Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:15:33.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Structure and development of the cell wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Charles B. Beck
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Perspective

Nearly all plant cells are characterized by an enclosing, cellulosic wall. Those that are not, such as gametes, are either very short-lived or are protected by enclosure within a sheath or tissue of walled cells. In addition to its vital role in communication between cells, the wall serves both supporting and protective functions. Cell walls were first observed, in cork, by Robert Hooke in 1663 and considered to be “dead” structures. Furthermore, the cell wall, produced by and to the exterior of the protoplast, has been considered by some biologists to be an extracellular structure. Most botanists, however, have persisted in considering the wall to be the outer part of the cell, a view based largely on the integration of cytokinesis and cell wall formation. Strong justification for this viewpoint has been provided by research during the past several decades which has shown that the wall is a dynamic structure that receives biochemical information from the protoplast and sends information to it. Recent studies suggest that the wall is an integral component of a cell wall–plasma membrane–cytoskeleton continuum which provides a pathway for molecular and mechanical signals between cells in a tissue, or between cells and the external environment (Wyatt and Carpita, 1993; Reuzeau and Pont-Lezica, 1995; see also Wojtaszek, 2000). Major components of this continuum are plasmodesmata, highly specialized regions of endoplasmic reticulum which traverse the walls and connect the protoplasts of adjacent cells, microtubules, thought to play important roles in determining the orientation of cellulose microfibrils in the cell wall (Baskin, 2001), and actin microfilaments which have been implicated in cytoplasmic streaming and in the transport of vesicles containing precursor compounds to the sites of wall synthesis (Chaffey et al., 2000).

Type
Chapter
Information
An Introduction to Plant Structure and Development
Plant Anatomy for the Twenty-First Century
, pp. 57 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoki, K., Kragler, F., Xoconostle-Cazares, B., and Lucas, W. J.. 2002. A subclass of plant heat shock cognate 70 chaperones carries a motif that facilitates trafficking through plasmodesmata. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 16342–16347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baskin, T. I. 2001. On the alignment of cellulose microfibrils by cortical microtubules: a review and a model. Protoplasma 215: 150–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baskin, T. I., Beemster, G. T. S., Judy-March, J. E., and Marga, F.. 2004. Disorganization of cortical microtubules stimulates tangential expansion and reduces the uniformity of cellulose microfibril alignment among cells in the root of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 135: 2279–2290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebe, D. U. and W. A. Russin. 1999. Plasmodesmata in the phloem-loading pathway. In Bel, A. J. E. and Kesteren, W. J. P., eds., Plasmodesmata: Structure, Function, and Role in Cell Communication. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 261–293Google Scholar
Boyd, J. C. 1985. Biophysical Control of Microfibril Orientation in Plant Cell Walls. Dordrecht: NijhoffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. M. Jr. 1985. Cellulose microfibril assembly and orientation: recent developments. J. Cell Sci. (Suppl.) 2: 13–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. M. Jr. and Montezinos, D.. 1976. Cellulose microfibrils: visualization of biosynthetic and orienting complexes in association with the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 73: 143–147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canny, M. J. 1995. Apoplastic water and solute movement: new rules for an old space. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 215–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffey, N., Barlow, P., and Barnett, J.. 2000. A cytoskeletal basis for wood formation in angiosperm trees: the involvement of microfilaments. Planta 210: 890–896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, D. J. 1997. Assembly and enlargement of the primary cell wall in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Devel. Biol. 13: 171–201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, D. J. 1999. Enzymes and other agents that enhance cell wall extensibility. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 391–417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, D. J. 2000. Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature 407: 321–326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, D. J. 2001. Wall structure and wall loosening: a look backwards and forwards. Plant Physiol. 125: 131–134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, D. J., Li, L. C., Cho, H. T.et al. 2002. The growing world of expansins. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 1436–1444CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Côté, W. A. (ed.) 1967. Wood Ultrastructrure: An Atlas of Electron Micrographs. Seattle, WA: University of Washington PressGoogle Scholar
Delmer, D. P. 1987. Cellulose biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 38: 259–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dengler, N. G., Dengler, R. E., and Hattersley, P. W.. 1985. Differing ontogenetic origins of PCR (“Kranz”) sheaths in leaf blades of C4 grasses (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 72: 284–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, B., Turgeon, R., and Parthasarathy, M. V.. 1992. Substructure of freeze-substituted plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 169: 28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlers, K. and Kollmann, R.. 2001. Primary and secondary plasmodesmata: structure, origin, and functioning. Protoplasma 216: 1–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehlers, K., Binding, H., and Kollmann, R.. 1999. The formation of symplasmic domains by plugging of plasmodesmata: a general event in plant morphogenesis?Protoplasma 209: 181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emons, A. M. C. and Kieft, H.. 1994. Winding threads around plant cells: applications of the geometrical model for microfibril deposition. Protoplasma 180: 59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emons, A. M. C. and Mulder, B. M.. 1998. The making of the architecture of the plant cell wall: how cells exploit geometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95: 7215–7219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
Evert, R. F., Russin, W. A., and Bosabalidis, A. M.. 1996. Anatomical and ultrastructural changes associated with sink-to-source transition in developing maize leaves. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157: 247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, A. J., Caderas, D., Wehrli, E., McQueen-Mason, S., and Kuhlemeir, C.. 1999. Analysis of expansin-induced morphogenesis on the apical meristem of tomato. Planta 208: 166–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey-Wyssling, A. 1954. The fine structure of cellulose microfibrils. Science 119: 80–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, S. C. 1989. Cellulases, hemicelluloses and auxin-stimulated growth: a possible relationship. Physiol. Plant. 75: 532–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, T. H. Jr. and Staehelin, L. A.. 1988. Spatial relationships between microtubules and plasma-membrane rosettes during the deposition of primary wall microfibrils in Closterium sp. Planta 173: 22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, T. H., Jr. and L. A. Staehelin 1991. Microtubule-mediated control of microfibril deposition: a re-examintion of the hypothesis. In Lloyd, C. W., ed., The Cytoskeletal Basis of Plant Growth and Form. London: Academic Press, pp. 85–99Google Scholar
Giddings, T. H., Brower, D. L., and Staehelin, L. A.. 1980. Visualization of particle complexes in the plasma membrane of Microsterias denticulata associated with the formation of cellulose fibrils in primary and secondary walls. J. Cell Biol. 84: 327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, T. 1989. Xyloglucans in the primary cell wall. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 139–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. B. 1974. A unified hypothesis for the role of membrane bound enzyme complexes in plant cell wall synthesis. J. Theor. Biol. 48: 445–449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogetsu, T. 1991. Mechanism for formation of the secondary wall thickening in tracheary elements: microtubules and microfibrils of tracheary elements of Pisum sativum L. and Commelina communis L. and the effects of amiprophosmethyl. Planta 185: 190–200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, D. R. 1992. The relationship of cells to organisms in plants: problems and implications of an organismal perspective. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: S28–S37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, D. R. and Hagemann, W.. 1991. The relationship of cell and organism in vascular plants. BioScience 41: 693–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegstra, K., Talmadge, K. W., Bauer, W. D., and Albersheim, P.. 1973. The structure of cell walls.III. A model of the walls of suspension-cultured sycamore cells based on the interconnections of the macromolecular components. Plant Physiol. 51: 188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, H., Fukuda, H. and Shibaoka, H.. 1988. Interrelation between the spatial disposition of actin filaments and microtubules during the differentiation of tracheary elements in cultured Zinnia cells. Protoplasma 143: 29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragler, F., Lucas, W. J., and Monzer, J.. 1998. Plasmodesmata: dynamics, domains, and patterning. Ann. Bot. 81: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragler, F., Monzer, J., Xoconostle-Cazares, B., and Lucas, W. J.. 2000. Peptide antagonists of the plasmodesmal macromolecular trafficking pathway. EMBO J. 19: 2856–2868CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachaud, S. and Maurosset, L.. 1996. Occurrence of plasmodesmata between differentiating vessels and other xylem cells in Sorbus terminalis L. Crantz and their fate during xylem maturation. Protoplasma 191: 220–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, C. W. 1984. Toward a dynamic helical model for the influence of microtubules on wall patterns in plants. Int. Rev. Cytol. 86: 1–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, W. J., Ding, B., and Schoot, C.. 1993. Plasmodesmata and the supracellular nature of plants. New Phytol. 125: 435–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyndon, R. F. 1994. Control of organogenesis at the shoot apex. New Phytol. 128: 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monzer, J. 1991. Ultrastructure of secondary plasmodesmata formation in regenerating Solanum nigrum protoplast cultures. Protoplasma 165: 86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, A. C. and Levy, S.. 1984. Helicoidal orientation of cellulose microfibrils in Nitella opaca internode cells: ultrastructure and computed theoretical effects of strain reorientation during wall growth. Planta 162: 370–384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neville, A. C. and S. Levy 1985. The helicoidal concept in plant cell wall ultrastructure and morphogenesis. In Brett, C. T. and Hillman, J. R., eds., Biochemistry of Plant Cell Walls. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–124Google Scholar
Oparka, K. J. and Roberts, A. G.. 2001. Plasmodesmata: a not so open-and-shut case. Plant Physiol. 125: 123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oparka, K. J., Robards, A. G., Boewink, P.et al. 1999. Simple, but not branched, plasmodesmata allow the nonspecific trafficking of proteins in developing tobacco leaves. Cell 97: 743–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolillo, D. J. 1995. The net orientation of wall microfibrils in the outer periclinal epidermal walls of seedling leaves of wheat. Ann. Bot. 76: 589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolillo, D. J. 2000. Axis elongation can occur with net longitudinal orientation of wall microfibrils. New Phytol. 145: 449–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, R. D. 1974. The Physical Biology of Plant Cell Walls. London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
Preston, R. D. 1982. The case for multinet growth in growing walls of plant cells. Planta 155: 356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayle, D. L. and Cleland, R. E.. 1992. The acid growth theory of auxin-induced cell elongation is alive and well. Plant PhysiolCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuzeau, C. and Pont-Lezica, R. F.. 1995. Comparing plant and animal extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton connections: are they alike?Protoplasma 186: 113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robards, A. W. 1970. Electron Microscopy and Plant Ultrastructure. London: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Robinson-Beers, K. and Evert, R. F.. 1991. Fine structure of plasmodesmata in mature leaves of sugarcane. Planta 184: 307–318Google ScholarPubMed
Roelofson, P. A. 1958. Cell wall structure as related to surface growth. Acta Bot. Neerl. 7: 77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofsen, P. A. and Houwink, A. L.. 1953. Architecture and growth of the primary cell wall in some plant hairs and in the Phycomyces sporangiophores. Acta Bot. Neerl. 2: 218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, J. C. 1981. Comparison of arced patterns in growing and non-growing polylamellate cell walls of higher plants. In Robinson, D. B. and Quader, H., eds., Cell Walls '81. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 162–170Google Scholar
Roland, J. C. and Vian, B.. 1979. The wall of the growing plant cell: its three dimensional organization. Int. Rev. Cytol. 61: 129–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, J. C., Reis, D., Vian, B., Satiat-Jeunemaitre, B., and Mosiniak, M.. 1987. Morphogenesis of plant cell walls at the supramolecular level: internal geometry and versatility of helicoidal expression. Protoplasma 140: 75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romberger, J. A., Hejnowicz, Z., and Hill, J. F. 1993. Plant Structure: Function and Development. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauter, M., Seagull, R. W., and Kende, H.. 1993. Internodal elongation and orientation of cellulose microfibrils and microtubules in deepwater rice. Planta 190: 354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seagull, R. W. 1986. Changes in microtubule orientation and wall microfibril orientation during in vitro cotton fiber development: an immunofluorescent study. Can. J. Bot. 64: 1373–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seagull, R. W. 1990. The effects of microtubule and microfilament disrupting agents on cytoskeletal arrays and wall deposition in developing cotton fibers. Protoplasma 159: 44–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seagull, R. W. 1991. Role of the cytoskeletal elements in organized wall microfibril deposition. In Haigler, C and Weimer, P. J., eds., Biosynthesis and Biodegradation of Cellulose. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 143–163Google Scholar
Schoot, C., Dietrich, M. A., Storms, M., Verbeke, J. A., and Lucas, J. A.. 1995. Establishment of cell-to-cell communication pathway between separate carpels during gynoecium development. Planta 195: 450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vian, C., Roland, J. C., and Reis, D.. 1993. Primary cell wall texture and its relation to surface expansion. Int. J. Plant Sci. 154: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, W. G., Mollenhauer, H. H., and Leech, J. H.. 1960. The ultrastructure of the meristematic cell. Am. J. Bot. 47: 319–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojtaszek, P. 2000. Genes and plant cell walls: a difficult relationship. Biol. Rev. 75: 437–475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolters-Arts, A. M. C., Amstel, T., and Derksen, J.. 1993. Tracing cellulose microfibril orientation in inner primary cell walls. Protoplasma 175: 102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, S. E. and Carpita, N. C.. 1993. The plant cytoskeleton–cell-wall continuum. Trends in Cell Biology 3: 413–417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wymer, C. and Lloyd, C.. 1996. Dynamic microtubules: implications for cell wall patterns. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, I. W. 1957. Aggregations of microfibrils and their orientations in the secondary wall of coniferous tracheids. Am. J. Bot. 44: 415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, I. W. and Vestal, M. R.. 1937. The orientation of cellulose in the secondary wall of tracheary cells. J. Arnold Arbor. 18: 185–195Google Scholar
Brown, R. M. Jr. 1999. Cellulose structure and biosynthesis. Pure Appl. Chem. 71: 767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, M. E., Graham, L. E., Botha, C. E. J., and Lavin, C. A.. 1997. Comparative ultrastructure of plasmodesmata of Chara and selected bryophytes: toward an elucidation of the evolutionary origin of plant plasmodesmata. Am. J. Bot. 84: 1169–1178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronshaw, J. 1965. Cytoplasmic fine structure and cell wall development in differentiating xylem elements. In Côté, W. A. Jr., ed., Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, pp. 99–124Google Scholar
Ding, B. and W. J. Lucas. 1996. Secondary plasmodesmata: biogenesis, special functions and evolution. In Smallwood, M., Knox, J. P., and Bowles, D. J., eds., Membranes: Specialized Functions in Plants. Oxford, UK: BIOS Scientific Publishers, pp. 489–506Google Scholar
Franceschi, V. R., Ding, B., and Lucas, W. J.. 1994. Mechanism of plasmodesmata formation in characean algae in relation to evolution of intercellular communication in higher plants. Planta 192: 347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey-Wyssling, A. and Mühlethaler, K.. 1965. Ultrastructural Plant Cytology. Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Harada, H. 1965. Ultrastructure and organization of gymnosperm cell walls. In Côté, W. A. Jr., ed., Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, pp. 215–233Google Scholar
Houwink, A. L. and Roelofsen, P. A.. 1954. Fibrillar architecture of growing plant cell walls. Acta Bot. Neerl. 3: 385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itaya, A. and Woo, Y. M.. 1999. Plasmodesmata and cell-to-cell communication in plants. Int. Rev. Cytol. 190: 251–316Google Scholar
Kerr, T. and Bailey, I. W.. 1934. The cambium and its derivative tissues. X. Structure, optical properties, and chemical composition of the so-called middle lamella. J. Arnold Arbor. 15: 327–349Google Scholar
Lamport, D. T. A. 1965. The protein component of primary cell walls. Adv. Bot. Res. 2: 151–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liese, W. 1956. The fine structure of bordered pits in soft-woods. In Côté, W. A. Jr., ed., Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, pp. 271–290Google Scholar
Linskens, H. F. and Jackson, J. F. (eds.) 1996. Plant Cell Wall Analysis. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumdar, G. P. and Preston, R. D.. 1941. The fine structure of collenchyma cells in Heracleum spondylium L. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B130: 201–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. 1964. Morphology of microtubules in plant cells. Science 144: 872–874Google Scholar
Northcote, D. H. 1989. Control of plant-cell wall biogenesis: an overview. Am. Chem. Soc. Symposium. 399: 1–15Google Scholar
Northcote, D. H. and Pickett-Heaps, J. D.. 1966. A function of the Golgi apparatus in polysaccharide synthesis and transport in root-cap cells of wheat. Biochem. J. 98: 159–167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett-Heaps, J. D. 1968. Xylem wall deposition: radioautographic investigations using lignin precursors. Protoplasma 65: 181–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, R. D. 1952. The Molecular Architecture of Plant Cell Walls. New York: John Wiley and SonsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, P. M. 1967. Radioautographic study of cell wall deposition in growing plant cells. J. Cell Biol. 35: 659–674CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robards, A. W. 1968. A new interpretation of plasmodesmatal ultrastructure. Planta 82: 200–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robards, A. W. (ed.) 1974. Dynamic Aspects of Plant Ultrastucture. London: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Roelofson, P. A. and Houwink, A. L. 1951. Cell wall structure of staminal hairs of Tradescantia virginica and its relation with growth. Protoplasma 40: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, L. M. 1969. On the ultrastructure of cambium and its vascular derivatives. III. The secondary walls of the sieve elements of Pinus strobus. Am. J. Bot. 56: 354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thimann, K. V. and Biradivolu, R.. 1994. Actin and the elongation of plant cells. II. The role of divalent ions. Protoplasma 183: 5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thimann, K. V., Reese, K., and Nachmias, V. T.. 1992. Actin and the elongation of plant cells. Protoplasma 171: 153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bel, A. J. E. and Kesteren, W. J. P. (eds.) 1999. Plasmodesmata: Structure, Function, and Role in Cell Communication. Berlin: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
Wardrop, A. B. 1962. Cell wall organization in higher plants. I. The primary wall. Bot. Rev. 28: 241–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardrop, A. B. 1965. Cellular differentiation in xylem. In Côté, W. A. Jr., ed., Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, pp. 61–97Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×