Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Nature of Translation
- Part II Translation in Society
- Part III Translation in Company
- Part IV Translation in Practice: Factual Genres
- 16 Translating Technical Texts
- 17 Translating Academic Texts
- 18 Translating Medical Texts
- 19 Translating Legal Texts
- 20 Translating News
- Part V Translation in Practice: Arts
- Part VI Translation in History
- Index
- References
18 - Translating Medical Texts
from Part IV - Translation in Practice: Factual Genres
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2022
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Nature of Translation
- Part II Translation in Society
- Part III Translation in Company
- Part IV Translation in Practice: Factual Genres
- 16 Translating Technical Texts
- 17 Translating Academic Texts
- 18 Translating Medical Texts
- 19 Translating Legal Texts
- 20 Translating News
- Part V Translation in Practice: Arts
- Part VI Translation in History
- Index
- References
Summary
Chapter 18 charts the history of medical translation and developments in the field. It introduces the main genres and target groups and discusses important challenges that medical translators face. The shift from the biomedical paradigm to patient-centredness and patient empowerment means that people want to understand information involving their own health, so that intralingual translation is often required for expert–lay medical translation. The chapter discusses the challenges that such intralingual translation presents, especially when coupled with interlingual translation. The importance of medical ethics in medical translation is also highlighted.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Translation , pp. 363 - 378Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Askehave, I., and Zethsen, K. K. (2000). The Patient Package Insert of the Future: (Report for the Danish Ministry of Health). Århus: Handelshøjskolen i Århus, Det erhvervssproglige fakultet.Google Scholar
Askehave, I., and Zethsen, K. K. (2002). Translating for laymen. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 10(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askehave, I., and Zethsen, K. K. (2003). Communication barriers in public discourse: The patient package insert. Information Design Journal, 4(1), 23–41.Google Scholar
Askehave, I., and Zethsen, K. K. (2010). PIL of the month: A study of best practice in EU patient information leaflets. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7(1), 97–120.Google Scholar
Askehave, I., and Zethsen, K. K. (2014). A comparative analysis of the lay-friendliness of Danish EU patient information leaflets from 2000 to 2012. Communication and Medicine, 11(3), 209–22. DOI: 10.1558/cam.v11i3.20700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ersland, A. (2014). Is Change Necessary? A Study of Norms and Translation Universals in Intralingual Translation. MA thesis, University of Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
Fischbach, H. (1993). Translation, the great pollinators of science: A brief flashback on medical translation. In Wright, S. E. and Wright, L. D., eds., Scientific and Technical Translation, vol. VI. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gordin, M. D. (2015). Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done Before and After Global English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, P. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5(2), 205–21.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspects of translation. In Brower, R. A., ed., On Translation. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 232–9. Reprinted in L. Venuti, ed. (2012) The Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 126–31.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. B. (2012). Medicine’s paradigm shift: An opportunity for psychology. American Psychological Association, President’s Column, 43(8), 5 www.apa.org/monitor/2012/09/pc.Google Scholar
López Piñero, J. M., and Terrada Ferrandis, M. L. (2005). Introducción a la terminología médica. Barcelona: Masson.Google Scholar
Montalt, V. (2017). Patient-centred translation and emerging trends in medicine and healthcare. European Society for Translation Studies Newsletter, 51, 10–11.Google Scholar
Montalt, V., and González-Davies, M. (2007). Medical Translation Step by Step: Learning by Drafting. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montalt, V., Zethsen, K. K., and Karwack, W. (2018). Medical translation in the 21st century – challenges and trends. MonTI, 10, 27–42.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Miquel, A., Ezpeleta-Piorno, P., and Saiz-Hontangas, P. (2018). Intralingual translation in healthcare settings: Strategies and proposals for medical translator training. In Montalt, V., Zethsen, K. and Karwacka, W., eds. Retos actuales y tendencias emergentes en traducción médica / Current challenges and emerging trends in medical translation. MonTI, 10, 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbeth Jensen, M. (2013). Translators of Patient Information Leaflets: Translation Experts or Expert Translators? A Mixed Methods Study of Lay-Friendliness. Aarhus: Aarhus University, School of Business and Social Sciences. (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Nisbeth Jensen, M. (2015). Optimising comprehensibility in interlingual translation: The need for intralingual translation. In Maksymski, K., Gutermuth, S. and Hansen-Schirra, S., eds., Translation and Comprehensibility. Berlin: Frank and Timme, pp. 163–94.Google Scholar
Nisbeth Jensen, M., and Zethsen, K. K. (2012). Translation of patient information leaflets: Trained translators and pharmacists-cum-translators – a comparison. Linguistica Antverpiensia. New Series, 11, 31–50.Google Scholar
Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century contemporary health. Health Promotion International, 15, 259–67. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. L. (1962). Mesopotamian medicine. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, xxxvi, 97–108.Google Scholar
Savage-Smith, E. (2004). Islamic medical manuscripts at the National Library of Medicine. www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/arabic/med_islam.html.Google Scholar
Sundhedsstyrelsen. (2009). Health literacy – Begrebet, konsekvenser og mulige interventioner [Health literacy – The concept, consequences and possible interventions]. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen. www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2009/health-literacy---begrebet-konsekvenser-og-mulige-interventioner.Google Scholar
Whyatt, B., Kajzer-Wietrzny, M., and Stachowiak, K. (2016). Similar and different: Cognitive rhythm and effort in translation and paraphrasing. Special issue: Language Processing in Translation. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 52(2), 175–208.Google Scholar
Zethsen, K. K. (2004). Latin-based terms: True or false friends? Target, 16(1), 125–42. DOI: 10.1075/target.16.1.07zet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zethsen, K. K. (2007). Beyond translation proper – Extending the field of translation studies. TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Redaction, 20(1), 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zethsen, K. K. (2009). Intralingual translation: An attempt at description. Meta, 54(4), 795–812.Google Scholar
Zethsen, K. K. (2018). Access is not the same as understanding. Why intralingual translation is crucial in a world of information overload. Across Languages and Cultures, 19(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar