Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:49:41.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part XI - Public–Private Partnerships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

Farok J. Contractor
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Jeffrey J. Reuer
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Frontiers of Strategic Alliance Research
Negotiating, Structuring and Governing Partnerships
, pp. 455 - 486
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Almeida Costa, Luis and Dierickx, Ingemar. 2002. “Licensing and bundling,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(2): 251267.Google Scholar
Anderson, Timothy R., Daim, Tugrul U., and Lavoie, Francois F. 2007. “Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer,” Technovation, 27(5): 306318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyres, Nicholas and Mayer, Kyle. 2007. “Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives,” Organization Science, 32(4): 10601077.Google Scholar
Arora, Ashish, Fosfuri, Andrea, and Alfonso, Gambardella 2001. Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audretsch, David and Feldman, Maryann. 1996. “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production,” The American Economic Review, 86(3): 630640.Google Scholar
Bercovitz, Janet and Feldman, Maryann. 2007. “Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances,” Research Policy, 36(7): 930948.Google Scholar
Bercovitz, Janet and Feldman, Maryann. 2008. “Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level,” Organization Science, 19(1): 6989.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, David, Campbell, Eric, Causino, Nancyanne, and Louis, Karen. 1996. “Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry,” New England Journal of Medicine, 335: 17341739.Google Scholar
Cohen, Wes, Nelson, Richard, and Walsh, John. 2002. “Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D,” Management Science, 48(1): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandal, Neil and Rockett, Katherine. 1995. “Licensing a sequence of innovations,” Economics Letters, 47(1): 101107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, Ranjay. 1995. “Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances,” The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 85112.Google Scholar
Huang, K. and Murray, Fiona. 2009. “Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics,” Academy of Management Journal, 52: 11931221.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam. 1989. “Real effects of academic research,” The American Economic Review, 79(5): 957970.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam, Trajtenberg, Manuel, and Henderson, Rebecca. 1993. “Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577598.Google Scholar
Kessler, Eric H. and Chakrabarti, Alok K. 1996. “Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes,” The Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 11431191.Google Scholar
Kim, Jisun and Daim, Tugrul U. 2014. “A new approach to measuring time-lags in technology licensing: Study of U.S. academic research institutions,” Journal of Technology Transfer, 39: 748773.Google Scholar
Ma, Mathew Y. 2015. Fundamentals of Patenting and Licensing for Scientists and Engineers: Second Edition. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin. 1995. “Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1): 5562.Google Scholar
Markman, Gideon D., Gianiodis, Peter T., Phan, Phillip, and Balkin, David B. 2005. “Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market,” Research Policy, 34: 10581075.Google Scholar
Markman, Gideon, Siegel, Donald S., and Wright, Mike. 2008. “Research and technology commercialization,” Journal of Management Studies, 45: 14011423.Google Scholar
Modic, Dolores, Feldman, Maryann P., and Changoluisa, Javier. 2015. The time lag in university technology transfers – a micro-level licensing data analysis. Presentation at the OECD conference: IP Statistics for Decision-makers, Vienna, November 2015.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C., Nelson, Richard R., Sampat, Bhaven N., and Ziedonis, Arvids A. 2001. “The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980,” Research Policy, 30: 99119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, David and Ziedonis, Arvids. 2015. “Market versus spillovers in outflows of university research,” Research Policy, 44(1): 5066.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, Jason and Powell, Walter. 2004. “Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community,” Organization Science, 15(1): 521.Google Scholar
Pacheco-de-Almeida, Goncalo, Hawk, Ashton, and Yeung, Bernard. 2015. “The right speed and its value,” Strategic Management Journal, 36(2): 159176.Google Scholar
Perkmann, Markus, Tartari, Valentina, McKelvey, Maureen, Autio, Erkko, Brostrom, Anders, D’Este, Pablo, Fini, Riccardo, Geuna, Aldo, Grimaldi, Rosa, Hughes, Alan, Krabel, Stefan, Kitson, Michael, Llerena, Patrick, Lissoni, Francesco, Salter, Ammon, and Sobrero, Maurizio. 2013. “Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university-industry relations,” Research Policy, 42(2): 423442.Google Scholar
Perkmann, Markus and Walsh, Kathryn. 2007. “University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4): 259280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Walter, Koput, Kenneth, and Smith-Doerr, Laurel. 1996. “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116145.Google Scholar
Powers, Joshua B. 2003. “Commercializing academic research: Resource effects on performance of university technology transfer,” Journal of Higher Education, 74(1): 2650.Google Scholar
Rothaermel, Frank, Agung, Shanti, and Jiang, Lin. 2007. “University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4): 691791.Google Scholar
Schilling, Melissa and Phelps, Corey. 2007. “Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation,” Management Science, 53(7): 11131126.Google Scholar
Sorenson, Olav, Rivkin, Jan, and Fleming, Lee. 2006. “Complexity, networks and knowledge flow,” Research Policy, 35: 9941017.Google Scholar
Stalk, George and Haut, Thomas M. 1990. How Time-based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian. 1997. “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 3567.Google Scholar
Welsh, R., Glenna, L., Lacy, W., and Biscotti, D. 2008. “Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism,” Research Policy, 37: 18541864.Google Scholar
Wright, Brian, Drivas, Kyriakos, Lei, Zhen, and Merril, Stephen. 2014. “Industry-funded academic inventions boost innovation,” Nature, 507: 297299.Google Scholar
Zollo, Maurizio, Reuer, Jeffrey, and Singh, Harbir. 2002. “Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances,” Organization Science, 13(6): 701713.Google Scholar

References

ADB (2013). Guidebook on Public–Private Partnership in Hospital Management. www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/31129/ppp-guidebook-hospital-management.pdf [accessed August 28, 2018].Google Scholar
Amit, R. & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493520.Google Scholar
Ansari, S., Munir, K. & Gregg, T. (2012). Impact at the “bottom of the pyramid”: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 813842.Google Scholar
Arend, R. J. (2009). Reputation for cooperation: Contingent benefits in alliance activity. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 371385. doi:10.1002/smj.740Google Scholar
Ashraf, N., Ahmadsimab, A. & Pinkse, J. (2017). From animosity to affinity: The interplay of competing logics and interdependence in cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 793822.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. & Köberle-Gaiser, M. (2008). The private finance initiative, project form and design innovation: The UK’s hospitals programme. Research Policy, 37(8), 13921402.Google Scholar
Battilana, J. & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 14191440.Google Scholar
Battilana, J. & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397441.Google Scholar
Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C. & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 16581685.Google Scholar
Baum, J. A. & McGahan, A. M. (2009). Outsourcing war: The evolution of the private military industry after the Cold War. Available at SSRN 1496498.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. & Iossa, E. (2006). Delegation of contracting in the private provision of public services. Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1–2), 7592.Google Scholar
Bennett, J., Iossa, E. & Legrenzi, G. (2010). Commercial activity as insurance: The investment behaviour of non‐profit organizations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(3), 445465.Google Scholar
Borys, B. & Jemison, D. B. (1989). Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 234249.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. (2002). Public‐value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145161.Google Scholar
Brandenburger, A. M. & Stuart, H. W. (1996). Value-based business strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 5(1), 524.Google Scholar
Bridoux, F., Coeurderoy, R. & Durand, R. (2011). Heterogeneous motives and the collective creation of value. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 711730.Google Scholar
Brinkerhoff, D. W. & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011). Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 214.Google Scholar
Cabral, S. & Saussier, S. (2013). Organizing prisons through public–private partnerships: A cross-country investigation. BAR: Brazilian Administration Review, 10(1), 100120.Google Scholar
Cabral, S., Lazzarini, S. G. & de Azevedo, P. F. (2010). Private operation with public supervision: Evidence of hybrid modes of governance in prisons. Public Choice, 145(1–2), 281293.Google Scholar
Caldwell, N. D., Roehrich, J. K. & George, G. (2017). Social value creation and relational coordination in public–private collaborations. Journal of Management Studies, 54 (6), 906928.Google Scholar
Chatain, O. (2011). Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 32(1), 76102.Google Scholar
Chong, E., Huet, F., Saussier, S. & Steiner, F. (2006). Public–private partnerships and prices: Evidence from water distribution in France. Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1–2), 149169.Google Scholar
CIRC (2013). Public Private Partnership: Tirupur Water Project. Case Study 03. October, 3 pp.Google Scholar
Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J. & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value.” California Management Review, 56(2), 130153.Google Scholar
Cravens, D. W., Piercy, N. F. & Shipp, S. H. (1996). New organizational forms for competing in highly dynamic environments: The network paradigm. British Journal of Management, 7(3), 203218.Google Scholar
Das, T. K. & Teng, B. S. (2002). The dynamics of alliance conditions in the alliance development process. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 725746.Google Scholar
Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J. & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81100.Google Scholar
Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 3551.Google Scholar
Engel, E., Fischer, R. & Galetovic, A. (2014). The Basic Public Finance of Public–Private Partnerships, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Martin, K. & Parmar, B. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 303314.Google Scholar
Garrette, B. & Karnani, A. (2010). Challenges in marketing socially useful goods to the poor. California Management Review, 52(4), 2947.Google Scholar
George, G., McGahan, A. M. & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661683.Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Shenkar, O., Luo, Y. & Nyaw, M. K. (2007). Do multiple parents help or hinder international joint venture performance? The mediating roles of contract completeness and partner cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 10211034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. J. & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691719.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293317.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(6), 781814.Google Scholar
Hart, O. (2003). Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public–private partnerships. Economic Journal, 113(486), C69C76.Google Scholar
Hart, O. & Moore, J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 11191158.Google Scholar
Heidl, R. A., Steensma, H. K. & Phelps, C. (2014). Divisive fault lines and the unplanned dissolutions of multipartner alliances. Organization Science, 25(5), 13511371.Google Scholar
Herzberg, B. & Sisombat, L. (2016). State of play – Public–private dialogue. Practical notes series. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank. 67 pp.Google Scholar
Hockerts, K. (2015). How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementarities. California Management Review, 57(3), 83106.Google Scholar
Hodge, G. A. & Greve, C. (2007). Public–private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 545558.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B. & Milgrom, P. (1994). The firm as an incentive system. American Economic Review, 84(4), 972991.Google Scholar
Iossa, E. & Martimort, D. (2015). The simple microeconomics of public–private partnerships. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17(1), 448.Google Scholar
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137159.Google Scholar
Jenkins, B., Ishikawa, E., Geaneotes, A. & Paul, J. (2010). Inclusive business solutions: Expanding opportunity and access at the base of the pyramid. International Finance Corporation (IFC) report of a conference held October 7–8, 2010.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305360.Google Scholar
Kivleniece, I. & Quélin, B. V. (2012). Creating and capturing value in public–private ties: A private actor’s perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 272299.Google Scholar
Kivleniece, I., Cabral, S., Lazzarini, S. G. & Quélin, B. V. (2017). Public–private collaboration: A review and avenues for further research. In Mesquita, L., Ragozzino, R. & Reuer, J. J., eds., Collaborative Strategy: Critical Issues for Alliances and Networks, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, ch. 24, 224233.Google Scholar
Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R. & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332354.Google Scholar
Kroeger, A. & Weber, C. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513540.Google Scholar
Kwak, Y. H., Chih, Y. & Ibbs, C. W. (2009). Towards a comprehensive understanding of public private partnerships for infrastructure development. California Management Review, 51(2), 5178.Google Scholar
Lavie, D. (2007). Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12), 11871212.Google Scholar
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G. & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180194.Google Scholar
Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. & Garrett, R. P. (2012). Governance in multilateral R&D alliances. Organization Science, 23(4), 11911210.Google Scholar
Lowndes, V. & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi‐organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2), 313333.Google Scholar
Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, May, 38.Google Scholar
Mahalingam, A. & Kapur, V. (2009). Institutional capacity and governance for PPP projects in India. In Lead 2009 Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M. & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). Perspective: The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20(6), 10341052.Google Scholar
Mair, J., Mayer, J. & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713739.Google Scholar
Makadok, R. & Coff, R. (2009). Both market and hierarchy: An incentive-system theory of hybrid governance forms. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 297319.Google Scholar
Mäkinen, S. & Seppänen, M. (2007). Assessing business model concepts with taxonomical research criteria: A preliminary study. Management Research News, 30(10), 735748.Google Scholar
Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268305.Google Scholar
Martimort, D. & Pouyet, J. (2008). To build or not to build: Normative and positive theories of public–private partnerships. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(2), 393411.Google Scholar
McMullen, J. S. & Warnick, B. J. (2015). The downside of blended value and hybrid organizing. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2015, No. 1, January, p. 10130). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Ménard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160(3), 345376.Google Scholar
Moore, M. H. & Khagram, S. (2004). On creating public value. What businesses might learn from government about strategic management. Corporate social responsibility initiative Working Paper (3).Google Scholar
Nicholls, A. (2009). “We do good things, don’t we?”: “Blended Value Accounting” in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 755769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pache, A. C. & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455476.Google Scholar
Pache, A. C. & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39(Part B), 335.Google Scholar
Park, S. H. & Russo, M. V. (1996). When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. Management Science, 42(6), 875890.Google Scholar
Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794829.Google Scholar
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K. & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 3443.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 217.Google Scholar
Quélin, B. V., Kivleniece, I. & Lazzarini, S. (2017). Public–private collaboration, hybridity and social value: Towards new theoretical perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), Special Issue on Public–Private Collaboration, Hybrid Organizational Design and Social Value. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12274Google Scholar
Quélin, B. V., Cabral, S., Lazzarini, S., Kivleniece, I. (2018). The Private Scope in Public-Private Collaborations. Organization Science (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Rangan, S., Samii, R. & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Constructive partnerships: When alliances between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 738751.Google Scholar
Rivera-Santos, M. & Rufín, C. (2010). Odd couples: Understanding the governance of firm–NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 5570.Google Scholar
Rivera-Santos, M. Rufín, C. & Wassmer, U. (2017). Alliances between firms and non-profits: A multiple and behavioral agency approach. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 854875.Google Scholar
Roehrich, J. K., Lewis, M. A. & George, G. (2014). Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review. Social Science & Medicine, 113, 110119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenkopf, L. & Padula, G. (2008). Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organization Science, 19(5), 669687.Google Scholar
Takahashi, N. (2000). The emergence of generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 11051134.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801843.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. & Sahlin-Andersson, K., eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London: Sage, Vol., 840, 99128.Google Scholar
UNDP (2008). Water for all: New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd. NTADCL case study.Google Scholar
Wach, E. (2012). Measuring the “inclusivity” of inclusive business. IDS Practice Papers, 9, 130.Google Scholar
Weber, C., Weidner, K., Kroeger, A. & Wallace, J. (2017). Social value creation in inter-organizational collaborations in the not-for-profit sector – give and take from a dyadic perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12272Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269296.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A. & Wright, M. (2015). Understanding the social role of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 610629.Google Scholar
Zeng, M. & Chen, X. P. (2003). Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 587605.Google Scholar
Zenger, T. & Hesterly, W. (1997). The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives and modular units. Organization Science, 8(3), 209222.Google Scholar
Zott, C., Amit, R. & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 10191042.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×