Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T05:22:00.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Diffusion-weighted MRI of focal renal masses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Bachir Taouli
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Characterization of renal masses mainly relies on the presence or absence of enhancement on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. With MRI, enhancement can be assessed by measuring signal intensity changes or visually without or with image subtraction. There is a growing interest in the application of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in body imaging for multiple reasons: DWI can provide structural and functional information without any intravenous (IV) contrast administration, thus it is easy to implement and repeat, and is very attractive in patients at risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).

The signal and contrast in DWI are based on the thermally driven random motion of water and microcapillary perfusion in tissues, and are usually quantified by calculating the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The ADC is dependent on different factors such as molecular architecture, interactions, and temperature in free fluid. The protons' motion is hindered or restricted by different components such as cell membranes, cellular density, or macromolecules in tissues. This is manifested by an ADC that is reduced from the bulk value. In general, the clinical implications of ADC change depend upon the tissue under investigation; an anomalous rise in ADC can indicate increased edema, cystic changes, and necrosis; while an anomalous reduction in ADC might indicate ischemia, infection, or tumor. As such, diffusion measures should be taken in context with other imaging sequences to ensure an accurate diagnosis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Israel, GM, Bosniak, MA. Renal imaging for diagnosis and staging of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin N Am 2003;30 (3):499–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, VB, Allen, SF, Hood, MN, Choyke, PL. Renal masses: quantitative assessment of enhancement with dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 2002;224 (3):695–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hecht, EM, Israel, GM, Krinsky, GA, et al. Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232 (2):373–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grobner, T. Gadolinium: a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21 (4):1104–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadowski, EA, Bennett, LK, Chan, MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007;243 (1):148–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, AS, Zic, JA, Abraham, JL. Gadolinium deposition in nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56 (1):27–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, MF, Prasad, PV, Bimmler, D, Kaiser, A, Edelman, RR. Functional imaging of the kidney by means of measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 1994;193 (3):711–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, CL, Aisen, AM, Ellis, JH, Londy, F, Chenevert, TL. Feasibility of MR diffusion studies in the kidney. J Magn Reson Imag 1995;5 (5):617–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Namimoto, T, Yamashita, Y, Mitsuzaki, K, et al. Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in diffuse renal disease by diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imag 1999;9 (6):832–7.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ichikawa, T, Haradome, H, Hachiya, J, Nitatori, T, Araki, T. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging in the upper abdomen: preliminary clinical experience in 61 patients. Abdom Imag 1999;24 (5):456–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuda, Y, Ohashi, I, Hanafusa, K, et al. Anisotropic diffusion in kidney: apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for clinical use. J Magn Reson Imag 2000;11 (2):156–60.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ries, M, Jones, RA, Basseau, F, Moonen, CT, Grenier, N. Diffusion tensor MRI of the human kidney. J Magn Reson Imag 2001;14 (1):42–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, JH, Tsui, EY, Luk, SH, et al. MR diffusion-weighted imaging of kidney: differentiation between hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis. Clin Imag 2001;25 (2):110–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murtz, P, Flacke, S, Traber, F, et al. Abdomen: diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pulse-triggered single-shot sequences. Radiology 2002;224 (1):258–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chow, LC, Bammer, R, Moseley, ME, Sommer, FG. Single breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. J Magn Reson Imag 2003;18 (3):377–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoeny, HC, Keyzer, F, Oyen, RH, Peeters, RR. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in healthy volunteers and patients with parenchymal diseases: initial experience. Radiology 2005;235 (3):911–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Y, Wang, X, Jiang, X. Relationship between the renal apparent diffusion coefficient and glomerular filtration rate: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imag 2007;26 (3):678–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Notohamiprodjo, M, Glaser, C, Herrmann, KA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the kidney with parallel imaging: initial clinical experience. Investig Radiol 2008;43 (10):677–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cova, M, Squillaci, E, Stacul, F, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results. Br J Radiol 2004;77 (922):851–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squillaci, E, Manenti, G, Di Stefano, F, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of renal tumours. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2004;23 (1):39–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Yoshikawa, T, Kawamitsu, H, Mitchell, DG, et al. ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187 (6):1521–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J, Tehrani, YM, Wang, L, et al. Renal masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: a preliminary experience. Radiology 2008;247 (2):458–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taouli, B, Thakur, RK, Mannelli, L, et al. Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2009;251:398–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S, Jain, M, Harris, AB, et al. T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2009;251 (3):796–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandrasegaran, K, Sundaram, CP, Ramaswamy, R, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of renal masses. Am J Roentgenol 2010;194 (2):438–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel, GM, Bosniak, MA. MR imaging of cystic renal masses. Magn Reson Imag Clin N Am 2004;12 (3):403–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho VB, AS, Hood, MN, Choyke, PL. Renal masses: quantitative assessment of enhancement with dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 2002;224 (3):695–700.Google ScholarPubMed
Silvera, S, Oppenheim, C, Touze, E, et al. Spontaneous intracerebral hematoma on diffusion-weighted images: influence of T2-shine-through and T2-blackout effects. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26 (2):236–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Bihan, D, Breton, E, Lallemand, D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168 (2):497–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×