Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:07:48.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - The phloem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Charles B. Beck
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Perspective: evolution of the phloem

With increase in the size of plants over geologic time, efficient systems for the transport of water and minerals (primary and secondary xylem) as well as for photosynthates, hormones and other substances (primary and secondary phloem) evolved (see Chapter 1). The protoplasts of differentiating conducting cells of the xylem (tracheids and vessel members) were eliminated through autolysis, thus providing at functional maturity open, but non-living, passageways through which water could be pulled upward and out through the leaves by the force of transpiration (see Chapter 11). Evolution in the phloem took a different course. An open, but living, system of interconnected tubes, formed by overlapping sieve cells in gymnosperms (and more primitive vascular plants), and superposed sieve tube members forming sieve tubes in angiosperms evolved. The protoplasts of sieve elements became degraded, losing the nucleus, tonoplast (vacuolar membrane) and all other organelles except some mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum. In conifers and dicotyledons, distinctive plastids and P-proteins (phloem proteins) evolved and, with the mitochondria and ER, became located peripherally in the cells. Concurrently, plasmodesmata which connected contiguous sieve tube members evolved into open pores, thus forming a symplastic system of essentially unimpeded passageways (Ehlers et al., 2000) through which photosynthate and other molecular materials are transported throughout the plant. Although living, but because of the loss of the nucleus, the sieve elements were no longer able to control their genetic and metabolic activities.

Type
Chapter
Information
An Introduction to Plant Structure and Development
Plant Anatomy for the Twenty-First Century
, pp. 215 - 239
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behnke, H. D. 1990. Cycads and gnetophytes. In Behnke, H. D. and Sjölund, R. D., eds., Sieve Elements: Comparative Structure, Induction and Development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, C. E. J. 1992. Plasmodesmatal distribution, structure and frequency in relation to assimilation in C3 and C4 grasses in southern Africa. Planta 187: 348–358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botha, C. E. J. and Bel, A. J. E.. 1992. Quantification of symplastic continuity as visualized by plasmodesmograms: diagnostic value for phloem-loading pathways. Planta 187: 359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, C. E. J., Cross, R. H. M., Bel, A. J. E., and Peter, C. I.. 2000. Phloem loading in the sucrose-export-defective (SXD-1) mutant maize is limited by callose deposition at plasmodesmata in bundle sheath–vascular parenchyma interface. Protoplasma 214: 65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffey, N., , Barlow P., and Barnett, J.. 2000. Structure–function relationships during secondary phloem development in an angiosperm tree, Aesculus hippocastanum: microtubules and cell walls. Tree Physiol. 20: 777–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronshaw, J. 1975. P-proteins. In Aronoff, S., Dainty, J. H., Gorham, P. R., Srivastava, L. M., and Swanson, C. A., eds., Phloem Transport. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 79–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronshaw, J. and D. B. Sabnis. 1990. Phloem proteins. In Behnke, H. D. and Sjölund, R. D., eds., Sieve Elements: Comparative Structure, Induction and Development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 257–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlers, K., Knoblauch, M., and Bel, A. J. E.. 2000. Ultrastructural features of well-preserved and injured sieve elements: minute clamps keep the phloem transport conduits free for mass flow. Protoplasma 214: 80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleftheriou, E. P. 1990. Monocotyledons. In Behnke, H. D. and Sjölund, R. D., eds., Sieve Elements: Comparative Structure, Induction and Development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
Esau, K. and Cheadle, V. I.. 1965. Cytologic studies on phloem. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 36: 252–343Google Scholar
Esau, K. and Thorsch, J.. 1985. Sieve plate pores and plasmodesmata, the communication channels of the symplast: ultrastructural aspects and developmental relations. Am. J. Bot. 72: 1641–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esau, K., Cheadle, V. I., and Risley, E. B.. 1962. Development of sieve-plate pores. Bot. Gaz. 123: 233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evert, R. F. 1984. Comparative structure of phloem. In White, R. A. and Dickinson, W. C., eds., Contemporary Problems in Plant Anatomy. New York: Academic Press, pp. 145–234Google Scholar
Evert, R. F. 1990a. Seedless vascular plants. In Behnke, H.-D. and Sjölund, R. D., eds., Sieve Elements. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 35–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evert, R. F. 1990b. Dicotyledons. In Behnke, H.-D. and Sjölund, R. D., eds., Sieve Elements. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 103–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evert, R. F., Eschrich, W., and Eichhorn, S. E.. 1973. P-protein distribution in mature sieve elements of Cucurbita maxima. Planta 109: 193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evert, R. F., Russin, W. A., and Botha, C. E. F.. 1996. Distribution and frequency of plasmodesmata in relation to photoassimilate pathways and phloem loading in the barley leaf. Planta 198: 572–579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, D. G. 1986. Ultrastructure, plasmodesmatal frequency, and solute concentration in green areas of variegated Coleus blumei Benth. leaves. Planta 169: 141–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franceschi, V. R., Krekling, T., Berryman, A. A., and Christiansen, E.. 1998. Specialized phloem parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Pinaceae) bark are an important site of defense reactions. Am. J. Bot. 85: 601–615CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giddings, T. H., Jr. and L. A. Staehelin. 1991. Microtubule-mediated control of microfibril deposition: a re-examination of the hypothesis. In Lloyd, C. W., The Cytoskeletal Basis of Plant Growth and Form. London, Academic Press, pp. 85–99Google Scholar
Hable, W. E., Bisgrove, S. R., and Kropf, D. L.. 1998. To shape a plant cell: the cytoskeleton in plant morphogenesis. Plant Cell 10: 1772–1774Google ScholarPubMed
Kempers, R., Ammerlaan, A., and Bel, A. J. E.. 1998. Symplasmic construction and ultrastructural features of the sieve element/companion cell complex in the transport phloem of apoplasmically and symplasmically phloem-loading species. Plant Physiol. 116: 271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, M., Peters, W. S., Ehlers, K., and Bel, A. J. E.. 2001. Reversible calcium-regulated stopcocks in legume sieve tubes. Plant Cell 13: 1221–1230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson-Beers, K. and Evert, R. F.. 1991. Ultrastructure of and plasmodesmatal frequency in mature leaves of sugarcane. Planta 184: 291–306Google ScholarPubMed
Romberger, J. A., Hejnowicz, Z., and Hill, J. B.. 1993. Plant Structure: Function and Development. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Medrano, R., Xoconostle-Cazares, B., and Lucas, W. J.. 2001. The phloem as a conduit for inter-organ communication. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 202–209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russin, W. A. and Evert, R. F.. 1985. Studies on the leaf of Populus deltoides (Salicaceae): ultrastructure, plasmodesmatal frequency, and solute concentrations. Am. J. Bot. 72: 1232–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schobert, C., Gottschalk, M., Kovar, D. R., et al. 2000. Characterization of Ricinus communis phloem profilin, RcPRO1. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 719–730CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, A. 1990. Conifers. In Behnke, H.-D. and Sjölund, R. D., eds., Sieve Elements. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 63–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, A. 1992. Living sieve cells of conifers as visualized by confocal, laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy. Protoplasma 166: 153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanner, D. C. 1974. The electro-osmotic theory. In Aronoff, S.et al., eds., Phloem Transport, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Series A-4. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 563–584Google Scholar
Srivastava, L. M. 1963. Secondary phloem in the Pinaceae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 36: 1–142Google Scholar
Turgeon, R. 2000. Plasmodesmata and solute exchange in the phloem. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 27: 521–529Google Scholar
Turgeon, R., Beebe, D. U., and Gowan, E.. 1993. The intermediary cell: minor-vein anatomy and raffinose oligosaccharide synthesis in the Scrophulariaceae. Planta 191: 446–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turgeon, R., Medville, R., and Nixon, K. C.. 2001. The evolution of minor vein phloem and phloem loading. Am. J. Bot. 88: 1331–1339CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bel, A. J. E. 1996. Interaction between sieve element and companion cell and the consequences for photoassimilate distribution: two structural hardward frames with associated physiological software packages in dicotyledons?J. Exp. Bot. 47: 1129–1140Google Scholar
Bel, A. J. E. and Kempers, R.. 1990. Symplastic isolation of the sieve element–companion cell complex in the phloem of Ricinus communis and Salix alba stems. Planta 183: 69–76Google Scholar
Bel, A. J. E. and Kempers, R. 1997. The pore/plasmodesm unit: key element in the interplay between sieve element and companion cell. Progr. Bot. 58: 278–291Google Scholar
Bel, A. J. E. and Knoblauch, M.. 2000. Sieve element and companion cell: the story of the comatose patient and the hyperactive nurse. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 27: 477–487Google Scholar
Bel, A. J. E. and Rijen, H. V. M.. 1994. Microelectrode-recorded development of the symplasmic autonomy of the sieve element/companion cell complex in the stem phloem of Lupinus luteus L. Planta 192: 165–175Google Scholar
Bel, A. J. E., Gamalei, Y. V., Ammerlaan, A., and Bik, L. P. M.. 1992. Dissimilar phloem loading in leaves with symplasmic or apoplasmic minor-vein configurations. Planta 186: 518–525Google ScholarPubMed
Bel, A. J. E., Ehlers, K., and Knoblauch, M.. 2002. Sieve elements caught in the act. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 126–132Google Scholar
Walsh, M. A. and Melaragno, J. E.. 1976. Ultrastructural features of developing sieve elements in Lemna minor L.: sieve plate and lateral sieve areas. Am. J. Bot. 63: 1174–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmers, W. E. and Turgeon, R.. 1991. Transfer cells and solute uptake in minor veins of Pisum sativum leaves. Planta 186: 2–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfieri, F. J. and Kemp, R. I.. 1968. the seasonal cycle of phloem development in Juniperus californica. Am. J. Bot. 70: 891–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayre, B. G., Blair, J. E., and Turgeon, R.. 2003. Functional and phylogenetic analyses of a conserved regulatory program in the phloem of minor veins. Plant Physiol. 133: 1229–1239CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayre, B. G., Keller, F., and Turgeon, R.. 2003. Symplastic continuity between companion cells and the translocation stream: long-distance transport is controlled by retention and retrieval mechanisms in the phloem. Plant Physiol. 131: 1518–1528CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, H. D. 1974. Companion cells and transfer cells. In Aronoff, S.et al., eds., Phloem Transport. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 153–175Google Scholar
Behnke, H. D. 1995. Sieve-element plastids, phloem proteins, and the evolution of the Ranunculaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. (Suppl.) 9: 25–37
Behnke, H. D. 2002. Sieve-element plastids and evolution of monocotyledons, with emphasis on Melanthiaceae sensu lato and Aristolochiaceae–Asaroideae, a putative dicotyledon sister group. Bot. Rev. 68: 524–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, H. D. and Sjölund, R. D. (eds.) 1990. Sieve Elements: Comparative Structure, Induction and Development. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronshaw, J. and Anderson, R.. Sieve plate pores of Nicotiana. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 27: 134–148CrossRef
Davis, J. D. and Evert, R. F.. 1970. Seasonal cycle of phloem development in woody vines. Bot. Gaz. 131: 128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, B. P. 1975. Differentiation of the sieve plate of Cucurbita: a further view. Ann. Bot. 39: 1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esau, K. 1965. Vascular Differentiation in Plants. New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
Esau, K. 1969. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, vol. 5, part 2, The Phloem. Berlin: BornträgerGoogle Scholar
Esau, K. 1973. Comparative structure of companion cells and phloem parenchyma cells in Mimosa pudica L. Ann. Bot. 37: 625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esau, K. and Cheadle, V. I.. 1958. Wall thickening in sieve elements. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 44: 546–553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esau, K. and Cheadle, V. I. 1959. Size of pores and their contents in sieve elements of dicotyledons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 45: 156–162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eschrich, W. 1975. Sealing systems in phloem. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, 2nd Ser. 1: 39–56Google Scholar
Evert, R. F. 1963. Ontogeny and structure of the secondary phloem in Pyrus malus. Am. J. Bot. 50: 8–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evert, R. F. 1977. Phloem structure and histochemistry. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28: 199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evert, R. F. 1982. Sieve-tube structure in relation to function. BioScience 32: 789–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giaquinta, R. T. 1983. Phloem loading of sucrose. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 34: 347–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottwald, J. R., Krysan, P. J., Young, J. C., Evert, R. F., and Sussman, M. R.. 2000. Genetic evidence for the in planta role of phloem-specific plasma membrane sucrose transporters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13979–13984CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunning, B. E. S. and J. S. Pate. 1974. Transfer cells. In Robards, A. W., ed., Dynamic Aspects of Plant Ultrastructure. London: McGraw-Hill, pp. 441–480Google Scholar
Haritatos, E., Medville, R., and Turgeon, R.. 2000. Minor vein structure and sugar transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 211: 105–111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman-Thoma, G., Bel, A. J. E. and Ehlers, K.. 2001. Ultrastructure of minor-vein phloem and assimilate export in summer and winter leaves of the symplasmically loading evergreens, Ajuga reptans L., Aucuba japonica Thunb., and Hedera helix L. Planta 2112: 231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, M. and Bel, A. J. E.. 1998. Sieve tubes in action. Plant Cell 10: 35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pate, J. S. and Gunning, B. E. S.. 1969. Vascular transfer cells in angiosperm leaves: a taxonomic and morphological survey. Protoplasma 68: 135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjölund, R. D. 1997. The phloem sieve element: a river runs through it. Plant Cell 9: 1137–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turgeon, R. and Gowan, E.. 1992. Sugar synthesis and phloem loading in Coleus blumei leaves. Planta 187: 388–394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bel, A. J. E. and Knoblauch, M.. 2000. Sieve element and companion cell: the story of the comatose patient and the hyperactive nurse. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 27: 477–487Google Scholar
Weatherley, P. E. 1962. The mechanism of sieve-tube translocation: observation, experiment and theory. Adv. Sci. 18: 571–577Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The phloem
  • Charles B. Beck, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: An Introduction to Plant Structure and Development
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165365.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The phloem
  • Charles B. Beck, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: An Introduction to Plant Structure and Development
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165365.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The phloem
  • Charles B. Beck, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: An Introduction to Plant Structure and Development
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165365.013
Available formats
×