Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T19:33:01.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Bachir Taouli
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved as an important diagnostic tool for assessing soft tissue tumors due to its excellent soft tissue contrast and multiplanar reconstruction capabilities. The imaging characteristics of common benign lesions, such as lipoma and hemangioma, are often specific enough to allow a conclusive diagnosis. However, conventional MRI is limited in providing clinically satisfactory information about soft tissue tumor characterization and the presence and extent of viable tumor tissue and/or tumor necrosis.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been used in the assessment of tumors, particularly those of the central nervous system. Results of studies correlating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and histopathological findings have suggested that higher cellularity is associated with more restricted diffusion (i.e., lower ADC). Recently, DWI has been utilized to characterize soft tissue tumors, and is expected to provide additional useful information such as lesion characterization and the presence and extent of viable tumor tissue and/or tumor necrosis that is not available with conventional MRI. In this chapter, DWI is reviewed with regard to soft tissue tumors.

Diffusion acquisition and processing for assessment of soft tissue tumors

Several diffusion acquisition techniques have been used to investigate the diffusivity of soft tissue tumors, including spin-echo (SE), multi-shot echo-planar imaging (MS-EPI), SE single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI), and SE and line-scan sequences. Scanning times for these techniques vary from 25 s (SS-EPI) to 12 min (SE). The maximum b-values (such as 600 and 701 s/mm) used in early reports appeared too low to enable full evaluation of tumor diffusivity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sugahara, T, Korogi, Y, Kochi, M, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imag 1999;9:53–60.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippi, CG, Edgar, MA, Ulug, AM, et al. Appearance of meningiomas on diffusion-weighted images: correlating diffusion constants with histopathologic findings. Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:65–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Kono, K, Inoue, Y, Nakayama, K, et al. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1081–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Guo, AC, Cummings, TJ, Dash, RC, et al. Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology 2002;224:177–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rijswijk, CSP, Kunz, P, Hogendoorn, PCW, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the characterization of soft-tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imag 2002;15:302–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einarsdottir, H, Karlsson, M, Wejde, J, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumours. Eur Radiol 2004;14:959–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeda, M, Matsumine, A, Kato, H, et al. Soft-tissue tumors evaluated by line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging: influence of myxoid matrix on the apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imag 2007;25:1199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagata, S, Nishimura, H, Uchida, M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis. Radiat Med 2008;26:287–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudeck, O, Zeile, M, Pink, D, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging allows monitoring of anticancer treatment effects in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. J Magn Reson Imag 2008;27:1109–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stejskal, EO, Tanner, JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965;42:288–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudbjartsson, H, Maier, SE, Mulkern, RV, et al. Line scan diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:509–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeda, M, Sakuma, H, Maier, SE, et al. Quantitative assessment of diffusion abnormalities in benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures by line scan diffusion-weighted imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1203–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyng, H, Haraldseth, O, Rofstad, EK. Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:828–36.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niwa, T, Aida, N, Fujita, K, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of retroperitoneal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008;7:49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoeny, HC, Keyzer, F, Chen, F, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in monitoring the effect of a vascular targeting agent on rhabdomyosarcoma in rats. Radiology 2005;234:756–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, BK, Macpherson, M. Epidermoid cyst of the sole. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986;15:1127–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, SH, Chung, HW, Choi, JY, et al. MRI findings of subcutaneous epidermal cysts: emphasis on the presence of rupture. Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:961–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, C, Maeda, M, Matsumine, A, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of subcutaneous epidermal cysts in the head and neck comparison with intracranial epidermoid cysts. Acad Radiol 2007;14:1020–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsushima, N, Maeda, M, Takamura, M, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Comparison to histopathological findings. J Neuroradiol 2007;34:183–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, KK, Renfrew, DL, Feddersen, RM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of myxoid-containing tumors. Skeletal Radiol 1991;20:245–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoeny, HC, Keyzer, F, Chen, F, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging allows noninvasive in vivo monitoring of the effects of combretastatin a-4 phosphate after repeated administration. Neoplasia 2005;7:779–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×