Book contents
- Fetal Therapy
- Fetal Therapy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Section 1: General Principles
- Section 2: Fetal Disease: Pathogenesis and Treatment
- Section III: The Future
- Chapter 53 Fetal Therapy and Translational Studies: Global Alignment, Coordination, and Collaboration in Perinatal Research – the Global Obstetrics Network (GONet) Initiative
- Chapter 54 Congenital Anomaly Registers: The European Experience
- Chapter 55 A Challenge for Prenatal Diagnosis in Developing Countries: Zika Virus as an Exemplar
- Index
- References
Chapter 55 - A Challenge for Prenatal Diagnosis in Developing Countries: Zika Virus as an Exemplar
from Section III: - The Future
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2019
Book contents
- Fetal Therapy
- Fetal Therapy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Section 1: General Principles
- Section 2: Fetal Disease: Pathogenesis and Treatment
- Section III: The Future
- Chapter 53 Fetal Therapy and Translational Studies: Global Alignment, Coordination, and Collaboration in Perinatal Research – the Global Obstetrics Network (GONet) Initiative
- Chapter 54 Congenital Anomaly Registers: The European Experience
- Chapter 55 A Challenge for Prenatal Diagnosis in Developing Countries: Zika Virus as an Exemplar
- Index
- References
Summary
The World Health Organization (WHO)’s Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health is to promote equality in access to care by providing adapted screening, diagnosis and care strategies based on the rights to physical and mental health and well-being. Even in the fetal period, prenatal diagnosis and recent fetal therapies aim to investigate and treat the fetus as it would be in postnatal life, and face issues of equitable access and feasibility, particularly in low-income countries.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fetal TherapyScientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits, pp. 580 - 587Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
National Newborn Screening and Global Resource Center (2014). Newborn Screening Reports and Publications. https://genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/newborn_reportsGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. Geneva: WHO, 2016.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality: Country, Regional and Global Estimates. Geneva: WHO, 2006.Google Scholar
Pan American Health Organization. Social Protection in Health Schemes for Mother, Newborn and Child Populations: Lessons Learned from the Latin American Region. Washington, DC: PAHO/WHO, 2008.Google Scholar
Christianson, A, Modell, B. Medical genetics in developing countries. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2004; 5: 219–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventura, W, Ventura-Laveriano, J, Nazario-Redondo, C. Perinatal outcomes associated with subsequent pregnancy among adolescent mothers in Peru. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012; 117: 56–60.Google Scholar
Ventura, W, Nazario-Redondo, C, Sekizawa, A. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis from the perspective of a low-resource country. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013; 122: 270–3.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Human Genetics: Services for the Prevention and Management of Genetic Disorders and Birth Defects in Developing Countries. WHO/WOAPBD Meeting 1999. Geneva: WHO, 1999.Google Scholar
Seffah, JD, Adanu, RM. Obstetric ultrasonography in low-income countries. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 52: 250–5.Google Scholar
Wong, AE, Kuppermann, M, Creasman, JM, Sepulveda, W, Vargas, JE. Patient and provider attitudes toward screening for Down syndrome in a Latin American country where abortion is illegal. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011; 115: 235–9.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, A, Newson, A, Luna, F, Ashcroft, R. Prenatal diagnosis and abortion for congenital abnormalities: is it ethical to provide one without the other? Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9: 48–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boland, R, Katzive, L. Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008; 34: 110–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baud, D, Gubler, DJ, Schaub, B, Lanteri, MC, Musso, D. An update on Zika virus infection. Lancet. 2017; 390: 2099–109.Google Scholar
Bardina, SV, Bunduc, P, Tripathi, S, Duehr, J, Frere, JJ, Brown, JA, et al. Enhancement of Zika virus pathogenesis by preexisting antiflavivirus immunity. Science. 2017; 356: 175–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BBC (2016). Zika virus triggers pregnancy delay calls. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-35388842Google Scholar
Sedgh, G, Singh, S, Hussain, R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014; 45: 301–14.Google Scholar
Oduyebo, T, Polen, KD, Walke, HT, Reagan-Steiner, S, Lathrop, E, Rabe, IB, et al. Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Caring for Pregnant Women with Possible Zika Virus Exposure – United States (Including U.S. Territories), July 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017; 66: 781–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oladapo, OT, Souza, JP, De Mucio, B, de Leon, RG, Perea, W, Gulmezoglu, AM, et al. WHO interim guidance on pregnancy management in the context of Zika virus infection. Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4: e510–11.Google Scholar
Jouannic, JM, Friszer, S, Leparc-Goffart, I, Garel, C, Eyrolle-Guignot, D. Zika virus infection in French Polynesia. Lancet. 2016; 387: 1051–2.Google Scholar
Pomar, L, Malinger, G, Benoist, G, Carles, G, Ville, Y, Rousset, D, et al. Association between Zika virus and fetopathy: a prospective cohort study in French Guiana. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 729–36.Google Scholar
Baud, D, Van Mieghem, T, Musso, D, Truttmann, AC, Panchaud, A, Vouga, M. Clinical management of pregnant women exposed to Zika virus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16: 523.Google Scholar
Calvet, G, Aguiar, RS, Melo, ASO, Sampaio, SA, de Filippis, I, Fabri, A, et al. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16: 653–60.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Thilaganathan, B, Bilardo, CM, Ngu, A, Malinger, G, Herrera, M. ISUOG Interim Guidance on ultrasound for Zika virus infection in pregnancy: information for healthcare professionals. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 530–2.Google Scholar
Vouga, M, Baud, D. Imaging of congenital Zika virus infection: the route to identification of prognostic factors. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36: 799–811.Google Scholar
Oduyebo, T, Petersen, EE, Rasmussen, SA, et al. Update: interim guidelines for health care providers caring for pregnant women and women of reproductive age with possible Zika virus exposure – United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 65: 122–7.Google Scholar
Vouga, M, Musso, D, Van Mieghem, T, Baud, D. CDC guidelines for pregnant women during the Zika virus outbreak. Lancet. 2016; 387: 843–4.Google Scholar
Schaub, B, Vouga, M, Najioullah, F, Gueneret, M, Monthieux, A, Harte, C, et al. Analysis of blood from Zika virus-infected fetuses: a prospective case series. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017; 17: 520–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panchaud, A, Stojanov, M, Ammerdorffer, A, Vouga, M, Baud, D. Emerging role of Zika virus in adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016; 29: 659–94.Google Scholar
Lambert, V, Pomar, L, Malinger, G. The Zika virus epidemic in French Guiana: proposition of an ultrasound based score for the diagnosis of fetal congenital Zika virus syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50(Suppl. 1): 1–47.Google Scholar
Leruez-Ville, M, Stirnemann, J, Sellier, Y, Guilleminot, T, Dejean, A, Magny, JF, et al. Feasibility of predicting the outcome of fetal infection with cytomegalovirus at the time of prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: 342. e1–9.Google Scholar
Sanz Cortes, M, Rivera, AM, Yepez, M, Guimaraes, CV, Diaz Yunes, I, Zarutskie, A, et al. Clinical assessment and brain findings in a cohort of mothers, fetuses and infants infected with ZIKA virus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: 440. e1–36.Google Scholar
Oliveira Melo, AS, Malinger, G, Ximenes, R, Szejnfeld, PO, Alves Sampaio, S, Bispo de Filippis, AM. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 6–7.Google Scholar
Pomar, L, Vouga, M, Lambert, V, Pomar, C, Hcini, N, Jolivet, A, et al. Maternal-fetal transmission and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women infected with Zika virus: prospective cohort study in French Guiana. BMJ. 2018; 363: k4431.Google Scholar
Brasil, P, Pereira, JP Jr., Moreira, ME, Ribeiro Nogueira, RM, Damasceno, L, Wakimoto, M, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 2321–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro-Mendoza, CK, Rice, ME, Galang, RR, Fulton, AC, VanMaldeghem, K, Prado, MV, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes After Maternal Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy – U.S. Territories, January 1, 2016-April 25, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017; 66: 615–21.Google Scholar
Hoen, B, Schaub, B, Funk, AL, Ardillon, V, Boullard, M, Cabie, A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after ZIKV infection in French territories in the Americas. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 985–94.Google Scholar
Panchaud, A, Vouga, M, Musso, D, Baud, D. An international registry for women exposed to Zika virus during pregnancy: time for answers. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16: 995–6.Google Scholar
Pomar, L, Musso, D, Malinger, G, Vouga, M, Panchaud, A, Baud, D. Zika virus during pregnancy: From maternal exposure to congenital Zika virus syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2019; 39: 420–430.Google Scholar