Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T16:50:59.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 69 - Statistics: Do We Understand the Results of Our Analyses?

from Section 17 - Novel Cell Therapies and Manipulations: Ready for Prime-Time?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2017

By
Binod Dhakal  and
Parameswaran Hari
Edited by
Hillard M. Lazarus ,
Robert Peter Gale ,
Armand Keating ,
Andrea Bacigalupo ,
Reinhold Munker  and
Kerry Atkinson
Edited in association with
Syed Ali Abutalib
Hillard M. Lazarus
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Robert Peter Gale
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Armand Keating
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Andrea Bacigalupo
Affiliation:
Ospedale San Martino, Genoa
Reinhold Munker
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University, Shreveport
Kerry Atkinson
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Syed Ali Abutalib
Affiliation:
Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Chicago
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Hematopoietic Cell Transplants
Concepts, Controversies and Future Directions
 , pp. 674 - 677
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Giobbie-Hurder, A, Gelber, RD, Regan, MM. Challenges of guarantee-time bias. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(23):2963–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, JP, Rizzo, JD, Zhang, MJ, Keiding, N. Statistical methods for the analysis and presentation of the results of bone marrow transplants. Part I: unadjusted analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28(10):909–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Tarone, RE, Ware, JH. On distribution-free tests for equality for survival distributions. Biometrika. 1977;64:156–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, T, McCarthy, PL, Carreras, J, Zhang, MJ, Lazarus, HM, Laport, GG, et al. Simplified validated prognostic model for progression-free survival after autologous transplantation for hodgkin lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(12):1740–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, JP, Rizzo, JD, Zhang, MJ, Keiding, N. Statistical methods for the analysis and presentation of the results of bone marrow transplants. Part 2: Regression modeling. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28(11):1001–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Logan, BR, Zhang, MJ, Klein, JP. Regression models for hazard rates versus cumulative incidence probabilities in hematopoietic cell transplantation data. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12(1 Suppl 1):107–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, JP, Andersen, PK. Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function. Biometrics. 2005;61(1):223–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, SN. Of P-values and Bayes: a modest proposal. Epidemiology. 2001;12(3):295–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P value fallacy. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(12):995–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uno, H, Claggett, B, Tian, L, Inoue, E, Gallo, P, Miyata, T, et al. Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(22):2380–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colhoun, HM, McKeigue, PM, Davey Smith, G. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet. 2003;361(9360):865–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, JP. Microarrays and molecular research: noise discovery? Lancet. 2005;365(9458):454–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, JP. Genetic associations: false or true? Trends Mol Med. 2003;9(4):135–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, S. A dirty dozen: twelve P-value misconceptions. Sem Hematol. 2008;45(3):135–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×