Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:06:04.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 25 - Transplantations

from Section 4 - The clinical setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

By
Laurence Weinberg
Edited by
Robert G. Hahn
Robert G. Hahn
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting , pp. 188 - 201
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mueller, AR, Platz, KP, Krause, P, et al. Perioperative factors influencing patient outcome after liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2013; 13 Suppl 1: S158–61.Google Scholar
Gruenberger, T, Steininger, R, Sautner, T, et al. Influence of donor criteria on postoperative graft function after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl Int 1994; 7 Suppl 1: S672–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blok, JJ, Putter, H, Rogiers, X, et al. Eurotransplant Liver Intestine Advisory Committee (ELIAC). Combined effect of donor and recipient risk on outcome after liver transplantation: Research of the Eurotransplant database. Liver Transpl 2015; 21: 1486–93. doi:10.1002/lt.24308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiefer, J, Lebherz-Eichinger, D, Erdoes, G, et al. Alterations of endothelial glycocalyx during orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with end-stage liver disease. Transplantation 2015; 99: 2118–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukowicka, B, Akar, RA, Olszewska, A, et al. The occurrence of postreperfusion syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation and its significance in terms of complications and short-term survival. Ann Transplant 2011; 16: 26–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paugam-Burtz, C, Kavafyan, J, Merckx, P, et al. Postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation for cirrhosis: outcome and predictors. Liver Transpl 2009; 15: 522–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabate, A, Dalmau, A, Koo, M, et al. Coagulopathy management in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 1523–5.Google Scholar
Porte, RJ. Coagulation and fibrinolysis in orthotopic liver transplantation: current views and insights. Semin Thromb Hemost 1993; 19: 191–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massicotte, L, Lenis, S, Thibeault, L, et al. Effect of low central venous pressure and phlebotomy on blood product transfusion requirements during liver transplantations. Liver Transpl 2006; 12: 117–23.Google Scholar
Sirivatanauksorn, Y, Parakonthun, T, Premasathian, N, et al. Renal dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2014; 46: 818–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yalavarthy, R, Edelstein, CL, Teitelbaum, I. Acute renal failure and chronic kidney disease following liver transplantation. Hemodial Int 2007; 11 Suppl 3: S7–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinti, F, Umbro, I, Giannelli, V, et al. Acute renal failure in liver transplant recipients: role of pretransplantation renal function and 1-year follow-up. Transplant Proc 2011; 43: 1136–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheingraber, S, Rehm, M, Sehmisch, C, Finsterer, U. Rapid saline infusion produces hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1265–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, JH, Miller, LR, Clack, S, Kim, JV. Cause of metabolic acidosis in prolonged surgery. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2142–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prough, DS, Bidani, A. Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis is a predictable consequence of intraoperative infusion of 0.9% saline. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1247–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, TJ. The ideal crystalloid – what is ‘balanced’? Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 4: 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, TJ, Venkatesh, B. Designing ‘balanced’ crystalloids. Crit Care Resusc 2003; 5: 284–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Omron, EM. Omron RM. A physicochemical model of crystalloid infusion on acid–base status. J Intensive Care Med 2010; 25: 271–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zander, R. Fluid Management. 2nd edn. http://www.bbraun.com/documents/Knowledge/Fluid_Management_0110.pdf (accessed 14 April 2015).Google Scholar
Watanabe, I, Mayumi, T, Arishima, T, et al. Hyperlactaemia can predict the prognosis after liver resection. Shock 2007; 28: 35–8.Google Scholar
Jansen, TC, van Bommel, J, Bakker, J. Blood lactate monitoring in critically ill patients: a systematic health technology assessment. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2827–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Kveim, M, Nesbakken, R, Bakker, J, et al. Serial blood lactate levels can predict the development of multiple organ failure following septic shock. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 221–6.Google Scholar
Nakatani, T. Utilization of exogenous acetate during canine haemorrhagic shock. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1979; 39: 653–8.Google Scholar
Mudge, GH, Manning, JA, Gilman, A. Sodium acetate as a source of fixed base. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1949; 71: 136–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamada, T, Yamamoto, M, Nakamura, K, et al. The pharmacokinetics of D-lactate, L-lactate and acetate in humans. Masui 1997; 46: 229–36.Google ScholarPubMed
McCague, A, Dermendjieva, M, Hutchinson, R, Wong, DT, Dao, N. Sodium acetate infusion in critically ill trauma patients for hyperchloremic acidosis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011; 19: 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skutches, CL, Holroyde, CP, Myers, RN, et al. Plasma acetate turnover and oxidation. J Clin Invest 1979; 64: 708–13.Google Scholar
Akanji, AO, Bruce, MA, Frayn, KN. Effect of acetate infusion on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation rates in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 1989; 43: 107–15.Google Scholar
Akanji, AO, Hockaday, TDR. Acetate tolerance and the kinetics of acetate utilization in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 51: 112–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, DJ, Alberti, KG. Hyperglycaemic effects of Hartmann's solution during surgery in patients with maturity onset diabetes. Br J Anaesth 1978; 50: 185–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arai, K, Mukaida, K, Fujioka, Y, et al. A comparative study of acetated Ringer's solution and lactated Ringer's solution as intraoperative fluids. Hiroshima J Anesth 1989; 25: 357–63.Google Scholar
Naylor, JM, Forsyth, GW. The alkalinizing effects of metabolizable bases in the healthy calf. Can J Vet Res 1986; 50: 509–16.Google Scholar
Kirkendol, PL, Starrs, J, Gonzalez, FM. The effect of acetate, lactate, succinate and gluconate on plasma pH and electrolytes in dogs. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1980; 26: 323–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Coll, E, Perez-Garcia, R, Rodriguez-Benitez, P, et al. Clinical and analytical changes in hemodialysis without acetate. Nefrologia 2007; 27: 742–8.Google Scholar
Bottger, I, Deuticke, U, Evertz-Prusse, E, Ross, BD, Wieland, O. On the behavior of the free acetate in the miniature pig. Acetate metabolism in the miniature pig. Z Gesamte Exp Med 1968; 145: 346–52.Google Scholar
Fournier, G, Potier, J, Thebaud, HE, et al. Substitution of acetic acid for hydrochloric acid in the bicarbonate buffered dialysate. Artif Organs 1998; 22: 608–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkendol, NW, Gonzalez, FM, Devia, CJ. Cardiac and vascular effects of infused sodium acetate in dogs. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1978; 24: 714–18.Google Scholar
Thaha, M, Yogiantoro, M, Soewanto, P. Correlation between intradialytic hypotension in patients undergoing routine hemodialysis and use of acetate compared in bicarbonate dialysate. Acta Med Indones 2005; 37: 145–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Veech, RL, Gitomer, WL. The medical and metabolic consequences of administration of sodium acetate. Adv Enzyme Regul 1988; 27: 313–43.Google Scholar
Quebbeman, EJ, Maierhofer, WJ, Piering, WF. Mechanisms producing hypoxemia during hemodialysis. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 359–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selby, NM, Fluck, RJ, Taal, MW, McIntyre, CW. Effects of acetate-free double-chamber hemodiafiltration and standard dialysis on systemic hemodynamics and troponin T levels. ASAIO J 2006; 52: 62–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, AD, Elkins, N, Reiss, OK, Chan, L, Shapiro, JI. Effects of acetate on energy metabolism and function in the isolated perfused rat heart. Kidney Int 1997; 52: 755–60.Google Scholar
Nitenberg, A, Huyghebaert, MF, Blanchet, F, Amiel, C. Analysis of increased myocardial contractility during sodium acetate infusion in humans. Kidney Int 1984; 26: 744–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCluskey, SA, Karkouti, K, Wijeysundera, D, et al. Hyperchloremia after noncardiac surgery is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality: a propensity-matched cohort study. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 412–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yunos, NM, Bellomo, R, Hegarty, C, et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs. chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA 2012; 308: 1566–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krajewski, ML, Raghunathan, K, Paluszkiewicz, SM, Schermer, CR, Shaw, AD. Meta-analysis of high- versus low-chloride content in perioperative and critical care fluid resuscitation. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 24–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, CS. Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest 1983; 71: 726–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salomonsson, M, Gonzalez, E, Kornfeld, M, Persson, AE. The cytosolic chloride concentration in macula densa and cortical thick ascending limb cells. Acta Physiol Scand 1993; 147: 305–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashimoto, S, Kawata, T, Schnermann, J, Koike, T. Chloride channel blockade attenuates the effect of angiotensin II on tubuloglomerular feedback in WKY but not spontaneously hypertensive rats. Kidney Blood Press Res 2004; 27: 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullivant, EM, Wilcox, CS, Welch, WJ. Intrarenal vasoconstriction during hyperchloremia: role of thromboxane. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: F152–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhou, F, Peng, ZY, Bishop, JV, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with 0.9% saline versus a balanced electrolyte solution on acute kidney injury in a rat model of sepsis. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: e270–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidet, B, Soni, N, Della Rocca, G, et al. A balanced view of balanced solutions. Crit Care 2010; 14: 325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCloughlin, PD, Bell, DA. Hartmann's Solution – osmolality and lactate. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 1135–6.Google Scholar
Schumann, R, Mandell, S, Michaels, MD, Klinck, J, Walia, A. Intraoperative fluid and pharmacologic management and the anesthesiologist's supervisory role for nontraditional technologies during liver transplantation: a survey of US academic centers. Transplant Proc 2013; 45: 2258–62.Google Scholar
Mukhtar, A, Aboulfetouh, F, Obayah, G, et al. The safety of modern hydroxyethyl starch in living donor liver transplantation: a comparison with human albumin. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 924–30.Google Scholar
Zhou, ZB, Shao, XX, Yang, XY, et al. Influence of hydroxyethyl starch on renal function after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2015; 47: 1616–19.Google Scholar
Hand, WR, Whiteley, JR, Epperson, TI, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch and acute kidney injury in orthotopic liver transplantation: a single-center retrospective review. Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 619–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagshaw, SM, Chawla, LS. Hydroxyethyl starch for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 709–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haase, N, Perner, A. Hydroxyethyl starch for resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19: 321–5.Google Scholar
Myburgh, JA, Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1901–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perner, A, Haase, N, Guttormsen, AB, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 124–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haase, N, Perner, A, Hennings, LI, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38–0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ 2013; 346: 839.Google Scholar
Zarychanski, R, Abou-Setta, AM, Turgeon, AF, et al. Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2013; 309: 678–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perel, P, Roberts, I, Ker, K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 28: CD000567.Google Scholar
Ma, PL, Peng, XX, Du, B, et al. Sources of heterogeneity in trials reporting hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or 0.42 associated excess mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-regression. Chin Med J 2015; 128: 2374–82.Google Scholar
Dart, AB, Mutter, TC, Ruth, CA, Taback, SP. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 20: CD007594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutter, TC, Ruth, CA, Dart, AB. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7: CD007594.Google Scholar
Niemi, TT, Suojaranta-Ylinen, RT, Kukkonen, SI, Kuitunen, AH. Gelatin and hydroxyethyl starch, but not albumin, impair hemostasis after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 998–1006.Google Scholar
Konrad, C, Markl, T, Schuepfer, G, Gerber, H, Tschopp, M. The effects of in vitro hemodilution with gelatin, hydroxyethyl starch, and lactated Ringer's solution on markers of coagulation: an analysis using SONOCLOT. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 483–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Hartog, CS, Reuter, D, Loesche, W, Hofmann, M, Reinhart, K. Influence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 on hemostasis as measured by viscoelastic device analysis: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 1725–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casutt, M, Kristoffy, A, Schuepfer, G, Spahn, DR, Konrad, C. Effects on coagulation of balanced (130/0.42) and non-balanced (130/0.4) hydroxyethyl starch or gelatin compared with balanced Ringer's solution: an in vitro study using two different viscoelastic coagulation tests ROTEM™ and SONOCLOT™. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 273–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, A, Aydınlı, B, Toprak, HI, et al. Impact of 6% starch 130/0.4 and 4% gelatin infusion on kidney function in living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2015; 47: 1883–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas-Rueddel, DO, Vlasakov, V, Reinhart, K, et al. Safety of gelatin for volume resuscitation – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1134–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Victorian Consultative Council on Anaesthetic Mortality and Morbidity. 10th Report of the Victorian Consultative Council on Anaesthetic Mortality and Morbidity, May 2011, Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Health. http://www.health.vic.gov.au/vccamm/vccamm-reports.htm (accessed 21 June 2015).Google Scholar
Jacob, M, Paul, O, Mehringer, L, et al. Albumin augmentation improves condition of guinea pig hearts after 4 hr of cold ischemia. Transplantation 2009; 87: 956–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozar, RA, Peng, Z, Zhang, R, et al. Plasma restoration of endothelial glycocalyx in a rodent model of hemorrhagic shock. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 1289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawidson, IJ, Sandor, ZF, Coorpender, J, et al. Intraoperative albumin administration affects the outcome of cadaver renal transplantation. Transplantation 1992; 53: 774–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pockaj, BA, Yang, JC, Lotze, MT, et al. A prospective randomized trial evaluating colloid versus crystalloid resuscitation in the treatment of the vascular leak syndrome associated with interleukin-2 therapy. J Immunother Tumor Immunol 1994; 15: 22–8.Google Scholar
Stevens, AP, Hlady, V, Dull, RO. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy can probe albumin dynamics inside lung endothelial glycocalyx. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2007; 293: L328–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiedermann, CJ, Joannidis, M. Nephroprotective potential of human albumin infusion: a narrative review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 912839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finfer, S. Reappraising the role of albumin for resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19: 315–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The SAFE Study Investigators. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 874–84.Google Scholar
Caironi, P, Tognoni, G, Masson, S, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1412–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, A, Laffan, MA, Waheed, U, Brett, SJ. Randomised trials of human albumin for adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of all-cause mortality. BMJ 2014; 349: g4561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raghunathan, K, Shaw, A, Nathanson, B, et al. Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: 1585–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, AD, Perner, SM, Goldstein, SL, et al. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 821–9.Google Scholar
Orbegozo Cortés, D, Rayo Bonor, A, Vincent, JL. Isotonic crystalloid solutions: a structured review of the literature. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 968–81.Google Scholar
O'Malley, CM, Frumento, RJ, Hardy, MA, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer's solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1518–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Hadimioglu, N, Saadawy, I, Saglam, T, Ertug, Z, Dinckan, A. The effect of different crystalloid solutions on acid–base balance and early kidney function after kidney transplantation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 264–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khajavi, MR, Etezadi, F, Moharari, RS, et al. Effects of normal saline vs. lactated Ringer's during renal transplantation. Ren Fail 2008; 30: 535–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, SY, Huh, KH, Lee, JR, et al. Comparison of the effects of normal saline versus Plasmalyte on acid–base balance during living donor kidney transplantation using the Stewart and base excess methods. Transplant Proc 2013; 45: 2191–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potura, E, Lindner, G, Biesenbach, P, et al. An acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid versus 0.9% saline in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 123–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnuelle, P, Johannes van der Woude, F. Perioperative fluid management in renal transplantation: a narrative review of the literature. Transpl Int 2006; 19: 947–59.Google Scholar
Legendre, C, Thervet, E, Page, B, et al. Hydroxyethylstarch and osmotic-nephrosis-like lesions in kidney transplantation. Lancet 1993; 342: 248–9.Google Scholar
Cittanova, ML, Leblanc, I, Legendre, C, et al. Effect of hydroxyethylstarch in brain-dead kidney donors on renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Lancet 1996; 348: 1620.Google Scholar
Bernard, C, Alain, M, Simone, C, Xavier, M, Jean-Francois, M. Hydroxyethylstarch and osmotic nephrosis-like lesions in kidney transplants. Lancet 1996; 348: 1595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, JF. Adverse effects of colloids on renal function. In: Vincent, JL, ed. Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Berlin: Springer, 2000: 486–93.Google Scholar
Patel, MS, Niemann, CU, Sally, MB, et al. The impact of hydroxyethyl starch use in deceased organ donors on the development of delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients: a propensity-adjusted analysis. Am J Transplant 2015; 15: 2152–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Transplantations
  • Edited by Robert G. Hahn, Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316401972.027
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Transplantations
  • Edited by Robert G. Hahn, Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316401972.027
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Transplantations
  • Edited by Robert G. Hahn, Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316401972.027
Available formats
×