Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:39:17.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 27 - Intensive care

from Section 4 - The clinical setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

By
Alena Lira  and
Michael R. Pinsky
Edited by
Robert G. Hahn
Robert G. Hahn
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting , pp. 206 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Perel, P, Roberts, I, Ker, K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2: CD000567.Google Scholar
Reinhart, K, Perner, A, Sprung, CL, et al. Consensus statement of the ESICM task force on colloid volume therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 368–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Finfer, S, Bette, L, Colman, T, et al. Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross sectional study in 391 intensive care units. Crit Care 2010; 14: R185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. Management of fluid balance: a European perspective. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25: 96–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, JL, De Backer, D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1726–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michard, F, Teboul, JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weil, MH, Shubin, H. Proposed reclassification of shock states with special reference to distributive defects. Adv Exp Med Biol 1971; 23: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlichtig, R, Kramer, D, Pinsky, MR. Flow redistribution during progressive hemorrhage is a determinant of critical O2 delivery. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70: 169–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asfar, P, Meziani, F, Hamel, JF, et al. High versus low blood pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1583–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallet, B, Pinsky, MR, Cecconi, M. Resuscitation of patients with septic shock: please “Mind the Gap”! Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 1653–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodcock, TE, Woodcock, TM. Revised Starling equation and the glycocalyx model of transvascular fluid exchange: an improved paradigm for prescribing intravenous fluid therapy. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 384–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clough, G. Relationship between microvascular permeability and ultrastructure. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1991; 55: 47–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, Boyce, N, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2247–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Cecconi, M, De Backer, D, Antonelli, M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring, Task Force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 49: 1795–815.Google Scholar
Severs, D, Hoorn, EJ, Rookmaaker, MB. A critical appraisal of intravenous fluids: from the physiological basis to clinical evidence. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014; 10: 1–10.Google Scholar
Gillies, MA, Habicher, M, Jhanji, S, et al. Incidence of postoperative death and acute kidney injury associated with i.v. 6% hydroxyethyl starch use: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2013; 112: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myburgh, JA, Mythen, MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1243–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chowdhury, AH, Cox, EF, Francis, ST, et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusion of 0.9% saline and Plasma-Lyte(R) 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunos, NM, Bellomo, R, Hegarty, C, et al. Association between a chloride liberal versus chloride restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA 2012; 308: 1566–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedermann, CJ, Joannidis, M. Accumulation of hydroxyethyl starch in human and animal tissues: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 160–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christidis, C, Mal, F, Ramos, J, et al. Worsening of hepatic dysfunction as a consequence of repeated hydroxyethyl starch infusion. J Hepatol 2001; 35: 726–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bork, K. Pruritus precipitated by hydroxyethyl starch: a review. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perner, A, Haase, N, Guttormsen, AB, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 124–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myburgh, JA, Finfer, S, Bellomo, R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1901–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagshaw, SM, Chawla, LS. Hydroxyethyl starch for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 709–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutter, TC, Ruth, CA, Dart, AB. Hydroxyethyl starch versus other fluid therapies: effect on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7: CD007594.Google Scholar
Zarychanski, R, Abou-Setta, AM, Turgeon, AF, et al. Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2013; 309: 678–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serpa, Neto A, Veelo, D, Peireira, VG, et al. Fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starches in patients with sepsis associated with an increased incidence of acute kidney injury and use of renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Crit Care 2014; 29: 185e1–7.Google Scholar
Thomas-Rueddel, DO, Vlasakov, V, Reinhart, K, et al. Safety of gelatin for volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1134–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochwerg, B, Alhazzani, W, Sindi, A, et al. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161: 347–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gattas, JD, Dan, A, Myburgh, J, et al. Fluid resuscitation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4 and 130/0.42) in acutely ill patients: systematic review of effects on mortality and treatment with renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 558–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haase, N, Perner, A, Hennings, LI, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38–0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ 2013; 346: f839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caironi, P, Tognoni, G, Masson, S, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1412–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAFE Study Investigators. Impact of albumin compared to saline on organ function and mortality of patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annane, D, Siami, S, Jaber, S, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs. crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1809–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, JH, Forbes, J, Nakada, T, et al. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 259–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, MA, Cecconi, M, Rhodes, A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 1392–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The ARISE Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1496–506.Google Scholar
Marik, PE, Cavalazzi, R, Vasu, T. Stroke volume variations and fluid responsiveness. A systematic review of literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642–7.Google Scholar
Dellinger, RP, Levy, MM, Rhodes, A, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 165–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yealy, DM, Kellum, JA, Huang, DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1683–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Mouncey, PR, Osborn, TM, Power, GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1301–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marik, PE, Lemson, J. Fluid responsiveness: an evolution of our understanding. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 617–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, K, Thiele, RH, Gan, TJ. Rational fluid management in today's ICU. Crit Care 2013; 17: S6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecconi, M, Corredor, C, Arulkumaran, N, et al. Clinical review: goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups. Crit Care 2013; 17: 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marik, PE, Monnet, X, Teboul, JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1: 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblett, SE, Snowden, CP, Shenton, BK, et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1069–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldheiser, A, Pavlova, V, Bonomo, T, et al. Balanced crystalloid compared with balanced colloid solution using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 231–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×