Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:36:20.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Word Prominence and Areal Linguistics

from Part I - Issues in Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

By
Harry van der Hulst ,
Rob Goedemans  and
Keren Rice
Edited by
Raymond Hickey
Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics , pp. 161 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alleyne, Mervyn, 1980. Comparative Afro-American: An Historical-comparative Study of English-based Afro-American Dialects of the New World. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Altmann, Heidi, 2006. The Perception and Production of Second Language Stress: A Cross-linguistic Experimental Study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Altmann, Heidi and Kabak, Bari, 2011. Second language phonology. In Kula, Nancy C., Botma, Bert and Nasukawa, Kuniya (eds), The Continuum Companion to Phonology, pp. 298–319. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K., 1948. Tonal systems in Southeast Asia. Journal of the American Oriental Society 68: 18491.Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen, 2009. Stress adaptation in loanword phonology: Perception and learnability. In Boersma, Paul and Hamann, Silke (eds), Phonology in Perception, pp. 191–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene, 2013. Prosodic systems in Southeastern Pomo stress. Talk presented at the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, Boston, January 2013.Google Scholar
Bye, Patrick, 2004. Evolutionary typology and Scandinavian pitch accent. Manuscript, University of Tromsø/CASTL.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Catherine A., 1964. A Grammar of the Lake Miwok Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, 1997. American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, 2006. Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 1–31. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Capell, Arthur, 1962. Some Linguistic Types in Australia. Oceania Linguistic Monographs, no. 7. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Capell, Arthur and Hinch, Heather E., 1970. Maung Grammar: Text and Vocabulary. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Carter, Hazel, 1973. Tonal data in comparative Bantu. African Language Studies 14: 3652.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. and Goldsmith, John, 1984. Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone: Introduction. In Clements, George and Goldsmith, John (eds), Autosegmental Studies in Bantu Tone, pp. 1–17. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Conathan, Lisa, 2004. The Linguistic Ecology of Northwestern California: Contact, Functional Convergence, and Dialectology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Davies, J., 1989. Umbugarla: A Sketch Grammar. BA (Hons) thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart, Tsujimura, Natsuko and Tu, Jung-yueh, 2012. Toward a taxonomy of loanword prosody. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 11: 13–39Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W., 1980. The Languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dogil, Grzegorz, 1999a. Baltic languages. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 877–896.Google Scholar
Dogil, Grzegorz, 1999b. West Slavic [languages]. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 813–838.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan and Lahiri, Aditi, 1991. The Germanic foot: Metrical coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22 (2): 251–286.Google Scholar
Eather, Bronwyn, 1990. A Grammar of Nakkara (Central Arnhem Land Coast). PhD dissertation, Australian National University. Reprinted in 2011 in series Outstanding Grammars from Australia, vol. 7, LINCOM.Google Scholar
Eckman, Fred R. and Iverson, Gregory, 2015. Second language acquisition and phonological change. In Honeybone, and Salmons, (eds), pp. 637–643.Google Scholar
Gårding, Eva, 1977. Scandinavian Word Accents. Lund: Travaux de L’Institut de Linguistique de Lund.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob, 2010a. A typology of stress patterns. In van der Hulst, et al. (eds), A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Languages of the World, pp. 647–666.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob, 2010b. An overview of word stress in Australian Aboriginal languages. In van der Hulst, et al. (eds), A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Languages of the World, pp. 55–86.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry, 2005a. Fixed stress locations. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 62–65.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry, 2005b. Weight-sensitive stress. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 66–69.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry, 2005c. Weight factors in weight-sensitive stress systems. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 70–73.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry, 2005d. Rhythm types. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 74–77.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry, 2009. StressTyp: A database for word accentual patterns in the world’s languages. In Everaert, Martin and Musgrave, Simon (eds), The Use of Databases in Cross-linguistic Research, pp. 235–282. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry, 2014. The separation of accent and rhythm: Evidence from StressTyp. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, pp. 119–148.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob, van der Hulst, Harry and Visch, Ellis (eds), 1996. Stress Patterns of the World. HIL Publications, vol. 2. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John, 1988. Prosodic trends in the Bantu languages. In van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval (eds), Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent, pp. 81–94. Dordrecht: Foris publications.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor, 2011. California Indian Languages. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch accent: Toward a typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, pp. 83–118.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, 2016. Metrical incoherence: Diachronic sources and synchronic analysis. In Heinz, Jeff, Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry (eds), Dimensions of Phonological Stress, pp. 9–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew and Luna, Edmundo, 2004. An intergenerational investigation of Hupa stress. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 105–117. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Greiner, Paul, 1994. Review of Salmons 1994. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 6 (2): 259–266.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, Shoshuke, 1979. The Tone Pattern of Japanese: An Autosegmental Theory of Tonology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Harvey, Mark, 2001. A Grammar of Limilngan. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 516. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds), 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einer, 1970. The language history of Scandinavia: A profile of problems. In Beneddiktsson, Hreinn (ed.), The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 41–86. Reykjavik: Visindafelag.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, 1995. Metrical Stress Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haynie, Hannah Jane, 2012. Studies in the History and Geography of California Languages. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey, 1978. Linguistic Diffusion in Arnhem Land. Canberra: AIATSIS.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, 1973. Pidgin-Sprachen im Bantu-Bereich. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 1997. Assessing the relative status of languages in medieval Ireland. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics, pp. 181–205. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2010. Language contact: Reassessment and reconsideration. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 1–28. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2014. The Sound Structure of Modern Irish. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, 1991. Takic and Yuman: A study in phonological convergence. International Journal of American Linguistics 57 (2): 133–157.Google Scholar
Hoddinott, W. G. and Kofod, F. M., 1988. The Ngankikurungkurr Language (Daly river area, Northern Territory). Pacific Linguistics, vol. D-77. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick and Salmons, Joseph (eds), 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hore, Michael, 1981. Syllable length and stress in Nunggubuyu. In Waters, B. (ed.), AAB SIL Working papers, series A5, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, 1999. Basque accentuation. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 947–994.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, 2000. On system-driven sound change: Accent shift in Markina Basque. Lingua 110: 99–129.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, 2003. From phrase-final to post-initial accent in Western Basque. In Fikkert, Paula and Jacobs, Heike (eds), Development in Prosodic Systems, pp. 249–281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, 2007. Historical convergence and divergence in Basque accentuation. In Riad, Tomas and Gussenhoven, Carlos (eds), Tones and Tunes, pp. 291–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, 2012. Two Basque accentual systems and word-prosodic typology. Lingua 122: 1335–1351.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, Elordieta, Gorka, Gaminde, Iñaki and Smiljanic, Rajka, 2002. From pitch accent to stress accent in Basque. In Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner, Natasha (eds), Laboratory Phonology, vol. 7, pp. 547–584. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, 1996. Primary accent is non-metrical. Revista di Linguistica 9 (1): 1–119.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), 1999a. Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, 1999b. Word accent. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 3–116.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, 2010. Word accent systems in the languages of Europe. In van der Hulst, et al. (eds), A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Languages of the World, pp. 429–508.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, 2012. Deconstructing stress. Lingua 122: 1494–1521.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), 2014a. Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, 2014b. Word stress: Past, present and future. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, pp. 3–55.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, 2014c. Representing rhythm. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, pp. 325–365.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, Goedemans, Rob and van Zanten, Ellen (eds), 2010. A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Languages of the World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry and Hellmuth, Sam, 2010. Word accent systems in the Middle Eastern languages. In van der Hulst, et al. (eds), A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Languages of the World, pp. 615–648.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, Hendriks, Bernadet and van de Weijer, Jeroen, 1999. A survey of European word prosodic systems. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 425–476.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry, Rice, Keren and Wetzels, Leo, 2010. Word accent systems in the languages of Middle America. In van der Hulst, et al. (eds), A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Languages of the World, pp. 313–380.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., 1977. On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.), Studies in Stress and Accent, pp. 37–82. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., 1989. Accent in Bantu: An appraisal. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19: 115–134.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, 1971. Über die phonologischen Sprachbünde. In Selected Works: Phonological Studies, pp. 137–144. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jany, Carmen, 2009. Chimariko Grammar: Areal and Typological Perspective. University of California Papers in Linguistics, vol. 142. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, 2010. Tutorial overview: Suprasegmental adaptation in loanwords. Lingua 120: 2295–2310.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, 2011. Loanword phonology. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth and Rice, Keren (eds), Companion to Phonology, pp. 2258–2282. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kijak, Anna M., 2009. A Cross-linguistic Study of L2 Perception and Production of Metrical Systems. Dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Kirton, J. F., 1977. Anyula Phonology. Pacific Linguistics, vol. A-10. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Kodzasov, Sandro, 1999. Caucasian: The Daghestanian languages. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 995–1020.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo, 2006. Where does loanword prosody come from? A case study of Japanese loanword accent. Lingua 116: 1140–1170.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi, 2015. Change in word prosody: Stress and quantity. In Honeybone, and Salmons, (eds), pp. 219–244.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi, Riad, Tomas and Jacobs, Haike, 1999. Diachronic prosody. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 335–424.Google Scholar
Leeding, V. L., 1989. Anindilyakwa Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney. http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/1558Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, 1994. Review of Accentual Change and Language Contact: Comparative Survey and a Case Study of Early Northern Europe (Joe Salmons). Diachronica 11 (1): 126–130.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. P. et al. (eds), 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 17th edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. www.ethnologue.comGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., 1986. The rise and fall of tones through diffusion. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 173–185. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark and Prince, Alan, 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249–336.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Marguerite, 1980. Towards a Dialectology of Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, 2009. Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKay, G. R., 1975. Rembarnga, a Language of Central Arnhem Land. PhD dissertation, Australian National University. Reprinted in 2011 in series Outstanding Grammars from Australia, vol. 5, LINCOM.Google Scholar
McKay, G. R., 2000. Ndjébanna. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, B. (eds), The Handbook of Australian Languages, vol. 5, pp. 155–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLendon, Sally, 1975. A Grammar of Eastern Pomo. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 74. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca, 1983. Ngalakan Grammar Texts and Vocabulary. Pacific Linguistics, vol. B-89. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca, 1989. Mangarayi. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca, 1994. A Grammar of Wardaman. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Michelson, Karin, 1988. A Comparative Study of Lake-Iroquian Accent. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 2010. Contact and North American languages. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 673–694. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith, 1978. Universals of language contact. In Universals 79: Germanen und Kelten. Also in Krüger, Bruno (ed.) 1983, Die Germanen: Geschichte und Kultur der germanischen Stämme bis zum 2. Jahrhundert unserer Zeitrechnung, pp. 232–254. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Moshinsky, Julius, 1974. A Grammar of Southeastern Pomo. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 72. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Odden, David, 1988. Predictable tone systems in Bantu. In van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval (eds), Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent, pp. 225–251. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Osbourne, C. R., 1966. A tentative description of the Waanji language. Manuscript, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon and Dupoux, Emmanuel, 2002. A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. In Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner, Natasha (eds), Laboratory Phonology, vol. 7, pp. 203–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peter, Steve, 1994. Review of Salmons 1994. Language 70 (1): 182–184.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Harvey, 1984. Wintu Grammar. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 94. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha, 2015. Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. In Honeybone, and Salmons, (eds), pp. 245–261.Google Scholar
Reid, Nicholas J., 1990. Nagan’gityemerri: A Language of the Daly River Region, Northern Territory of Australia. Reprinted in 2011 in series Outstanding Grammars from Australia, vol. 6, LINCOM.Google Scholar
Riad, Tomas, 1998. Toward a Scandinavian accent typology. In Kehrein, Wolfgang and Wiese, Richard (eds), Phonology and Morphology of the Germanic Languages, pp. 77–112. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren, 2010. Accent in the native languages of North America. In van der Hulst, et al. (eds), A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Languages of the World, pp. 155–248.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren, 2014. Convergence of prominence systems? In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, pp. 194–227.Google Scholar
Roca, Iggy, 1999. Stress in the Romance languages. In van der Hulst, (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, pp. 659–812.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt, 1975. A Guide to the Languages of the World. Stanford, CA: Language Universals Project.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt, 1977. The geographical and genetic distribution of linguistic features. In Juilland, Alphonse (ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg, vol. 1: General Linguistics, pp. 137–160. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph, 1992. Accentual Change and Language Contact: Comparative Survey and a Case Study of Early Northern Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandefur, John and Jenhan, David, 1977. A tentative description of the phonemes of the Ngalkbun language. Work Papers of the SIL-AAB, series A1: 57–96. Darwin.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Margaret C., 1972. Alawa Phonology and Grammar. Canberra: AIATSIS.Google Scholar
Shaw, Patricia, 1985. Coexistent and competing stress rules. International Journal of American Linguistics 51: 1–18.Google Scholar
Sommerfelt, Alf, 1962. Diachronic and Synchronic Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G., 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence, 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tryon, Darrel T., 1970. An Introduction to Maranungku. Pacific Linguistics, vol. B-14. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Uffmann, Christian, 2015. Loanword adaptation. In Honeybone, and Salmons, (eds), pp. 644–666.Google Scholar
Ureland, Sture, 1971. Observations on Texas–Swedish phonology. Studia Linguistica 25: 69–110.Google Scholar
Uwano, Zendo, 1999. Classification of Japanese accent systems. In Kaji, Shigeki (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium ‘Cross-Linguistic Studies on Tonal Phenomena, Tonogenesis, Typology, and Related Topics’, pp. 151–186. Tokyo: ILCAA.Google Scholar
Uwano, Zendo, 2012. Three types of accent kernels in Japanese. Lingua 122: 1415–1440.Google Scholar
Veenker, Wolfgang, 1967. Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, 2013. A Grammar of Southern Pomo: An Indigenous Language of California. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Leo and Meira, Sergio, 2010. A survey of South American stress systems. In van der Hulst, et al. (eds), A Survey of Word Accentual Systems in the Languages of the World, pp. 313–380.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Melanie P., 1991. Djambarrpuyngu: A Yolngu Variety of Northern Australia. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×