. (2005). Identity and the economics of organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 9–32.Google Scholar
Albert, S. & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.Google Scholar
Argote, L. & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.Google Scholar
Ariño, A. & Ring, P. S. (2010). The role of fairness in alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(10), 1054–1087.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(4), 325–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. & Rogers, K. M. (2012). Is the employee-organization relationship misspecified? The centrality of tribes in experiencing the organization. In Shore, L. M., Shapiro, J. A-M., and Tetrick, L. E., eds., The Employee-Organization Relationship: Applications for the 21st Century. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, pp. 23–53.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M., & Corley, K. G. (2011). Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organization Science, 22(5), 1144–1156.Google Scholar
Bate, P. (1984). The impact of organizational culture on approaches to organizational problem-solving. Organization Studies, 5(1), 43–66.Google Scholar
Bercovitz, B., Jap, S., & Nickerson, J. (2006). The antecedents and performance implications of cooperative exchange norms. Organization Science, 17, 724–742.Google Scholar
Bouas, K. S. & Komorita, S. S. (1996). Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1144–1150.Google Scholar
Brickson, S. L. (2013). Athletes, best friends, and social activists: An integrative model accounting for the role of identity in organizational identification. Organization Science, 24(1), 226–245.Google Scholar
Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 836–849.Google Scholar
Cao, Z. & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X-P. (1996). The group-based binding pledge as a solution to public goods problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 192–202.Google Scholar
Chi, T. & Seth, A. (2009). A dynamic model of the choice of mode for exploiting complementary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 365–387.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). Identification in organizations: The role of self-concept orientations and identification motives. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 516–538.Google Scholar
Das, T. K. & Teng, B. S. (1998). Resource and risk management in the strategic alliance making process. Journal of Management, 24(1), 21–42.Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M., Van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Orbell, J. M. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68(1), 83–97.Google Scholar
De Dreu, K. W. C. & Nauta, A. (2009). Self-interest and other orientation in organizational behavior: Implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 913–926.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, J. & Singh, H. (1998). Relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Van den Heuvel, H. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 717–730.Google Scholar
Faems, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A., & Van Looy, B. (2008). Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. The Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1053–1078.Google Scholar
Gavetti, G. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16(6), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–317.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Singh, H. (2009). The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1213–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R. & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781–814.Google Scholar
Handley, S. M. & Angst, C. M. (2014). The impact of culture on the relationship between governance and opportunism in outsourcing relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1412–1434.Google Scholar
Hargadon, A. B. & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500.Google Scholar
Heide, J. B. & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 32–44.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.Google Scholar
Hennart, J. F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361–374.Google Scholar
Hirst, G., van Dick, R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2009). A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 963–982.Google Scholar
Hoetker, G. & Mellewigt, T. (2009). Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10), 1025–1044.Google Scholar
Holloway, S. S. & Parmigiani, A. (2016). Friends and profits don’t mix: The performance implications of repeated partnerships. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 460–478.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A. C. & Currall, S. C. (2004). The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15(5), 586–599.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E., Chang, C. H., & Yang, L. Q. (2010). Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 226–245.Google Scholar
Jones, G. R. & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–547.Google Scholar
Kane, A. A. (2010). Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organization Science, 21(3), 643–660.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., & Rugelsjoen, B. (2010). Managing alliances with the balanced scorecard. Harvard Business Review, January–February.Google Scholar
Kjaergaard, A., Morsing, M., & Ravasi, D. (2011). Mediating identity: A study of media influence on organizational identity construction in a celebrity firm. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 514–544.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (1993). Cooperation and organizational identification. In Murninghan, J. K., ed., Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Murninghan, pp. 244–268.Google Scholar
Kreiner, G. E. & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Krishnan, R., Geyskens, I., & Steenkamp, J-B. E. M. (2016). The effectiveness of contractual and trust-based governance in strategic alliances under behavioral and environmental uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 2521–2542.Google Scholar
Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917.Google Scholar
Lavie, D., Haunschild, P. R., & Khanna, P. (2012). Organizational differences, relational mechanisms, and alliance performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1453–1479.Google Scholar
Lee, C., Farh, J. L., & Chen, Z. J. (2011). Promoting group potency in project teams: The importance of group identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1147–1162.Google Scholar
Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. (2010). Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31(4), 349–370.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, S. & Foss, N. J. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2002). Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 903–919.Google Scholar
Macneil, I. R. (1977). Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review, 72, 854–902.Google Scholar
Madhok, A. & Tallman, S. B. (1998). Resources, transactions, and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organization Science, 9(3), 326–339.Google Scholar
Makadok, R. & Coff, R. (2009). Both market and hierarchy: An incentive-system theory of hybrid governance forms. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 297–320.Google Scholar
Mesquita, L. F. & Brush, T. H. (2008). Untangling safeguard and production coordination effects in long-term buyer-supplier relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 785–807.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77–91.Google Scholar
Nickerson, J. A. & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632.Google Scholar
Noordewier, T. G., John, G., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 80–93.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187–206.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141.Google Scholar
Oxley, J. E. (1997). Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, 13(2), 387–409.Google Scholar
Paulus, P. B. & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 76–87.Google Scholar
Poppo, L. & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23, 707–725.Google Scholar
Poppo, L., Zhou, K, & Zenger, T. (2008). Examining the conditional limits of relational governance: Specialized assets, performance ambiguity, and long‐standing ties. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1195–1216.Google Scholar
Poppo, L. & Zhou, K. Z. (2014). Managing contracts for fairness in buyer–supplier exchanges. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1508–1527.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. G. (2003). Disentangling collective identities. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 5, 161–188.Google Scholar
Prentice, D., Miller, D., & Lightdale, J. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 20(5), 484–493.Google Scholar
Reuer, J. J., Klijn, E., & Lioukas, C. S. (2014). Board involvement in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1626–1644.Google Scholar
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384.Google Scholar
Ring, P. & Van de Ven, A. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 217–233.Google Scholar
Salk, J. E. & Shenkar, O. (2001). Social identities in an international joint venture: An exploratory case study. Organization Science, 12(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
Santos, F. M. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508.Google Scholar
Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203.Google Scholar
Schreiner, M., Kale, P., & Corsten, D. (2009). What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success? Strategic Management Journal, 30(13), 1395–1419.Google Scholar
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, 4th edn. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stettner, U. & Lavie, D. (2014). Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1903–1929.Google Scholar
Thatcher, S. M. B. & Zhu, X. (2006). Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1076–1088.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1978). Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. In Tajfel, H., ed., Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, pp. 101–140.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. L. (2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4(3), 207–226.Google Scholar
Van Der Vegt, G. S. & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532–547.Google Scholar
Van Knippenberg, D. & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zander, U. & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76–92.Google Scholar

References

Albert, S. & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In Cummings, L. L. and Staw, B. M., eds., Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 263–295.Google Scholar
Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M., Pratt, M. G. & Pradies, C. (2014). Ambivalence in Organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science, 25(5), 1453–1478.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. (2010). “Coopetition” in business networks – to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, M., Raza-Ullah, T. & Vanyushyn, V. (2016). The coopetition paradox and tension: The moderating role of coopetition capability. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 19–30.Google Scholar
Berends, H., Van Burg, E. & Van Raaij, E. M. (2011). Contacts and contracts: Cross-level network dynamics in the development of an aircraft material. Organization Science, 22(4), 940–960.Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.Google Scholar
Cui, A. S. & Kumar, S. (2013). Advancing multilevel alliance research: Rejoinder to commentary on Cui and Kumar (2012) and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 662–664.Google Scholar
Das, T. K. & Teng, B. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11(1), 77–101.Google Scholar
Driskell, J. E. & Salas, E. (1996). Stress and Human Performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R. & Bingham, C. B. (2010). Crossroads – microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263–1273.Google Scholar
Enberg, C. (2012). Enabling knowledge integration in coopetitive R&D projects: The management of conflicting logics. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 771–780.Google Scholar
Felin, T. & Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3(4), 441–455.Google Scholar
Fernandez, A. & Chiambaretto, P. (2016). Managing tensions related to information in coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 66–76.Google Scholar
Fernandez, A., Le Roy, F. & Gnyawali, D. R. (2014). Sources and management of tension in co-opetition case evidence from telecommunications satellites manufacturing in Europe. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, L. & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7), 1019–1039.Google Scholar
Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1016–1030.Google Scholar
Fulmer, C. A. & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. G. (2006). Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organization Science, 17(1), 150–167.Google Scholar
Gnyawali, D. R. & Park, B. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650–663.Google Scholar
Grigoriou, K. & Rothaermel, F. T. (2014). Structural microfoundations of innovation: The role of relational stars. Journal of Management, 40(2), 586–615.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 905–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E. & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multi-level research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Luo, Y., Liu, Y. & Yang, Q. (2013). An investigation of interpersonal ties in interorganizational exchanges in emerging markets: A boundary-spanning perspective. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1557–1587.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A. C. & Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9(4), 454–468.Google Scholar
Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J. & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811.Google Scholar
Kale, P., Dyer, J. H. & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747–767.Google Scholar
Keinan, G. (1987). Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 639–644.Google Scholar
Khanna, T., Gulati, R. & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 193–210.Google Scholar
Kleinbaum, A. M. & Stuart, T. E. (2014). Inside the black box of the corporate staff: Social networks and the implementation of corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 24–47.Google Scholar
Kostova, T. & Roth, K. (2003). Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 297–317.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. and Kozlowski, S. W., eds., Multi-Level Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 3–90.Google Scholar
Li, J., Xin, K. & Pillutla, M. (2002). Multi-cultural leadership teams and organizational identification in international joint ventures. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(2), 320–337.Google Scholar
Love, L. G., Priem, R. L. & Lumpkin, G. T. (2002). Explicitly articulated strategy and firm performance under alternative levels of centralization. Journal of Management, 28(5), 611–627.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. W., Moncrief, W. C., Lassk, F. G. & Shepherd, C. D. (2012). Linking performance outcomes to salesperson organizational citizenship behavior in an industrial sales setting. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(4), 491–501.Google Scholar
Mesquita, L. F., Anand, J. & Brush, T. H. (2008). Comparing the resource-based and relational views: Knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29(9), 913–941.Google Scholar
Moliterno, T. P. & Mahony, D. M. (2011). Network theory of organization: A multi-level approach. Journal of Management, 37(2), 443–467.Google Scholar
Mollick, E. (2012). People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1001–1015.Google Scholar
Oh, H., Labianca, G. & Chung, M. (2006). A multi-level model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 569–582.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A. & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.Google Scholar
Park, S. H. & Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12(1), 37–53.Google Scholar
Paruchuri, S. (2010). Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organization Science, 21(1), 63–80.Google Scholar
Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Griffis, S. E. & Autry, C. W. (2011). Multi-level challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491–520.Google Scholar
Perrewé, P. L., Zellars, K. L., Ferris, G. R., Rossi, A. M., Kacmar, C. J. & Ralston, D. A. (2004). Neutralizing job stressors: Political skill as an antidote to the dysfunctional consequences of role conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 141–152.Google Scholar
Phelps, C., Heidl, R. & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1115–1166.Google Scholar
Priem, R. L., Walters, B. A. & Li, S. (2011). Decisions, decisions! How judgment policy studies can integrate macro and micro domains in management research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 553–580.Google Scholar
Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. (2014). The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189–198.Google Scholar
Rockmann, K. W., Pratt, M. G. & Northcraft, G. B. (2007). Divided loyalties: Determinants of identification in interorganizational teams. Small Group Research, 38(6), 727–751.Google Scholar
Rogan, M. (2014). Executive departures without client losses: The role of multiplex ties in exchange partner retention. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 563–584.Google Scholar
Rothman, N. B. & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2007). The social consequences of expressing emotional ambivalence in groups and teams. In Mannix, E. A., Neale, M. A. and Anderson, C. P., eds., Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 10. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 275–308.Google Scholar
Salk, J. E. & Shenkar, O. (2001). Social identities in an international joint venture: An exploratory case study. Organization Science, 12(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
Salvato, C. & Rerup, C. (2011). Beyond collective entities: Multi-level research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, 37(2), 468–490.Google Scholar
Sarkar, M., Aulakh, P. S. & Madhok, A. (2009). Process capabilities and value generation in alliance portfolios. Organization Science, 20(3), 583–600.Google Scholar
Seran, T., Pellegrin-Boucher, E. & Gurau, C. (2016). The management of coopetitive tensions within multi-unit organizations. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 31–41.Google Scholar
Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–623.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K. & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K. & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.Google Scholar
Spekman, R. E., Forbes, T. M. III, Isabella, L. A. & MacAvoy, T. C. (1998). Alliance management: A view from the past and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 35(6), 747–772.Google Scholar
Tyler, B. B. & Steensma, H. K. (1995). Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 43–70.Google Scholar
van Burg, E., Berends, H. & van Raaij, E. M. (2014). Framing and interorganizational knowledge transfer: A process study of collaborative innovation in the aircraft industry. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 349–378.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Rajagopalan, N. (2015). Alliance capabilities review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 236–260.Google Scholar
Weber, Y. & Drori, I. (2011). Integrating organizational and human behavior perspectives on mergers and acquisitions. International Studies of Management & Organization, 41(3), 76–95.Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. J. & Anand, J. (2009). A multi-level perspective on knowledge transfer: Evidence from the Chinese automotive industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 959–983.Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. J. & Chadwick, C. (2014). What we will do versus what we can do: The relative effects of unit-level NPD motivation and capability. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1867–1880.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S. & Birkinshaw, J. (2015). How is ambidexterity initiated? The emergent charter definition process. Organization Science, 26(4), 1119–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×